How to create a bidimensional array in C with double pointer - pointers

I tried to make a bidimensional array from an unallocated pointer.
I get "realloc(): invalid next size" here :
int nr=0,**cycles;
int steps=10;
while(steps--)
{
if(nr==0)
{
cycles=(int **) malloc (sizeof (int*));
}
else
{
cycles=(int **) realloc (cycles,sizeof (int*));
}
*(cycles+nr)=(int *) malloc(sizeof(int));
nr++;
}

Related

Structure pointer dereference

I am trying to pass a structure of point array as shown, how can I correctly dereference the address to change the value the address points to.
// header file "header.h"
typedef struct {
double x;
double y;
} Pointbase;
typedef Pointbase *XYpt;
typedef struct {
XYpt xy[1];
} ChartPointsbase;
typedef ChartPointsbase **PointArray;
#include "header.h"
...
void npCluster(double drop, XYpt *newpt, PointArray outpts)
{
double xx[2]={-15, 100};
int i;
outpts = (PointArray)malloc(sizeof(PointArray) * 2);
for (i=0;i<2; i++)
{
(*(*outpts)->xy[i])->x=xx[i];
(*(*outpts)->xy[i])->y=drop;
}
}
The complier likes the following line but does not compute
(*outpts)->xy[i]->y=drop;
Any suggestions will be most appreciated.
I figured it out for "c" compiler as follows:
Define struct with two 1D arrays each of size dimsize, allocate memory to handles, set the size =k, and dereference as follows:
for (i=0; i<k; i=i++)
{
(*(outpts->xx))->dat[i]=135*i+j;
(*(outpts->yy))->dat[i]=drop;
}
For further nesting, say struct array of the above with two unequal point arrays, where cht is an array of PointArray
typedef struct {
int32 dimSize;
C1Hdl cht[1];
} XYchartCluster;
// initialize 1st array
for (i=0; i<k; i=i++)
{
(*(*(xycht)->cht[0])->xx)->dat[i]=135*i+j;
(*(*(xycht)->cht[0])->yy)->dat[i]=drop;
}
// initialize 2nd array with values from point npt
for (i=0; i<sz; i=i++)
{
(*(*(xycht)->cht[1])->xx)->dat[i]=npt->x;
(*(*(xycht)->cht[1])->yy)->dat[i]=npt->y;
}
/*
Note: size of each array in chart should be initialized and
memory assigned (dynamically changing size)
*/

Sizeof pointer of pointer in C [duplicate]

