Let me try to ask this question from a different angle.
I noticed that everytime an aspx page gets rendered in the browser using the "web site" model, a random assembly gets created 'on-the-fly' in the Temporary ASP.NET files. Analyzing the assembly in Reflector shows that the class created for any given .aspx file is under the "ASP" namespace.
So, starting with a empty "Temporary ASP.NET Files" directory, I opened my ASP.NET "website" in VS2008, and launched the default page. Immediately I observed that a random directory was generated inside that folder. Working my way down the path, I found 2 DLLs created: App_Code.1lywsqqz.dll, and App_Web_iohekame.dll. I assume that all the .aspx pages in the website get compiled into App_Web dll and everything in App_Code folder gets compiled into App_Code.dll.
So if my App_Code C#/VB.net files are under the "ASP" namespace, and my App_Web files are created under the "ASP" namespace, how come I still get an error "Could not load type 'ASP.NothwindDataContext'?
Somebody said "you don't need namespaces in the App_Code folder", but I tried it without and still get "Could not load type 'NorthwindDataContext'".
So what's going on between the App_Code folder, the rest of the site, and namespaces?
EDIT:
Here's my LinqDataSource in my .aspx file:
<asp:LinqDataSource ID="LinqDataSource1" runat="server"
ContextTypeName="NothwindDataContext" EnableUpdate="True"
TableName="Categories">
</asp:LinqDataSource>
Neither "NorthwindDataContext", nor "ASP.NorthwindDataContext" works.
Types in App_Code C# source files, just like any C# file, will not be put in a specific namespace unless specifically declared by namespace Name {...} around it. So a class MyClass declared in App_Code will have the fully qualified type name MyClass. Just that.
You can reference it in Web.config as: "MyClass, App_Code".
Side note: When you are using a DBML in App_Code, the namespace of generated classes are defined in that file (look at the properties window when DBML file is open). If you specify a namespace in that file, naturally, your classes will be defined in that namespace. Note that this does not contradict with what I said above. The thing is, the LINQ data context generator processes the file and defines the classes in the specific namespace.
Related
I have an ASP.NET web site that I am trying to build, but I am getting some compiler errors on one page.
This page was originally not in any namespace. I then moved it to a namespace and rebuilt successfully. Now I removed the namespace, but the generated part of the partial class is still generating with the previous namespace.
I've deleted the generated files in C:\Windows\Microsoft.NET\Framework\v4.0.30319\Temporary ASP.NET Files, and they have regenerated with the out of date namespace.
Why are the generated parts not in sync with the manually created parts?
EDIT
Found solution. Had to change the Inherits attribute at the top of the .aspx file to match the new namespace/class name.
I am using visual studio 2012. I have created a directory named "Handler" inside my project and added an aspx file along with .cs file (both downloaded from a third party tool) to it. All code is working fine.
Now, I have published project to another directory. In published directory I have marked that the in side "Handler" folder aspx page is there but not the .cs page.
Now, when ever I am requesting the aspx page inside "Handler", I am getting error 404 xxxx.aspx page not found. Now, if I am coping the path and hit the url for that page then I am getting error that xxxx.aspx.cs file not found.
As per my best knowledge, whenever we build the project, all the code will build to dll in bin folder. Then why this file is required .cs file?
Thanks.
This will depend on the attributes of the #Page directive of your aspx page
I guess your third party page #page directive holds a CodeFile attribute.
CodeFile attribute states that, even though the .aspx.cs gets compiled (let's say it just gets checked) in Visual Studio, the result of the compilation will not be put in the dll resulting of the build.
The .aspx.cs will be compiled, along with the .aspx upon first invocation.
This allows to edit your deployed aspx.cs and have the result available immediately (which can be seen as handy, or risky)
As per my best knowledge, whenever we build the project, all the code
will build to dll in bin folder. Then why this file is required .cs
file?
This is the case when being in the default case, having a CodeBehind attribute in the page directive,instead of a CodeFile attribute
See CodeBehind and CodeFile attributes in documentation for #Page element
Note that you can use CodeFile attribute in Web Application Projects. I do it all the time.
I've seen lots of posts about the Inherits Attribute, and the Parser Error "Could not load type"
I can get this working by putting "RootNamespace.PageName" for a specific page, where RootNamespace matches the Root namespace in my project properites.
But I would rather not put the namespace in there. i.e. I would rather put "PageName" than "Namespace.PageName".
