Closed. This question is opinion-based. It is not currently accepting answers.
Want to improve this question? Update the question so it can be answered with facts and citations by editing this post.
Closed 6 days ago.
Improve this question
I apologize if the title is a little confusing, but hopefully that highlights the point of my question. If a method has recursively called itself multiple times and some base case is reached that causes all recursive calls to return/'undo', what would be a proper term to describe that?
Exiting, undoing, and unraveling recursion all come to mind, but I'm mostly wondering if there's an agreed upon term for it that I can use in comments. Thanks!
Related
Closed. This question is opinion-based. It is not currently accepting answers.
Want to improve this question? Update the question so it can be answered with facts and citations by editing this post.
Closed 2 years ago.
Improve this question
When should one consider using a metamodel in place of an expensive analysis component? I haven't actually seen an example of an openMDAO project that uses metamodels yet, so I was wondering if they're recommended or whether it's still best to treat expensive analyses like normal ones.
Using a metamodel is a trade-off. You trade accuracy vs execution time so it is up to you in your context.
Closed. This question needs details or clarity. It is not currently accepting answers.
Want to improve this question? Add details and clarify the problem by editing this post.
Closed 4 years ago.
Improve this question
I see plenty of mentions of their categorical dual, i.e. co-mbinators like y-combinator, etc. But no one seems to give an example of an mbinator? Even wiki.haskell.org/Combinator doesn't mention it.
The etymology doesn't involve "co-". I guess you could ask about "binator", which might make pairs without putting them together. But that's not a very useful concept.
Closed. This question is opinion-based. It is not currently accepting answers.
Want to improve this question? Update the question so it can be answered with facts and citations by editing this post.
Closed 6 years ago.
Improve this question
I am starting a new project and I have the problem with the measurability of the requirement usability.
With is an good atomic measurable indicator for usability?
Number of klicks or keystrokes per action, weighted with the estimated relative frequency of the action.
However, this metric does not take into account a few important aspects of usability:
How easy it is to memorize the sequence of clicks and keystrokes
The amount of feedback provided to the user
The likelyhood of invalid inputs
Still it can be useful for comparing user interfaces that are similar with respect to these aspects.
Closed. This question needs details or clarity. It is not currently accepting answers.
Want to improve this question? Add details and clarify the problem by editing this post.
Closed 8 years ago.
Improve this question
What is the difference between function and procedure in PL/SQL?
No, it is not. In PL/SQL functions return data, procedures do not. In C for example both are called functions.
Closed. This question is opinion-based. It is not currently accepting answers.
Want to improve this question? Update the question so it can be answered with facts and citations by editing this post.
Closed 9 years ago.
Improve this question
It's not available on the lower left screen thingy. If I do po self.delegate.tvDelegated it doesn't work either.
It's simple looking at some variable value. What's the problem?
Sometimes is better to use the original method sending, instead of dot notation, even if in the latest version support mors dote, try to write
po [[self delegate] tvDelegated]