Let me start off by saying that I'm pretty new to flex and action script. Anyways, I'm trying to create a custom event to take a selected employee and populate a form. The event is being dispatched (the dispatchEvent(event) is returning true) but the breakpoints set inside of the handler are never being hit.
Here is some snippets of my code (Logically Arranged for better understanding):
Employee Form Custom Component
<mx:Metadata>
[Event(name="selectEmployeeEvent", type="events.EmployeeEvent")]
<mx:Metadata>
<mx:Script>
[Bindable]
public var selectedEmployee:Employee;
</mx:Script>
...Form Fields
Application
<mx:DataGrid id="grdEmployees" width="160" height="268"
itemClick="EmployeeClicked(event);">
<custom:EmployeeForm
selectEmployeeEvent="SelectEmployeeEventHandler(event)"
selectedEmployee="{selectedEmployee}" />
<mx:Script>
[Bindable]
private var selectedEmployee:Employee;
private function EmployeeClicked(event:ListEvent):void
{
var employeeData:Employee;
employeeData = event.itemRenderer.data as Employee;
var employeeEventObject:EmployeeEvent =
new EmployeeEvent( "selectEmployeeEvent", employeeData);
var test:Boolean = dispatchEvent(employeeEventObject);
//test == true in debugger
}
private function SelectEmployeeEventHandler(event:EmployeeEvent):void
{
selectedEmployee = event.Employee; //This event never fires
}
</mx:Script>
There are a few things conspiring to cause trouble here. :)
First, this declaration in your custom component:
<mx:Metadata>
[Event(name="selectEmployeeEvent", type="events.EmployeeEvent")]
<mx:Metadata>
... announces to the compiler that your custom component dispatches this particular event, but you're actually dispatching it with your containing document, rather than your custom component -- so your event listener never gets called, because there's nothing set up to call it.
Another thing is that, in list-item-selection situations like this one, the more typical behavior is to extract the object from the selectedItem property of the currentTarget of the ListEvent (i.e., your grid -- and currentTarget rather than target, because of the way event bubbling works). In your case, the selectedItem property of the grid should contain an Employee object (assuming your grid's dataProvider is an ArrayCollection of Employee objects), so you'd reference it directly this way:
private function employeeClicked(event:ListEvent):void
{
var employee:Employee = event.currentTarget.selectedItem as Employee;
dispatchEvent(new EmployeeEvent("selectEmployeeEvent"), employee);
}
Using the itemRenderer as a source of data is sort of notoriously unreliable, since item renderers are visual elements that get reused by the framework in ways you can't always predict. It's much safer, instead, to pull the item from the event directly as I've demonstrated above -- in which case you wouldn't need an "employeeData" object at all, since you'd already have the Employee object.
Perhaps, though, it might be better to suggest an approach that's more in line with the way the framework operates -- one in which no event dispatching is necessary because of the data-binding features you get out-of-the-box with the framework. For example, in your containing document:
<mx:Script>
<![CDATA[
import mx.events.ListEvent;
[Bindable]
private var selectedEmployee:Employee;
private function dgEmployees_itemClick(event:ListEvent):void
{
selectedEmployee = event.currentTarget.selectedItem as Employee;
}
]]>
</mx:Script>
<mx:DataGrid id="dgEmployees" dataProvider="{someArrayCollectionOfEmployees}" itemClick="dgEmployees_itemClick(event)" />
<custom:EmployeeForm selectedEmployee="{selectedEmployee}" />
... you'd define a selectedEmployee member, marked as Bindable, which you set in the DataGrid's itemClick handler. That way, the binding expression you've specified on the EmployeeForm will make sure the form always has a reference to the selected employee. Then, in the form itself:
<mx:Script>
<![CDATA[
[Bindable]
[Inspectable]
public var selectedEmployee:Employee;
]]>
</mx:Script>
<mx:Form>
<mx:FormItem label="Name">
<mx:TextInput text="{selectedEmployee.name}" />
</mx:FormItem>
</mx:Form>
... you simply accept the selected employee (which is marked bindable again, to ensure the form fields always have the most recent information about that selected employee).
Does this make sense? I might be oversimplifying given that I've no familiarity with the requirements of your application, but it's such a common scenario that I figured I'd throw an alternative out there just for illustration, to give you a better understanding of the conventional way of handling it.
If for some reason you do need to dispatch a custom event, though, in addition to simply setting the selected item -- e.g., if there are other components listening for that event -- then the dispatchEvent call you've specified should be fine, so long as you understand it's the containing document that's dispatching the event, so anyone wishing to be notified of it would need to attach a specific listener to that document:
yourContainingDoc.addEventListener("selectEmployeeEvent", yourOtherComponentsSelectionHandler);
Hope it helps -- feel free to post comments and I'll keep an eye out.
