Why does an element styled with "height: 100%" appears to be > 100%? - css

I have a page where while the page loads, I put an absolute DIV over all of my content with "height:100%" that states "the page is loading...".
However, it appears from the scrollbar that the height of the page is 100% + the height of the content.
This immediately goes away once the page loads and the overlay absolute positioned DIV is set to display:none.
This happens in Firefox 3, Chrome, IE6.
Any ideas on how to make height:100%, just 100% and not more?
<html>
<head>
<style type="text/css">
* html, * body {height: 100%; margin: 0; padding: 0}
#message {background: black; height: 100%; left: 0; opacity: 0.15; position: absolute; top: 0%; width: 100%}
#loading {height: 100%; left: 0; position: absolute; top: 45%; width: 100%; z-index: 2}
#loading p {background: white; border: 2px solid #666; width: 180px}
</style>
</head>
<body>
<div id="grayout"></div>
<div id="loading"><p>Page is loading...</p></div>
<div id="content">
// content is dynamically loaded into this div via AJAX
</div>
</body>
</html>
Update: it appears the problem is that I have "top:45%". How do move that DIV to the center of the page (since it's a "page is loading message") without causing this same problem all over again?

If that element has vertical padding or margin, it’s added to the height of the block according to the CSS specification (see the visual formatting model for absolutely positioned, non-replaced elements).
Edit   The top:45% is moving your element 45% down. Remove it (top:0) or set the element’s height to auto (default value).

Have you tried:
* html, * body {height: 100%; margin: 0; padding: 0;}
Which should remove all padding and margins from the page as well.

Try adding
overflow: hidden;

Absolutely positioned elements are taken out of the flow of the page, so the div probably isn't being fitted behind the content. Why is the container div being absolutely positioned in the first place?

Almost always, I start my CSS with the following line:
* {padding:0; margin:0}
This should fix your issue.

Re: // A LOT of content is dynamically loaded via AJAX
Does any of the dynamic data have unbreakable lines, or perhaps images or text that would exceed the space?

Your "loading" div is the full height of the window, and it's positioned 45% from the top, so it overflows the window by 45%, giving you a scroll bar.
Try moving it to the top of the page and centering the text vertically.

Ha posted HTML caused an issue without intro text..
<html>
<head>
</head>
<body>
<div style="height: 100%; background-color: blue;"></div>
</body>
</html>

Related

html,body height 100% and body's padding-bottom doesn't work in Firefox

I have the html, body {height: 100%;} thing to (among other things) do a div {position: relative; top: 80%}.
Now I want some padding/margin/space after that div, right before the page's bottom edge.
The most straightforward thing I came up with, div {margin-bottom: 3em;}, works in Chrome, but not in Firefox (as far as I can tell, the margin starts where the body ends, at "100%", which is way above the div's bottom edge).
Fiddle: http://jsfiddle.net/xvrhmLsv/3/
A workaround might be a "media query height cascade", but I'd very much like to avoid that; plus I remember running into this behaviour more than once... Ideas?
How about using a border to get the effect you want? e.g.
div {
border-bottom: 3em solid white;
}
The following is the CSS taken from your fiddle :
html,
body {
height: 100%;
}
body {
padding-bottom: 3em; /*does not work*/
}
div {
background: red;
height:100%;
position: relative;
top: 80%;
margin-bottom: 3em; /*does not work in Firefox, works in Chrome*/
}
and the html is :
<!DOCTYPE html>
<html>
<head lang="en">
<meta charset="UTF-8">
</head>
<body>
(scroll down)
<div></div>
</body>
</html>
Actually, both padding-bottom and margin-bottom works in Chrome and also in Firefox.
The elements html and body have a height defined to 100%, therefore their height are constrained by the height of the window. The element <div> has a top property set at 80%. The div overflows the body, and therefore, the padding-bottom you set on the body is hidden by the div.
The difference comes from the margin-bottom set on the div. This margin is taken into account by both browsers, but Chrome scrolls down the the element including his bottom margin, whereas Firefox scrolls down to the bottom offset of the element's box only.
I updated the fiddle with some opacity on the div, and borders on the elements.
EDIT : Firefox appear to not scroll down to the margin-bottom of the overflowing div because of the use of top. If, instead of top: 80%; I put margin-top: 80%; the margin-bottom is taken into account in the scroll.
See fiddle. In this last fiddle, the only change I made is to replace top by margin-top.

