What's the simplest correct way of aligning images without gaps horizontally within a div?
If possible I would not like to wrap every image in a div and I would not like to use a list. I'm rather looking for the proper CSS to achieve this with minimal markup.
The biggest problem are the gaps between the images which I can remove by setting the font-size to 0 wich is ugly and works only for Firefox.
<div class="images"><img1><img2><img3></div>
.images {
display: inline;
...???
}
A good way to do it would be to float the images.
However, be sure to add an overflow attirbute to their parent container to ensure it goes all the way around them,
Adding a margin would also neaten them up.
.images {
overflow: hidden;
}
.images img {
float: left;
margin: 0px;
}
Related
I have a layout as shown in this fiddle: https://jsfiddle.net/4dbgnqha/4/. For reasons that you can read about in this post, I don't want to change the way the page is laid out.
Now, it works fairly well, but the issue is that when I add a border to the bottom of the .item divs, I realize that they don't span the full width of the page. As you can see in the above fiddle, the second .item down doesn't have enough content to fill the width, so its border doesn't reach the full width.
I thought I could fix this by just adding .item { width: 100%; }, but when I do that, the image gets added enough additional width to center the p, which looks really weird. Demo of that: https://jsfiddle.net/4dbgnqha/7/
I know it will fix if I add a set width to the image, but as I mentioned in my original post, I want it to be really flexible, able to have many image widths. I also know that if I wrap the image in an element and set that element to a really small width, like 1px, it will work, but that seems like a hack, and the reason I'm doing this stupid table layout in the first place is that I'm trying to avoid any such hacks.
How can I fix this issue?
You can add this into the CSS, it's a hack, but works very well with table layout.
.item p {
width: 100%;
}
https://jsfiddle.net/4dbgnqha/8/
you need to add width 100% to the .item p element so it gets the maximum available width, otherwise that element will get width:auto. So just add width:100% like this:
.item p {
margin: 0px;
display: table-cell;
vertical-align: top;
width: 100%;
}
edit: well, now I see it was already answered, but for anyone looking for info, this is why it happens
I know this question has been asked many times but I am having difficulty in finding out in what is going wrong with the code in my case.
I have a wrapper div with a number of other divs contained within it. Some of those divs are side by side using float: left; ect. and the layout is almost exactly as I would like it. However for some reason the wrapper divs border is not extending all the way to the footer element when the wrapper is NOT float: left;
Example:
http://jsfiddle.net/8wVdm/
However when I add float: left to the wrapper div the border does extend all the way like I want it too:
http://jsfiddle.net/C5kTh/
However the problem with this is that the wrapper div is then not automatically centered. How do I fix this?
You'll want to research clearfixing, which is a set of css rules that force a container to wrap around any floated elements it contains:
.clearfix:after {
content: " ";
visibility: hidden;
display: block;
height: 0;
clear: both;
}
here is a nice detailed answer on how they work.
here's an updated fiddle with a clearfix added.
What's the simplest solution to make four equally sized boxes that is displayed inline (horizontally) and is centered in the screen all through out responsively?
I have four divs with same sizes, displayed inline and is always placed in center, meaning they always have an equal margins on left and write of the screen. And i want it to be responsive. I already tried flex-box but i'm having trouble with browser compatibility with css3.
I don't know if this is the absolute "best" way. But something like this would definitely work.
div {
width: 22%; //adjust as necessary
margin-right: 4%; //adjust as necessary
float: left;
height: 5em; //adjust or remove as necessary
}
div.last { //alternatively you could consider using the :last-child selector
margin-right: 0;
float: right;
}
You will have to apply a class of "last" to the last div. Alternatively you could use div:last-child if they were all contained in a parent element.
Also, when adjusting the margin/width make sure they stay relative. widthx4 + margin-rightx3 should always = 100 (assuming no padding or borders).
This question already has answers here:
Image inside div has extra space below the image
(10 answers)
Closed 7 years ago.
In Firefox only my video thumbnails are displaying mysterious 2-3 pixels of white space between the bottom of my image and its border (see below).
I've tried everything I can think of in Firebug with no luck.
How can I remove this white space?
You're seeing the space for descenders (the bits that hang off the bottom of 'y' and 'p') because img is an inline element by default. This removes the gap:
.youtube-thumb img { display: block; }
You can use code below if you don't want to modify block mode:
img{vertical-align:text-bottom}
Or you can use following as Stuart suggests:
img{vertical-align:bottom}
If you would like to preserve the image as inline you can put vertical-align: top or vertical-align: bottom on it. By default it is aligned on the baseline hence the few pixels beneath it.
