I'm using selenium to run some functional tests on the UI for our current application.
I want to ensure that strings from the resource files in the Web project are being displayed at the correct time and place.
Simple (I thought) all I have to do is reference the assembly of the web application and assert that the text selenium is reading from the UI matches the test in the approriate resource file.
The problem is the ASP.Net does some precomilation processing on the resource files and compiles them into an assembly called App_GlobalResources, which isn't created by the normal build process so the functional tests fail because that can't find the App_GlobalResources assembly to look the string up from.
So, any suggestions? Do I need to abandon the App_GlobalResources approach and do something manual that I have control over?
Do you understand the problem or do I need to provide more info?
My interim solution is to use SVN:Externals to pull a copy of the resx files into the test project.
I can then access them via
ResourceManager resource = new System.Resources.ResourceManager("My.Web.Namespace.resources.ImageUrls", Assembly.GetExecutingAssembly());
Its ugly because I already have a reference to the webproject (which I can probably remove now...) and I don't like mixing source files between projects. It just feels like asking for trouble but until someone suggests something better this will have to do.
Have you considered moving your GlobalResources into a separate assembly and then referencing that from both your web project and your test project? This is quite easy to do in VS 2008, and achievable but a little more difficult in VS 2005.
I was able to solve a similar problem using that approach.
Related
I have developed a lot of class library projects in VS 2012 to be used in Windows Forms and Web forms applications.
The question is simple. Do I need to deploy the DLL file itself together with the XML file that is created?
For example, the class library project is called DataWare. Upon building, I got 5 files in Release folder (this project reference Entity Framework):
DataWare.dll
DataWare.pdb
DataWare.dll.config
EntityFramework.dll
EntityFramework.xml
I know that ".pdb" file contains debugging information, so there is no need to deploy. The ".config" file is not taken into account. Instead the App.config or Web.config are.
Regarding this, I think I have to deploy just DataWare.dll and EntityFramework.dll.
However, the main doubt is if I need to deploy EntityFramework.xml as well.
Regards
Jaime
The XML file contains the doc comments for the public types & members in the assembly.
You only need it if you want Visual Studio to show documentation in IntelliSense.
If you're deploying a consumer-facing app (as opposed to a developer-facing reusable library), you do not need it.
No, in most cases you do not need it. If there is an external DLL that needs to be copied local and referenced using the config, then you might need to, but that is somewhat rare.
I have a web project called "TestResourceApp" with Labels.resx in App_GlobalResources folder. I want to add another language by creating a satellite assembly.
Here are the steps I took to create the satellite assembly. The default text always get displayed. What did I do wrong ?
1) Create Labels.fr.resx in a different folder.
2) Generate resource file:
Resgen Labels.fr.resx TestResourceApp.App_GlobalResources.Labels.fr.resources
3) Generate satellite assembly:
AL /t:lib /embed:TestResourceApp.App_GlobalResources.Labels.fr.resources /out:french.dll /c:fr
4) Copy french.dll to TestResourceApp/bin/fr
I have uiculture set to auto in web.config and I have change the language on the browser.
I was able to use this page to solve some satellite assembly issues I was having. I'll throw in a few more things to check.
It's helpful to decompile the "neutral" assembly and see how it's put together. A tool like ILDASM.exe is helpful for this purpose. Once you get it decompiled, look through the text output for ".mresource", and you should see one with your naming. For example, if you add a resource to a Visual Studio project, they're named MyAssemblyName + ".Properties.Resources" + a language (if any) + ".resources" Examples:
MyAssembly.Properties.Resources.resources (neutral language)
MyAssembly.Properties.Resources.en-US.resources (English (US))
In my case, I had the file named properly, and in the appropriate folder (such as Bin\en-US). I was able to verify that much by using ProcMon.exe (by the SysInternals guys) and could see the worker process finding and reading in my DLL file (instead of just saying "PATH NOT FOUND"). However, it was not finding the resource by the name that it expected it to. That's when some disassembly helped to get to the bottom of the naming problem.
So, use ProcMon.exe to narrow down the kind of problem you might have. Hopefully that's helpful to someone.
It's complicated but here are a few tips for those who run into this problem:
Try to include the resx in the web project and let VS do the job for you.
Reflector is your friend. Compare satellite assemblies you created and those created by VS.
If you web app is targetting ASP.NET 2.0, you should use Resgex and AL that come with .net 2.0. Open the assemblies in Reflector and check the "references". It should reference mscorlib version 2.0.
If you deploy your web app using web deployment project, make sure the namespace for the resources in your satellite assemblies is correct. Again, compare with what VS creates. In my case, I used the wrong tool to generate the designer.cs file because I wanted them to be accessible from a different assembly. Make sure you are using GlobalResourceProxyGenerator. Otherwise, the namespaces won't match and the deployment code will not be able to find your resource. The namespace in the designer.cs should simply be "Resources", not "XXXX.App_GlobalResources"
Did you have set enableClientBasedCulture to true in globalization ?
