Is there a built in way to change the favicon for different themes? If not would it be as simple as creatign a custom control to emit the link tag with the correct url to the icon?
Update
So based on what I have found in order to do this, it looks like I am going to have to create an http handler that will intercept all calls for favicon.ico.
This handler will then determine which theme we are using (in my case it will be based on the domain name), it will then output the themed favicon.ico from the various themes folders.
Since I am supporting IE7, I'm thinking this is the only option I have. Still curious if anyone else has a better way.
As long as your user is not using IE, that should be fine. IE (up to at least version 7) only reads the favicon.ico file and completely ignores the link tag.
After some research and thought It looks like the only way to do this and still support IE7 and earlier (I am not sure if IE8 updated support for favicon or not). Would be to dynamically serve the icon to do this you can do the following:
Create and register an HttpHandler to process requests for FavIcon.ico
Configure IIS to send requests for .ico files to ASP.Net (If your using IIS6 or earlier)
Run the logic that you use to determine which theme and from that find the .ico your going to serve up, and send it to the browser.
Note that per W3Schools
http://www.w3schools.com/browsers/browsers_stats.asp
You should expect about 1/2 your users to be using IE.
Related
Im developing a site and I would like the page to refresh when a change is detected to a CSS file. I used to be able to do this easily with the following bookmarks, but now none of them work on Chrome.
http://david.dojotoolkit.org/recss.html
http://calvincorreli.com/2006/02/13/re-recss/
http://www.paulirish.com/2008/how-to-iterate-quickly-when-debugging-css/
I cant change the HTML of the site im working on so I cant use the livereload app. Ideally I would keep using Chrome but I would switch to another browser if necessary.
You have two ways:
Edit css file and use livereload to reload it automatically in Chrome
Change your CSS in Chrome and save it (without IDE using).
About livereload(it works not for css only).
Use livereload. You need download Livereload 2 and add javascript file to your page or use Chrome extension.
This script is meant to be included into the web pages you want to monitor, like this:
<script src="http://localhost:35729/livereload.js"></script>
LiveReload 2 server listens on port 35729 and serves livereload.js over HTTP (besides speaking the web socket protocol on the same port).
A slightly smarter way is to use the host name of the current page, assuming that it is being served from the same computer. This approach enables LiveReload when viewing the web page from other devices on the network:
<script>document.write('<script src="http://'
+ location.host.split(':')[0]
+ ':35729/livereload.js"></'
+ 'script>')</script>
However, location.host is empty for file: URLs, so we need to account for that:
<script>document.write('<script src="http://'
+ (location.host || 'localhost').split(':')[0]
+ ':35729/livereload.js"></'
+ 'script>')</script>
LiveReload.js finds a script tag that includes .../livereload.js and uses it to determine the hostname/port to connect to. It also understands some options from the query string: host, port, snipver, mindelay and maxdelay.
From GitHub
About changing CSS in Chrome devtools.
Just take a minuit and watch a demo from Paul Irish
Maybe it can fit your needs, since I don't know what editor you use there is two nice ones with embed live editing, are: Brackets IO (free) and JetBrains WebStorm. If you dont ever want to change editors, like Pinal said, Livereload it's a good one, but sometimes its litte bug to make it, but it's a good choice!
You can use Code Kit https://incident57.com/codekit/ and get the free trial and use it for 10 days or you can buy it for $29, I think its totally worth it. You can use Fire.app also http://fireapp.kkbox.com/. Tincr is also a nice app you can use and I think this one is free http://tin.cr/. Hope this helps!
Do you see any errors in chrome console? all 3 bookmarklets work fine for me on chrome 35.0.1916.153.
The change might come from your sites server, e.g some servers block requests with additional parameters. In that case you'll need to modify bookmarklet to not add it.
Using developer tools, I can amend a css file for a site I'm currently viewing in a browser.
I want to, effectively, do the same - but instead of amending the css file, loading a local css file, just for that particular domain.
Another way of phrasing it: "When any page of stackoverflow.com is loaded, load C:\test.css to the browser".
Yes, it's possible. Have a look at http://userstyles.org.
Userstyles.org offers CSS files for usage with the extension "Stylish", and Stylish recently announced that they are becoming evil (https://forum.userstyles.org/discussion/comment/109966/#Comment_109966) and can therefore not be used anymore.
One can use the styles with greasemonkey, but then the activation for various websites doesn't work anymore (the CSS is converted into a JS file and the list of sites where it should be applied onto is hardcoded inside an if-statement in that script). I.e. in order to use e.g. "dokuwiki highlight and full width" on a site using dokuwiki but not being http://dokuwiki.org, you have to edit that if-statement and reload.
I noticed some websites put the version numbers (especially) in the CSS file path. For example:
<link rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" href="style.css?v=12345678" />
What is the main purpose to put the version number? If the purpose is to remember when the CSS file was updated last time, shouldn't the version number added as a comment inside the CSS file?
