I have tried
<ul id="contact_list">
<li id="phone">Local 604-555-5555</li>
<li id="i18l_phone">Toll-Free 1-800-555-5555</li>
</ul>
with
#contact_list
{
list-style: disc none inside;
}
#contact_list #phone
{
list-style-image: url(images/small_wood_phone.png);
}
#contact_list #i18l_phone
{
list-style-image: url(images/i18l_wood_phone.png);
}
to no avail. Only a disc appears. If I want each individual list item to have it's own bullet, how can I accomplish this with css, without using background images.
Edit : I have discovered that, despite what firebug tells me, the list-style-image rule is being overridden somehow. If I inline the rule, like so:
<li id="phone" style="list-style-image: url(images/small_wood_phone.png);">Local 604-555-5555</li>
then all is well. Since I have no other rules in the test case I'm running that contains ul or li in the selector, I'm not sure why inlining gives a different result.
Try this:
#contact_list li
{
list-style: none;
}
#contact_list li#phone
{
list-style-image: url('images/small_wood_phone.png');
}
#contact_list li#i18l_phone
{
list-style-image: url('images/i18l_wood_phone.png');
}
I'm not sure if this is your problem, but you're using relative links to your images. When you use relative links in css, it is relative to the css file, but if it is inlined, it will be relative to the html page.
First determine whether you are in "quirks" mode or not, because for many CSS properties it makes a difference.
Secondly, the W3c specifies that the URL should be in double quotes (although I don't use the quotes, either). Go with the spec to save yourself trouble down the line.
If you are specifying "strict" in your DOCTYPE, then the browser may require the double quotes, per the standard.
The thing is, I tried your code it it works. The only time it doesn't is if the images are not present. Maybe you need to check to see that the images you specify in the CSS are actually in the folder images or not misspelled.
NOTE: IN both firefox and ie.
I never would have thought. If I quote the url, like so:
#contact_list #phone
{
list-style-image: url("/images/small_wood_phone.png");
}
it starts working. I unquote it, and it stops. I thought that's not supposed to make a difference.
Thanks for your help, everyone.
I would suggest doing it slightly differently, in the CSS - i.e.:
#contact_list
{
list-style: none;
}
#contact_list li {
padding-left: 20px; /* assumes the icons are 16px */
}
#contact_list #phone
{
background: url(images/small_wood_phone.png) no-repeat top left;
}
#contact_list #i18l_phone
{
background: url(images/i18l_wood_phone.png) no-repeat top left;
}
You might double check that those images are where you think they are. This example works fine unless the images are missing.
Could you try adding list-style-type: none; to #contact-list? Perhaps even instead of your list-style: declaration.
It pains me to suggest it, but have you tried the !important flag? Also, does it behave the same in other browsers? What if this is something you have in your Firefox userChrome.css file?
You could try adding !important after the list-style-image property, which would prevent it from being overridden.
#contact_list
{
list-style: disc none inside;
}
#contact_list #phone
{
background-image: url(images/small_wood_phone.png) no-repeat top left;
padding-left: <image width>px;
}
#contact_list #i18l_phone
{
background-image: url(images/i18l_wood_phone.png) no-repeat top left;
padding-left: <image width>px;
}
Related
I'm currently customising a site with Magento. I installed a wow-slider image slider. It works but it seems to have 2 random dots to the left and also a random space before the shadow.
Please see link
ellamatt.mygostore.co.uk
Please see here and let me know if you have an idea. I would give you the code but there are a few CSS and JS pages that go with this.
PS: it works properly in usual HTML but not in Magento.
The two dots are because of the li elements.
Changing the list-style property to none on this css rule will get rid of them:
Old:
.widget-static-block ul {
list-style: disc outside none;
padding-left: 1.5em;
}
New:
.widget-static-block ul {
list-style: none outside none;
padding-left: 1.5em;
}
And, for the shadow, on the same css rule, add a height of zero and displaying it as inline will get the ul block out of the way and remove the space before the shadow.
Final:
.widget-static-block ul {
display: inline;
height: 0;
list-style: none outside none;
padding: 0;
}
In order to make all my links looks like buttons, I've done that in my CSS:
a {
color: #06A;
text-decoration: underline;
margin: 10px 20px;
padding: 10px 20px;
/*background-color: #EEE;*/
border: #BBB solid 1px;
}
They look fine, however, they seem to mix-up, that is they are being positioned as if they had no padding or margins.
Take a look here, if you still don't see my point: http://picasaweb.google.com/lh/photo/1yjC0oyQUbBlo_2D4RqjLZsCgnyUSAKTKup5o2EMfkM?feat=directlink
<a> is by nature and definition an inline element, meaning that it can't be given widths, height, paddings or margins (along with a few other styles).
