I'm trying to learn how to communicate via SPI with STM32 but I've run into some problems.
The first step i took was to implement SPI communications using two arduino unos: the master writes a byte and the slave responds with another byte according to the input (when the master sends anything, triggering the exchange). Everything worked as it should to the best of my knowledge.
The second step is the one I'm stuck at which is to replace the master arduino with a NUCLEO-F767ZI board. I've set up SPI1 using the auto generated code for now, and I've set it up with what I think are the default options. In the main, I send a single byte to the arduino, and this is where the problem starts:
By using the serial port in the arduino I can see that it does receive data, but usually bit shifted. So if I send a 16, i usually get a 32 or other power of two in the arduino (see attached image)
I'm using clock polarity 0 and clock phase 0 on both microcontrollers (so clock idle on low and sampling on the rising edge). Just to be sure I've tried all possibilities but to no avail, it still doesn't work properly, and I don't really know why. Another thing I considered was that perhaps the clock is running too fast (the peripheral clock is set to 16 MHz), but if I change the prescaler to anything other than SPI_BAUDRATEPRESCALER_2, i stop getting any data on the arduino, only 0s, which I find odd, I would expect it to work just the same if only the master controls the clock.
Just for completeness, here are the spi settings I'm using:
hspi1.Instance = SPI1;
hspi1.Init.Mode = SPI_MODE_MASTER;
hspi1.Init.Direction = SPI_DIRECTION_2LINES;
hspi1.Init.DataSize = SPI_DATASIZE_8BIT;
hspi1.Init.CLKPolarity = SPI_POLARITY_LOW;
hspi1.Init.CLKPhase = SPI_PHASE_1EDGE;
hspi1.Init.NSS = SPI_NSS_HARD_OUTPUT;
hspi1.Init.BaudRatePrescaler = SPI_BAUDRATEPRESCALER_2;
hspi1.Init.FirstBit = SPI_FIRSTBIT_MSB;
hspi1.Init.TIMode = SPI_TIMODE_DISABLE;
hspi1.Init.CRCCalculation = SPI_CRCCALCULATION_DISABLE;
hspi1.Init.CRCPolynomial = 7;
hspi1.Init.CRCLength = SPI_CRC_LENGTH_DATASIZE;
hspi1.Init.NSSPMode = SPI_NSS_PULSE_DISABLE;
The arduino slave code (I've removed the reply part for now):
void setup (void)
{
pinMode(MISO, OUTPUT);
Serial.begin(115200);
// turn on SPI in slave mode
SPCR |= _BV(SPE);
// turn on interrupts
SPCR |= _BV(SPIE);
//Check arduino SPI settings, outputs 11000000, so CPHA and CPOL = 0
Serial.println("SPCR");
Serial.println(SPCR,BIN);
} // end of setup
void loop(void){
}
// SPI interrupt routine
ISR (SPI_STC_vect)
{
byte c = SPDR;
Serial.println(c);
}
}
STM32 master code (ommiting irrelevant parts):
MX_SPI1_Init();
uint8_t data = 16;
while (1)
{
HAL_SPI_Transmit(&hspi1, &data, 1, 100);
HAL_Delay(500);
}
Does anyone have a clue as to why this could be happening? I've found nothing on the prescaler issues and all bitshifting issue posts say that the problem is with clock phase or polarity discrepancies, which I've verified is not.
Thanks in advance
SPI clock rate input to Atmega328P should be lower than Fosc/4
SPI requires the use of nCS wire. An SPI slave will reset it's logic on deassertion of nCS, but if nCS is always at a low level - any missed clock pulse would propagate to the next transfer, shifting the data.
Stm32F7 has NSSP: NSS pulse management - the option for issuing CLK pulse between data bytes. To deassert nCS pin between larger transfers SPI shoud either be disabled and then reenabled before the next transfer, or nCS management should be implemented in the software. In a later case make sure to deassert nCS only after all CLK pulses are completed.
Arduino UNO have Atmega powered from 5V, Stm32 is powered from 3V (on some boards it's 3.3V). Logic high input minimum for the Atmega328 is 0.6VCC, 5V * 0.6V = 3V, wich is on the edge. See this question
A scope would help a lot to solve such cases.
Related
I am starting to study the Wire library (no previous Arduino Wire library experience), I read some info taken from here.
As you all know, this really simple example changes the value of a AD5171 digital potentiometer via I2C. Written by Nicholas Zambetti and Shawn Bonkowski, demonstrates use of the Wire library.
I just copied and reduced the code below a little from the example. I am an experienced assembler and C/C++ programmer and hardware developer/designer. Although several I2C devices like DS3231 RTC, etc. work fine using standard Arduino libraries, the mentioned example doesn't work for me in my working NANO board. What am I doing wrong?
This code should transmit:
first the I2C protocol device address - Start / 8 + 1bits
test instruction data byte
variable 1 test byte constantly incremented
I2C Stop condition
The only byte I can see in my oscilloscope is just the first one (please see picture below). The 2 data bytes are not being transmitted. If I reduce the transmission to just the step #2 instruction single data byte, the same result is shown.
#include <Wire.h>
void setup()
{
Wire.begin(); // join i2c bus (address optional for master)
}
byte val = 0;
void loop()
{
Wire.beginTransmission(44); // transmit to device #44 (0x2c)
Wire.write(byte(0x55)); // sends instruction byte
Wire.write(val++); // sends potentiometer value byte
Wire.endTransmission(); // stop transmitting
delay(50); // some time delay for my oscilloscope
}
This is what this code produces:
I see transferred data as 01011000 1. I hope the is right decoded. Why you not zoom it more for better reading? It is hard see data levels on raising clock edges. This match to address 44, 0x2C . As you can also see that you get NACK on the end of address octet. So this means no device with transmitting address is on the bus.