You're dispatching the event from the class in the lower code sample (DataGrid, I guess), but the event is defined in the EmployeeForm class, and the event handler is likewise attached to the EmployeeForm instance. To the best of my knowledge, events propagate up in the hierarchy, not down, so when you fire the event from the form's parent, it will never trigger handlers in the form itself. Either fire the event from the form or attach the event handler to the parent component.
Related
I could not get the event to dispatch. is there any thing missing in my code?
Application1.mxml:
<s:Button x="50" y="10" label="Button" click="dispatchEvent(new Event('buttonToggle'))"/>
component1.mxml
[Bindable(event="buttonToggle")]
public function disableChk():void {
trace("event");
}
It is not very clear what do you want to ask but I'll try to explain the code I see.
First, dispatching and listening events are performing by dispatchEvent() and addEventListener() of flash.events.EventDispatcher. So you're dispatching event right. But what about listening? To listen to event you should add something like (in the same MXML class where event is dispatching):
addEventListener("buttonToggle", onButtonToggle);
…
private function onButtonToggle(event:Event):void
{
trace("event");
}
What about your example it is not about event handling but about data binding. And of course data binding relies on event dispatching/handling under the hood but there are some limitations to check if event dispatching works using data binding.
First of all, you're using function as a source of data binding. And there are to problems with it:
Using bindable function without returning value (you have void) is non-sense.
Even if your function will return value it won't call if there is no any bindings in MXML attributes to this function.
But to solve problem of your code (but not your question) we need to have more information about your goal and more code about your implementation.
For the simplest way of handling events of MXML components within the same component you can use very simple handlers:
<s:Button x="50" y="10" label="Button" click="myClickHandler()"/>
and:
private function myClickHandler():void
{
trace("Event");
}
You can read more about handling events from the official documentation.
In my Flex app I am using a repeater to show a report on my database data. On this report the user can "drill-down" on the data to show more detail. In order to make this easier on the eye I have a header label and then a datagrid within the repeater.
Whilst this works perfectly, because the dataprovider for the datagrid comes from an array in the repeaters dataprovider, it is causing the following warning:
Data binding will not be able to detect assignments to "report"
The warning is for this line:
<mx:DataGrid id="dgReport" dataProvider="{rptReport.currentItem.report}" rowCount="{rptReport.currentItem.report.length}">
Below is my code, if anyone has any suggestions for how I can get rid of the warning/do this properly they will be most welcome!
<mx:Script>
<![CDATA[
[Bindable] private var reportProvider;
private function report_Handler(event:ResultEvent):void {
// Temp variables
var currentHeader:String = "";
var previousHeader:String = "";
// Retrieve PHP array
var reportPHP:Array = ArrayUtil.toArray(event.result);
// Create Flex array
var reportFlex:Array = [];
var reportFlex_dataGrid:Array = [];
// Loop through PHP array
for(var i:int = 0; i < reportPHP.length; i++) {
// Retrieve current header
currentHeader = reportPHP[i].header;
// Clear array
if (currentHeader != previousHeader) {
reportFlex_dataGrid = [];
}
reportFlex_dataGrid.push({column1:reportPHP[i].column1, column2:reportPHP[i].column2, column3:reportPHP[i].column3});
}
// Add to repeater array
if (currentHeader != previousHeader) {
// Add to array
reportFlex.push({header:reportPHP[i].header, report:reportFlex_dataGrid});
}
// Store previous headers
previousHeader = reportPHP[i].header;
// Add to combobox data provider
reportProvider = new ArrayCollection(reportFlex);
}
]]>
</mx:Script>
<mx:Repeater id="rptReport" dataProvider="{reportProvider}">
<mx:VBox>
<mx:Spacer height="5"/>
<mx:Label id="lblHeader" text="{rptReport.currentItem.header}"/>
<mx:DataGrid id="dgReport" dataProvider="{rptReport.currentItem.report}" rowCount="{rptReport.currentItem.report.length}">
<mx:columns>
<mx:DataGridColumn headerText="Column1" dataField="column1"/>
<mx:DataGridColumn headerText="Column2" dataField="column2"/>
<mx:DataGridColumn headerText="Column3" dataField="column3"/>
</mx:columns>
</mx:DataGrid>
</mx:VBox>
</mx:Repeater>
Data binding will not be able to detect assignments to "report"
Your dataProvider is rptReport.currentItem.report. Of this, rptReport, being an mxml element, is Bindable. The currentItem property of the Repeater component is also declared to be Bindable. The report property of the current item is not bindable - current item itself is just an object. Through this warning Flex is saying that if you alter the report of an already assigned object to something else, it won't be automatically reflected in the data grid.
