I'm building a heavily CRUD based ASP.NET website and I've got to the phase of the project where I'm trying to build a search webpage that shows the user different subsets of a certain important table based on parameters they enter such as dates and different text fields.
I can't use a fixed SQL statement, because depending on whether they search by date or by something else, the SQL would be different, so instead I have been generating a results list using a table web control that starts out invisible and then is filled and set to visible once the user identifies a search they want to make. I used a table control because its easy to create and modify in the code behind, and I was able to make the needed calls to the database and populate that table as required.
However, the second thing I need with this search page, is the ability to allow the user to select a record from the results and then go edit it using the rest of the CRUD based pages on the site. To do that, I created asp:buttons in the table and gave them all different ids and the same event handler. But since I created the buttons dynamically, it seems the event disappears on callback and my scheme fails, so I'm taking a second look at how to do this.
My current code for the events looks like:
tempcell = new TableCell();
Button tempbutton = new Button();
tempbutton.Text = "Go";
tempbutton.ID = "gobutton" + rowN;
tempbutton.Visible = true;
tempbutton.Click += new EventHandler(tempbutton_Click);
tempcell.Controls.Add(tempbutton);
temprow.Cells.Add(tempcell);
My results table is declared like this:
<asp:Table ID="ResultTable" visible="false" runat="server"
GridLines="Both" CellSpacing="8">
</asp:Table>
I'd like to be able to identify which record the user selected, so I can send that info on to another page. And of course, I still need to be able to generate results for several different search criteria. Currently I have date, template and code based searches that lead to different stored procedures and different parameters based on what the user has entered.
Any suggestions on this? It seems like the data grids and repeaters require SQL statements in advance to work properly, so I'm not sure how to use them, but if I could then the item command approach would work with the buttons.
Your event will hook up successfully if the button is recreated in the page load event.
Otherwise, use a GridView. It is the perfect solution for simple CRUD, and you can control it as much as you need.
Related
I would really like to understand how to use the "count" property of the IconTabFilter for SAPUI5 to dynamically show the count of the result set of a table.
I have the following code -
<IconTabFilter
count="{DataSet/$count}">
<Table items="{DataSet}">
But the count is not filled automatically.
I am using an oData model that is bound on the view level. I do not want to make another backend request just for the counts. What am I doing wrong here? Is there a different mechanism that can be used?
I also tried using the updateFinished event on the table to then get the count and set it via JS but the event is triggered only on DOM placement of the table. In my case the table is hidden behind the IconTab and is not placed into the DOM till the first time the user clicks the tab so its useless.
Really would appreciate some insight into how to use this!
Thanks!
Okay, so what I did was I bound my information to a local model and did an oData $expand query to fetch the entire pages information in one call.
This worked out for me because I had several sets of data to be fetched. Before they were bound individually to tables, now they are all in one query.
In the .done() method of the call I just used the setCount method of the IconTabFilter to set the count as per the return data set.
I have a little appliation that shows MySQL data in web browser ListGrid. It has 14 columns.
I would like to upgrade it so the user could add query parameters.
For this job the best I could imagine is the grid.setShowFilterEditor() that put text boxes above the column headers and will live together with the column header when moved or resized.
I planned to use the filter button FilterEditorSubmitHandler() to get the filter values and run the query.
Unfortunately, I can not find any solution to get the text from a certain filter box eg. the value that was written by the user into the box above Column_#1. Is there any way to do that or this FilterEditor grown together with the DataSources object, and not available for any other data binding?
Something like this, but without using DataSource:
http://www.smartclient.com/smartgwt/showcase/#grid_sortfilter_disable_filter
As per my knowledge, filter editor works on com.smartgwt.client.data.DataSource only.
If you want to have filterEditor in ListGrid, you have to use DataSource or go for some custom implementation.
Goal
What I need is to display a SQL DataTable to the user on a webpage through ASP.NET and allow them to select a number of rows very quickly and easily, and then hit any of a number of different buttons to signify different operations. The selected rows are to be sent off to be processed (generally sent to a webservice or similar through codebehind). This is a somewhat generic solution, as I will be using this same setup in many places - thus the data, and the available operations will be different.
