I've got a stylesheet that will not, for whatever reason, apply list-style-type to a UL element. I'm using YUI's Grid CSS with their reset-fonts-grid.css file, which I know strips that out as part of the CSS reset.
After calling YUI, I call the stylesheet for the website and in there have a block for UL:
ul {list-style-type: disc;}
I've also tried setting it via list-style but get the same result. I know that the above CSS block is getting read as if I add things like padding or margins those do get applied. The style-type isn't showing up in either Firefox or IE.
The only other CSS I've applied to UL's are in a #nav div but that CSS doesn't touch the list-style-type, it uses the reset that YUI provided, and YUI and the site style sheet are the only two CSS sheets that are called.
I've also got FCKEditor on the admin side of the site and that editor does show the bullet styles so I know it has to be something with the CSS that isn't being filtered by FCKEditor.
You need to include the following in your css:
li { display: list-item; }
This triggers Firefox to show the disc.
and you can also give a left-margin if the reset.css you are using make all margin null :
that means :
li {
list-style: disc outside none;
display: list-item;
margin-left: 1em;
}
Assuming you apply this css after the reset, it should work !
Matthieu Ricaud
If I'm not mistaken, you should be applying this rule to the li, not the ul.
ul li {list-style-type: disc;}
I had this problem and it turned out I didn't have any padding on the ul, which was stopping the discs from being visible.
Margin messes with this too
This problem was caused by the li display attribute being set to block in a parent class. Overriding with list-item solved the problem.
Make sure the 'li' doesn't have overflow: hidden applied.
My reset.css was margin: 0, padding: 0. After several hours of looking and troubleshooting this worked:
li {
list-style: disc outside none;
margin-left: 1em;
}
ul {
margin: 1em;
}
I had this problem and it turned out I didn't have any padding-left on the ul, which was stopping the discs from being visible. The default padding-left for ul elements is 40px.
The and elements have a top and bottom margin of 16px (1em) and a padding-left of 40px (2.5em).
(Ref: https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Learn/CSS/Styling_text/Styling_lists)
All I can think of is that something is over-riding this afterwards.
You are including the reset styles first, right?
Have you tried following the rule with !important?
Which stylesheet does FireBug show having last control over the element?
Is this live somewhere to be viewed by others?
Update
I'm fairly confident that providing code-examples would help you receive a solution must faster. If you can upload an example of this issue somewhere, or provide the markup so we can test it on our localhosts, you'll have a better chance of getting some valuable input.
The problem with questions is that they lead others to believe the person asking the question has sufficient knowledge to ask the question. In programming that isn't always the case. There may have been something you missed, or accidentally jipped. Without others having eyes on your code, they have to assume you missed nothing, and overlooked nothing.
In IE I just use a class "normal_ol" for styling an ol list and made some modifications shown below:
previous code:
ol.normal_ol { float:left; padding:0 0 0 25px; margin:0; width:500px;}
ol.normal_ol li{ font:normal 13px/20px Arial; color:#4D4E53; float:left; width:100%;}
modified code:
ol.normal_ol { float:left; padding:0 0 0 25px; margin:0;}
ol.normal_ol li{ font:normal 13px/20px Arial; color:#4D4E53; }
Turns out that YUI's reset CSS strips the list style from 'ul li' instead of just 'ul', which is why setting it just in 'ul' never worked.
Make sure you have no display property set in the li tag in my case I had a display: flex property on my li tag for some reason.
please use inline css
<li style="disply:list-item">my li content </li>
All you have to do is add this class to your css.
.ul-no-style { list-style: none; padding: 0; margin: 0; }
Including the padding and margin set at 0.
Some reset.css set the ::marker to content : "", try to unset that on the <li> element:
li::marker {
content : unset;
}
Related
I am making a navbar for a website made via GatsbyJS. I am attempting to style the links in the navbar such that they do not have an underline.
I have already set the link to not have any text decoration--when I inspect the element in my browser, it even shows the "text-decoration: none" property. I have also confirmed that my CSS is influencing the object--I can change the color of the text, for example, it is only the text-decoration which I cannot influence.
CSS:
.nav {
background: #fd8;
}
.nav ul {
text-align: center;
border: 1px solid #000;
}
.nav ul li {
display: inline-block;
padding: 8px 10px;
margin: 0;
}
.nav ul li a {
color: #221;
text-decoration: none;
}
html + js:
...
import { Link } from "gatsby"
import styles from "./navbar.module.css"
...
