Since there is no ErrorProvider class in .NETCF, how can I implement similar functionality (not necessarily exactly like ErrorProvider)?
I am using all the regular databinding constructs to bind controls to a datatable, using the DataRow.RowError property and DataRow.SetColumnError method, but I can't find events on any of DataTable, BindingManagerBase, etc. that I can hook into to receive any sort of notification.
Am I stuck calling a method to manually iterate through all the controls on my form and change some look/feel of the bound control?
Thanks,
MrB
The ErrorProvider class seems pretty basic - actually, a little too basic. If you have Red Gate Reflector, I would recommend disassembling the class and looking at it. Otherwise, create a Dictionary<Control, String>.
Here is a quick idea on creating your own provider:
Dictionary<Control, String> ErrorSet = new Dictionary<Control, String>();
public void SetError(Control control, String message)
{
// code for adding error information
ErrorSet.Add(control, message);
}
public String GetError(Control control)
{
// code for retrieving error information
return ErrorSet[control];
}
public String Clear()
{
// code for clearing all errors
}
I don't have R-G reflector here or I would provide more sample methods. But this ought to provide some sort of sample to work from.
Related
I have a ICollection of Projects in my user class
public ICollection<Project> Projects { get; set; }
When I try to render the count of projects in my view, it gives an error
<h2>You have #Model.Projects.Count() projects....</h2>
Any help appreciated.
ICollection doesn't have a Count method, it has a Count property. You are probably getting confused with the LINQ Count extension method which is supported on an IEnumerable interface.
Just remove the parenthesis at the end of the Count call i.e.
<h2>You have #Model.Projects.Count projects...</h2>
I think I figured out what the issue was here. I added a constructor in my user class to handle the null reference exception
public User()
{
this.Roles = new List<Role>();
this.Projects = new List<Project>();
}
This did the trick.
And ofcourse I called count without the paranthesis
In general, I've found it useful to write default constructors of every type, so that when stepping through a project like this I can visually see when each one is called. Not having a copy constructor or something similar can mask odd issues like this and make debugging infinitely frustrating.
I am working on a Silverlight application using V3 SP1 of MVVM Light Toolkit.
My application is fully French/English. All UI elements (buttons, labels, etc.) and all the data (models). I need dynamic language switching and this is fully implemented and works with anything coming from a resource file. What I am struggling with is the ViewModels.
The Models have language specific prperties (DescriptionEn, DescriptionFr) and an additional property call LocalizedDescription which uses the current culture to return call the language specific property.
When the language changes (via a button click) I raise and broadcast (via the Messenger) a property changed event.
In each of my ViewModels, I register to receive the property changed message for the language swap.
I want to notify all the properties of the ViewModel that something has changed.
From: http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/system.componentmodel.inotifypropertychanged.propertychanged.aspx
The PropertyChanged event can indicate all properties on the object have changed by using either null or String.Empty as the property name in the PropertyChangedEventArgs.
However, since the toolkit abstracts the raising of the changed event with RaisePropertyChanged(...) I cannot get this to work. I have also examined the source of the tookit and discovered that RaisePropertyChanged calls VerifyPropertyName(..) which in turn returns an error is the property does not belong to the ViewModel. I also noticed that the VerifyPropertyName method is attributed with Conditional("DEBUG"), but even if I choose the Release configuration, the ArgumentException("Property not found") is still raised.
Does anyone know of a way to get this to work using the toolkit aside from manually calling RaisePropertyChanged for every property of the ViewModel?
Follow-up:
Based on the comment from Simon, I attempted to create my own class that extends ViewModelBase. I looked at the source on CodePlex and decided to create a single method called RaiseAllPropertyChanged(). It would simply be a copy of the RaisePropertyChanged(string propertyName) but without the parameter and without the call to VerifyPropertyName(...). I cannot get it to work. Here is what I have.
public class ViewModelBaseExtended : ViewModelBase
{
protected void RaiseAllPropertyChanged()
{
var handler = this.PropertyChanged;
if (handler != null)
{
handler(this, new PropertyChangedEventArgs(String.Empty));
}
}
}
But I get a compiler error: The event 'GalaSoft.MvvmLight.ViewModelBase.PropertyChanged' can only appear on the left hand side of += or -=. This is a copy of the code that is used in the ViewModelBase.
Can someone offer some advice as to how to get this to work?
Solution:
I copied all the code from ViewModelBase into a new class. I then added the method RaisePropertyChanged() mentioned above which instantiates the PropertyChangedEventArgs class with String.Empty. This is now the new subclass for my ViewModels.
Thanks again to Simon for leading the way!
In case you're reading this in 2016, you can use ObservableObject and notify that all of the properties have changed by doing:
RaisePropertyChanged(string.Empty);
Unfortunately this is not possible with the current code-base of MVVMLight
In the short term your have 2 options:
User your own custom base class. And by custom base class I mean "Do not inherit from the MVVMLight class".
