I would like to solder a microcontroller, control buttons and an DVI/HDMI output and program this in a way, that I can store images on it and let them display as a dia-show via the outputs.
It doesn't have to have a lot of storage capacity, 128Mb would be enough.
but I don't know how to start, because I haven't done anything like this before.
My aim is to present some important images to friends by just taking this hardware, connecting it to a TV screen and showing these photos. If should be able to switch the photos manually (using a button) or automatically in a dia-show.
It should support several TV resolutions and it should be connectable to my PC (USB prefered), so that I can upload and delete photos.
So where to start and how to do that?
Thank you in advance, Andreas
If your aim is just to show some photos, there are assuredly simpler and more cost effective ways to do so; devices exist which do more or less exactly what you are proposing.
If your aim is to learn about microcontrollers and this is a project your are taking up to further that, I would recommend looking into the Arduino: http://www.arduino.cc/ or a similar kit based micro, and growing your project from that.
Microcontroller + low level language will be a huge pain to work with, particularly if you wish to handle various file formats and screen resolutions. Get a full-blown computer with an OS instead - something like http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/PC/104
If your goal is purely to be able to display photos then I would recommend using a digital camera with video out capabilities.
If your aim is to learn about electronics and microcontrollers I would start with a good book and an Arduino board. Note that writing microcontroller code to handle file systems, image formats and video output is non-trivial. Simpler projects may be a better starting point as they are more accessible resulting in quicker progress, less frustration and more motivation!
The engineering field is a interesting field. You can start with the web site "www.microchip.com". You will need a high end device consider the PIC32MX795L512, there is a nice starter kit for it, "Ethernet Starter Kit" http://www.microchip.com/stellent/idcplg?IdcService=SS_GET_PAGE&nodeId=2615&dDocName=en545713. This kit has the on board debugger & programmer to do all the hard work.
You get sample projects with the package, you can program using ansi c programming.
IDE : MPLAB which is free, and the C32 compiler has a student/lite version.
Arduino also has a board with the same device.
I personally like "www.techtoys.com.hk", they have device compatible with Microchip boards like techtoys.com.hk/PIC_boards/PIC32STK%20SSD1963%20EVK/PIC32STK%20SSD1963%20EVK%20R1A.htm, or this techtoys.com.hk/PIC_boards/PIC2432EVK-RD4/PIC2432%20EVK%20RD4.htm where this board you will need a debugger/programmer like the low cost PIC Kit 3 "microchip.com/pickit3".
The trouble is you need to write the HDMI video library yourself, there are some VGA libraries available but they are only black and white and very hard to get color with these analog images. The rest of the libraries are already there, USB MSD(flash drive), SD Card, pictures (jpg) etc.
microchip.com/stellent/idcplg?IdcService=SS_GET_PAGE&nodeId=2680&dDocName=en547784
Feel free to contact me if you need some help, I might be able to help with the HDMI library.
It's a lot of fun to play with these toys.
Regards
Lucas
B-Eng Digital Engineering.
imlucanio#yahoo.com (no spamming)
Remember to add the http and www to the web links.
It sounds like you want an iPod. That is a dead simple thing to work with and it does everything you want. Otherwise, very complicated. I'd suggest the BeagleBoard and embedded Linux. Yes, it warrants that level of complexity.
The options for small microcontrollers just aren't there. The Arduino is very popular and yes, you can interface an SD card to it. That'd be your storage. Yes, you can put a digital potentiometer on it, that can be your interface. I've seen some video overlays that do simple text, but never any JPEG display (too much processing required). And certainly no 24 bit color (so that the output would actually look good) - that would take WAY too many pins to do correctly (and the Arduino doesn't have a D/A converter! You'd have to rig something up that would suck). And even then, all of the options for TV out weren't HDMI, but RCA (the old red/white/yellow cables).
So in short, no. Get a computer. That's what can do the job.
Related
I'm trying to write an app that will be able to see when a lot of people are close inside a single area. I was thinking to use BLE. I don't have a good knowledge of this technology and I have a single, but big question. In modern days, how easy is it to see a BL device that is actually transmitting and discoverable in places like streets, etc...? It's my idea very dumb? Will my idea work with the spread of contact-tracing apps?? Thank you.
You can scan the Bluetooth frequency bands to detect devices that are advertising themselves, so yes, this is possible.
