Issue with background color and Google Chrome - css

Sometimes I get a broken background in Chrome. I do not get this error with any other browser.
This is the simple CSS line responsible for the background color of body:
body
{
background: black;
color: white;
font-family: Chaparral Pro, lucida grande, verdana, sans-serif;
}
This is exactly how I get this problem. I click a link included in an Gmail's email and I get something wrong (no background). I then refresh the page and the background is colored completely.
How do fix this problem?

Never heard of it. Try:
html, body {
width: 100%;
height: 100%;
background-color: #000;
color: #fff;
font-family: ...;
}

Ok guys, I found a solution,
. It's not great but does the trick with no side effects.
The HTML:
<span id="chromeFix"></span>
(put this below the body tags)
The CSS:
#chromeFix { display: block; position: absolute; width: 1px; height: 100%; top: 0px; left: 0px; }
What this does to solve the issue:
It forces Chrome to think the page's content is 100% when it's not - this stops the body 'appearing' the size of the content and resolves the missing background bug. This is basically doing what height: 100% does when applied to the body or html but you don't get the side effect of having your backgrounds cut off when scrolling (past 100% page height) like you do with a 100% height on those elements.
I can sleep now =]

I had the same issue on a couple of sites and fixed it by moving the background styling from body to html (which I guess is a variation of the body {} to html, body{} technique already mentioned but shows that you can make do with the style on html only), e.g.
body {
background-color:#000000;
background-image:url('images/bg.png');
background-repeat:repeat-x;
font-family:Arial,Helvetica,sans-serif;
font-size:85%;
color:#cccccc;
}
becomes
html {
background-color:#000000;
background-image:url('images/bg.png');
background-repeat:repeat-x;
}
body {
font-family:Arial,Helvetica,sans-serif;
font-size:85%;
color:#cccccc;
}
This worked in IE6-8, Chrome 4-5, Safari 4, Opera 10 and Firefox 3.x with no obvious nasty side-effects.

I was able to fix this with:
html { height: 100%; }

HTML and body height 100% doesn't work in older IE versions.
You have to move the backgroundproperties from the body element to the html element.
That will fix it crossbrowser.

Simple, correct, solution - define the background image and colour in html, not body. Unless you've defined a specific height (not a percentage) in the body, its height will be assumed to be as tall as required to hold all content. so your background styling should go into html, which is the entire html document, not just the body. Simples.

After trying all of the other solutions here without success, I skeptically tried the solution found in this article, and got it to work.
Essentially, it boils down to removing #charset "utf-8"; from your CSS.
This seems like a poor implementation in DreamWeaver - but it did fix the issue for me, regardless.

I am not sure 100%, but try to replace selector with "html, body":
html, body
{
background: black;
color: white;
font-family: Chaparral Pro, lucida grande, verdana, sans-serif;
}

I would try what Logan and 1mdm suggested, tho tweak the CSS, but I would really wait for a new Chrome version to come out with fixed bugs, before growing white hair.
IMHO the current Chrome version is still alpha version and was released so that it can spread while it is in development. I personally had issues with table widths, my code worked fine in EVERY browser but could not make it work in Chrome.

Google Chrome and safari needs a tweak for body and background issues.
We have use additional identifier as mentioned below.
<style>
body { background:#204960 url(../images/example.gif) repeat-x top; margin:0; padding:0; font-family:Tahoma; font-size:12px; }
#body{ background:#204960 url(../images/example.gif) repeat-x top; margin:0; padding:0; font-family:Tahoma; font-size:12px;}
</style>
<body id="body">
Use both body and #body identifier and enter same styles in both.
Make the body tag with id attribute of body.
This works for me.

Adam's chromeFix solution with Paul Alexander's pure-CSS modification solved the problem in Chrome, but not in Safari. A couple additional tweaks solved the problem in Safari, too: width: 100% and z-index:-1 (or some other appropriate negative value that puts this element behind all the other elements on the page).
The CSS:
body:after {display:block; position:absolute; width:100%; height:100%; top:0px; left:0px; z-index:-1; content: "";}

I had the same thing in both Chrome and Safari aka Webkit browsers. I'm suspecting it's not a bug, but the incorrect use of css which 'breaks' the background.
In the Question above, the body background property is set to:
background: black;
Which is fine, but not entirely correct. There's no image background, thus...
background-color: black;

I'm seen this problem with Chrome too, if I remember correctly if you minimize and then maximize your window it fixes it as well?
Haven't really used Chrome too much since it was released but this is definitely something I blame on Google as the code I was checking it on was air tight.