Trying to set JScrollPane height to 100% without stretching container?

I have a middle container that takes up whatever vertical space is left on the screen. In it, I placed a Jquery scroller that is currently set to 200px:
.scroll-pane
{
width: 100%;
height: 200px;
overflow: auto;
}
.horizontal-only
{
height: auto;
max-height: 100%;
}
However, if I set .scroll-pane height to 100%, it just removes the scrollbar and stretches the whole page.
See JsFiddle here
How can I stop this? Thanks!
Here is my solution to this problem (jsfiddle). It uses markup like this:
<div id="top">...</div>
<div id="wrapper">
<div id="middle">...</div>
</div>
<div id="bottom">...</div>
The top and bottom divs are position absolutely at the top and bottom, with a width of 100%. The wrapper div has height: 100%, box-sizing: border-box, and top and bottom padding equal to the height of the top and bottom divs, respectively. This causes it to fill the viewport but have padding underneath the top and bottom divs. The middle div has a height of 100% so it fills the content box of the wrapper (i.e., 100% minus the top and bottom paddings). It has position: relative, which leaves you free to use height: 100% on both interior boxes.
Lastly, middleleft is positioned absolutely and middleright has a left margin equal to its width, which causes it to fill the remaining horizontal space.
height: 100% never works like you want it to. The CSS specifications dictate that it must equal the height of the browser window, or the closest parent block-level element with an absolute height specified. That means that this code will should not work as expected:
<!DOCTYPE html>
<html>
<head>
<title>Want the body to fill the page? Too bad!</title>
<style type="text/css">
html, body {
height: 100%;
}
.page {
padding-top: 50px;
box-sizing: border-box;
height: 100%;
}
.header {
margin-top: -50px;
height: 50px;
}
.body {
height: 100%;
background: gray;
}
</style>
</head>
<body>
<div class="page">
<div class="header">
<h1>Too bad!</h1>
</div>
<div class="body">
<p>Hello cruel world...</p>
</div>
</div>
</body>
</html>
However, that works fine in Chrome. Why? I can only assume that Google decided to specifically go against web standards because in this case, the standards make no sense. Why would I want something to be the exact height of the browser window? The only time is a <div> wrapping the whole page; in this case a simple "height is relative to the parent block" rule works just fine without breaking expectations elsewhere.
There is a way around this, though. At least, that's what I wanted to say before I tried this in Firefox too. Another way to get height: 100% (with some restrictions) is with position: absolute. However, it would seem that Firefox isn't respecting position: relative on a display: table-cell element - probably those pesky standards again. Here's the code for this technique anyway, if you are interested:
#wrapper > div > #middleleft {
position: relative;
}
.scroll-pane {
position: absolute;
top: 0;
right: 0;
bottom: 0;
left: 0;
}
So what can you do? Well, unfortunately, I don't yet know the answer to that. A kludgy solution would be to have Javascript set the height to an absolute pixel value, and attach an event to window resizing in order to update that height. I'll get back to you if I find a better way.
I'm not sure exactly what your trying to do, but another method would be to set body height to 100%, then set scrollpane to "height: auto". Then for the "top" and "bottom" div's used fixed positioning, plus margin equal to top/bottom height.
body {
height: 100%;
}
.top {
position: fixed;
top: 0;
height: 100px;
}
.middle {
height: auto;
margin: 100px auto;
}
.bottom {
position: fixed;
bottom: 0;
height: 100px;
}
<div class="top">content</div>
<div class="middle">content</div>
<div class="bottom">content</div>
Try that...