The goal is to be able to know basically nothing about the data - that is for the user to understand. If this concept is already impossible (though I believe it is not), please let me know.
Pulling from T-SQL (SQL Server 2008 R2 or later).
Using ASP.NET to make aspx webpage. Codebehind is done in VB.NET, in both cases we're using 4.0
I'm fluent in C# and VC++, so if you can't easily translate your code, don't worry about that.
The problem
My problem has been creating a row selection process for the user which persists while sorting or paging the table, is quick for the user and relatively quick in response time, and which is reflected in the GridView's bound data (as this allows me to use a filter on a DataView to produce a DataTable for passing). If there's another way to know the selected rows then I'm all game so long as it is persistant and quick for the user.
I'm not debugging and I'm not having syntax issues (I do not believe) - I don't know how to proceed.
I don't necessarily need code as a solution - I need to understand if my metaphor is either bad practice, or simply uncommon and thus not well supported. In either case, what is an appropriate way to proceed? If nothing else, where do I look for a solution besides endless API and Tutorials?
My original plan
I wanted to use asp:GridView for binding the DataTable pulled from TSQL since I can auto-generate columns. This allows me to display data without needing to know what it is. I planned to add a specific boolean Column (left most) for storing the User's row selection. Then I can simply run a filter on the DataTable to produce a DataView, get the resulting DataTable from that DataView, and pass it down the chain.
All the columns except our specific selection one would be Read-Only. The user isn't editing data - their selecting records and view their selection side-by-side with the viewable relevant data.
Of note, I planned to check for name collision so our added Column doesn't collide with any existing Column in the DataTable - I'd rename it as needed using 'Select' followed by an integer produced by looping through, comparing my name to other columns, incrementing as needed.
I presumed that once I set this up, it would just handle itself: the user could click the resulting checkbox column cell's and it would change the data on the fly. The point of saving the selection was their selection persisted through sorting and paging for convenience (I save the GridView's DataSource and re-bind when necessary). It didn't really matter if the user refreshed the page and completely and lost their checkboxes - they would need to review any changes/new data, and they wouldn't need more then a brief moment to check off whatever they wanted.
This did not happen.
I found that AutoGenerateColumns does not produce checkboxes for boolean DataColumns. It produces text, so I end up with the word 'True' or 'False'.
I began looking for a way to get check boxes in the cells for a boolean DataColumn. I found that for the added boolean column, I could bind an asp:CheckBoxField to it using the attribute DataField. Of course, I have to figure out how to point it at a variable DataField...
<Columns>
<asp:CheckBoxField DataField="Select" HeaderText="Select"
ReadOnly="False" SortExpression="Select">
<ItemStyle HorizontalAlign="Center" />
</asp:CheckBoxField>
</Columns>
However, because a GridView is designed for Row-By-Row editing, all the resulting CheckBoxes are disabled and cannot be checked. This is because their containing row is not in Edit Mdoe. I do not want to enable Row-By-Row editing using a button or similar metaphor as the user often needs to check off several rows. More clicks is bad, and annoying. They should be focused soley on their data and making their selection, not worrying about remembering to enter and end edit mode. Also, the metaphor seems poorly placed here since the checkboxes are the -ONLY- editable data - and are not part of the represented data.
I could, of course, make a new class which inherits from GridView, overload the method which generates columns to produce checkboxes instead of text fields - but I felt there had to be a more straightforward path. Maybe this is the way to go? But maybe it would have the same editing issue as above - I'm not sure.
So, next I tried looking at using an asp:TemplateField as a column in my GridView. This TemplateField contains an asp:CheckBox who's Checked state is based on the underlying bound data value. The issue here is trying to make changing the check-state update that bound value. I would need some way of looking up a GridView value I could then use to find the same row in the DataTable. I've seen great examples using a Primary Key. While I could assume everyone keeps a Primary Key for any possible table, this might not be the case! I could further add a Primary Key myself, but now it looks like I would be adding and removing two columns before I pass a DataTable off to a WebService instead of just one. Again, I also would need to be able to assign a Column name which is dynamic to avoid collision.