Everybody has said your code is fine, and you know it works on other browsers without problems. So it's time to drop the science and just try stuff :)
Try putting the background color IN the body tag itself instead of/as-well-as in the CSS. Maybe insist again (redudantly) in Javascript. At some point, Chrome will have to place the background as you want it every time. Might be a timing-interpreting issue...
[Should any of this work, of course, you can toggle it on the server-side so the funny code only shows up in Chrome. And in a few months, when Chrome has changed and the problem disappears... well, worry about that later.]

It must be a WebKit issue as it is in both Safari 4 and Chrome.

I'm pretty sure this is a bug in Chrome. Most likely it happens if you resize the browser TO full screen, then switch tabs. And sometimes if you just switch tabs/open a new one. Good to hear you found a "fix" though.

When you create CSS style using Dreamweaver for web designing, Dreamweaver adds a default code such as
#charset “utf-8″;
Try removing this from your stylesheet, the background image or colour should display properly
Source

body, html {
width: 100%;
height: 100%;
}
Worked for me :)

Here is how I ended up solving the problem:
This was the actual issue, clearly the body tag defined in CSS was not picked up.
My environment: Chrome Browser/Safari,
First time when it does not work, So according to the thread recommendation here I ended up adding the css file with the html entry
Sample CSS file: mystyle.css
<style type="”text/css”">
html {
background-color:#000000;
background-repeat:repeat-x;
}
body {
background-color: #DCDBD9;
color: #2C2C2C;
font: normal 100% Cambria, Georgia, serif;
}
</style>
Sample html file:
<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.01//EN">
<html>
<head>
<meta name="generator" content="HTML Tidy for Mac OS X (vers 31 October 2006 - Apple Inc. build 15.6), see www.w3.org">
<title>Test Html File</title>
<link rel="stylesheet" href="mystyle.css" type="text/css">
</head>
<body>
<h1>Achieve sentence with Skynet! READ MORE</a></h1>
</body>
</html>
After the first loading it will work in Chrome and then go back to CSS file comment the html entry, so your modified CSS will be
<style type="”text/css”">
// html {
// background-color:#000000;
// background-image:url('bg.png');
// background-repeat:repeat-x;
// }
body {
background-color: #DCDBD9;
color: #2C2C2C;
font: normal 100% Cambria, Georgia, serif;
}
</style>
Clearly seems to be bug in webkit, Saw the same behavior in Safari as well. Thanks for sharing the html information, have been hunting around forever of why the body tag was not working.
The final output is something like this:

Oddly enough it doesn't actually happen on every page and it doesn't seem to always work even when refreshed.
My solutions was to add {height: 100%;} as well.

My Cascading Style Sheet used:
body {background-color: #FAF0E6; font-family: arial, sans-serif }
It worked in Internet Explorer but failed in Firefox and Chrome. I changed it to:
body {background: #FAF0E6; font-family: arial, sans-serif }
(i.e. I removed -color.)
It works in all three browsers. (I had to restart Chrome.)

IF you're still having trouble, you may try switching 'top' to 'bottom' in chromeFix above, and also a div rather than a span
<div id="chromeFix"></div>
style:
#chromeFix { display: block; position: absolute; width: 1px; height: 100%; bottom: 0px; left: 0px; }

Related

Background image not displaying in chrome browser

I've created a small search widget, however the background doesn't appear when viewing it through chrome. I've tested IE, FF and safari which all appear OK.
http://paradigmsearch.co.uk/widget/?id=1
I'm usually reluctant to put layout issue on SO. However, I've been going over this for a while.
On the element:
<div class="widget" id="id_300x250">
I'm applying the following CSS definitions
.widget {
font-family: arial;
height: 250px;
width: 300px;
border: none;
background: url('/uploads/widget_background/cached/proportional/300x250/1_512648b566578.png') no-repeat center center;
}
The background just isn't visible. If this is a really silly mark-up / css oversight then I apologies profusely.
Currently using chrome browser Version 25.0.1364.172m
This is a pretty funny issue which I only figured out when opening your page in Chrome's incognito mode: Your background image is being blocked by AdBlock.
Also, for rendering purposes it's better practice to stick style elements in your page's head.
I've tested your code using chrome 25.0.1364.172m, all appear OK.
Check it: http://jsfiddle.net/rcHMc/
HTML
<div class="widget" id="id_300x250">
CSS
.widget {
font-family: arial;
height: 250px;
width: 300px;
border: none;
background: url('http://paradigmsearch.co.uk/uploads/widget_background/cached/proportional/300x250/1_512648b566578.png') no-repeat center center;
}

How can I force browsers to print background images in CSS?

