I want to create a column (in R) that indexes the presence of a number in another column grouped by a user_id column. And when the other column is NA, the new desired column should not increase.
The example should bring clarity.
I have this df:
data <- data.frame(user_id = c(1, 1, 1, 2, 2, 2, 2, 3, 3, 3, 3),
one=c(1,NA,3,2,NA,0,NA,4,3,4,NA))
user_id tobeindexed
1 1 1
2 1 NA
3 1 3
4 2 2
5 2 NA
6 2 0
7 2 NA
8 3 4
9 3 3
10 3 4
11 3 NA
I want to make a new column looking like "desired" in the following df:
> cbind(data,data.frame(desired = c(1,1,2,1,1,2,2,1,2,3,3)))
user_id tobeindexed desired
1 1 1 1
2 1 NA 1
3 1 3 2
4 2 2 1
5 2 NA 1
6 2 0 2
7 2 NA 2
8 3 4 1
9 3 3 2
10 3 4 3
11 3 NA 3
How can I solve this?
Using colsum and group_by gets me close, but the count does not start over from 1 when the user_id changes...
> data %>% group_by(user_id) %>% mutate(desired = cumsum(!is.na(tobeindexed)))
user_id tobeindexed desired
<dbl> <dbl> <int>
1 1 1 1
2 1 NA 1
3 1 3 2
4 2 2 3
5 2 NA 3
6 2 0 4
7 2 NA 4
8 3 4 5
9 3 3 6
10 3 4 7
11 3 NA 7
Given the sample data you provided (with the one) column, this works unchanged. The code is retained below for demonstration.
base R
data$out <- ave(data$one, data$user_id, FUN = function(z) cumsum(!is.na(z)))
data
# user_id one out
# 1 1 1 1
# 2 1 NA 1
# 3 1 3 2
# 4 2 2 1
# 5 2 NA 1
# 6 2 0 2
# 7 2 NA 2
# 8 3 4 1
# 9 3 3 2
# 10 3 4 3
# 11 3 NA 3
dplyr
library(dplyr)
data %>%
group_by(user_id) %>%
mutate(out = cumsum(!is.na(one))) %>%
ungroup()
# # A tibble: 11 × 3
# user_id one out
# <dbl> <dbl> <int>
# 1 1 1 1
# 2 1 NA 1
# 3 1 3 2
# 4 2 2 1
# 5 2 NA 1
# 6 2 0 2
# 7 2 NA 2
# 8 3 4 1
# 9 3 3 2
# 10 3 4 3
# 11 3 NA 3
Related
I need to shift valid values to the top the of dataframe withing each id. Here is an example dataset:
df <- data.frame(id = c(1,1,1,2,2,2,3,3,3,3),
itemid = c(1,2,3,1,2,3,1,2,3,4),
values = c(1,NA,0,NA,NA,0,1,NA,0,NA))
df
id itemid values
1 1 1 1
2 1 2 NA
3 1 3 0
4 2 1 NA
5 2 2 NA
6 2 3 0
7 3 1 1
8 3 2 NA
9 3 3 0
10 3 4 NA
excluding the id column, when there is a missing value in values column, I want to shift all values aligned to the top for each id.
How can I get this desired dataset below?
df1
id itemid values
1 1 1 1
2 1 2 0
3 1 3 NA
4 2 1 0
5 2 2 NA
6 2 3 NA
7 3 1 1
8 3 2 0
9 3 3 NA
10 3 4 NA
Using tidyverse you can arrange by whether values is missing or not (which will put those at the bottom).
library(tidyverse)
df %>%
arrange(id, is.na(values))
Output
id itemid values
<dbl> <dbl> <dbl>
1 1 1 1
2 1 3 0
3 1 2 NA
4 2 3 0
5 2 1 NA
6 2 2 NA
7 3 1 1
8 3 3 0
9 3 2 NA
10 3 4 NA
Or, if you wish to retain the same order for itemid and other columns, you can use mutate to specifically order columns of interest (like values). Other answers provide good solutions, such as #Santiago and #ThomasIsCoding. If you have multiple columns of interest to move NA to the bottom per group, you can also try:
df %>%
group_by(id) %>%
mutate(across(.cols = values, ~values[order(is.na(.))]))
where the .cols argument would contain the columns to transform and reorder independently.