To change that, simply add display: block; which will turn it into a block level element enabling paddings, margins etc.
If you want something that will stay in the flow but be able to accept these styles, use display: inline-block;. This also applies to other inline elements like <span>.
The easiest solution is to set the line-height correctly (without changing display).
Use "display: block" to make padding and margin have a effect.
Try styling your links with display: inline-block;.
You may want to consider using the float style:
<a style='float:left' href='#' />
...which will let you do all the fun stuff and "help" position your anchors as a bonus.
(If you want things to stop floating, put clear:both )
#snowflake's question-level comment got me thinking.
It might help you to know that there are those who believe that using a list for this sort of content is better than marking up plain anchor tags (after all, this is a list of genres, is it not?).
The code for this would look a bit like this:
HTML:
<ul class="genrelist">
<li>Fantasy</li>
<li>Children's Literature</li>
<li>Speculative Fiction</li>
<li>Absurdist Fiction</li>
<li>Fiction</li>
<li>Word I can't read</li>
</ul>
CSS:
.genrelist {
list-style-type: none;
overflow: hidden;
}
.genrelist li {
/*background-color: #EEE;*/
border: #BBB solid 1px;
display: inline;
float: left;
margin: 10px 20px;
padding: 10px 20px;
}
.genrelist li a {
color: #06A;
text-decoration: underline;
}
The code above would display like this (full-size image):
Something seems to be breaking the display of lists (ul and ol) in IE7. They work fine in IE8, FF, Safari etc but not IE7 and IE6.
I just want them to be displayed normally: ul lists should show bullet points and ol lists should show numbers.
I've narrowed it down to the first 1000 lines of code in styles_layout.css... ;)
Actually, I believe it has something to do with the following styles:
* { margin: 0; }
html, body { height: 100%; }
.wrapper
{
min-height: 100%;
height: auto !important;
height: 100%;
margin: 0 auto -39px;
}
Have a look here: http://www.olvarwood.com.au/olvarwoodonline/mod/forum/discuss.php?d=2, login as a guest
IE7 and below style ul elements like this:
ul {
margin-left: 40px
}
Good browsers style ul elements like this:
ul {
padding-left: 40px
}
It's better explained by Eric Meyer here:
https://developer.mozilla.org/en/Consistent_List_Indentation
and the section "Finding Consistency" will tell you what you do.
This is because the ul/li elements have inherited the zero-margin property.
I solved it myself through trial and error:
* {
margin: 0;
}
This stops Ol's and Ul's from displaying properly in IE7 and IE6. I have no idea why...
I won't even pretend to be an expert on css, I get my butt kicked by it all the time, but I just happened to run into this, although my situation was a bit different.
I ended up having to specify a class tied to ul and set the list-type.
.classname ul { list-style disc inside }
Try that and see if it helps.
Hi I am developing a simple application based upon ASP.NET MVC. I have altered the default master.css to my have my own styles. Now the only problem is that i am adding background-image property to my one of my UL->Li->A to create menus. It is working fine in firefox but the images are not showing up at all in Internet explorer (IE7/8).
Does anyone has clue what is going wrong ?
my CSS is following;
#nav-menu ul
{
list-style: none;
padding: 0;
margin: 0;
color:White;
}
#nav-menu li
{
/*float: left;*/
margin: 0.15em 0.15em;
display:block;
}
#nav-menu li a
{
background-image: url('/Images/leftbarlightblue.jpg');
background-repeat:no-repeat;
background-position:bottom;
height: 2em;
line-height: 2em;
width: 12em;
display: block;
text-decoration: none;
text-align: center;
color: white;
}
#nav-menu li a:hover
{
background-image: url('./Images/leftbardarkblue.jpg');
background-repeat:no-repeat;
background-position:bottom;
height: 2em;
line-height: 2em;
width: 12em;
display: block;
color: white;
text-decoration: none;
text-align: center;
}
#nav-menu
{
width:15em
}
while XHTML is
<div id="menucontainer">
<div id="nav-menu">
<ul>
<li><%= Html.ActionLink("Home", "Index", "Home")%></li>
<li><%= Html.ActionLink("About Us", "About", "Home")%></li>
</ul>
</div>
</div>
Yes i tried with ./Images/... but it still not worked.
Following is my hierarchy of folders
Solution -> Content
Site.css
Images
logo.jpg
leftbarlightblue.jpg
->Controllers
-> Models
->Views
Home
Shared
Site.Master
your stylesheet needs to use the literal path as follows:
background-image: url('/Content/Images/leftbarlightblue.jpg');
and not
background-image: url('/Images/leftbarlightblue.jpg');
If your working with CSS a lot I really recommend getting FireFox and FireBug, it will enable you to look at your stylesheets on the fly and see exactly why certain things aren't working.