This question was asked before but the solution is not applicable in my case. I want to make sure certain background images are printed because they are integral to the page. (They are not images directly in the page because there are several of them being used as CSS sprites.)
Another solution on that same question suggests using list-style-image, which only works if you have a different image for every icon, no CSS sprites possible.
Aside from creating a separate page with the icons inline, is there another solution?
With Chrome and Safari you can add the CSS style -webkit-print-color-adjust: exact; to the element to force print the background color and/or image
Browsers, by default, have their option to print background-colors and images turned off. You can add some lines in CSS to bypass this.
Just add:
* {
-webkit-print-color-adjust: exact !important; /* Chrome, Safari 6 – 15.3, Edge */
color-adjust: exact !important; /* Firefox 48 – 96 */
print-color-adjust: exact !important; /* Firefox 97+, Safari 15.4+ */
}
I found a way to print the background image with CSS. It's a bit dependent on how your background is laid out, but it seems to work for my application.
Essentially, you add the #media print to the end of your stylesheet and change the body background slightly.
Example, if your current CSS looks like this:
body {
background:url(images/mybg.png) no-repeat;
}
At the end of your stylesheet, you add:
#media print {
body {
content:url(images/mybg.png);
}
}
This adds the image to the body as a "foreground" image, thus making it printable.
You may need to add some additional CSS to make the z-index proper. But again, its up to how your page is laid out.
This worked for me when I couldn't get a header image to show up in print view.
You have very little control over a browser's printing methods. At most you can SUGGEST, but if the browser's print settings have "don't print background images", there's nothing you can do without rewriting your page to turn the background images into floating "foreground" images that happen to be behind other content.
The below code works well for me (at least for Chrome).
I also added some margin and page orientation controls.(portrait, landscape)
<style type="text/css" media="print">
#media print {
body {-webkit-print-color-adjust: exact;}
}
#page {
size:A4 landscape;
margin-left: 0px;
margin-right: 0px;
margin-top: 0px;
margin-bottom: 0px;
margin: 0;
-webkit-print-color-adjust: exact;
}
</style>
Make sure to use the !important attribute. This dramatically increases the likelihood your styles are retained when printed.
#example1 {
background:url(image.png) no-repeat !important;
}
#example2 {
background-color: #123456 !important;
}
Like #ckpepper02 said, the body content:url option works well. I found however that if you modify it slightly you can just use it to add a header image of sorts using the :before pseudo element as follows.
#media print {
body:before { content: url(img/printlogo.png);}
}
That will slip the image at the top of the page, and from my limited testing, it works in Chrome and the IE9
-hanz
Use psuedo-elements. While many browsers will ignore background images, psuedo-elements with their content set to an image are technically NOT background images. You can then position the background image roughly where the image should have gone (though it's not as easy or precise as the original image).
One drawback is that for this to work in Chrome, you need to specify this behavior outside of your print media query, and then make it visible in the print media query block. So, something like this...
.image:before{
visibility:hidden;
position:absolute;
content: url("your/image/path");
}
#media print {
.image{
position:relative;
}
.image:before{
visibility:visible;
top:etc...
}
}
The drawback is that the image will often be downloaded on normal page loads, adding unnecessary bulk. You can avoid that by just using the same image/path you'd already used for the original, visible image.
it is working in google chrome when you add !important attribute to background image
make sure you add attribute first and try again, you can do it like that
.inputbg {
background: url('inputbg.png') !important;
}
Browsers, by default, have their option to print background-colors and images turned off. You can add some lines in CSS to bypass this. Just add:
* {
-webkit-print-color-adjust: exact !important; /* Chrome, Safari */
color-adjust: exact !important; /*Firefox*/
}
Note: It's not working on the entire body but you could speciy it for a inner element or a container div element.
You can use borders for fixed colors.
borderTop: solid 15px black;
and for gradient background you can use:
box-sizing: border-box;
border-style: solid;
border-top: 0px;
border-left: 0px;
border-right: 0px;
border-image: linear-gradient(to right, red, blue) 100%;
border-image-slice: 1;
border-width: 18px;
https://gist.github.com/danomanion/6175687 proposes an elegant solution, using a custom bullet in place of a background image. In this example, the aim is to apply a background image to an a element with class logo. (You should substitute these for the identifier of the element you wish to style.)
a.logo {
display: list-item;
list-style-image: url("../images/desired-background.png");
list-style-position: inside;
}
By including this within a
#media print {
}
block, I'm able to replace a white-on-transparent logo on the screen, rendered as a background-image, with a black-on-transparent logo for print.
You can do some tricks like that:
<style>
#page {
size: 21cm 29.7cm;
size: landscape
/*margin: 30mm 45mm 30mm 45mm;*/
}
.whater{
opacity: 0.05;
height: 100%;
width: 100%;
position: absolute;
z-index: 9999;
}
</style>
In body tag:
<img src="YOUR IMAGE URL" class="whater"/>