What might be more difficult is making sense of it all. If I run a Bluetooth scanner in my study, I get dozens of devices, most of which I have no idea what they are. A lot of them will probably belong to the people living next door; some advertise their name (Apple TV, for example), but most don't. If you look at the signal strength you can probably rule out a fair few devices that are too far away for your purposes.
I'm building a temperature monitoring unit with arduino, LM35 and a 16*2 LCD display. Now I am going to integrate this unit by SIM900A GSM/GPRS module and I get temperature readings by SMS.
Now my question is, can I get those values by voice calling. If I called to the GSM modem, can it tell the temperature readings.
You need to add all possible values as .amr files or you can break them and play the appropriate files using at commands. Like for 35 you can play sound "thirty" and then "five".
Follow the AMR playing application note available here
Apart of having all the messages in PCM files there is also possibility to use TTS (text to speech) There are small and compact TTS engines out there suitable for Arduino port. Here two I am using (with AVR32):
Tiny Speech Synth by stan 1901
just port it to your arduino (removing the waveout stuff and just use the buffer as PCM). The only lib it really needs is math.h for sin,cos. It may need a bit more work to actually make it more comprehensible but its not that bad when tuned the frequencies ... its using floats heavily but I think port to integer math is also possible ...
KECAL 1.0 ports for ATMEGA
its much older TTS engine originaly from ZX Spectrum but its a bit less comprehensible especially with low quality reproductors (like buzzer) ... But id does not need PWM or DAC ...
I do not know of any more recent OpenSource TTS engine compact enough for MCU platform all I know of are too big or relaying on SAPI,.NET or other OS integrated stuff making them useless.
The #1 is simple and commented enough to make changes improving the phonemes. The #2 was heavily optimized for speed and size (it run on ~4MHz Z80) so no way to improve quality there.
Btw there are also IC for TTS out there so that might be even better choice...
[edit1]
Take a look at this:
Is there any text to speech program that will run on an 8- or 16-bit CPU?
Among other things I added there very good quality and low CPU demand TTS engine ported from Z80 asm into C++, which can be directly used by MCUs ...
i am working on a project that uses qr code to check in guest at an event. i intended to implement it as a mobile app on android but my professor require a hardware element to the project. so my question s are
can i do decoding of a qr-code image on a microcontroller with a CMOS camera and which one is recommended?
if not, is it possible to use a cmos camera with a microcontroller to take the picture and send it to a pc to do the decoding and which microcontroller is recommended?
any other suggestion will be appreciated
I wouldn't try to decode QR Code with something less powerful than ARM.
Ad 1.
Of course you can, but, as I said, I wouldn't try on something less powerful than ARM (unless you're a C ninja and you can fit into, say, AVR for this task).
Decoding QR code itself isn't that hard and I you'll be able to write it by yourself (or use existing library).
Ad 2.
You'll need some connectivity to do that. There are many Bluetooth, Ethernet and WLAN boards around (in my experience, best choice may be Bluetooth, you may get away without implementing network stack).
Useful link.
Decoding QR codes is relatively easy as barcodes go. You can use source code from the ZXing library, running on the server side (it's primarily Java) to do the decoding. Decoding is "fast"; on the original Android (ARM7) devices it would still decode in about 100ms.
But I think your question is about image quality. I am not familiar with the output of CMOS sensors, but for QR codes, you don't need color data and you don't need much resolution (240x240 works for most QR codes). If anything the issue is focus.
We have a device that has an analog camera. We have a card that samples it and digitizes it. This is all done in directx. At this point in time, replacing hardware is not an option, but we need to code such that we can see this video feed real-time regardless of any hardware or underlying operating system changes occur in the future.
Along this line, we've chosen Qt to implement a GUI to view this camera feed. However, if we move to a linux or other embedded platform in the future and change other hardware (including the physical device where the camera/video sampler lives), we will need to change the camera display software as well, and that's going to be a pain because we need to integrate it into our GUI.
What i proposed was migrating to a more abstract model where data is sent over a socket to the GUI and the video is displayed live after being parsed from the socket stream.
First, is this a good idea or a bad idea?
Secondly, how would you implement such a thing? How do the video samplers usually give usable output? How can I push this output over a socket? Once I am on the receiving end parsing the output, how do I know what to do with the output (as in how to get the output to render)? The only thing I can think of would be to write each sample to a file and then to display the contents of the file every time a new sample arrives. This seems like an inefficient solution to me, if it would work at all.