First off, here is some code:
int main()
{
int days[] = {1,2,3,4,5};
int *ptr = days;
printf("%u\n", sizeof(days));
printf("%u\n", sizeof(ptr));
return 0;
}
Is there a way to find out the size of the array that ptr is pointing to (instead of just giving its size, which is four bytes on a 32-bit system)?
No, you can't. The compiler doesn't know what the pointer is pointing to. There are tricks, like ending the array with a known out-of-band value and then counting the size up until that value, but that's not using sizeof().
Another trick is the one mentioned by Zan, which is to stash the size somewhere. For example, if you're dynamically allocating the array, allocate a block one int bigger than the one you need, stash the size in the first int, and return ptr+1 as the pointer to the array. When you need the size, decrement the pointer and peek at the stashed value. Just remember to free the whole block starting from the beginning, and not just the array.
The answer is, "No."
What C programmers do is store the size of the array somewhere. It can be part of a structure, or the programmer can cheat a bit and malloc() more memory than requested in order to store a length value before the start of the array.
For dynamic arrays (malloc or C++ new) you need to store the size of the array as mentioned by others or perhaps build an array manager structure which handles add, remove, count, etc. Unfortunately C doesn't do this nearly as well as C++ since you basically have to build it for each different array type you are storing which is cumbersome if you have multiple types of arrays that you need to manage.
For static arrays, such as the one in your example, there is a common macro used to get the size, but it is not recommended as it does not check if the parameter is really a static array. The macro is used in real code though, e.g. in the Linux kernel headers although it may be slightly different than the one below:
#if !defined(ARRAY_SIZE)
#define ARRAY_SIZE(x) (sizeof((x)) / sizeof((x)[0]))
#endif
int main()
{
int days[] = {1,2,3,4,5};
int *ptr = days;
printf("%u\n", ARRAY_SIZE(days));
printf("%u\n", sizeof(ptr));
return 0;
}
You can google for reasons to be wary of macros like this. Be careful.
If possible, the C++ stdlib such as vector which is much safer and easier to use.
There is a clean solution with C++ templates, without using sizeof(). The following getSize() function returns the size of any static array:
#include <cstddef>
template<typename T, size_t SIZE>
size_t getSize(T (&)[SIZE]) {
return SIZE;
}
Here is an example with a foo_t structure:
#include <cstddef>
template<typename T, size_t SIZE>
size_t getSize(T (&)[SIZE]) {
return SIZE;
}
struct foo_t {
int ball;
};
int main()
{
foo_t foos3[] = {{1},{2},{3}};
foo_t foos5[] = {{1},{2},{3},{4},{5}};
printf("%u\n", getSize(foos3));
printf("%u\n", getSize(foos5));
return 0;
}
Output:
3
5
As all the correct answers have stated, you cannot get this information from the decayed pointer value of the array alone. If the decayed pointer is the argument received by the function, then the size of the originating array has to be provided in some other way for the function to come to know that size.
Here's a suggestion different from what has been provided thus far,that will work: Pass a pointer to the array instead. This suggestion is similar to the C++ style suggestions, except that C does not support templates or references:
#define ARRAY_SZ 10
void foo (int (*arr)[ARRAY_SZ]) {
printf("%u\n", (unsigned)sizeof(*arr)/sizeof(**arr));
}
But, this suggestion is kind of silly for your problem, since the function is defined to know exactly the size of the array that is passed in (hence, there is little need to use sizeof at all on the array). What it does do, though, is offer some type safety. It will prohibit you from passing in an array of an unwanted size.
int x[20];
int y[10];
foo(&x); /* error */
foo(&y); /* ok */
If the function is supposed to be able to operate on any size of array, then you will have to provide the size to the function as additional information.
For this specific example, yes, there is, IF you use typedefs (see below). Of course, if you do it this way, you're just as well off to use SIZEOF_DAYS, since you know what the pointer is pointing to.
If you have a (void *) pointer, as is returned by malloc() or the like, then, no, there is no way to determine what data structure the pointer is pointing to and thus, no way to determine its size.
#include <stdio.h>
#define NUM_DAYS 5
typedef int days_t[ NUM_DAYS ];
#define SIZEOF_DAYS ( sizeof( days_t ) )
int main() {
days_t days;
days_t *ptr = &days;
printf( "SIZEOF_DAYS: %u\n", SIZEOF_DAYS );
printf( "sizeof(days): %u\n", sizeof(days) );
printf( "sizeof(*ptr): %u\n", sizeof(*ptr) );
printf( "sizeof(ptr): %u\n", sizeof(ptr) );
return 0;
}
Output:
SIZEOF_DAYS: 20
sizeof(days): 20
sizeof(*ptr): 20
sizeof(ptr): 4
There is no magic solution. C is not a reflective language. Objects don't automatically know what they are.
But you have many choices:
Obviously, add a parameter
Wrap the call in a macro and automatically add a parameter
Use a more complex object. Define a structure which contains the dynamic array and also the size of the array. Then, pass the address of the structure.
You can do something like this:
int days[] = { /*length:*/5, /*values:*/ 1,2,3,4,5 };
int *ptr = days + 1;
printf("array length: %u\n", ptr[-1]);
return 0;
My solution to this problem is to save the length of the array into a struct Array as a meta-information about the array.
#include <stdio.h>
#include <stdlib.h>
struct Array
{
int length;
double *array;
};
typedef struct Array Array;
Array* NewArray(int length)
{
/* Allocate the memory for the struct Array */
Array *newArray = (Array*) malloc(sizeof(Array));
/* Insert only non-negative length's*/
newArray->length = (length > 0) ? length : 0;
newArray->array = (double*) malloc(length*sizeof(double));
return newArray;
}
void SetArray(Array *structure,int length,double* array)
{
structure->length = length;
structure->array = array;
}
void PrintArray(Array *structure)
{
if(structure->length > 0)
{
int i;
printf("length: %d\n", structure->length);
for (i = 0; i < structure->length; i++)
