I have an application written in ASP.NET 1.1. If I switch IIS to use 2.0 what issues am I likely to see? Initial tests have thrown no problems, but I was wondering if anyone had experience of running ASP.NET 1.1 applications under 2.0 and could maybe point out some areas to watch out for?
Thanks for any advice.
Just make sure that you are not running different web applications in the same application pool if they require different versions of the .NET framework.
Create separate app pools (at least one for each version of the framework).
Maybe also have a look at this blog post by Brad Abrams about breaking changes between .NET framework 1.1 and 2.0. Here's a short quote :
...we work very hard to ensure that
your V1.1 apps will this just work on
2.0, but none-the-less, this doc is likely worth a quick scan as you
migrate to 2.0
When we migrated our 1.1 applications to 2.0, I don't think we had any problems. There were a handful of cases where the compiler warned us that we should use a different (updated) assembly, but other than that everything was fine.
Most ASP.NET 1.1 applications will run just fine under ASP.NET 2.0. One thing to watch though is that you don't run an ASP.NET 1.1 and an ASP.NET 2.0 application in the same application pool.
The biggest problem we had was connected with the insertion of the xhtmlConformance element in the web.config file connected with javascript libraries, removing it worked fine for us
check this post from Scott Gu.
Usually asp.net 1.1 application migration to 2.0 does not raise any issues. You might need to change the location where you put the class files.
You will see some warnings, some deprecated method call etc.
Related
I'm working with one of my clients wherein they are having a few application still written on .net framework 3.5. Though we still have support for .net 3.5, client wishes to upgrade the framework to 4.8. There are no plans to migrate to core/.net 6 as of now but to upgrade to framework's latest version 4.8.
I'm looking for some pointers to migrate an application from 3.5 to 4.8, what could be the runtime changes/retargeting changes/breaking changes. It would be of great help if someone could give me a roadmap to address the problem - where to start from, what details to look into etc. I searched a lot and could not get any specific pointer for my use case. Please help.
Thanks in advance!
Well, in most cases, you should be able to simple set the project up to say .net 4.8 (or 4x). But, you might as well go all the way.
You WILL however has to download and install .net 4.8 on the web server. So, on your developer computer, you most likly do have .net 4.8. But, don't forget to download + install .net 4.8 on the web server (or if it is a hosted plan, find out what is the level of .net they support).
So, for the most part, you should be able to simple in your project, set it as 4.8, and see if it compiles. You have a VERY good chance it will.
That would be this setting project->"my project name properties"
So, the above for the most part should make things work.
Also, once you done the above, (then re-build all). You want to check web.config, and this setting:
<httpRuntime targetFramework="4.8" maxRequestLength="2000000"/>
As noted, you also have to check/ensure that the web hosted server (if this is not a on-site server) also needs the .net frameworks to be downloaded and installed. Often they already are but you want to check that.
It also possible that you are using a asp.net web site as opposed to a asp.net web site application, and thus the above steps do change somewhat.
I currently have an ASP.net 2.0 site with multiple ASP.Net 1.1 sites running as Virtual Directories under the main 2.0 site. While this creates some problems with web.config entries inheritance from the 2.0 site to the 1.1 sites, we have been able to configure all the sites so they work. However, we are now getting ready to migrate the 1.1 sites to 3.5. Unfortunately, due to bureaucracy out of my control, we can't upgrade the main 2.0 site, yet. I wanted to make sure that there wouldn't be any issues with simply upgrading the child virtual directories to 3.5.
My initial guess is that this would be fine since 3.5 uses the same runtime as 2.0, however, I'm wondering if there are any major differences in the web.config items in 3.5 that might conflict with 2.0 items.
Does anyone have any insight?
we did this and, as pointed out, it is mainly inheritence in the web.config (aspecially if you use the AJAXControl toolkit as 3.5 and 2.0 are different versions). Once you have those resolved the sites should be fine.
I don't think there are any major differences that would cause you a problem as ASP.NET 3.5 web sites are only ever indicated to be 2.0 sites and it'll be the 2.0 runtime reading the web.config I believe.
You should also note that you cannot mix .NET versions in IIS application pools. So you cannot use the same application pool for .NET 1.1 and .NET 2.0+ web applications.
If at all possible you should set up the same situation on a staging server, test the migration, document each step and the troubleshooting steps you take, if any, to get things working. Then you don't have to guess. :)
We are migrating many ASP.NET 1.1 web applications to new servers. We would like to convert all of them to 2.0 in the process. Ideally, in the end, the 1.1 framework will not even be installed on the new servers. We've never had major issues converting applications to 2.0 from 1.1. Our biggest issue has always been changing ConfigurationSettings.AppSettings to ConfigurationManager.AppSettings.
Has anyone else ever had major issues?
Are there any major things to look out for or consider up front?
