I'm using scilab on cloud
function c = example(a,b)
c = a*b
endfunction
How can I call it?
I tried exec(example(3,2)) without success
This solution seems to work although obviously in this case I can't call the file before calling the function.
result = example(3, 2)
Related
I have a script that defines a function, and later intended to call the function but forgot to add the parentheses, like this:
function myfunc()
println("inside myfunc")
end
myfunc # This line is silently ignored. The function isn't invoked and there's no error message.
After a while I did figure out that I was missing the parentheses, but since Julia didn't give me an error, I'm wondering what that line is actually doing? I'm assuming that it must be doing something with the myfunc statement, but I don't know Julia well enough to understand what is happening.
I tried --depwarn=yes but don't see a julia command line switch to increase the warning level or verbosity. Please let me know if one exists.
For background context, the reason this came up is that I'm trying to translate a Bash script to Julia, and there are numerous locations where an argument-less function is defined and then invoked, and in Bash you don't need parentheses after the function name to invoke it.
The script is being run from command line (julia stub.jl) and I'm using Julia 1.0.3 on macOS.
It doesn't silently ignore the function. Calling myfunc in an interactive session will show you what happens: the call returns the function object to the console, and thus call's the show method for Function, showing how many methods are currently defined for that function in your workspace.
julia> function myfunc()
println("inside myfunc")
end
myfunc (generic function with 1 method)
julia> myfunc
myfunc (generic function with 1 method)
Since you're calling this in a script, show is never called, and thus you don't see any result. But it doesn't error, because the syntax is valid.
Thanks to DNF for the helpful comment on it being in a script.
It does nothing.
As in c, an expression has a value: in c the expression _ a=1+1; _ has the value _ 2 _ In c, this just fell out of the parser: they wanted to be able to evaluate expressions like _ a==b _
In Julia, it's the result of designing a language where the code you write is handled as a data object of the language. In Julia, the expression "a=1+1" has the value "a=1+1".
In c, the fact that
a=1+1;
is an acceptable line of code means that, accidentally,
a;
is also an acceptable line of code. The same is true in Julia: the compiler expects to see a data value there: any data value you put may be acceptable: even for example the data value that represents the calculated value returned by a function:
myfunc()
or the value that represents the function object itself:
myfunc
As in c, the fact that data values are everywhere in your code just indicates that the syntax allows data values everywhere in your code and that the compiler does nothing with data values that are everywhere in your code.
I am working on converting code from MATLAB to scilab included here.
The # symbol is used as a memory pointer in MATLAB pointing to the location of the function tst_callback.
Scilab does not like this however. Is there a scilab equivalent for the #?
function test
sysIDgui(#tst_callback)
end
function tst_callback()
disp("Hello Ron")
endfunction
What you are trying to do is to pass a function as argument to another function. In Scilab, you don't need any special syntax.
Try it yourself. Define these two functions:
function y = applyFunction(f,x)
y = f(x);
endfunction
function y = double(x)
y = x * 2;
endfunction
Then test it on the console:
--> applyFunction(double,7)
ans =
14.
Note: the main usage of # in MATLAB, is to create anonymous functions (see documentation), ones that are not defined in a separate file. As for Scilab, there is no way to create anonymous functions.
I'm writing a function that I would find easier to write and read if it could define another function differently depending on input or runtime values of variables (and then use that function). The following illustrates the idea (even if defining a function inside a function is of no advantage in this simple example):
julia> function f(option::Bool)
if option
g() = println("option true")
g()
else
g() = println("option false")
g()
end
end;
WARNING: Method definition g() in module Main at REPL[1]:3 overwritten at REPL[1]:6.
julia> f(true)
option false
julia> f(false)
ERROR: UndefVarError: g not defined
in f(::Bool) at .\REPL[1]:7
Using the full function ... end syntax for g does not help either.
The question is: am I doing something wrong to get that warning and that unintended behavior, or Julia does not allow this for a reason? And if it can be done, how?
N.B. For my present need, I can just define two different functions, g1 and g2, and it seems to work; but what if there were many cases of g for just one task concept? I thought that a function, being a first-class object, could be manipulated freely: assigned to a variable, defined in a way or another depending on conditions, overwritten, etc.
P.S. I know I can compose a String and then parse-eval it, but that's an ugly solution.
You want to use anonymous functions. This is a known issue (this other issue also shows your problem).
function f(option::Bool)
if option
g = () -> println("option true")
else
g = () -> println("option false")
end
g
end
In v0.5 there's no performance difference between anonymous and generic functions, so there's no reason to not use anonymous functions. Note that there's also a sytnax for extended anonymous functions:
f = function (x)
x
end
and you can add dispatches via call overloading:
(T::typeof(f))(x,y) = x+y
so there's no reason to not use an anonymous function here.
lets say I have written a function for adding two numbers.
function [result] = add_twonum(a1,a2)
result = a1+a2;
endfunction
in the main file, when I call
result = add_twonum(1,2)
I expect result = 3 .
However it says
!--error 4
Undefined variable: add_twonum
Please help me. I have used Matlab a lot but never scilab. I tried every possible way I know of. like changing current directory etc etc.
In the main file, you need to execute the function first, with
exec('add_twonum.sci');
assuming add_twonum.sci is the file which contains your function. Then you can call the function:
result = add_twonum(a1,a2);
I am working with scilab 5.4.1. Is there any way to define and invoke more than 1 function in .sci file. I have read in theory that there is a possibility. Does somebody know how?
This is possible, just define multiple functions in one file.
//First function
function x=myfct(a, b)
x=a+b
endfunction
//Second function
function y=myfct2(a, b)
y=a/b
endfunction
//Third function
function y=myfct3(a, b, c)
y = myfct(a,b)
y = myfct2(y,c)
disp(y)
endfunction
See the SciLab help pages for more information about functions.
After defining the above functions in a file and running the file once, the files are defined. You can now call them from console:
>> myfct3(3,4)