printf("%g\n", structure->array[i]);
}
else
printf("Empty Array. Length 0\n");
}
int main()
{
int i;
Array *negativeTest, *days = NewArray(5);
double moreDays[] = {1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10};
for (i = 0; i < days->length; i++)
days->array[i] = i+1;
PrintArray(days);
SetArray(days,10,moreDays);
PrintArray(days);
negativeTest = NewArray(-5);
PrintArray(negativeTest);
return 0;
}
But you have to care about set the right length of the array you want to store, because the is no way to check this length, like our friends massively explained.
This is how I personally do it in my code. I like to keep it as simple as possible while still able to get values that I need.
typedef struct intArr {
int size;
int* arr;
} intArr_t;
int main() {
intArr_t arr;
arr.size = 6;
arr.arr = (int*)malloc(sizeof(int) * arr.size);
for (size_t i = 0; i < arr.size; i++) {
arr.arr[i] = i * 10;
}
return 0;
}
No, you can't use sizeof(ptr) to find the size of array ptr is pointing to.
Though allocating extra memory(more than the size of array) will be helpful if you want to store the length in extra space.
int main()
{
int days[] = {1,2,3,4,5};
int *ptr = days;
printf("%u\n", sizeof(days));
printf("%u\n", sizeof(ptr));
return 0;
}
Size of days[] is 20 which is no of elements * size of it's data type.
While the size of pointer is 4 no matter what it is pointing to.
Because a pointer points to other element by storing it's address.
In strings there is a '\0' character at the end so the length of the string can be gotten using functions like strlen. The problem with an integer array, for example, is that you can't use any value as an end value so one possible solution is to address the array and use as an end value the NULL pointer.
#include <stdio.h>
/* the following function will produce the warning:
* ‘sizeof’ on array function parameter ‘a’ will
* return size of ‘int *’ [-Wsizeof-array-argument]
*/
void foo( int a[] )
{
printf( "%lu\n", sizeof a );
}
/* so we have to implement something else one possible
* idea is to use the NULL pointer as a control value
* the same way '\0' is used in strings but this way
* the pointer passed to a function should address pointers
* so the actual implementation of an array type will
* be a pointer to pointer
*/
typedef char * type_t; /* line 18 */
typedef type_t ** array_t;
int main( void )
{
array_t initialize( int, ... );
/* initialize an array with four values "foo", "bar", "baz", "foobar"
* if one wants to use integers rather than strings than in the typedef
* declaration at line 18 the char * type should be changed with int
* and in the format used for printing the array values
* at line 45 and 51 "%s" should be changed with "%i"
*/
array_t array = initialize( 4, "foo", "bar", "baz", "foobar" );
int size( array_t );
/* print array size */
printf( "size %i:\n", size( array ));
void aprint( char *, array_t );
/* print array values */
aprint( "%s\n", array ); /* line 45 */
type_t getval( array_t, int );
/* print an indexed value */
int i = 2;
type_t val = getval( array, i );
printf( "%i: %s\n", i, val ); /* line 51 */
void delete( array_t );
/* free some space */
delete( array );
return 0;
}
/* the output of the program should be:
* size 4:
* foo
* bar
* baz
* foobar
* 2: baz
*/
#include <stdarg.h>
#include <stdlib.h>
array_t initialize( int n, ... )
{
/* here we store the array values */
type_t *v = (type_t *) malloc( sizeof( type_t ) * n );
va_list ap;
va_start( ap, n );
int j;
for ( j = 0; j < n; j++ )
v[j] = va_arg( ap, type_t );
va_end( ap );
/* the actual array will hold the addresses of those
* values plus a NULL pointer
*/
array_t a = (array_t) malloc( sizeof( type_t *) * ( n + 1 ));
a[n] = NULL;
for ( j = 0; j < n; j++ )
a[j] = v + j;
return a;
}
int size( array_t a )
{
int n = 0;
while ( *a++ != NULL )
n++;
return n;
}
void aprint( char *fmt, array_t a )
{
while ( *a != NULL )
printf( fmt, **a++ );
}
type_t getval( array_t a, int i )
{
return *a[i];
}
void delete( array_t a )
{
free( *a );
free( a );
}
#include <stdio.h>
#include <string.h>
#include <stddef.h>
#include <stdlib.h>
#define array(type) struct { size_t size; type elem[0]; }
void *array_new(int esize, int ecnt)
{
size_t *a = (size_t *)malloc(esize*ecnt+sizeof(size_t));
if (a) *a = ecnt;
return a;
}
#define array_new(type, count) array_new(sizeof(type),count)
#define array_delete free
#define array_foreach(type, e, arr) \
for (type *e = (arr)->elem; e < (arr)->size + (arr)->elem; ++e)
int main(int argc, char const *argv[])
{
array(int) *iarr = array_new(int, 10);
array(float) *farr = array_new(float, 10);
array(double) *darr = array_new(double, 10);
array(char) *carr = array_new(char, 11);
for (int i = 0; i < iarr->size; ++i) {
iarr->elem[i] = i;
farr->elem[i] = i*1.0f;
darr->elem[i] = i*1.0;
carr->elem[i] = i+'0';
}
array_foreach(int, e, iarr) {
printf("%d ", *e);
}
array_foreach(float, e, farr) {
printf("%.0f ", *e);
}
array_foreach(double, e, darr) {
printf("%.0lf ", *e);
}
carr->elem[carr->size-1] = '\0';
printf("%s\n", carr->elem);
return 0;
}
#define array_size 10
struct {
int16 size;
int16 array[array_size];
int16 property1[(array_size/16)+1]
int16 property2[(array_size/16)+1]
} array1 = {array_size, 0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9};
#undef array_size
array_size is passing to the size variable:
#define array_size 30
struct {
int16 size;
int16 array[array_size];
int16 property1[(array_size/16)+1]
int16 property2[(array_size/16)+1]
} array2 = {array_size};
#undef array_size
Usage is:
void main() {
int16 size = array1.size;
for (int i=0; i!=size; i++) {
array1.array[i] *= 2;
}
}
Most implementations will have a function that tells you the reserved size for objects allocated with malloc() or calloc(), for example GNU has malloc_usable_size()
However, this will return the size of the reversed block, which can be larger than the value given to malloc()/realloc().
There is a popular macro, which you can define for finding number of elements in the array (Microsoft CRT even provides it OOB with name _countof):
#define countof(x) (sizeof(x)/sizeof((x)[0]))
Then you can write:
int my_array[] = { ... some elements ... };
printf("%zu", countof(my_array)); // 'z' is correct type specifier for size_t