Strange Chrome behavior: calculates all margin percentages right except for margin-top!

When I declare this style for a div:
#fbInner{
position: absolute;
margin: 11.2% 9.7% 0% 26.4%;
width: 63.5%;
height: 54.6%;
overflow: visible;
/*max-height: 190px;
max-width: 490px;*/
font-size: 11px;
font-family: "lucida grande",tahoma,verdana,arial,sans-serif;
color: #FFF;
/*border: solid 2px gray;*/
}
Chrome sets every margin right except of the margin top, which is set much smaller than in other browsers ... strange, all other margins are displayed like it should ...
What is the reason for that?
Is there a workaround that still uses percentages?
Seeing as this is an x-browser css question, resetting the css styles would be a valuable first step - maybe even the solution. You haven't disclosed any HTML code, so I can't know what other tags or styles are affecting #fbInner
In any case, here is the "meyerweb reset" stylesheet: http://meyerweb.com/eric/tools/css/reset/
Link it topmost in your HTML file. It will probably break your site, but that's a good thing. At least it should be equally broken in all browsers now. When you've fixed the look of your page, it should work properly in most/all browsers.

Scrollbar color change in Firefox

I want to change the scrollbar color in Firefox. How can I do that?
Changing the scrollbar color in Firefox is not as trivial as it is in Internet Explorer and Opera. Firefox only allows the style of the scrollbar to be set by the theme. This is a good thing. Lots of users don't like having the look and feel of interface widgets randomly changed at the whim of a designer. Changing the look of interface pieces can be even more of a problem for visually impaired visitors who may be using a high contrast theme.
That said, if the scrollbar is contained within a <div> in your page, you can create a custom scrollbar and make it functional using JavaScript. This jQuery plugin looks like it would do the trick pretty nicely: http://jscrollpane.kelvinluck.com/
I think this is more or less what you want to do: http://martinsmucker.com/demo/scroller.html
Here's how it works:
Inside the document's <head>, we have to reference several stylesheets and scripts (which you've probably already downloaded from http://jscrollpane.kelvinluck.com/.
This is where a vast majority of the magic happens:
<!-- Styles -->
<link rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" href="jquery.jscrollpane.css" />
<style type="text/css">
html, body {
height: 100%;
margin: 0;
padding:0;
}
#container {
height:100%;
width:100%;
margin: 0;
padding:0;
overflow: auto;
}
</style>
<!-- Scripts -->
<script type="text/javascript" src="http://ajax.googleapis.com/ajax/libs/jquery/1.4.2/jquery.min.js"></script>
<script type="text/javascript" src="jquery.mousewheel.js"></script>
<script type="text/javascript" src="jquery.jscrollpane.min.js"></script>
<script type="text/javascript">
$(document).ready(function() {
$('.scroll-pane').jScrollPane();
});
</script>
This assumes that the css and js files are located in the same directory as your html file. We start by linking to the provided stylesheet.
Then, add a bit of CSS to prevent the normal scrollbars from showing. Set the margin and padding of html and body to 0, and set the height to 100%. All of our content will be wrapped in a div with an id of "container". This container fills the page exactly (height: 100%; width:100%;) and it steals the scrolling so that we can customize the scrollbar (overflow: auto;).