From HTML5 ★ Boilerplate Docs:
What is ?v=1" '?v=1' is the JavaScript/CSS Version Control with
Cachebusting
Why do you need to cache JavaScript CSS? Web page designs are getting
richer and richer, which means more scripts and stylesheets in the
page. A first-time visitor to your page may have to make several HTTP
requests, but by using the Expires header you make those components
cacheable. This avoids unnecessary HTTP requests on subsequent page
views. Expires headers are most often used with images, but they
should be used on all components including scripts, stylesheets etc.
How does HTML5 Boilerplate handle JavaScript CSS cache? HTML5
Boilerplate comes with server configuration files: .htacess,
web.config and nginx.conf. These files tell the server to add
JavaScript CSS cache control.
When do you need to use version control with cachebusting?
Traditionally, if you use a far future Expires header you have to
change the component's filename whenever the component changes.
How to use cachebusting? If you update your JavaScript or CSS, just
update the "?v=1" to "?v=2", "?v=3" ... This will trick the browser
think you are trying to load a new file, therefore, solve the cache
problem.
It's there to make sure that you have the current version. If you change your website and leave the name as before, browser may not notice the change and use old CSS from its cache. If you add version, the browser will download the new stylesheet.
If you set caches to expire far in the future adding ?v=2 will let the server know this is a new file but you won't need to give it a unique name (saving you a global search and replace)
HTM5 boilerplate also includes it in their project.
Check this video also: HTML5 Boilerplate Walkthrough.
One of the reason could be to bypass file caching. Same name CSS files can be cached by the servers and may result in bad display if new version has has layout changes.
This is to optimise browser-caching. You can set the header for CSS files to never expire so the browser will always get it from its cache.
But if you do this, you'll get problems when changing the CSS file because some browsers might not notice the change. By adding/changing the version-parameter it's "another" request and so it won't be taken from the cache (but after the new version is cached, it's taken from there in the future to save bandwidth/number of requests until the version changes again).
A detailed explanation can be found at html5boilerplate.com.
My knowledge is pretty much out of date regarding websites, but the variable stored in the 'href' argument is received by the browser through HTTP. Using the usual tricks in URL-rewriting you could actually have an arbitrary script that produces CSS-output when called. That output can differ, depending on the argument.
I found out that some websites use css tag like style.css?ver=1. What is this?
What is purpose of ?ver=1?
How do I do it in code?
To avoid caching of CSS.
If the website updates their CSS they update the ver to a higher number, therefore browser is forced to get a new file and not use cached previous version.
Otherwise a browser may get a new HTML code and old CSS and some elements of the website may look broken.
Adding '?ver=1' makes the HTTP request look like a GET query with parameters, and well-behaved browsers (and proxies) will refuse to cache parameterized queries. Of course well-behaved browsers (and proxies) should also pay attention to the 'Cache-control: no-cache', 'Expires', 'Last-Modified', and 'ETag' response headers (all of which were added to HTTP to specify correct caching behavior).
The '?ver=1' method is an expensive way to force behavior when the site developer doesn't know how (or is too lazy) to implement the correct response headers. In particular, it means that every page request is going to force requesting that CSS file, even though, in practice, CSS files change rarely, if at all.
My recommendation? Don't do it.
The purpose of the ?ver=1 is to parameterize the css file, so when they publish a new style.css file they up the version and it forces the client to download the new file, instead of pulling from the cached version.
If you are developing a web application in HTML and CSS or any other technology, and you are using some external CSS or JS files, you might notice one thing that in some cases if you made any changes to your existing .css or .js files then the browsers are not reflecting the changes immediately.
What happens in that case is that the browser do not download a fresh copy of the latest version of the .css and .js files, instead it uses those files stored in your local cache. As a result the changes you made recently are not visible to you.
<link rel="stylesheet" href="style.css?v=1.1">
The above case when you load the web page the browser will treat "style.css" as a different file along with "?v=1.1". Hence the browser is forced to download a fresh copy if the stylesheet or the script file.
I think that ?ver=1 is for the version no. of the web app. Every time a new build is created, the app can update the ver to the new version. This is so that the browser will load the new CSS file and not use the cached one (both use different file names).
You can refer to this site: http://www.knowlegezone.com/36/article/Technology/Software/JavaScript/CSS-Caching-Hack----javascript-as-well
IMO a better way to do this would be to include a hash generated off of the file size or a checksum based on the file contents or last-modified date. That way you don't have to update some version number and just let the number be driven off of the file's changing properties.
The web dev toolbar for Firefox is quite an impressive tool.
What I am completely clueless about is how does this tool get the css stylesheet file of a site? This is hosted on a host which is secure etc. I am completely stumped.
I must be thinking about this in all the wrong way.
Thanks
The client (in this case Firefox) has to download the CSS file in order to render the page correctly. The plugin (in this case Firebug) simply requests the proper URL and the browser it gets it--most likely from the cache. There is no real mystery here.
In every HTML file, there's a link to the CSS stylesheet, or else the browser wouldn't know where to find it, thus losing the ability to render the page correctly.
It's in the form of <link rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" href="theme.css">,
I'd like to add that regardless of whether the host is 'secure' or not, it still is presenting the file to the client.
Unless, of course, you're looking at a XML file. Then you need to consult the XSL which'll tell you where the stylesheet is.