In most cases you can safely ignore this type of warnings.
When you say x="{a.b.c.d}" in mxml, the guarantee is that flex will detect changes made to any of the four items in the chain (a, b, c and d) and update the value of x. In other words, x will change when a or a.b or b.c or c.d is changed. For this to work, Flex expects that all those four are declared bindable. If it finds any of these items to be not bindable, it will throw a warning. A property is bindable if it was declared using mxml or if it was declared with the [Bindable] metadata tag in ActionScript.
In most cases, one would be interested only in the changes to a or a.b. In your example, changes happen only when HTTPService is resend, in which case the dataProvider itself will change.
Dude, a little off-topic, but having a grid in a repeater sounds really busy. If you want to have a drill-down, pop it up or put it in a pane that's only visible in that mode.
Visually, the repeater is a pattern which the user can internalize. A grid inside that pattern is a lot harder to deal with. Scrolling the grid vs. scrolling the repeater will likely be frustrating, let alone Tab navigation.
Logistically, you are creating a lot of in-memory UI. I would worry about performance.
Consider using a List with a custom Item renderer instead of a repeater. I still would not put a grid in there, but it's worth the effort.
Cheers
well, I have a combobox which I have bind his selectedItem property to a value object object, like this
<fx:Binding source="styles_cb.selectedItem.toString()" destination="_uniform.style"/>
<fx:Declarations>
<fx:XML id="config_xml" xmlns="" source="config.xml" />
<!-- Place non-visual elements (e.g., services, value objects) here -->
</fx:Declarations>
<mx:ComboBox x="66.15" y="63.85" editable="false" id="styles_cb" dataProvider="{config_xml.styles.style}" />
the value object is a custom class with some setters and getters, and I want to set a property based of the value of the selectedItem of the combo, so inside the value object I have something like this
[Bindable]
public function set style(value:String):void
{
_style = value;
trace(value);
}
my problem is that each time I change the combobox selection which in fact change the style property of the value object it does it 3 times, if I trace the value of the setter it actually do the trace 3 times, why?? how can I avoid this? I'm doing something wrong? or there is a better way to do it, please help, thanks for any help
It's common for data binding expressions to fire many times more than one would expect. I don't know the exact reason. If this causes issue for your app, then don't bind the source directly to the target, instead use invalidation. Bind the source to set a flag, stylesSelectedItemChanged and call invalidateProperties(). Then override commitProperties() and inside your commitProperties(), check if stylesSelectedItemChanged is true, and if so, propagate the new value forward to the destination and reset the flag to false. Be sure to also call super.commitProperties() or else many things would break.
Invalidation is extremely common in the Flex framework, every component uses it internally, and it helps a lot with these kinds of issues.
wow!!, some times writing a question let you think about it twice and let you find the answer by yourself, so I find my own solution, in the documentation said I can make all the properties of an object bindables if I put [Bindable] in the class declaration, so I did it like this
[Bindable]
[RemoteClass(alias='Uniform')]
public class Uniform extends Object implements IEventDispatcher
however when I was trying to dispatch an event in the setters I found in the docs that I must add the event name like this
[Bindable("styleChanged")]
public function get style():String
{
return _style;
}
public function set style(value:String):void
{
_style = value;
dispatchEvent(new Event("styleChanged"));
}
now I found that doing this, mark the property with a double bind and that was making me set the property many times, hugg!, but now I know I can avoid using the second [Bindable] and still the event get dispatch, so now I wonder why I need to use [Bindable("styleChanged")] in the first place if I still can dispacth the event with only [Bindable] and the dispatch method?, weird
hope this help to someone
I'm running into an odd issue with itemRenderers inside a TileList.
Here is a working example without an itemRenderer: 152.org/flex/
Here is the broken version with an itemRenderer: 152.org/brokenExample/
(I don't have the rep to make both of these a link)
Both examples have "View Source" enabled.
To see the problem use the broken example, select an album and scroll down one row. Scroll back up and the images will be switched. If you try this on the working example it's fine.
This seems to be a widely known bug, but I can't find a solution for it.
UPDATE
I started playing with this example again and found out something else. Turns out you don't have to override the data setter. You can create a new method in the itemRenderer that is set whenever the tile wants to refresh. So the trick is to not rely on the initialize or creationComplete methods.
This is what I have for the itemRenderer in the Application.