Here is a good resource on how to convert asp.net applications from 1.1 to 2.0 using visual studio 2005.
Converting an ASP.NET Website from Version 1.1 to 2.0
Edit: Here is the MSDN step by step guide for converting apps:
http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/aa479567.aspx
When converting to 2.0 the only major issue I've run across was performance of compiled Regexes got much worse the way we were using it. Switching it to use the static Regex.Replace() method solved much of the problems.
I can't find the article that I found this in back then, but if I do I'll add it to this post.
The bottom line is make sure you test it not just for functional equivalence but for performance too.
The biggest problem I've seen is that the new default is to use Web Site "projects". This should not be a problem if you're running Visual Studio 2005 SP1, where they corrected this problem.
I also had some odd problem that I think may have involved the vwd.webinfo file. Our web service application worked perfectly on my computer, but on the build server, it tried to become a web site "project", so it didn't compile. No compile == no symbols.
I know we are really behind the times here, but we are just about to upgrade from .NET 1.1 to .NET 2.0.
Thank you for your sympathy.
Anyhow, are there any gotchas we should look out for?
Do you have any general advice before we jump in?
Please do not post telling me to go straight to 3.5: 2.0 is all we're allowed!
We're using mostly C#.
Yes. The most important thing for you to know is to use a Web Application Project, not a Web Site. Web Sites use a totally different compilation model and migration is pretty much a disaster. Web Application Projects are much more similar to how things worked in 1.1.
We also had an intermittent problem with redirecting from the login screen, but according to Google, we were basically the only ones who had that problem - we've since resolved it.
Most of the other problems we ran into were small and easy to navigate, and the overall experience was a net improvement.
Here is my recommendation before upgrading:
If you are used to use Visual Studio 2003, you will need to go for VS2005. You will have to convert the old solutions and projects so that it will be compatible with VS2005. Make sure to have a backup of the project you're going to convert so that you can roll back or even use it as source for any modification you may need to the converted projects.
If you're developing web applications using .NET 1.1, make sure that all the virtual directories and applications in the IIS is configured to work with ASP.NET 2.0. You may need also to configure a new Application Pool for your .NET 2.0 applications.
If you're using any third party libraries in your .NET 1.1 projects, you may need to confirm its compatibility with .NET 2.0 projects. Some old libraries used in .NET 1.1 are not compatible with 2.0.
One gotcha is home-grown 1.1 implementations of .NET 2.0 stuff (that was missing in 1.1) like RegistryHandler and so forth. Sometimes your newly-ported 2.0 code will look like it's properly using a 2.0 class when it's really using the home-grown version.
Deployment is another gotcha, if you're upgrading an already-deployed app. You have to switch the .NET version in IIS from 1.1 to 2.0.
I remember we had to change some client scripts, because the way ClientIDs are generated for server controls changed from ASP.NET 1.1 to 2.0.
I don't remember the exact circumstances, but some IDs which previously wer prefixed ctl0_ became ctl00_...
I am really stuck with this Parser Error Message telling me "Could not load the assembly 'App_Web_amlohswi'. Make sure that it is compiled before accessing the page." I have been looking around for a few hours checking different posts here and googling information. I have found out that I need to set up a new Application Pool that runs .NET 2.x.
(On a side note, my app is being developed in .NET 3.5, is there a way to set it up to use 3.5 instead of 2.x?)
Can someone provide me with a good explaination on how to set this up properly and (optionally) why is it necessary?
I am more used to developing in PHP so I am used to edit src >> upload >> success!
Thanks!
ASP.NET 3.5 sites run in 2.0 app pools as long as that version of .NET is installed on the system.
You may have to set up web.config properly. Visual Studio should do this for you when you create a new project.
You should also make sure you don't combine 1.1 and 2.0 applications in the same app pool. Try putting it in a separate app pool and see that helps.
Since #Trull provided you with a link to the "how", I'll chime in with the why.
.Net 3.5 just builds on the base .Net 2.0 libraries so you don't need to set it up for 3.5. .Net 2.0 and .Net 1.1/1.0 share some of the same name spaces and classes and therefore you need to choose which set of libraries you want to use with your application. Since your application uses the libraries from .Net 2.0, you need your app pool set up to load these libraries for your application rather than the .Net 1.1 libraries. You will also need .Net 3.5 installed on the web server, even though you only configure the app to use the (base) .Net 2.0 libraries.
This would basically be the equivalent of different versions of PHP. You would expect an application written using PHP 5 (and taking advantage of constructs in PHP 5) to work with a PHP4 interpreter. You'd need to upgrade to the newest interpreter (or at least choose the newer one if both are installed) before your app would work. It's the same with .Net -- you need to choose the right version, the version that your code expects to reference before it will work.
Here is how you use 3.5 in IIS. All hail Hansleman!