Make div stay at bottom of page's content all the time even when there are scrollbars

I am looking to implement the opposite behaviour to the following question: CSS Push Div to bottom of page. I.e., when content overflows to the scrollbars, I would like the footer to be at the bottom of the page, like Stack Overflow.
I have a div with id="footer" and the following CSS:
#footer {
position: absolute;
bottom: 30px;
width: 100%;
}
This moves the div to the bottom of the viewport - but the element stays there even when you scroll the page down, so it is no longer at the bottom.
How can I make sure the div stays at the bottom of the page's contents even when the content overflows? I'm not looking for fixed positioning, only for the element to be at the bottom of all content.
Image:
This is precisely what position: fixed was designed for:
#footer {
position: fixed;
bottom: 0;
width: 100%;
}
Here's the fiddle: http://jsfiddle.net/uw8f9/
Unfortunately you can't do this with out adding a little extra HTML and having one piece of CSS rely on another.
HTML
First you need to wrap your header,footer and #body into a #holder div:
<div id="holder">
<header>.....</header>
<div id="body">....</div>
<footer>....</footer>
</div>
CSS
Then set height: 100% to html and body (actual body, not your #body div) to ensure you can set minimum height as a percentage on child elements.
Now set min-height: 100% on the #holder div so it fills the content of the screen and use position: absolute to sit the footer at the bottom of the #holder div.
Unfortunately, you have to apply padding-bottom to the #body div that is the same height as the footer to ensure that the footer does not sit above any content:
html,body{
height: 100%
}
#holder{
min-height: 100%;
position:relative;
}
#body{
padding-bottom: 100px; /* height of footer */
}
footer{
height: 100px;
width:100%;
position: absolute;
left: 0;
bottom: 0;
}
Working example, short body: http://jsfiddle.net/ELUGc/
Working example, long body: http://jsfiddle.net/ELUGc/1/
Just worked out for another solution as above example have bug( somewhere error ) for me. Variation from the selected answer.
html,body {
height: 100%
}
#nonFooter {
min-height: 100%;
position:relative;
/* Firefox */
min-height: -moz-calc(100% - 30px);
/* WebKit */
min-height: -webkit-calc(100% - 30px);
/* Opera */
min-height: -o-calc(100% - 30px);
/* Standard */
min-height: calc(100% - 30px);
}
#footer {
height:30px;
margin: 0;
clear: both;
width:100%;
position: relative;
}
for html layout
<body>
<div id="nonFooter">header,middle,left,right,etc</div>
<div id="footer"></div>
</body>
Well this way don't support old browser however its acceptable for old browser to scrolldown 30px to view the footer
plunker
I realise it says not to use this for 'responding to other answers' but unfortunately I don't have enough rep to add a comment onto the appropriate answer (!) but ...
If you are having problems in asp.net with the answer from 'My Head Hurts' - you need to add 'height : 100%' to the main generated FORM tag as well as HTML and BODY tags in order for this to work.
You didn't close your ; after position: absolute.
Otherwise your above code would have worked perfectly!
#footer {
position:absolute;
bottom:30px;
width:100%;
}
I would comment if i could , but i have no permissions yet, so i will post a hint as an answer, for unexpected behavior on some android devices:
Position: Fixed only works in Android 2.1 thru 2.3 by using the following meta tag:
<meta name="viewport" content="width=device-width, user-scalable=no">.
see http://caniuse.com/#search=position
This is an intuitive solution using the viewport command that just sets the minimum height to the viewport height minus the footer height.
html,body{
height: 100%
}
#nonFooter{
min-height: calc(100vh - 30px)
}
#footer {
height:30px;
margin: 0;
clear: both;
width:100%;
}
position: fixed;
bottom: 0;
(if needs element in whole display and left align)
left:0;
width: 100%;
I've solved a similar issue by putting all of my main content within an extra div tag (id="outer"). I've then moved the div tag with id="footer" outside of this last "outer" div tag.
I've used CSS to specify the height of "outer" and specified the width and height of "footer". I've also used CSS to specify the margin-left and margin-right of "footer" as auto. The result is that the footer sits firmly at the bottom of my page and scrolls with the page too (although, it's still appears inside the "outer" div, but happily outside of the main "content" div. which seems strange, but it's where I want it).
I just want to add - most of the other answers worked fine for me; however, it took a long time to get them working!
This is because setting height: 100% only picks up parent div's height!
So if your entire html (inside of the body) looks like the following:
<div id="holder">
<header>.....</header>
<div id="body">....</div>
<footer>....</footer>
</div>
Then the following will be fine:
html,body{
height: 100%
}
#holder{
min-height: 100%;
position:relative;
}
#body{
padding-bottom: 100px; /* height of footer */
}
footer{
height: 100px;
width:100%;
position: absolute;
left: 0;
bottom: 0;
}
...as "holder" will pick up it's height directly from "body".
Kudos to My Head Hurts, whose answer was the one I ended up getting to work!
However. If your html is more nested (because it's only an element of the full page, or it's within a certain column, etc) then you need to make sure every containing element also has height: 100% set on the div. Otherwise, the information on height will be lost between "body" and "holder".
E.g. the following, where I've added the "full height" class to every div to make sure the height gets all the way down to our header/body/footer elements:
<div class="full-height">
<div class="container full-height">
<div id="holder">
<header>.....</header>
<div id="body">....</div>
<footer>....</footer>
</div>
</div>
</div>
And remember to set height on full-height class in the css:
#full-height{
height: 100%;
}
That fixed my issues!
if you have a fixed height footer (for example 712px) you can do this with js like so:
var bgTop = 0;
window.addEventListener("resize",theResize);
function theResize(){
bgTop = winHeight - 712;
document.getElementById("bg").style.marginTop = bgTop+"px";
}
I hit my footer with a margin-top: auto and it did the trick! Im commenting this here just in case it could help any future visitors.

