I need to change my connection string in the web.config file based on an environment variable (for different enviornments, like dev/staging/production, etc). I have seen other solutions that use build tasks to accomplish changing different configurations, but haven't been able to find something that will let me change my connection string based on an environment variable. Does anyone know of any way to do this?
We make use of the configSource attribute for the appSettings and connectionStrings elements in the web.config.
Basically, we have the same web.config file for all of our environments: dev, qa and production.
Then we utilize seperate "environment specific" files.. For example...
In web.config:
<?xml version="1.0"?>
<configuration>
<appSettings configSource="local.appsettings.config" />
<connectionStrings configSource="local.connectionstrings.config" />
</configuration>
Then we maintain the following files:
local.appsettings.config.development
local.appsettings.config.qa
local.appsettings.config.production
local.connectionstrings.config.development
local.connectionstrings.config.qa
local.connectionstrings.config.production
Since we pre-compile all of our asp.net applications before deployment, we've got a custom msBuild task utilized by our CI solution that copies the right configuration files (based on the target environment) to the proper .config file...
So, if we are deploying to dev, local.appsettings.config.development -> local.appsettings.config
If we are deploying to qa, local.appsettings.config.qa -> local.appsettings.config
This allows us to keep the core web.config the same across all of our environments.
How about having two connection strings and another variable, like "isTesting" in your web.config, then based on the value of isTesting pick which connection string to use?
you can also use config sections, and based upon server name switch between sections. this way you can have keys named the same.
link text
You can set a web.config for each environment in the configuration manager using prebuild events. I have tried this with excellent results.
http://www.hanselman.com/blog/ManagingMultipleConfigurationFileEnvironmentsWithPreBuildEvents.aspx
When you have debug and build you can have local/preproduction/production... etc
Related
Consider a group of developers working on an ASP.net web application. Each developer would like to have a private version of the web.config.
By "private" I mean that a developer can freely change the file to suit their dev/test needs at any given moment, without it affecting other team members and without ending up in source control.
How can one go about achieving this with Visual Studio 2015?
My closest solution so far is to have a "private" Solution Configuration with a matching Web.config Transformation file ("web.private.config") that's excluded from source control.
But this is not a satisfactory solution because:
a. The transformation is not run automatically when debugging (with F5). The developers need to remember to run it manually.
b. The result of the transformation ends up in the main "web.config" file which is, naturally, included in source control.
We had a very similar problem but only needed personalized versions of the <appSettings> section in Web.config.
In this situation the inclusion of an external file through configSource turned out to be problematic, as this attribute completely replaces the <appSettings>-node. So there remains no way to keep global key/values AND personal key/values for all developers. The whole section is completely replaced by the included private file.
What we need is both global and private <appSettings>. The solution we found was the file attribute. It allows to merge Web.config settings with settings from an additional file.
We ended up with a construct like this one:
<!-- Web.config with global appSettings) -->
...
<appSettings file="Web.PERSONAL.config">
<add key="BaseUrl" value="https://projectname.dev.local" />
...
</appSettings>
...
<!-- Web.PERSONAL.config with personal appSettings -->
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<appSettings >
<add key="EmailSmtpUser" value="my.name#my.domain.com" />
<add key="EmailSmtpPwd" value="***" />
</appSettings >
If you put identical keys in both files, the Web.PERSONAL.config version will overwrite the Web.config version.
The file Web.PERSONAL.config must be excluded from Git through .gitignore .
Keep in mind:
While configSource works for ALL nodes in Web.config, the file attribute is restricted to <appSettings>.
Have web.config include an external file (via configSource) and add that file to .gitignore
The correct answer is to host your local development site in a separate location from your Visual Studio solution. You can then use publish profiles to publish changes to that location and web.config transforms to maintain a separate local config for each developer. Each developer would use a different publish profile which transforms the web.config with their own transform and deploys the transformed web.config to the publish location. You can then attach a debugger to the published site using Visual Studio's Debug > Attach To Process option.