Download and compile MVVMLight in Release mode. This will force the "VerifyPropertyName" method to be excluded. Of course then you don't get the value of property name checks.
I am sure Laurent Bugnion will have this fixed soon.
A lighter solution to this problem would have been to override RaisePropertyChanged(string propertyName) in your class :
protected override void RaisePropertyChanged(string propertyName)
{
if (propertyName != null)
{
base.RaisePropertyChanged(propertyName);
}
else
{
var handler = PropertyChangedHandler;
if (handler != null)
{
handler(this, new PropertyChangedEventArgs(null));
}
}
}
I'm trying to create my calendar control with databinding.
public partial class Calendar : UserControl
{
public static readonly DependencyProperty DateProperty =
DependencyProperty.Register("Date", typeof(DateTime),
typeof(Calendar), null);
public object Date
{
get { return GetValue(DateProperty); }
set
{
SetValue(DateProperty, value);
OnPropertyChanged("Date");
}
}
public Calendar()
{
// Required to initialize variables
InitializeComponent();
DayText.Text = ((DateTime)Date).ToString("dd");
MonthText.Text = ((DateTime)Date).ToString("MMM");
this.Loaded += new RoutedEventHandler(Calendar_Loaded);
this.GotFocus += new RoutedEventHandler(Calendar_Loaded);
}
void Calendar_Loaded(object sender, RoutedEventArgs e)
{
DayText.Text = ((DateTime)Date).ToString("dd");
MonthText.Text = ((DateTime)Date).ToString("MMM");
}
}
But When I create the listbox with this control, same calndar have the wrong date. I'm sure that the Date passed thorough databinding is correct but I don't understand why same calender show a different day (I'm noticed that is the day of a previous calendar control intance)
Thank you for supporting!
Hmm ... where do we start? Here's a few things I've noticed:
If you're using a dependency property, there's no need to call OnPropertyChanged from the Date property setter.
The dependency property declares the type as DateTime, but your public exposed property is of type object, which then requires you to cast it elsewhere.
If Calendar_Loaded is to be called in more situations than in response to the Loaded event (such as the GotFocus event, then I'd recommend that you call it something else, or create a method with a relevant name (e.g. UpdateDateParts) and call it from properly named separate event handlers.
Using fixed format specifiers when processing date strings does not localize well.
In addition to that, I'd suggest that you could implement the user interface in a manner that supports databinding (and re-templating) by using bindings and exposing the date parts of the Date dependency property instead of manually updating the Text property of some text blocks/boxes in event handlers. In fact, if you derive from Control instead of UserControl then you can create and actuall lookless control that has it's user interface defined by a style in themes\generic.xaml that can be re-defined by users of your control.
As for why the date is incorrect in different instances of your calendar control, we'd need to see some of your XAML/code to see how the control is being used and initialized to be able to provide a better answer. However, I thought the above was worth putting in an Answer, instead of trying to say it in a Comment.
I'm a first-time user of the AOP features of Unity 2.0 and would like some advice. My goal is to be able to log method calls in an ASPX page, like so:
public partial class Page2 : Page
{
protected void Page_Load(object sender, EventArgs e)
{
}
[Log]
private void Testing()
{
}
}
Here is the code for the LogAttribute:
public class LogAttribute : HandlerAttribute
{
public override ICallHandler CreateHandler(IUnityContainer container)
{
return new LogHandler(Order);
}
}
Now the LogHandler:
public class LogHandler : ICallHandler
{
public LogHandler(int order)
{
Order = order;
}
public IMethodReturn Invoke(IMethodInvocation input, GetNextHandlerDelegate getNext)
{
string className = input.MethodBase.DeclaringType.Name;
string methodName = input.MethodBase.Name;
string preMethodMessage = string.Format("{0}.{1}", className, methodName);
System.Diagnostics.Debug.WriteLine(preMethodMessage);
return getNext()(input, getNext);
}
public int Order { get; set; }
}
The problem I have is how to use the [Log] attribute. I've seen plenty of example of how to configure the interception settings, for example:
container.AddNewExtension<Interception>();
container.Configure<Interception>().SetDefaultInterceptorFor<ILogger>(new InterfaceInterceptor());
But this implies that I have an interface to intercept, which I don't. I have the ASPX page which uses the [Log] attribute.
so how can I configure Unity to make use of the [Log] attribute? I've done this before using PostSharp and would like to be able to use Unity to do the same.
Cheers.
Jas.
You're unfortunately not going to get this to work in an ASP.NET page with Unity interception.
Unity interception uses a runtime interception model. Depending on the interceptor you choose, you'll either get a subclass with virtual method overrides to call the call handlers (VirtualMethodInterceptor) or a separate proxy object (Interface or TransparentProxyInterceptor) which execute the call handlers and then forward to the real object.