div tag should not take up space

#decoration extend a bit outside of #wrapper. The problem is that if the browser viewport is 910px a vertical scroll bar appears.
How do I make it so that #decoration to not occupy space so the vertical scroll bar do not appear.
EDIT:
Check out this link to see what I want. Just in such a way no vertical scroll bar is there.
http://jsfiddle.net/HLqwN/
Using overflow:hidden will clip part of #decoration so that do not work.
<head>
<style>
#wrapper {
width: 900px;
position: relative;
}
#decoration {
position: absolute;
width: 542px;
height: 126px;
top: 0;
left: 660px;
}
</style>
</head>
<body>
<div id="wrapper">
<img id="decoration" src="/images/decoration.png" alt="" title="" />
<div id="content">
Some content
</div>
</div>
</body>
You could set overflow: hidden as the other answers are suggesting.
However, a "decoration" image should not be an <img>, it should be a CSS background-image.
Like this:
#wrapper {
height: 126px;
background: #ccc url(http://dummyimage.com/542x126/f0f/fff) 660px 0 no-repeat
}
See: http://jsfiddle.net/rdSJH/
if it is a decorative image, perhaps you should use it as a background image on the wrapper rather than in HTML source, you can still position it 660px left and it will not then cause a content scroll bar as it's not content.
#wrapper {
width: 900px;
position: relative;
background: url(background.png) no-repeat 660px 0;
}
[update after your clarification]
OK so you want the decoration to overlap the wrapper if there's space available to do so, like a pop-out?
is so try this, fiddle
notes: the span holding the background image should be outside the wrapper, no width on the span use your left co-ordinate and right: 0; or whatever margin from the right you might like, and still use the image as a background image. the span can sit down the bottom of your HTML out of the way
You could use overflow: hidden; on your wrapper
You might want to wrap a div around the decoration image and set overflow:hidden on that. Setting overflow:hidden on your wrapper might cause other content to be clipped depending on your layout.
If it's just a decoration you should try doing it with a background image though, then you don't have to worry about the clipping.