Then we reference all of the appropriate scripts. Here I'm using the copy of jQuery hosted by Google, and again I'm assuming that all of the local scripts are in the same directory as the html file. The last little bit of jquery finds all of the divs with the "scroll-pane" class and adds the appropriate elements and scroll functionality to them.
The html is then very simple.
<body>
<div class="scroll-pane" id="container">
All of your content for the page goes here.
</div>
</body>
If you've done everything right, your page should look like my example.
Chrome and Safari do support the coloring of the scrollbars. Place the following code in your css and see the magic happen:
::-webkit-scrollbar {
height: 12px;
width: 12px;
background: #969696;
-webkit-border-radius: 1ex;
}
::-webkit-scrollbar-thumb {
background: #2B2B2B;
-webkit-border-radius: 1ex;
-webkit-box-shadow: 0px 1px 2px rgba(0, 0, 0, 0.75);
}
::-webkit-scrollbar-corner {
background: #1A1A1A;
}
The only thing missing is for firefox to support this feature.
Since version 64 Firefox allows limited styling of scrollbars:
.my-scrollable {
scrollbar-color: red blue;
scrollbar-width: thin;
}
See https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Web/CSS/scrollbar-color
It is not possible directly via CSS.
But if you can use jQuery, jscrollpane may help you.
you can't. as you can see here, this is only possible fpr IE5+ and Opera7.2+.
EDIT: with a bit of javascript it could be possible to build you own "html-scrollbars" that could be styled like you want them - but i don't think you should do that, writing this just to be detailed.
Well, I have heard someone saying "It's Impossible"...
But I don't believe in the impossible.
In the follwing example I only want to stylize the <ul> list in the main sidebar. Simply try this solution for Firefox scrollbar stylizes:
<div class="parent">
<div class="sidebar">
<ul class="scrollable">
<li></li>
</ul>
</div>
</div>
The Css will be:
.scrollable {
overflow: auto;
max-height:80vh;
overflow-y: scroll;
scrollbar-color: #0A4C95 #C2D2E4;
}
.scrollable::-webkit-scrollbar {
width: 0.5em!important;
}
.scrollable::-webkit-scrollbar-track-piece {
-webkit-box-shadow: inset 0 0 6px rgba(0,0,0,0.1);
}
.scrollable::-webkit-scrollbar-thumb:vertical {
background-color: #ddd;
outline: 1px solid slategrey;
}
Here are the final results:
(Note: The first image is the default scrollbar color).
This is not really useful as far as I know, but it's worth noting that the attribute which controls whether or not scrollbars are displayed in Firefox is: (reference link)
Attribute....scrollbars
Type.........nsIDOMBarProp
Description..The object that controls whether or not scrollbars
are shown in the window. This attribute is "replaceable"
in JavaScript. Read only
Firefox also has the following vendor specific properties:
overflow: -moz-scrollbars-none
other valid values are -moz-scrollbars-horizontal and -moz-scrollbars-vertical.
for Firefox or cross browser you can use :
jQuery custom content scroller
more simple and easy to use
here sample i implement in magento and tested on firefox, opera, chrome and safari : http://i.stack.imgur.com/wnRCL.png
In Firefox V103 coloring scrollbar works with:
html, body{scrollbar-color: #f33942 #000;}