How do you recommend I handle this? Are there any cross-platform libraries available for such a thing?
Thank you.
edit: i am willing to accept suggestions of something different rather than what is listed above.
Have you looked at QVision? It is a Qt based framework for managing video and video processing. You don't need the processing, but I think it will do what you want.
Anything that duplicates the video stream is going to cost you in performance, especially in an embedded space. In most situations for video, I think you're better off trying to use local hardware acceleration to blast the video directly to the screen. With some proper encapsulation, you should be able to use Qt for the GUI surrounding the video, and have a class that is platform specific that you use to control the actual video drawing to the screen (where to draw, and how big, etc.).
Edit:
You may also want to look at the Phonon library. I haven't looked at it much, but it appears to support showing video that may be acquired from a range of different sources.
Besides Arduino, what other ways are there to learn hardware programming in a hands-on way? Are there any nifty kits available, either a pre-assembled robot, that you can program to move a certain way, or do certain things, or anything similar to that?
Atmel AVR and the PIC both have experiment boards that you can use solder stuff on to, usually they have a couple of buttons and some lights pre-soldered to the area. This let's you program/flash the microprocessor and play with the output pins. You can either write the programs in assembly or C.
Parallax have a number of kits. They have two product lines suited for "playing around", Basic Stamp and something called Propeller. The former is a small microprocessor that runs programs written in Basic (a tad disgusting ;)) and the latter runs something called Spin or assembly (well after compilation obviously.)
I would go with either AVR or the PIC. I've done PIC but I've heard good things about AVR, they seem to ship with better software.
At first look Microsoft's VPL sounds good, but when it comes to actually LEARNING how hardware works it goes a LONG way to hide those details from you. As a matter of fact it is pretty much designed for people who don't program, and is distastful to someone who's actually written embedded software. IF you just want to make stuff happen and not delve into the details it's fine, but if you want to get down to the metal like programming the "Arduino" boards it's not for you.
If you're used to something like the Arduino then something like the PIC will be an easy transistion. SparcFun Electronics has all sorts of DIY type projects and hardware available. If you have a decent bookstore around your area, I would suggest looking for "Circuit Cellar" magazine. It has articles on a monthly basis with project for someone looking to get into hardware projects, everything from homebrew Software Defined Radio to FPGA based 3D graphics. (Raytracing actually) Usually the authors describe the project in an article and "WHY" they made the decisions they did, a description and schematics of the hardware and provide a link to source code.
Cypress Semiconductor has one of the most interesting embedded processors on the market and several high quality dev boards for sale. The PSoC includes the ability to not only configure the software, but also to "drop in" software configured hardware such Analog to digital converters, serial I/O, Digital to Analog and Various amps and filters. It's a REALLY cool concept, and the "touch sensor" capability of the PSoC were actually used in several models of the IPod.
One thing about programming these little micros is they don't have a lot between you and the hardware, you get to see how things really work. It doesn't matter whether you're talking about an 8-bit microcontroller or a quad-core Pentium programming hardware is largely the same concept. You write to a memory mapped register for some piece of hardware like a serial controller, and the hardware responds in someway. If you program a baudrate generator in a PIC or PC it's largely the same idea, you write a value that will be used as a division factor from a given clock to achive a given baudrate. The numbers and names maybe different, but the concepts is the same. On a PC you may have to map to the PCI address of the card, which adds a some complications, but if you looked underneath the OS you would see that that was done just by writing values to registers simalar to programming a PIC to use a different "Page" of memory. Is it worth learning an 8-bitter? Well, there are approximately $5 billion dollars in sales of the little 8-bit micros today with projection only showing growth in that market in the future. I saw one reference that state the average car has 25 Microcontrollers in it. That's not too bad.
I haven't played with it much, but the iRobot looks pretty cool.
The ability to simulate how your robot will work which some of the other answers mentioned is nice, but there's nothing like seeing a real-life robot do what you programmed it to do. That, to me, is what really makes robots fun and cool.
There's the .NET Micro Framework.
It's incredibly simple to use/setup and there's lots of hardware being made to target this framework.
You should take a look at Microsoft Robotics Developer Studio which supports many different kits.
I have always been curious about gumstix. It seems more professional than arduino, and it aims at the Linux programmer. I cannot give you a real suggestion, as I've never played with it, but I would definitely go with one of this toys if I had to do and learn some cool hardware programming.