I think there is a lot of value in standardising dev environments so that one can just download the solution and run it.
Custom, long term/permanent, developer specific configs will sooner or later lead to a subtle bug that will be tricky to find.
My solution to your problem would be to find out the reason(s) why permanent individual configs are needed and have a look if these environment specific differences can be eliminated.
We presently override appSettings from our web.config in a Local.config file for each developer. However we also need to override connection strings, so we access our local copy on our machine while the web.config might reference the production server. I know that you can override appSettings by specifying file="Local.config", but is this possible for the connectionStrings as well? We already make use of an external file for the connection strings but this file has all three connection strings (local developer, dev, and production).
What I'd like to do is have the connectionString defaulted to production, but overridden on a developer's machine and on the development server. However, this doesn't seem to be possible as unlike appSettings, you can't specify a value for connectionStrings when you tell it to use an external file.
Is this possible to achieve without having to add additional code?
I should note that I cannot use the Config Transformations at the moment as we are on ASP.NET 3.5.
In the main application configuration file, you use the configSource attribute to specify the fully qualified name and location of the external file. This example refers to an external configuration file named connections.config.
<?xml version='1.0' encoding='utf-8'?>
<configuration>
<connectionStrings configSource="connections.config"/>
</configuration>
For detailed information, please visit this link on msdn (section: Using External Configuration Files)
I have two web application. Their folder hierarchy in server is like that.
first one is : .../firstapplitaion
second is : .../firstapplication/secondapplication/Default.aspx
At first can i run them with just firstapplication's web.config file? secondapplication's web config hasnt any special things.
Thanks for your helps..
One way would be to have a section in your web.config files point to an appropriate file, like this
<configuration>
<appSettings file="C:\MyCommonFolder\MyCommonAppSettings.config">
</appSettings>
</configuration>
Hope that helps
If the second app's web.config file is the same why bother to even run them as seperate apps? Why not just make them one app that uses the same web.config? Or were you trying to split them into seperate app pools?
What I have done in a similar situation was to have each site contain it's own seperate web.config but to move all of the shared pieces into my Machine.config. For me it's locatd in the C:\WINDOWS\Microsoft.NET\Framework\vX.X.XXX\Config folder (I would suggest backig it up first). Because of the way the config files work you can put settings in your machine.config and your websites will inherit these settigs. So put any shared settings there, with very unique names, and you should be set.
I'm entering a parallel test and dev stage where I need to use one db for test and a different one for dev. How can I have the app choose which connection string to implement based on which physical folder it (the app) sits in?
I know there are SVN strategies to consider but this is small-scale enough to avoid 2 sperate code-bases. Would like to be able to publish the same VS project to either of my 2 directories without having to remind myself to change the connection string.
I'm running under IIS7 so perhaps it offers better control than conditionals in (and overrides) web.config. (or not)
thankx!
A word of advice:
I wouldn't base your connection string on your published folder. Down the road, the folder might change, and folks may not be aware that that determines which connection string you're using.
Instead, control it with a setting in your web.config file. Just add a setting that allows you to switch between production and dev databases. In fact, you could simply test for the presence of a debug mode setting. If that setting is there, you're targeting the development database; otherwise, you're targeting production.
The nice thing about that solution is that it doesn't depend on where you deploy the site, and you can document the setting in the Web.config file.
Hope this helps.
Edit for Clarity: By "a debug mode setting" I mean a setting that determines which database you're targeting, dev/production. Not whether your application is running in Debug mode, since the Framework already provides a function that does that. Also, you wouldn't necessarily remove the setting, since you'd want to keep it for documentation purposes. Rather, you'd comment it out.
You could e.g. create a <connectionStrings> container that contains a connection string for each folder your app could be in:
<connectionStrings>
<add name="Folder1" connectionString=".....(conn str. #1)...:" />
<add name="Folder2" connectionString=".....(conn str. #2)...:" />
....