<asp:TemplateField HeaderText="Select">
<ItemTemplate>
<asp:CheckBox runat="server" ID="CheckBox"
Checked="<%# DataBinder.Eval(Container.DataItem, "Select") %>"
AutoPostBack="true" OnCheckedChanged="SelectCheckBox_CheckChanged" />
</ItemTemplate>
</asp:TemplateField>
I stopped myself - This path is also fairly indirect. Surely there is a much cleaner, simpler way to do this. Is it uncommon for someone to display Read-Only data where records are selected to be submitted, in one fashion or another, for processing/updating/alteration?
Is my choice of GridView poor? I haven't yet found another good way to represent Table data.
[Thanks to Filburt and Devjosh. I have restructured the post and included my attempt approach. ]
I have a table on my SQL DB call ReportList which is a list of report. I need to go through that list and interrogate the reportserver, eport by report, to populate a table called ReportParameters. The ReportParameters table has a column for ReportOwnerID which needs to contains the ReportID value of the corresponding (owner) report as listed in the ReportList table.
This is in VB.NET 2005 ASP2.0 and I have ended up with a mess. Please help me with the cleanest approach to doing this.
It needs to work so:- I have a listbox of the reports as per REportList and a GridView that list all the parameters (uniquely - most of the parameters are common to many reports) the idea being that the parameters get set once and the report can be kicked off by selecting them in the ReportList CheckListBox and clicking on Execute.
I would like it that as I click on a particular report in the ListView, the relevant parameters in the Gridview get a green background and those that do not apply are red. The leftmost column in the gridview contains tha Parameter NAME (not editable) and the next column must be editable to populate the value.
DONE SO FAR:
I have tried on clicking the EXECUTE button , to build a parameters string in a testbox and call that with the Javascript OpenReportWin() function when I open the report in a new window. This works fine, but my biggest issue it interrogating the reportserver reports to get back a list of parameters and dooping them into a table. I have triend to use a hidden DataGrid bound to a ds onto the reportParamaters table; I have tried to poulate it using a datalist but I cannot get the hang of these thionsg and its looking messy. Ther must be a simple clean way of gettting the .GetParameters resultset back from the report server and populating the table without having to create a reportviewer object and cycling through the list of reports - it then has to render each report before you can get that list out.
Thanks
I will withdraw this for now. I will submit a solution when I am comfortable that I have reahced a clean solution.
Mac
PLEASE CLOSE!!!
I have a selection list that is generated dynamically, it lists a number of checkboxes that are based on an end-user editable table, as such I have no idea what data, or how much, might be contained in this table and how many checkboxes or what they might contain, other than the primary keys of the table.
The user will select the checks they wish to see, and then control is passed to another page via PostBackUrl. The second page has to figure out which records to show (build it's where clause) based on the checkboxes checked in the previous page.
So, my problem is several-fold. First, asp:CheckBoxes don't have values. This can be worked around by a number of methods. Right now, i'm using a placeholder and dynamically creating the checkboxes in the ItemDataBound event of the DataList. I set the ID to "CheckboxKey1Key2" (where Key1 and Key2 are the primary keys of the check items).
Second, I have to walk through the controls of the PreviousPage to dig out all these values. That in itself is also a pain, but doable.
Now, my thinking is to build the where clause of my Linq2Sql query based on the keys I got from decoding the checked checkbox names. This all seems like a lot of jumping through hoops for something that shouldn't be this difficult. Am I missing something? Does anyone have any better solutions?
Make a class with a structure for your values that will be useful and easy for you to use on the result page. Then when the user clicks whatever it is they click to go to the result page, loop through the DataList, create a collection from the checked items, and you will only need to grab one object instead of everything, when you need to format your query.
Then when you get to the result page, loop through the collection and build the query in the loop. Pretty easy and not much code.