I am inheriting some ASP.NET code (I am an OS guy, not a web dev (yet ;-)). The solution has been re-factored and there are multiple projects (libraries and asp.net sites) in it. Aside from the libraries, there are two asp.net projects (called MAINSITE and SUBSITE). Only MAINSITE is being used as the official site (as an asp.net site), and MAINSITE has a depency on the code in the SUBSITE asp.net site, but doesn't use the site itself. I am trying to figure out how to clean this up and convert SUBSITE into a library.
My quick question is, whenever I debug the MAINSITE (set as default), it runs two asp.net processes: MAINSITE and SUBSITE. And so, at the very least, how can I avoid this? Is there a quick/temporary solution to this?
My detailed question is this:
What makes an asp.net site an asp.net site? For instance, in C the difference between an dll and exe could be defined (superficially anyway) as the presence of a main, and potential export information for the library (among other things, of course). If I were to convert an exe to dll I might:
1. remove the main code
2. make sure the public interface was correct (and exported correctly)
3. convert the makefile to build a dll rather than an exe.
Can someone point me to some similar steps for asp.net to .net lib?
Maybe:
1. get rid of index.aspx
2. get rid of web.config
3. any *.cs files to remove?
4. how do I change the properties?
5. any gotchas?
Thanks so much for your help.
Details: Visual Studio 2008/.NET 3.5
There are many, many components to make an application run as an ASP.Net application. However, in terms of your actual Web Application project, there's really not that much difference between it and generic library code except for the fact that much of your code relies on the existence of the HttpApplication runtime.
Any code that utilizes the System.Web (especially System.Web.UI) is going to be suspect in terms of having this dependency. For example, all the code in page or webcontrol event handlers (Init, Load, PreRender, etc.) relies on the fact that there is an HttpHandler (running inside an HttpApplication) raising these events. If you run the same WebControl out of a library that's not in an ASP.Net project, none of this will ever happen and the control will be useless. However, that exact same library would be quite functional if executed in the context of an ASP.Net process.
It really boils down to what process you're running the library in. In most cases, ASP.Net processes are spawned by IIS, although it is possible to host an ASP.Net process in other types of programs as well.
There isn't a simple 5-step process for converting a web project to a library unfortunately. But as a rule of thumb, webcontrols, .aspx and .ascx codebehind aren't going to convert.
For a more detailed look at what makes code into an ASP.Net program, see Rick Strahl's "A Low level look at ASP.Net".
If you go to "File" > "New" > "New Project..." and then click on the (assuming you're using C#) "Visual C#" in the list on the left, you're given the ability to create a "Class Library" project. You can extract all the relevant code to one of these and then reference in in your "MAINSITE".
You will need to reference it in the "References" section of your MAINSITE project and may need to import your library project using the import keyword.
I am having an issue when attempting to override the DisplayNameAttribute in ASP.NET MVC to provide a localized string. The code itself is straightforward and similar to that in another Stackoverflow post link text
The code works for global resources but not so well for local resources. I have a registration screen and used the Visual Studio "Generate Local Resource" command to create my local resource file. The generated file is named Registration.aspx.resx and the App_LocalResources folder is created relative to the actual Registration.aspx page - as one would expect.
However, when I attempt to get the localized string using:
ResourceManager.GetString(resourceKey)
I receive the following error message.
Could not find any resources
appropriate for the specified culture
or the neutral culture. Make sure
"FullAssemblyName.Views.Account.App_LocalResources.Registration_aspx.resources"
was correctly embedded or linked into
assembly "FullAssemblyName" at compile
time, or that all the satellite
assemblies required are loadable and
fully signed.
Using reflector, I can see that the file is actually Registration.aspx.resources and not Registration_aspx.resources - the underscore/period being the subtle difference
FullAssemblyName.Views.Account.App_LocalResources.Registration.aspx.resources
I have toyed with the code quite a bit but no matter what I do, the file being requested is always different than that copiled in the assembly. For instance, if i rename Registration_aspx (in the generated Registration.aspx.designer.cs class i get the same error but this time the path is "...App_LocalResources.Registrationaspx.resources"
Has anyone run into this? Is there any way I can ensure that the resource found in my assembly has this underscore?!?!?
Thank you in advance!
Try Michael K. Campbell solution link text. It worked fine form me in localizing my project.
I am trying to convert an ASP.NET website into a web application project. The conversion has gone ok I think apart from previously I had 2 xsd files in the App_Code folder. I believe this folder is not used in web applications projects, so where would I put xsd files now.
I don't think you have to put them anyplace in particular. For the purposes of organization you could create a data directory. If the project is small enough, I leave it in the root.
You can place the files wherever you want, but you have to be careful that your namespace references are still correct.
I would look at your Root Namespace declaration in the project properties to ensure that it is set to what you expect it to be. Also, you will want to look at the location of your TableAdapter objects, as that is where the actual error is, not in the declaration of your StudentQueriesDataTable (Referenced by your xsd as the posted question)