<itemRenderers:ImageTile img="{data}"/>
This is the code I have in the itemRenderer.
public function set img(value:String) : void {
trace("setting source: " + value);
this.source = value;
this.name = value.toString().split("/").pop().split(".").shift();
}
I updated my example to reflex this change.
I don't have your app handy, so I can't test end-to-end, but I've looked at your source. You probably need to override the data setter in your itemRenderer:
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<mx:Image xmlns:mx="http://www.adobe.com/2006/mxml" initialize="init()">
<mx:Script>
<![CDATA[
override public function set data(value:Object):void
{
super.data = value;
this.source = data;
this.name = data.toString().split("/").pop().split(".").shift();
}
private function init() : void {
// Removed from your source and transplanted above
}
]]>
</mx:Script>
</mx:Image>
Flex will attempt to re-use item renderers in lists (which means the lifecycle events you might be expecting -- initialize, creationComplete, etc. -- won't always fire), so if you want to be sure your renderer gets updated when the data item changes (as it will when scroll events happen), the best practice is to override the renderer's data property. That'll most likely fix the problem.
Maybe try to invalidate on creationComplete?
From what I recall with DataGrids (which work somewhat similarly to a tilelist), when an item comes into focus its recreated.
<mx:itemRenderer>
<mx:Image id="myImage" creationComplete="myImage.invalidate()" />
</mx:itemRenderer>
Haven't tried this code but I think this is where you want to start looking. I took a look at your itemRenderer component. Try creationComplete instead of initialize to call your function
I have a ToggleButtonBar with a DataProvider setup like this:
<mx:ToggleButtonBar itemClick="clickHandler(event);" selectedIndex="0">
<mx:dataProvider>
<mx:String>{resourceManager.getString('dashboard','daily')}</mx:String>
<mx:String>{resourceManager.getString('dashboard','monthly')}</mx:String>
<mx:String>{resourceManager.getString('dashboard','quarterly')}</mx:String>
<mx:String>{resourceManager.getString('dashboard','yearly')}</mx:String>
</mx:dataProvider>
</mx:ToggleButtonBar>
To switch locale to Chinese, I have a combobox with this handler:
resourceManager.localeChain = "zh_CN";
My problem is that on locale change, while the labels for all the other controls on the screen dynamically reload for the new locale, the dataProvider values don't refresh.
I can manually reset them in code, but is there a cleaner solution?
I would abstract out the data for your data provider into a bindable variable, then just reset the data provider when you change locals.
<mx:Script>
<![CDATA[
[Bindable]
myArray:Array = new Array(
[resourceManager.getString('dashboard','daily')]
, [resourceManager.getString('dashboard','monthly')]
, [{resourceManager.getString('dashboard','quarterly')]
, [resourceManager.getString('dashboard','yearly')]);
]]>
</mx:Script>
<mx:ToggleButtonBar itemClick="clickHandler(event);"
selectedIndex="0" id="myToggleButtonBar" dataprovider="{myArray}" />
Then you can just say
myToggleButtonBar.dataProvider = myArray;
after you swap the locals and it should work.
Disclaimer, there may be some minor errors in my code, I obviously am not able to test it and I don't have flex builder available right now to even check my syntax so I hope I didn't make any spelling mistakes. But this should get you in the ballpark.
Maybe if you make a getter bindable to a custom event for ex: "langChange"
[Bindable("langChange")]
public function get dataProviderToggleB():ArrayCollection
{
var arr :ArrayCollection = new ArrayCollection();
arr.addItem(resourceManager.getString('dashboard','daily'));
arr.addItem(resourceManager.getString('dashboard','monthly'));
return arr;
}
and in your "resourceManager.localeChain" setter you dispatch:
dispatchEvent(new Event("langChange"));
and you can used like this:
<mx:ToggleButtonBar dataProvider="{dataProviderToggleB} itemClick="clickHandler(event);" selectedIndex="0">
I hope this would help you.
You should keep 'daily', ... in your array and use a labelFunction to translate the label.
When the resourceManager sends a change event you should do a combo.labelFunction = labelFunction
The trick is to add brackets around each element in the dataProvider array, that way it gets parsed correctly. Note that this also binds correctly to locale changes in flex, no custom event dispatching is needed.
<mx:ToggleButtonBar itemClick="clickHandler(event);" selectedIndex="0"
dataProvider="{[ (resourceManager.getString('dashboard','daily')),
(resourceManager.getString('dashboard','monthly')),
(resourceManager.getString('dashboard','quarterly')),
(resourceManager.getString('dashboard','yearly')) ]}">
</mx:ToggleButtonBar>