I am presently running several websites and a mail server from my home network. I have a business DSL account with 8 public IP addresses (1 by itself, and 7 in a block). To handle routing/firewall/gateway, I am presently using RRAS, DNS, & DHCP from Windows 2003 running on a ancient (circa 2001) PC -- which I suspect is going to fail any time now.
What I would like to do is replace that with a simple router. Have a consumer model LinkSys Wifi-router, which I'm presently just using as an access point (don't have the model number handy, but it's one of their standard models). It seems to be able to handle all the NAT/firewall/DHCP tasks -- except for handling routing the multiple public addresses. (e.g., I need x.x.x.123, port 21 getting to one machine, but port 80 of x.x.x.123 & x.x.x.124 to going to another, and x.x.x.123, port 5000 to still another etc).
So my questions are:
Can this be done with standard Linksys router, which they just don't explain in the consumer manual?
Can this be done ... if I replace the firmware with a community/OS version (and if so, which one?)
If neither of the above, can someone recommend a profession router (preferably with wifi) that does do this, which is close to a consumer level price point.
Alternately, is there a reliable OS/3rd party replacement to RRAS which handles this (since RRAS is the part causing the most trouble)
Alternate-Alternately, can someone point to a VERY simple HOWTO to doing this (ie. follow these steps and forget about it), to installing a LINUX system to do this) (since I assume I can run Linux longer on the old machine)?
This can't be done on a Linksys router with stock firmware. It can be done if you load a third-party firmware, but there's no GUI (afaik) to accomplish it, so you'll be hacking system shell scripts which is pretty hairy. I would recommend getting a low-power or older PC and installing PFSense.
PFSense is an open-source router appliance OS distribution with a very easy to use web front end.
Install DD-wrt On your linksys box. I believe this will have everything you need link text
Related
I'm currently looking at options to allow me to build a remote COM-port solution.
The idea is to be able to access from my remote PC, another PC that's directly connected to a device locally via its serial COM-port.
I know that the obivous answer is to use a VPN between the 2 Internet connected PCs.
However, I need this solution to be as seamless to the end-user as possible.
i.e. no installing and configuring VPN software, etc.
So I was thinking that WebRTC would be great because the end-user can simply use their web-browser and not have to install any additional software.
My question is, is it possible to stream the COM port data between the 2 PCs via WebRTC?
If so, can you please point me in the right direction as to how I can go about achieving this?
Sorry if this is a ridiculous question, I'm very new to WebRTC, just exploring my options.
Thanks.
That should work great!
Networking wise you get NAT Traversal. That means the two computers can be in completely different networks, and still communicate. You may have to run a TURN server if P2P isn't possible.
Data wise you can exchange anything you want via data channels. It is datagram based and you can send/receive binary data. You get a callback telling you how much has been delivered, that way you can detect backpressure.
Are you ok with installing software on the remote host? You can do something like Pion WebRTC's data-channels. This shows you can have a browser connect to a Go process via WebRTC. Then use tarm/serial on the remote host to interact with the device.
If you want a browser on both ends there is the Web Serial API I haven't used it myself though. That locks you into only doing Chromium which might be an issue.
I've been asked to implement VPN capabilities in an existing software project on an embedded system, in order to make the device available via network to an external server while avoiding trouble with firewalls (no need for encryption, just to make it accessible).
Unfortunately, the embedded system is based on a Cortex-M4 MCU, therefore Linux, which would allow for VPN nearly out of the box, is not an option. All I've got is an RTOS and a working LwIP stack.
I've used VPNs in the past. However, my network knowledge is rather limited concerning implementing VPNs, so I'm rather stumped. As I think, I'd use the current LwIP instance for building up the tunnel connection, and the application would use a second instance for the actual network communication, while the network interface of the second instance is a virtual one (like a tap device on linux), encapsulating its low level data and tranceiving it via the tunnel connection of the first LwIP instance.