I've set up a JSFiddle to test several different solutions to this problem. Based on the [vague] criteria of
1) Maximum flexibility
2) No weird behavior
The accepted answer here of
img { display: block; }
which is recommended by a lot of people (such as in this excellent article), actually ranks fourth.
1st, 2nd, and 3rd place are all a toss-up between these three solutions:
1) The solution given by #Dave Kok and #Hasan Gursoy:
img { vertical-align: top; } /* or bottom */
pros:
All display values work on both the parent and img.
No very strange behavior; any siblings of the img fall where you'd expect them to.
Very efficient.
cons:
In the [perfectly valid] case of both the parent and img having `display: inline`, the value of this property can determine the position of the img's parent (a bit strange).
2) Setting font-size: 0; on the parent element:
.parent {
font-size: 0;
vertical-align: top;
}
.parent > * {
font-size: 16px;
vertical-align: top;
}
Since this one [kind of] requires vertical-align: top on the img, this is basically an extension of the 1st solution.
pros:
All display values work on both the parent and img.
No very strange behavior; any siblings of the img fall where you'd expect them to.
Fixes the inline whitespace problem for any siblings of the img.
Although this still moves the position of the parent in the case of the parent and img both having `display: inline`, at least you can't see the parent anymore.
cons:
Less efficient code.
This assumes "correct" markup; if the img has text node siblings, they won't show up.
3) Setting line-height: 0 on the parent element:
.parent {
line-height: 0;
vertical-align: top;
}
.parent > * {
line-height: 1.15;
vertical-align: top;
}
Similar to the 2nd solution in that, to make it fully flexible, it basically becomes an extension of the 1st.
pros:
Behaves like the first two solutions on all display combinations except when the parent and img have `display: inline`.
cons:
Less efficient code.
In the case of both the parent and img having `display: inline`, we get all sorts of crazy. (Maybe playing with the `line-height` property isn't the best idea...)
So there you have it. I hope this helps some poor soul.
I found this question and none of the solutions here worked for me. I found another solution that got rid of the gaps below images in Chrome. I had to add line-height:0; to the img selector in my CSS and the gaps below images went away.
Crazy that this problem persists in browsers in 2013.
Had this prob, found perfect solution elsewhere if you dont want you use block just add
img { vertical-align: top }
.youtube-thumb img {display:block;} or .youtube-thumb img {float:left;}
Give the height of the div .youtube-thumb the height of the image. That should set the problem in Firefox browser.
.youtube-thumb{ height: 106px }
As stated before, the image is treated as text, so the bottom is to accommodate for those pesky: "p,q,y,g,j"; the easiest solution is to assign the img display:block; in your css.
But this does inhibit the standard image behavior of flowing with the text. To keep that behavior and eliminate the space. I recommend wrapping the image with something like this.
<style>
.imageHolder
{
display: inline-block;
}
img.noSpace
{
display: block;
}
</style>
<div class="imageHolder"><img src="myimg.png" class="noSpace"/></div>
I have to use a float div (the main window of my application), and I'd like to center that floated DIV based on the client's screen width. How can I accomplish that?
Right now I'm using a left:20% but that's not always centered depending on the user's screen resolution
Do you want the div to grow relative to the browser window, or to fit the content inside of it?
If the former, you can just use a percentage based width rather than pixel, and it should still center.
If the latter, don't use a float...start by setting width:auto; (I think that should make it auto-expand to fit content). Then you will need some javascript to measure the width of the DIV, set the width: css property in pixels, then measure the browser window, and center the container based on these measurements.
Sorry, I was wrong about width:auto;. I guess just float it, and then use javascript like I described above to manually set the margin-right and margin-left.
Sorry, thought up a better solution.
#float {
float:left;
margin-left:50%;
position:relative;
}
And then, using jquery,
$(document).ready(function() {
var float_width = $('#float').width();
var left_spacing = float_width / 2;
$('#float').css('left', '-' + left_spacing);
});
Forgive me if my javascript is off or doesn't quite work...I didn't test it and I'm a JS noob :)
You can try to use
.mainWindow {
margin: 0 auto;
}
then make sure the parent element is text-align: center;
I usually use an auto centered container div and then put any other containers (like your floated div) inside that container. Is there any particular reason you can't do that?
Example CSS:
#container {
width: 960px;
margin: 0 auto;
position: relative;
}
My solution is easy with css
.div{
position: absolute;
top: calc(50vw);
left: calc(50vw);
}
is code clean