<nav className={styles.nav}>
<ul>
<li>
<Link style={{ textDecoration: 'none' }} to="/about">
About
</Link>
</li>
EDIT: the inline styling with textDecoration was a product of some fiddling I was doing prior to posting this question and was not present until recently. Removing it has no effect on the issue.
Rendered HTML by request:
<nav class="navbar-module--nav--25Dcz">
<ul>
<li>
About
</li>
...
</ul>
</nav>
I have discovered that the errant underline was actually a 1px box-shadow, probably from some global style I can't find associated with the Gatsby Typography plugin.
When you say .nav you want to select a class by that. And as I see, in your html,
nav (<nav...) is a tag with a class navbar-module--nav--25Dcz
So if you change your CSS to:
(Remove the period character . from .nav)
nav {...}
nav ul {...}
nav ul li {...}
nav ul li a {...}
It should work fine.
Also, take a look at Styled Components: https://www.styled-components.com/ which let you write CSS in JS and use similar features from preprocessors like Less and SASS.
Hope this helps!
Your issue is that you're using a class selector (.nav) when you should be using a tag name selector instead. Changing to nav ul li a{text-decoration:none} should fix your issue. If that doesn't work, then you probably have some CSS with higher precedence somewhere that is overriding it.
So for those still searching for an answer. It's really a BUG. At least with <ul>, <li> tags and their nesting. There's just one bypass, and even that has a bit of a limitation. So here's a sample with a fixed (removed) underline and it contains notes also on what to add, what to avoid.
https://stackblitz.com/edit/keep-remove-underline-from-nested-li-item?file=index.html [working text decoration removal]
the solution is:
need to use inline-block for <ul>, set vertical top align and 100% width
avoid to use white-space nowrap
I tried everything to remove it, then after reading this I remembered that I added what in the link https://www.gatsbyjs.org/docs/typography-js/
Icones was underlined, anything that will be was underlined
nothing worked until I removed that.
I can't explain why, but when I referenced a class that was LESS specific I was able to get the text decoration to go away with text-decoration none. So if you have a less specific wrapper class try targeting the links with that
.wrapper a {
text-decoration:none;
}
You can select the global a tag or be specific, and after text decoration, add !important. That will override any default styling that gatsby is imposing.
.nav ul li a {
color: #221;
text-decoration: none !important;
}
Morning Guys,
I have a CSS issue that's driving me up the wall. I have an unordered list with custom bullet images:
.mainTable ul {
list-style-position: inside;
list-style-image: url(../img/bullet_white.png);
line-height: 18px;
color: #335;
}
Now some of these list items contain links and some do not. For the ones that do, I'd like the bullet to change on rollover. Not too tricky you'd think... Here's how I marked it up:
.mainTable ul li a:link {
padding-left:0px; // using padding as a test
}
.mainTable ul li a:hover {
list-style-image: url(../img/bullet_red.png);
padding-left:2px; // padding changes (moves link text), but bullet's still white
}
Now I've sussed (as the padding changes) that the styling is being applied to the inner link, and not the "li" container. I tried testing:
.mainTable ul li:hover
and the image changes, but it changes for all "li" tags in scope (because that's what I've told it to do), but that's not what I'm after. There must be a simple way of doing this without resorting to js but I'll be buggered if I can figure it out.
Any suggestions? All help (even if it's just "You need to use js you nugget") gratefully appreciated :)
Danny
GOT IT SORTED! (can't answer my own question yet - for some reason...)
Thanks for the heads up guys. The answer is a mixture of the above suggestions. Moving the bullets from the li tags and on to the anchors worked a treat, but the list items without the link got no bullet...DOH!
I then set up another class, "notALink", and stuck my default list styling on it. Here's the Markup if anyone's interested...
.mainTable ul { /* kill formatting on the ul */
list-style-position: inside;
line-height: 18px;
color: #335;
list-style-type: none;
}
.mainTable ul li a:link { /* link becomes the list, essentially */
list-style-image: url(../img/bullet_white.png);
list-style-position: inside;
display: list-item;
}
.notALink { /* looks like link above, just ain't a link */
list-style-image: url(../img/bullet_white.png);
list-style-position: inside;
display: list-item;
}
.mainTable ul li a:hover { /* changes the bullet image on rollover - nugget! :) */
list-style-image: url(../img/bullet_red.png);
}
Works fine - Cheers peeps, you've dug me out of a little hole I was digging myself
Danny
No, there is no way to change parent on child hover in pure CSS (2 or 3). See: Is there a CSS parent selector?