Next have you double checked that the URL is correct for the image? A quick way of checking is to get the absolute URL (browse to it in the browser to be sure, it should be something similar to http://myapp/content/images/leftbarlightblue.jpg) and place that in your code instead of your old image URL. If that loads then it is probably your relative paths are wrong (the ../ part), because I don't know your folder structure I cannot help you with what it should be.
On a seperate note background-position should have the horizontal position followed by the veritcal position.
background-position: left bottom;
I guess the display depends on the url.
Where is your master.css located?
Have you tried url('Images/leftbarlightblue.jpg') instead?
I Got the issue, the images were created using CMYK. So FF was showing them using approximate colors while Internet explorer was totally ignoring them. Changing the format solve the issue. Thanks for your help guys.
Add the XHTMLfor #nav-menu, also if you have a live link of this problem post that as well
Try starting the image paths without all the extra dot's and slashes. For example:
/images/image.jpg
Instead of
../../images/image.jpg
I'm still not sure how the files are stored on your actual webserver so you may need to add a directory or two but usually it is not wise to use dot's to tell the server how many levels up to go in the directory tree (plus a lot of people forget that you need to specify where the image is as seen from the CSS file's location not necessarily the HTML/ASP file's location)
I have a CSS rule like this:
a:hover { background-color: #fff; }
But this results in a bad-looking gap at the bottom on image links, and what's even worse, if I have transparent images, the link's background color can be seen through the image.
I have stumbled upon this problem many times before, but I always solved it using the quick-and-dirty approach of assigning a class to image links:
a.imagelink:hover { background-color: transparent; }
Today I was looking for a more elegant solution to this problem when I stumbled upon this.
Basically what it suggests is using display: block, and this really solves the problem for non-transparent images. However, it results in another problem: now the link is as wide as the paragraph, although the image is not.
Is there a nice way to solve this problem, or do I have to use the dirty approach again?
Thanks,
I tried to find some selector that would get only <a> elements that don't have <img> descendants, but couldn't find any...
About images with that bottom gap, you could do the following:
a img{vertical-align:text-bottom;}
This should get rid of the background showing up behind the image, but may throw off the layout (by not much, though), so be careful.
For the transparent images, you should use a class.
I really hope that's solved in CSS3, by implementing a parent selector.
I'm confused at what you are terming "image links"... is that an 'img' tag inside of an anchor? Or are you setting the image in CSS?
If you're setting the image in CSS, then there is no problem here (since you're already able to target it)... so I must assume you mean:
<a ...><img src="..." /></a>
To which, I would suggest that you specify a background color on the image... So, assuming the container it's in should be white...
a:hover { background: SomeColor }
a:hover img { background-color: #fff; }
I usually do something like this to remove the gap under images:
img {
display: block;
float: left;
}
Of course this is not always the ideal solution but it's fine in most situations.
This way works way better.
a[href$=jpg], a[href$=jpeg], a[href$=jpe], a[href$=png], a[href$=gif] {
text-decoration: none;
border: 0 none;
background-color: transparent;
}
No cumbersome classes that have to be applied to each image. Detailed description here:
http://perishablepress.com/press/2008/10/14/css-remove-link-underlines-borders-linked-images/
Untested idea:
a:hover {background-color: #fff;}
img:hover { background-color: transparent;}
The following should work (untested):
First you
a:hover { background-color: #fff; }
Then you
a:imagelink:hover { background-color: inherit; }
The second rule will override the first for <a class="imagelink" etc.> and preserve the background color of the parent.
I tried to do this without the class="", but I can't find a CSS selector that is the opposite of foo > bar, which styles a bar when it is the child of a foo. You would want to style the foo when it has a child of class bar. You can do that and even fancier things with jQuery, but that may not be desirable as a general technique.
you could use display: inline-block but that's not completely crossbrowser. IE6 and lower will have a problem with it.
I assume you have whitespaces between <a> and <img>? try removing that like this:
<a><img /></a>
I had this problem today, and used another solution than display: block thanks to the link by asker. This means I am able to retain the link ONLY on the image and not expand it to its container.
Images are inline, so they have space below them for lower part of letters like "y, j, g". This positions the images at baseline, but you can alter it if you have no <a>TEXT HERE</a> like with a logo. However you still need to mask the text line space and its easy if you use a plain color as background (eg in body or div#wrapper).
body {
background-color: #112233;
}
a:hover {
background-color: red;
}
a img {
border-style: none; /* not need for this solution, but removes borders around images which have a link */
vertical-align: bottom; /* here */
}
a:hover img {
background-color: #112233; /* MUST match the container background, or you arent masking the hover effect */
}
I had the same problem. In my case I am using the image as background. I did the following and it resolved my problem:
background-image: url(file:"use the same background image or color");