css background doesn't show up in ie 6 when using rules like #id.class

i'm making a splash image div that changes the background with different css class, here's rules i defined:
#splash {
height: 130px;
}
#splash.homepage {
background: #F7EECF url("images/splash_home.png") no-repeat 0 0 scroll;
}
#splash.projectspage {
background: #F7EECF url("images/splash_projects.png") no-repeat 0 0 scroll;
}
this works fine in firefox and chrome, but the background somehow doesn't show up in ie 6. The weird thing is, it works for the homepage class but not the projectspage class. so ie 6 seems to interpret these almost identical rule differently. i tried clear the cache, didn't help. i'm quite new to css and ie 6 hacks, so am i missing anythings here?
also another problem that's slightly related to this, it seems it doesn't work in firefox when there is space before the class, like "#splash .homepage", but somehow i see other people's websites using the css with a space. what could be the problem?
update:
i tried to reverse the order of the #splash.homepage and #splash.projectspage, then now projectspage works but not the homepage. It seems whatever is immediately followed by #splash is used.
here are some relevant css & htmls:
#splash {
height: 130px;
}
#splash.projectspage { background: #F7EECF url('images/splash_projects.png') no-repeat 0 0 scroll; }
#splash.homepage { background: #F7EECF url('images/splash_home.png') no-repeat 0 0 scroll; }
#splashtext {
padding: 53px;
height: 40px;
width: 450px;
}
#splashtext h2 {
color: #FFFFFF;
font-family: Georgia, "Times New Roman", serif;
font-size: 20px;
font-weight: normal;
font-style: italic;
}
#splashtext p {
color: #FFFFAA;
font-family: Calibri, Arial, san-serif;
font-size: 14px;
font-weight: normal;
margin-top: 10px;
font-style: italic;
}
<!-- splash, this one does not show -->
<div id="splash" class="homepage">
<div id="splashtext">
<h2>some header</h2>
<p>some description</p>
</div>
</div>
<!-- splash, this one shows -->
<div id="splash" class="projectspage">
<div id="splashtext">
<h2>some other header</h2>
<p>some other description</p>
</div>
</div>
IE6 does not support multiple combined selectors to select elements (#id.class or .class.class, etc). IE6 will ONLY recognize the last class/ID in your chain.
Details and example
However, in this case, as long as you only have .homepage and .projectspage on one element on the page, the background image should be showing up on the correct element.
I noticed that you are probably using .homepage and .projectspage to differentiate between two PAGES and the same ELEMENT on those different pages. A good practice is to put the class on the <body> element so you can use it to differentiate each page and their descendants.
<body class="homepage">
<div id="splash">
Then your CSS would be:
body.homepage div#splash { blah }
body.projectspage div#splash { blah }
Added benefit: you can now target any elements on a per page basis, not just the ones that you add ".homepage" or ".projectspage" to.
It's possible you're having an issue with the .png image files. IE6 cannot handle the transparency layer that is part of .png images, it simply renders any pixel with a transparent marker as a grey background.
As for the second part of your question, #splash.background is a significantly different rule than #splash .background. The first one (no space) refers to the element with id splash that also has a background class. The second rule (with a space) refers to any element of class background that is a child of the element with id splash. Subtle, but important difference.
Try taking out the quotes around your URLs in the background specifiers, or changing them to single quotes.
Why are you worried about ie6? Anyway it works in ie7 and ie8.
Are you sure that is not a problem with png? Try with a jpg or gif image.
I would bet that the problem is specifically to do with the IE6 misshandling of .pngs
To test, try replacing these graphics with a gif or jpg and check to see if the selectors are working correctly.
Once you've identified that it is a problem with pngs try using the Supersleight jQuery plugin.
I think using min-height property will sometimes work.
Try the below code.
#splash {
min-height:130px; /* first */
height:auto !important; /* second */
height: 130px; /* third */
}
#splash.homepage {
background: #F7EECF url("images/splash_home.png") no-repeat 0 0 scroll;
}
#splash.projectspage {
background: #F7EECF url("images/splash_projects.png") no-repeat 0 0 scroll;
}
Note: Please use the same order of css in #splash selector.
(I guess your projectspage is under a sub-directory of home-page?)
Try using absolute paths to each image in the CSS (eg. url("/images/splash_projects.png")) - it chould be that IE6 resolves images relative to the containing page instead of the CSS file (depends whether your CSS is inline or in an external file I suppose.)
I've got the same problem, and it's not PNGs.
e.g.
column2menu li { border-bottom : 1px solid;}
column2menu li.goats { border-bottom-color : brown;}
...works in IE6, but...
td#menu { background-repeat:no-repeat;
background-position:bottom right;}
td#menu.goats { background-image :
url(../images/goats.jpg);}
...doesn't.
But I found a solution for ie6 that works so far in FF, i.e.:
.tdgoats { background-repeat:no-repeat;
background-position:bottom right;
background-image : url(../images/goats.jpg);}
...so you use:
...and ie6 is happy
Thsi post looks OK where I'm typing it, but the preview in the blue box is a bit odd.
Somehow lines 2 and 3 got <h1>'d

Resources