I have a library project with a few DLLs and 10 or so .aspx and .ascx files.
To get an update of my library project, other projects in my company copy the DLLs in and then copy the .aspx and .ascx files into a specific folder in their project.
Only problem is every time they copy they have to change the Namespace of the inherits attribute to match the root namesapce in their project.
If they don't do this, they get no compiler errors but just get a Parser error when they hit the libary .aspx and .ascx files.
This is very annoying, it seems very ridiculous that so many pages will not work if the project root namespace changes.
Does anybody have any ideas on how I can make library pages and user controls for nuse withing other peoples projects?
Thanks,
Mike G
Ah ha! A colleague stumbled upon a way around this by accident...
OK I have a single shared "Library" project and many "normal" projects that make use of shared stuff from the Library...
1- Create a "Library" WebApplication that outputs a DLL, and put your web library code and also .ascxs and .aspx pages into the WebApplication project. 2- Reference the "Library" DLL in your "Normal" projects 3- Copy just the shared .aspx and .ascx files from "library" into the "normal" projects, but ... (important bit!) ... without the code behind
In our example we don't actually include the copied .ascx and .aspx files in the project (e.g. They're not referenced in the .vbproj file) and they don't get put in source control, they just get copied in from the library every time you build. We haven't experimented with what happens if you tell the project about the .aspx and .ascx files but they definitely load OK at run time.
So it does actually make sense no I think ab out it.
Basically the root namespace of the .aspx files is unachanged it's just refers to classes in the referenced library DLL so it all works.
I have a website that has 2 files as follows:
page.aspx
page.aspx.cs
It used to be that I could just drop new files onto the web server and IIS would automatically compile the files and I could access the page e.g.
http://www.website.com/page.aspx
... and the associated functionality in the page class contained in the .cs file would work nicely.
Now I get the error: "Could not load type namespace.classname" which refers to my page class.
Now for some strange reason I have to put all my .cs files, even page classes into the app_code folder.
All that has changed on my website is that I reorganised the structure so that instead of my pages being on the web root they are now inside http://.../newfolder/page.aspx.
For some reason all my page.aspx.cs files now have to be in app_code.
Any ideas?
Sounds like you are mixing up a Web Application Project and a Web Site.
Are you sure the files are exactly the same? Perhaps one #Page directive says CodeBehind=Page.aspx.cs and the other says CodeFile=Page.aspx.cs?
CodeBehind requires project compilation, so you cannot just drop in a new .cs file, you need to upload a new compiled DLL. CodeFile will allow dynamic compilation.
The App_Code directory is dynamically compiled (in both cases) when your app is accessed, so the Inherit directive has a valid type when you put the file there. In general, don't do this. You want the .cs file to go with the .aspx file. Use App_Code for business logic or utility classes that aren't associated with a particular page.
Finally, is this new subdirectory set up as a new app in IIS? What does the web.config file in your new directory change? Are you running the same version of ASP.NET? Check the "compilation" tag. I'm not sure what you could do there to cause this, but I'm sure you could cause some chaos.
In a Project I have different modules or folders.In a module I have a namespace called idsobject.I have class in this namespace.
In another CS fle in the same folder I'm trying to access this class.But i'm not able.while if put that cs file in aPP_code than i able to get that class.
how to access the class in another cs file within the same folder.
thanks in advance
In an ASP.NET web site project, *.cs files are only compiled and made available to the rest of the application if they're located in the App_Code folder, or a subfolder in App_Code, or if they are associated with a *.aspx as code behind. The architecture is intended to allow full server-side compilation. You can't just put a *.cs anywhere and expect IIS to be able to find it, compile it, and link it with the rest of the app.
With an ASP.NET web application, you can put *.cs files where ever you want, because they are compiled by Visual Studio using details that are kept in the project file.
I'm guessing that you're using a web site project, which is why it works when you put the file in App_Code.
First check the namespace. If you accessing the correct namespace then perhaps the class access is set to private.
You could give us some extra information.
This sounds strange. Putting a class in a file in a Web project with a .cs extension should work just fine no matter which folder the file is located.
The only thing I can suggest is to make sure that there is at least a
using idsobject;
line at the top of the code unit where you are trying to access the class. The default behaviour for ASP.NET Web forms is for no namespace to be defined, which can sometimes lead to confusion.
The class should be marked as public if you've tried to access it from another namespace.
If it doesn't help, please post here a problematic code snippet.