So you have two options:
Use JavaScript
or
Leave list style as empty and add bullets to childs (a or something else). That way, you will change style of a, not li.
This is what I would do;]
or (from Yi Jiang comment)
Add extra class to li elements containing a
What you can do is style the a as display: block and move it to the left (using negative margin) to cover the li:s bullet. Check this fiddle:
http://jsfiddle.net/TG5Lj/
You may need to set a background-color to the a as well if your a:s background-image doesn't completely cover the li:s.
Try applying styling to
.mainTable ul li:hover li
or something like that. It should override the rule for the parents.
EDIT: Sorry, I didn't fully understand your question. It seems to me that it's impossible to do with css as you would have to apply styling to "a li that has no 'a' descendants", which I don't think can be expressed in css selectors. As a walkaround in order not to use scripts I suggest that you change the background of the link and not the bullet image.
I am using yui reset:
<link rel="stylesheet" href="http://yui.yahooapis.com/2.8.0r4/build/reset/reset-min.css"/>
and I'm having a hard time getting my ordered lists to show with decimal.
So far I'm using this, but it still seems to be overwritten to be blank?
ol, ol li{
list-style-type: decimal;
list-style-position: outside;
}
You can un-reset these styles. See: http://noscope.com/vanilla-css
What I prefer to do it have a wrapping class for my un-reset items. This way the reset remains universal everywhere else.
/* un-reset bullets */
.bullets ul {
margin:0 1.5em 1.5em 1.5em;
}
.bullets ul li {
list-style-type:disc;
}
You can use specificity to override the reset styles by using a class or id in front of your selector.
Using your developer console in Chrome or FF should be really useful in figuring out how to overwrite or determine the cause.
If you could provide a URL I would be happy to take a look.
GL!
My custom drop down menu has a really large change in top and bottom padding.
UPDATE Javascript, CSS & HTML included in fiddle [PHP removed]
First off, I didn't realise I could share a fiddle ^^
Pretty epic site.
I'ma keep debugging, but thought I'd post it here to see if anyone can spot where the problem is :)
In your fieldset css you are changing the line-height, which is also applied to the dropdown.
You have to set the line-height in the css for the dropdown:
.dropdown,
.dropdown li /* or whatever other selector is also needed */
{
line-height: 1em;
}
EDIT:
That seems to fit quite good:
.dropdown,
.dropdown li,
.dropdown span,
.dropdown a {
padding: 0;
line-height: 3em;
}
I'm trying to tweak code that rendered by Glimmer which probably marks my CSS mastery kinda low....
I have HTML like:
<ul id="main_navigation">
<li id="trigger0"><a /Topics">Webinar Topics</a>
<ul class="subNavMenuItems" id="subNav0">
<li>Intro</li>
<li>Computer Skills</li>[and so on]
In my css i have:
#main_navigation ul{
margin: 0;
padding: 0;
float: left;
width: 20%;
font-size:13px;
font: bold;
font-variant: small-caps;
}
the width rule is observed - but none of the others are. The file containing these rules are the last file imported so these rules should override any others (though 'main_navigation' is the only matching element _anyway so cascading stuff shouldn't matter.
You probably want
font-weight: bold;
Try this:
#main_navigation li {
...
}
I don't have an exact solution for you, but I'm certain that things will become easy if you use firefox and install firebug. Firebug has a mode that shows all of the style sheet info that could affect an element. It also shows how different rules interact while allowing you to try changing things without reloading.
Also, missing a double quote in <a /Topics"> and the href attribute.
#main_navigation ul should match, from the HTML code shown, your ul with the ID subNav0. Do you have any CSS styling .subNavMenuItems or #subNav0, or perhaps ul li ul, which would also get to the same thing as #main_navigation ul? If you do have any such CSS, it is potentially mucking with the CSS shown. To be absolutely specific, you could style ul#main_navigation li#trigger0 ul#subNav0.
Ben has a good suggestion with trying the Firebug addon for Firefox.
This HTML is invalid: <a /Topics">Webinar Topics</a>. You want Webinar Topics most likely.
What element are you trying to style?
#main_navigation ul {
/* css here */
}
Surely styles a ul that's a direct descendant of #main_navigation, whereas you're trying to style (I think) either the outer-menu which is #main_navigation or the inner ul which is #main_navigation li ul ...unless I'm reading this badly?