Output
id itemid values
<dbl> <dbl> <dbl>
1 1 1 1
2 1 2 0
3 1 3 NA
4 2 1 0
5 2 2 NA
6 2 3 NA
7 3 1 1
8 3 2 0
9 3 3 NA
10 3 4 NA
We can try ave + order
> transform(df, values = ave(values, id, FUN = function(x) x[order(is.na(x))]))
id itemid values
1 1 1 1
2 1 2 0
3 1 3 NA
4 2 1 0
5 2 2 NA
6 2 3 NA
7 3 1 1
8 3 2 0
9 3 3 NA
10 3 4 NA
With data.table:
library(data.table)
setDT(df)[, values := values[order(is.na(values))], id][]
#> id itemid values
#> 1: 1 1 1
#> 2: 1 2 0
#> 3: 1 3 NA
#> 4: 2 1 0
#> 5: 2 2 NA
#> 6: 2 3 NA
#> 7: 3 1 1
#> 8: 3 2 0
#> 9: 3 3 NA
#> 10: 3 4 NA
I'd define a function that does what you want and then group by id:
completed_first <- function(x) {
completed <- x[!is.na(x)]
length(completed) <- length(x)
completed
}
library(dplyr)
df %>%
group_by(id) %>%
mutate(
values = completed_first(values)
) %>%
ungroup()
# # A tibble: 10 × 3
# id itemid values
# <dbl> <dbl> <dbl>
# 1 1 1 1
# 2 1 2 0
# 3 1 3 NA
# 4 2 1 0
# 5 2 2 NA
# 6 2 3 NA
# 7 3 1 1
# 8 3 2 0
# 9 3 3 NA
# 10 3 4 NA
(This method preserves the order of itemid.)
Or building upon ThomasIsCoding's answer:
library(dplyr)
df %>%
group_by(id) %>%
mutate(
values = values[order(is.na(values))]
) %>%
ungroup()
# # A tibble: 10 × 3
# id itemid values
# <dbl> <dbl> <dbl>
# 1 1 1 1
# 2 1 2 0
# 3 1 3 NA
# 4 2 1 0
# 5 2 2 NA
# 6 2 3 NA
# 7 3 1 1
# 8 3 2 0
# 9 3 3 NA
# 10 3 4 NA
I have a dataframe like this.
data <- data.frame(Condition = c(1,1,2,3,1,1,2,2,2,3,1,1,2,3,3))
I want to populate a new variable Sequence which identifies whenever Condition starts again from 1.
So the new dataframe would look like this.
Thanks in advance for the help!
data <- data.frame(Condition = c(1,1,2,3,1,1,2,2,2,3,1,1,2,3,3),
Sequence = c(1,1,1,1,2,2,2,2,2,2,3,3,3,3,3))
base R
data$Sequence2 <- cumsum(c(TRUE, data$Condition[-1] == 1 & data$Condition[-nrow(data)] != 1))
data
# Condition Sequence Sequence2
# 1 1 1 1
# 2 1 1 1
# 3 2 1 1
# 4 3 1 1
# 5 1 2 2
# 6 1 2 2
# 7 2 2 2
# 8 2 2 2
# 9 2 2 2
# 10 3 2 2
# 11 1 3 3
# 12 1 3 3
# 13 2 3 3
# 14 3 3 3
# 15 3 3 3
dplyr
library(dplyr)
data %>%
mutate(
Sequence2 = cumsum(Condition == 1 & lag(Condition != 1, default = TRUE))
)
# Condition Sequence Sequence2
# 1 1 1 1
# 2 1 1 1
# 3 2 1 1
# 4 3 1 1
# 5 1 2 2
# 6 1 2 2
# 7 2 2 2
# 8 2 2 2
# 9 2 2 2
# 10 3 2 2
# 11 1 3 3
# 12 1 3 3
# 13 2 3 3
# 14 3 3 3
# 15 3 3 3
This took a while. Finally I find this solution:
library(dplyr)
data %>%
group_by(Sequnce = cumsum(
ifelse(Condition==1, lead(Condition)+1, Condition)
- Condition==1)
)
Condition Sequnce
<dbl> <int>
1 1 1
2 1 1
3 2 1
4 3 1
5 1 2
6 1 2
7 2 2
8 2 2
9 2 2
10 3 2
11 1 3
12 1 3
13 2 3
14 3 3
15 3 3
i got this df:
df <- data.frame(month = c(1,1,1,1,1,2,2,2,2,2,3,3,3,3,3,4,4,4,4,4),
day = c(1,2,3,4,5,1,2,3,4,5,1,2,3,4,5,1,2,3,4,5),
flow = c(2,5,7,8,5,4,6,7,9,2,NA,1,6,10,2,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA))
and i want to reach this result:
month day flow dayofminflow
1 1 1 2 1
2 1 2 5 1
3 1 3 7 1
4 1 4 8 1
5 1 5 5 1
6 2 1 4 5
7 2 2 6 5
8 2 3 7 5
9 2 4 9 5
10 2 5 2 5
11 3 1 NA 2
12 3 2 1 2
13 3 3 6 2
14 3 4 10 2
15 3 5 2 2
16 4 1 NA NA
17 4 2 NA NA
18 4 3 NA NA
19 4 4 NA NA
20 4 5 NA NA
I was using this solution, but it returns NA when the first value is NA:
newdf <- df %>% group_by(month) %>% mutate(Val=day[flow==min(flow)][1])
And this solution returns an error when all data is NA:
library(dplyr)
df <- df %>%
group_by(month) %>%
mutate(dayminflowofthemonth = day[which.min(flow)]) %>%
ungroup
You would just change the default na.rm = TRUE in min() from the first solution to ignore NAs?
df %>%
group_by(month) %>%
mutate(dayofminflow = day[which(min(flow, na.rm = TRUE) == flow)][1])
# A tibble: 20 x 4
# Groups: month [4]
month day flow dayofminflow
<dbl> <dbl> <dbl> <dbl>
1 1 1 2 1
2 1 2 5 1
3 1 3 7 1
4 1 4 8 1
5 1 5 5 1
6 2 1 4 5
7 2 2 6 5
8 2 3 7 5
9 2 4 9 5
10 2 5 2 5
11 3 1 NA 2
12 3 2 1 2
13 3 3 6 2
14 3 4 10 2
15 3 5 2 2
16 4 1 NA NA
17 4 2 NA NA
18 4 3 NA NA
19 4 4 NA NA
20 4 5 NA NA
Though you get a warning no non-missing arguments to min; returning Inf from month 4 since all flow values are NA.
i need some help:
i got this df:
df <- data.frame(month = c(1,1,1,1,1,2,2,2,2,2),
day = c(1,2,3,4,5,1,2,3,4,5),
flow = c(2,5,7,8,5,4,6,7,9,2))
month day flow
1 1 1 2
2 1 2 5
3 1 3 7
4 1 4 8
5 1 5 5
6 2 1 4
7 2 2 6
8 2 3 7
9 2 4 9
10 2 5 2
but i want to know the day of min per month:
month day flow dayminflowofthemonth
1 1 1 2 1
2 1 2 5 1
3 1 3 7 1
4 1 4 8 1
5 1 5 5 1
6 2 1 4 5
7 2 2 6 5
8 2 3 7 5
9 2 4 9 5
10 2 5 2 5
this repetition is not a problem, i will use pivot fuction
tks people!