How is unsigned int *ptr treated as prt[i]?

int *c;
int d,noofentries;
struct A
{
unsigned int *ptr;
int entry;
}a;
a->ptr=memalloc(34,unsigned int);
a->ptr = (unsigned int*) entry
nofoentries = 8 ;
d =56749;
for(i=0;i<noofentries;i++)
{
c[i] = d; // how is a pointer treated as array ?
}
for(i=0;i<34;i++)
{
a->ptr[i] = c[i]; //segmentation fault occurs
}
I require the assignment of the values populated in c[i] to be assigned to a->ptr[i]. So that when a->ptr[i] deleted then c[i] is also freed.
Kindly help!!
generally you would not want your pointer to be treated as an array, rather you would have an array and use its name as pointer to refer to any particular member of the array
for e.g
int arr[5];
//the array name 'arr' points to the zeroth element
so now you can use *(arr+ indexNo) = value or arr[indexNo] = value, to assign a value to a particular element
you would want to use your pointer as an array, when you have assigned an array to it.
for e.g
int arr[5];
int *ptr;
if you do
ptr = arr;
you can access ptr as you would have accessed arr
as
ptr[index]= value;
a pointer to a type is just the same than an array of the type
*( c + x ) = a
<=>
c[x] = a;
c + x find the right pointer position since it adds x * sizeof(type) to c pointer.
your code compiling under gcc :
#include <stdlib.h>
#include <assert.h>
#include <stdio.h>
struct A { unsigned int *ptr; int entry; };
int main(int argc, char ** argv)
{
unsigned int * c;
unsigned int d;
int noofentries, i;
struct A a;
noofentries=34;
c=malloc(noofentries * sizeof(unsigned int));
d =56749;
for(i=0;i<noofentries;i++) { c[i] = d; }
// no need to copy full array c, since ptr is a pointer over it...
a.ptr = c;
// warning if above line is not done then allocation of ptr is required:
// a.ptr = malloc(noofentries * sizeof(unsigned int));
// and content copy
// for(i=0;i<noofentries;i++) { a.ptr[i] = c[i]; }
for(i=0;i<noofentries;i++) {
assert( a.ptr[i] == *(c + i) );
printf("a.ptr[%u]=%u\n",i,*(a.ptr + i));
}
free(c);
}