Here's the issue - ASP.NET controls creation and calls to your page, and there's no easy way to hook into them. Without controlling the creation of the page object, you can't use the VirtualMethodInterceptor, because that requires that you instantiate a subclass. And you can't use the proxy version either, because you need ASP.NET to make calls through the proxy.
PostSharp gets around this because it's actually rewriting your IL at compile time.
Assuming you could hook into the creation of the page object, you'd have to use the VirtualMethodInterceptor here. It's a private method, so you want logging on "self" calls (calls from one method of the object into another method on the same object). The proxy-based interceptors can't see those, since the proxy is a separate instance.
I expect there is a hook somewhere to customize how ASP.NET creates object - BuildManager maybe? But I don't know enough about the details, and I expect it'll require some pretty serious hacking to get work.
So, how do you get around this? My recommendation (actually, I'd recommend this anyway) is to use the Model-View-Presenter pattern for your ASP.NET pages. Make the page object itself dumb. All it does is forward calls to a separate object, the Presenter. The Presenter is where your real logic is, and is independent of the details of ASP.NET. You get a huge gain in testability, and you can intercept calls on the presenter without all the difficulty that ASP.NET gives you.
i'm trying to work out the best method to perform logging in the application i'm currently developing.
right now, i have a Log table that stores the username, timestamp, action, controller, and a message. when a controller is instantiated, it gets the IoC info through Castle Windsor.
for example, my "Sites" controller is created as follows:
private ISitesRepository siteRepository;
private ILogWriter logWriter;
public SiteController(ISitesRepository siteRepository, ILogWriter logWriter)
{
this.siteRepository = siteRepository;
this.logWriter = logWriter;
}
and the log writer has a function that creates and inserts a log entry (WriteToLog). within the Sites controller's Edit and Create actions, it calls the WriteToLog function.
this is working and doing its job, but my question is- do i really need to set up each controller this way, passing through the ILogWriter interface/repository? it struck me that i could possibly set up a LogController, and just have that do the "heavy lifting" of writing to my logs.
that way, i wouldn't have to mess with the IoC stuff in every other controller. is it possible to execute an action on another controller (for example, a LogController-> WriteLog)? i'm not sure how would that be done without doing a redirect...
Could you pass by an abstract class? This abstract class having a static property referencing you log writer?
something like this
public abstract class BaseController
{
public static ILogWriter Logwriter{get;set;}
public static BaseController
{
Logwriter = YourFactory.GetLogwriter();
}
}
public class YourController:BaseController
{
public YourController(ISitesRepository siteRepository)
{
}
}
Ok, after much head scratching, i think i found an acceptable solution.
I implemented my logging action as a custom action filter as so:
public class LogAction : ActionFilterAttribute, IActionFilter
{
public LogLevel loglevel;
public string message;
public override void OnActionExecuted(ActionExecutedContext filterContext)
{
ILogWriter logWriter = AppServiceFactory.Instance.Create<ILogWriter>();
logWriter.WriteToLog(
filterContext.ActionDescriptor.ControllerDescriptor.ControllerName,
filterContext.ActionDescriptor.ActionName,
loglevel,
filterContext.HttpContext.Timestamp,
filterContext.HttpContext.User.Identity.Name.ToString(),
message + "(id=" + filterContext.RouteData.Values["id"] + ")");
}
}
but i ran into a wall trying to get the IoC to work in a custom attribute filter. scouring stackoverflow and google searches, i found that it's sort of difficult to do, with talk about using different wrappers, action invokers, etc, which all seemed more complicated than i was really willing to deal with.
trying to learn more about IoC (i'm still very new at this), i found this article,
which really helped point me in the right direction. i added his sealed AppServiceFactory class with my WindsorControllerFactory, and it worked like a charm.
As i said, i'm very new with to MVC and this IoC stuff, so i'm not sure this is an ideal way of handling things- but it seems simple and it works so far. I'd welcome any comments or criticisms on handling it through this method.
UPDATE
Figured out a different way of doing this- created a function in my WebUI project as such:
public static class Loggers
{
public static void WriteLog(ControllerContext controllerContext, LogLevel logLevel, string message)
{
ILogWriter logWriter = AppServiceFactory.Instance.Create<ILogWriter>();
logWriter.WriteToLog(
controllerContext.RouteData.Values["controller"].ToString(),
controllerContext.RouteData.Values["action"].ToString(),
logLevel,
controllerContext.HttpContext.Timestamp,
controllerContext.HttpContext.User.Identity.Name.ToString(),
message);
}
}
now, wherever i want to log something, i can call
Loggers.WriteLog(
this.ControllerContext,
LogLevel.Membership,
"Removed role '" + role + "'" + " from user " + _userService.Get(id).UserName );
to write a record to the log. this gives me a lot more flexibility on my "message" content, and solves the problem of including logging in the global.asax file, which would've been difficult if not impossible using the attribute filters. i'll leave the rest, as it may be of use to someone else, but i think this is the way i'll go on this.
as usual, things are usually simpler in MVC than i original think they will be :)