Maybe this way I'd be able to create a custom solution for the problem, but the solution should conform to any standards (as the server will be any kind of sophisticated system).
So I wonder if anyone has been confronted with a task like this, and would appreciate any hint what to do, at least a direction where to look at.
Thanks in advance!
Having simulated a router, it's important that it should be able to generate an ARP Request and respond to the same. I do not understand how to begin implementing the same?
Are there an API's that exist in C that generate ARP Request.
Suppose I have a route lookup in my simulated router and I find out that, the route exists but there is no static ARP entry, the process should be able to generate an ARP Request.
Do I need a tap interface for this sort of functionality?
I believe to answer your question, knowledge of the environment is needed. What OS is your simulator running in? Unix, Linux, Windows, OS X? And you are developing router software for which hardware (or chipset or embedded software, real-time operating system?)
If you are simulating your hardware router software in an OS like windows, there are utilities and commands that you can have your sandboxed simulator environment issue that can be intercepted by your simulated router.
Bottom line, a little more knowledge of the environment of your simulator might help! Good luck :)
So, I recently installed synergy because I was tired of using two mice and keyboards. Problem is, set up is not working. First, the setup.
Server:
Desktop
Windows 7 64 - on our home network, part of Workgroup: WORKGROUP
Client:
work issued laptop
Windows XP SP2 32 - on home network, part of workd Domain: DOMAIN
Server is set up, all the computer names are correct. I'm a bit of a noob at networking things, and I don't want to mess up the configuration of my work laptop again (I already switched the domain to my workgroup, BAD). So, any suggestions that aren't too crazy please, since it's a company laptop.
I've tried putting in the ip on the client as well, firewall is allowing on the port in use, just can't get it to work. I think I'm SOL with the Workgroup/Domain difference though...
From what I remember, Synergy doesn't care about the workgroup and/or domain, it just needs to be able to communicate with the server/client IPs. Did you try to manually insert IPs of client/server?
In a very similar situation I discovered that when trying to ping my non-domain desktop with its workgroup name the dns resolver was appending the work domain to the desktops name. So when I tried synergy with an IP address I successfully connected the two computers.
The only caveat I can offer is maybe you needed to add the application to the windows firewall exception list for both machines. I would assume the port setting was the same between the two computers (default is 24800) in which case you should only use the IP address because the application knows to access 24800 via that setting in the advanced configuration.
You can add the program to the whitelist or specifically the port if you prefer via the Windows Firewall. On a side note - I am also using an older version of synergy (1.3.1) and not the latest as of this answer (1.4.2 Beta) which did not work for me, but I will assume it's because my server was running 1.3.1.
I chose not to update all 6 machines and their respective horrific configuration constructs that synergy loves to enforce upon us. [caution... rant: x is left of y and y is right of x... really? are you sure about that Einstein? Synergy could at least INFER that bit of logic instead of REQUIRING it!]
Hope that helps.
i want to read MAC address of machine from Adobe AIR. I am using flex 3 and AIR 2.
how can i do this
the main purpose is i want to install that product in only one machine
var ni:NetworkInfo = NetworkInfo.networkInfo;
var interfaceVector:Vector.<NetworkInterface> = ni.findInterfaces();
Taken from the Network Info sample in the desktop version of Tour de Flex.
As far as I can tell, you cannot do it with Flex/AIR alone - you can however use the NativeProcess API to communicate with a Java/C program that can do this for you.
If you want to limit your application to just one machine, why don't you just install it manually without giving away the setup file - is it a remote machine? Even in that case you should be able to do a remote installation, right?
The answer "track the combination of IP address and user ID" won't satisfy my (very similar) needs. If the (laptop) computer is moved across WiFi domains, its IP address will change. If the computer is on a commerical IP provider, the IP address can often change without warning or notice.
My users don't want to deal with such problems. They don't even want to know that these problems exist!
The binding of MAC address and user ID can be done at installation time. It's not perfect, but it's pretty good.
Of course what we need is an implementation of public-private key...
Oz