How to assign a pointer a 2D square array of unknown size?Whats wrong in the following function?

Here is the code I tried,Segmentation fault was the result..
void allocate(int ** universe,int n) // to assign pointer "a" a nXn matrix
{
universe=(int **) calloc(n,sizeof(int *));
int l;
for(l=0;l<n;l++)
universe[l]=(int *)calloc(n,sizeof(int));
int u;
for(l=0;l<n;l++)
for(u=0;u<n;u++) //making all entries 00
universe[l][u]=0;
}
Whats wrong in the following function?
Since arguments are passed by value, your function works on a copy of the passed-in pointer, and doesn't modify the pointer in the caller, that remains uninitialised (or still points where it pointed before), and you can't access the allocated memory from the caller, and trying to access it via universe[i][j] is likely to cause a segmentation fault. As a further consequence, when allocate() returns, you have lost the only pointers to the allocated memory and that's a leak.
The correct way to do it is to
return the pointer,
int ** allocate(int n)
{
int **universe = calloc(n,sizeof(int *));
if (!universe) {
fputs(stderr, "Allocation of universe failed.");
exit(EXIT_FAILURE);
}
int l;
for(l = 0; l < n; l++) {
universe[l] = calloc(n,sizeof(int));
if (!universe[l]) {
fprintf(stderr, "Failed to allocate row %d.\n", l);
exit(EXIT_FAILURE);
}
}
return universe;
}
and call that like int **universe = allocate(124);, or
pass in the address of the pointer you want to allocate memory to,
void allocate(int *** universe_addr,int n) // to assign pointer "a" a nXn matrix
{
int ** universe = calloc(n,sizeof(int *));
if (!universe) {
/* repair or exit */
}
int l;
for(l = 0; l < n; l++) {
universe[l]=(int *)calloc(n,sizeof(int));
if (!universe[l]) {
/* repair or exit */
}
}
/* Now set the pointer in the caller */
*universe_addr = universe;
}
and call it like allocate(&universe, 123);.
Note: I have removed the initialisation loop, since calloc already zeros the allocated memory, hence it is unnecessary to set it to 0 again.