<add name="Folder-n" connectionString=".....(conn str. #n)...:" />
</connectionStrings>
and then just pick the right one, depending on where your app starts up from.
Marc
Get a unique string for the application, perhaps something like:
string folder = Regex.Match(Server.MapPath("~"), #"\(.+?)\$").Groups[0].Value;
Then use the string to get a value from the web.config:
ConnectionStringSetting connectionString = ConfigurationManager.ConnectionStrings["ConnectionString." + folder] ?? ConfigurationManager.ConnectionStrings["ConnectionString"];
In the web.config you can add several connection strings with the folder names appended for each dev site, and a default connection string with just the name and no folder.
I usually put the connection strings into a separate config file and reference them from the main web.config using configSource:
In web.config:
<?xml version="1.0"?>
<configuration>
<!-- connection strings are located in an external config
file to facilitate deployment in various environments -->
<connectionStrings configSource="connections.config"></connectionStrings>
</configuration>
In connections.config:
<?xml version="1.0"?>
<connectionStrings>
<add name="ConnectionName" connectionString="[your connection string]"/>
</connectionStrings>
Once deployed, I usually exclude connections.config from future deployments (unless it should be changed, that is).
On a project I'm working on we have a web application with three configuration files;
Web.Config
Web.Config.TestServer
Web.Config.LiveServer
When we release to the test server, Web.Config is renamed to Web.Config.Development and Web.Config.TestServer is renamed to Web.Config, making that configuration active for the application.
It is quite onerous keeping three very similar configuration files up to date, and this system is used across a number of applications which are part of this project; not just the website.
The differences in configuration are most commonly local directories or paths, URLs, IPs, port numbers, and email addresses.
I'm looking for a better way.
While your approach seems tedious, I find it to be the best approach.
I used to keep all of my configurations in a single web.config file, and simply had the "production" section commented out.
Shortly after this I had to do a "hybrid" test where my lookup data was coming from the production server, but the new data was being inserted into the test database. At that point I had to start piece-mealing what parts of the configuration block to comment/uncomment, and it became a nightmare.
Similarly, we have our server administrators do the actual migration from test to production, and most of them aren't fluent enough in .NET to know how to manage the web.config files. It is far easier for them to simply see a .test or .prod file and migrate the proper one up.
You could use something like a database to store all your configurations, but then you're running into another layer of abstraction and you have to manage that on top of things.
Once you get the knack or the template of how your two (or three) configuration files will be setup, it becomes a lot easier to manage them and you can have your test server configuration get modified for some unique testing without much hassle.
If you have a db server in the mix, you can create a table that has the config, the property name, and the property value in it, then all you have to do is change one value in the web.config, the config name (dev, test, prod).
If you have different dbs for each config, then the only thing that's different is the connection string.
Use Config Transformation and there is a blog here about it.
http://blogs.msdn.com/b/webdevtools/archive/2009/05/04/web-deployment-web-config-transformation.aspx
Basically you create targets named web.{build configuration}.config. In each target file you write your transformation where you can add, delete and modify nodes and attributes. Example could be
web.staging.configss
<?xml version="1.0"?>
<configuration xmlns:xdt="http://schemas.microsoft.com/XML-Document-Transform">
<connectionStrings>
<add name="personalDB"
connectionString="Server=StagingBox; Database=personal; User Id=admin; password=StagingPersonalPassword"
providerName="System.Data.SqlClient" xdt:Transform="Replace" xdt:Locator="Match(name)" />
<add name="professionalDB"
connectionString="Server=StagingBox; Database=professional; User Id=professional; password=StagingProfessionalPassword"
providerName="System.Data.SqlClient" xdt:Transform="Replace" xdt:Locator="Match(name)"/>
</connectionStrings>
</configuration>
You then execute the transform by calling MSBuild {project file} /t:TransformWebConfig /p:Configuration=Staging