We can use which.min to return the index of 'min'imum 'flow' per group and use that to get the corresponding 'day' to create the column with mutate
library(dplyr)
df <- df %>%
group_by(month) %>%
mutate(dayminflowofthemonth = day[which.min(flow)]) %>%
ungroup
-output
df
# A tibble: 10 x 4
# month day flow dayminflowofthemonth
# <dbl> <dbl> <dbl> <dbl>
# 1 1 1 2 1
# 2 1 2 5 1
# 3 1 3 7 1
# 4 1 4 8 1
# 5 1 5 5 1
# 6 2 1 4 5
# 7 2 2 6 5
# 8 2 3 7 5
# 9 2 4 9 5
#10 2 5 2 5
Another option using indexing inside dplyr pipeline:
library(dplyr)
#Code
newdf <- df %>% group_by(month) %>% mutate(Val=day[flow==min(flow)][1])
Output:
# A tibble: 10 x 4
# Groups: month [2]
month day flow Val
<dbl> <dbl> <dbl> <dbl>
1 1 1 2 1
2 1 2 5 1
3 1 3 7 1
4 1 4 8 1
5 1 5 5 1
6 2 1 4 5
7 2 2 6 5
8 2 3 7 5
9 2 4 9 5
10 2 5 2 5
Here is a base R option using ave
transform(
df,
dayminflowofthemonth = ave(day*(ave(flow,month,FUN = min)==flow),month,FUN = max)
)
which gives
month day flow dayminflowofthemonth
1 1 1 2 1
2 1 2 5 1
3 1 3 7 1
4 1 4 8 1
5 1 5 5 1
6 2 1 4 5
7 2 2 6 5
8 2 3 7 5
9 2 4 9 5
10 2 5 2 5
One more base R approach:
df$dayminflowofthemonth <- by(
df,
df$month,
function(x) x$day[which.min(x$flow)]
)[df$month]
I try to count triplets; for this I use three vectors that are packed in a dataframe:
X=c(4,4,4,4,4,4,4,4,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,2,2,2,2,2,2,3,3,3,3,3,3,3,3)
Y=c(1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,2,2,3,4,2,2,2,2,3,4,1,1,2,2,3,3,4,4)
Z=c(4,4,5,4,4,4,4,4,6,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,2,2,2,2,7,2,3,3,3,3,3,3,3,3)
Count_Frame=data.frame(matrix(NA, nrow=(length(X)), ncol=3))
Count_Frame[1]=X
Count_Frame[2]=Y
Count_Frame[3]=Z
Counts=data.frame(table(Count_Frame))
There is the following problem: if I increase the value range in the vectors or use even more vectors the "Counts" dataframe quickly approaches its size limit due to the many 0-counts. Is there a way to exclude the 0-counts while generating "Counts"?
We can use data.table. Convert the 'data.frame' to 'data.table' (setDT(Count_Frame)), grouped by all the columns (.(X, Y, Z)), we get the number or rows (.N).
library(data.table)
setDT(Count_Frame)[,.N ,.(X, Y, Z)]
# X Y Z N
# 1: 4 1 4 7
# 2: 4 1 5 1
# 3: 1 1 6 1
# 4: 1 1 1 3
# 5: 1 2 1 2
# 6: 1 3 1 1
# 7: 1 4 1 1
# 8: 2 2 2 4
# 9: 2 3 7 1
#10: 2 4 2 1
#11: 3 1 3 2
#12: 3 2 3 2
#13: 3 3 3 2
#14: 3 4 3 2
Instead of naming all the columns, we can use names(Count_Frame) as well (if there are many columns)
setDT(Count_Frame)[,.N , names(Count_Frame)]
You can accomplish this with aggregate:
Count_Frame$one <- 1
aggregate(one ~ X1 + X2 + X3, data=Count_Frame, FUN=sum)
This will calculate the positive instances of table, but will not list the zero counts.
One solution is to create a combination of the column values and count those instead:
library(tidyr)
as.data.frame(table(unite(Count_Frame, tmp, X1, X2, X3))) %>%
separate(Var1, c('X1', 'X2', 'X3'))
Resulting output is:
X1 X2 X3 Freq
1 1 1 1 3
2 1 1 6 1
3 1 2 1 2
4 1 3 1 1
5 1 4 1 1
6 2 2 2 4
7 2 3 7 1
8 2 4 2 1
9 3 1 3 2
10 3 2 3 2
11 3 3 3 2
12 3 4 3 2
13 4 1 4 7
14 4 1 5 1
Or using plyr:
library(plyr)
count(Count_Frame, colnames(Count_Frame))
output
# > count(Count_Frame, colnames(Count_Frame))
# X1 X2 X3 freq
# 1 1 1 1 3
# 2 1 1 6 1
# 3 1 2 1 2
# 4 1 3 1 1
# 5 1 4 1 1
# 6 2 2 2 4
# 7 2 3 7 1
# 8 2 4 2 1
# 9 3 1 3 2
# 10 3 2 3 2
# 11 3 3 3 2
# 12 3 4 3 2
# 13 4 1 4 7
# 14 4 1 5 1