Passing argument without a cast in MPI

For my homework I have to test for several large matrices using this Conjugate Gradient Program with MPI (see code below). I copied the program from my book and it is supposed to compile but I get the errors:
In function 'main':
37:warning: passing argument 1 of read_replicated_vector makes pointer from integer without a cast
37: warning: passing argument 2 of read_replicated_vector makes pointer from integer without a cast
37: warning: passing argument 3 of read_replicated_vector makes integer from pointer without a cast
37: warning: passing argument 4 of read_replicated_vector from incompatible pointer type
37: error: void value not ignored as it ought to be
44: warning: passing argument 1 of print_replicated_vector makes pointer from integer without a cast
44: warning: passing argument 3 of print_replicated_vector makes integer from pointer without a cast
44: error: too many arguments to function print_replicated_vector
#include <stdlib.h>
#include <stdio.h>
#include "mpi.h"
#include "MyMPI.h"
main (int argc, char *argv[])
{
double **a; /* Solving Ax = b for x */
double *astorage; /* Holds elements of A */
double *b; /* Constant vector */
double *x; /* Solution vector */
int p; /* MPI Processes */
int id; /* Process rank */
int m; /* Rows in A */
int n; /* Columns in A */
int n1; /* Elements in b */
/* Initialize a and b so that solution is x[i] = i */
MPI_Init (&argc, &argv);
MPI_Comm_size (MPI_COMM_WORLD, &p);
MPI_Comm_rank (MPI_COMM_WORLD, &id);
read_block_row_matrix (id, p, argv[1], (void *) &a,
(void *) &astorage, MPI_DOUBLE, &m, &n);
n1 = read_replicated_vector (id, p, argv[2], (void **) &b, MPI_DOUBLE);
if ((m != n) || (n != n1))
{
if (!id)
printf ("Incompatible dimensions (%d x %d) x (%d)\n", m, n, n1);
}
else {
x = (double *) malloc (n * sizeof(double));
cg (p, id, a, b, x, n);
print_replicated_vector (id, p, x, MPI_DOUBLE, n); // here
}
MPI_Finalize();
}
id and p are not pointers, so I do think I need to pass them by reference in the calls to MPI_Comm_size and MPI_Comm_rank, though I tried doing that.
Edit
//Input Function
void read_replicated_vector (
char *s, /* IN - File name */
void **v, /* OUT - Vector */
MPI_Datatype dtype, /* IN - Vector type */
int *n, /* OUT - Vector length */
MPI_Comm comm) /* IN - Communicator */
{
int datum_size; /* Bytes per vector element */
int i;
int id; /* Process rank */
FILE *infileptr; /* Input file pointer */
int p; /* Number of processes */
MPI_Comm_rank (comm, &id);
MPI_Comm_size (comm, &p);
datum_size = get_size (dtype);
if (id == (p-1))
{
infileptr = fopen (s, "r");
if (infileptr == NULL) *n = 0;
else fread (n, sizeof(int), 1, infileptr);
}
MPI_Bcast (n, 1, MPI_INT, p-1, MPI_COMM_WORLD);
if (! *n) terminate (id, "Cannot open vector file");
*v = my_malloc (id, *n * datum_size);
if (id == (p-1))
{
fread (*v, datum_size, *n, infileptr);
fclose (infileptr);
}
MPI_Bcast (*v, *n, dtype, p-1, MPI_COMM_WORLD);
}
// Output Function
void print_replicated_vector (
void *v, /* IN - Address of vector */
MPI_Datatype dtype, /* IN - Vector element type */
int n, /* IN - Elements in vector */
MPI_Comm comm) /* IN - Communicator */
{
int id; /* Process rank */
MPI_Comm_rank (comm, &id);
if (!id)
{
print_subvector (v, dtype, n);
printf ("\n\n");
}
}
Your warnings are because you're calling the function
void print_replicated_vector (void *, MPI_Datatype, int, MPI_Comm);
with a first parameter of type int:
print_replicated_vector (id, p, x, MPI_DOUBLE, n); // here
C code will sometimes store a pointer in an int, and that's what the compiler is assuming you want to do and it's doing the appropriate type conversions (but warning you of them). But to make the code correct you'd have to make the types match up. I.e. pass a pointer to id with &id or whatever the appropriate argument is (I don't know what print_replicated_vector does or what you want it to do).

Resources