IFRAME and conflicting absolute positions

I would like to have an IFRAME dynamically sized using the following CSS:
#myiframe {
position: absolute;
top: 0;
bottom: 0;
left: 0;
right: 0;
}
However, no browser seems to support this.
In good browsers I could wrap the IFRAME in a DIV with the quoted CSS style and set the height & width of the IFRAME to 100%. But this does not work in IE7. Short of using CSS expressions, has anyone managed to solve this?
Update
MatTheCat answered with a scenario that works if the IFRAME is located directly under the body and the body/html tags have height: 100% set. In my original question I did not state where the IFRAME was and what styling applied to it's container. Hopefully the following addresses this:
<html>
<body>
<div id="container"><iframe id="myiframe"></iframe></div>
</body>
</html>
and let's assume the following container CSS:
#container {
position: absolute;
top: 10px;
bottom: 10px;
left: 10px;
right: 10px;
}
if you now place height: 100% on the IFRAME it will not size correctly.
Use a div for the padding on all sides. Place the iframe in it using 100% of its parent div.
http://jsfiddle.net/sg3s/j8sbX/
Now there are a few things you need to remember. An iframe is originally an inline-frame, so while modern browsers don't care, set display:block on it. By default it also has a border. Any stying we want to be done needs to be done on the iframe container instead or we'll break the 100% container boundry.
And this is how we would put an element above it:
http://jsfiddle.net/sg3s/j8sbX/25/ (edit: my bad, you actually need to set border=0 on the iframe for IE7)
Should work fine in IE7+ (IE6 doesn't like absolute positioning + using top/right/bottom/left to give it layout)
Edit Some extra explanation
We need to style the iframe container mainly because an iframe on itself doesn't let itself be sized with top/left/bottom/right. But what will work is setting its width and height to 100%. So starting from there we simply wrap the iframe in an element which we can reliably style to make less than the window 100%, the size which elements default to when none of their parents have a static height/width.
Thinking about it we can actually drop the absolute and block. http://jsfiddle.net/sg3s/j8sbX/26/ Might want to doublecheck IE7 on that though.
After we make the iframe 100% high and wide we cannot put any margin, padding, or border on it because that will be added to the already 100% height & width. Thus making it larger than its container, for divs that will result in an overflow:visible, simply showing everything going over the edges. But that in turn would mess up the margins, paddings and offsets we gave our elements.... In fact to make it be only the 100% height and width you have to make sure you removed the iframes default border.
Try it out by adding a larger border (like 3px) in my example to the iframe, you should easily be able to see how it's affecting the layout.
Why don't you use height & width? You'd still get an absolute position by setting top/bottom & left/right, as in the example below.
<!DOCTYPE HTML>
<html>
<head>
<style type="text/css">
html, body {
margin:0;
padding:0;
border:0px;
height:100%;
width:100%;
}
#container {
position: absolute;
top: 10px;
bottom: 10px;
left: 10px;
right: 10px;
}
#myiframe {
position: absolute;
top: 0%;
left: 0%;
height: 100%;
width: 100%;
}
</style>
</head>
<body>
<div id="container"><iframe id="myiframe"></iframe></div>
</body>
</html>
This works for me (Tested on IE9).
html,body {
margin:0;
padding:0;
height:100%;
min-height:100%;
}
#myiframe {
width:100%;
height:100%;
border:0;
}
work fine for me even with IE7.
I would say take a look at this stack overflow question. It might help:
Make Iframe to fit 100% of container's remaining height
You can try to use this:
document.getElementsByTagName('iframe')[1].style.borderWidth = '0px';
document.getElementsByTagName('iframe')[1].style.backgroundColor = 'green';

Resources