You can get error code about sending process from endTransmission function as return int. Send this value to serial monitor.
Error codes you can see in arduino documentation
uint8_t err;
err= Wire.endTransmission(); // stop transmitting and get status
You can also use sketch i2c_scanner from arduino Wire examples to discovery right address of your device.
I try to communicate, read and write, from Arduino - slave - to RPi - master - with Android Things.
If i R/W, with a level converter, from RPi to Arduino 5v (16Mhz), everything works fine.
So i decide to eliminate the level converter, and use a 3v3 Arduino mini pro (8Mhz).
The write works fine, but when i try to read from the Arduino, the signal stops.
5v_16Mhz
After the Setup to 9, 0 address, and reads to 9, the signal still low and received the data. No problem.
3v3_8Mhz
After the Setup to 9, 0 address, and read to 9, the signal goes high and the data stop.
I used the same example for the Slave:
#include <Wire.h>
byte RFID[20] = {9,8,7,6,5,4,3,2,1,1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,1,2};
void setup() {
Wire.begin(8); // join i2c bus with address #8
Wire.onRequest(requestEvent); // register event
Wire.onReceive(receiveEvent); // register event
Serial.begin(115200); // start serial for output
pinMode(13, OUTPUT);
}
void loop() {
delay(100);
}
// function that executes whenever data is requested by master
// this function is registered as an event, see setup()
void requestEvent() {
Serial.println("Master ask");
digitalWrite(13, HIGH);
delay(250);
Wire.write(RFID, 20);
digitalWrite(13, LOW);
}
// function should be executes whenever data is received from master
// this function is registered as an event, but it's called every time the RPi
// call the Device.
void receiveEvent(int howMany) {
while (0 < Wire.available()) {
byte RTC_syn = Wire.read(); // receive byte
Serial.println(RTC_syn);
}
}
I really don't know how drives the signal high...
Someone can help me?
If i R/W, with a level converter, from RPi to Arduino 5v (16Mhz), everything works fine.
So i decide to eliminate the level converter, and use a 3v3 Arduino mini pro (8Mhz).
The write works fine, but when i try to read from the Arduino, the signal stops.
This is because level converter you had in the 5V/3.3V version does more than shift the voltage. It also acts as a nice high-impedance buffer between the two devices that helps keep the signal driven and avoids loading effects.
Without the buffer, your bus is likely experiencing a bit of loading. You can try to combat this by adding stronger pull-up resistors. The RPi3 has 1.8k pull-up resistors on the I2C lines, which generally works but can be marginal depending on the input impedance of the slave device. The Arduino Mini has pads to install I2C pull-ups but there are none by default.
The recommended pull-up resistance for a pure 3.3V I2C bus is closer to 1k, so you likely just need to add some stronger pull-ups between SCL/SDA and +3.3V. Anything you add will be in parallel to the RPi3 resistors so factor that into your calculation. For example, adding 4.7k resistors brings the effective resistance down to about 1.3k.
If you are unable to solve it with pull-ups, you can achieve the same buffer effect without level translation by using a line driver IC (random example).
If the level converter works, you should stick with it.
Communication protocols like I2C encode data into a series of logic HIGH and logic LOW signals. What does HIGH / LOW mean? It depends on the devices. For the majority of embedded devices, logic LOW will be ground, 0V.
For Arduinos and Raspberry Pis, the source voltage is different (3.3V versus 5V). This difference can lead to several potential issues.
The 5V signal is too high for the Arduino to handle, causing the Arduino to stop working or reboot
The 3.3V signal is not strong enough to be interpreted as logic HIGH. Embedded devices have circuits that round signals to HIGH/LOW, and the thresholds may not be entirely even. A 5V input may only accept 4.5V or higher, interpreting everything else as LOW or in an indeterminate state.
I want to write a stepper motor driver with a STM32L152RE.
I would like to control the position of the stepper motor with a potentiometer.
As I am new, I do not know how to communicate with (DIR, STEP).
Can someone give me a light or show me a way?
I'm using an A4988 - DMOS Microstepping Driver with Translator And Overcurrent Protection
I tried to use STM32 tim, but I could not.
Actually I have wrote whole driver for a4988, it is irq based. But I can't uncover it.
I can describe a path how to start. Anyway you should have some kind of hardware, because A4988 needs extra components for current control (resistors), and some capacitors..
You could try POLOLU HW.
If you have some kind of custom board, there may be some flaws.. So recheck pins.
Especially ROSC pin, SENSE1, SENSE2 pins as those may cause that motor wont work even if other pins are ok.
ROSC pin is for low power mode, so here you should calculate, if you just ignore it, be sure to connect at least to 10k resistor. Don't let it float. SENSE1, SENSE2 pins can be connected to 0.25omh resistors. You should check it.
Also from power pins very decisive VREG pin. It should get from 0 to 2000mV if I remember. Actually it controls current for your motor. So it depends on your stepper motor. Here also may appear nasty flaws. For example you have small stepper motor, and setting too high VREG value, than A4988 will sink too much current and your motor will glitch. Anyway you should read A4988 data sheet very accurately.
DIR PIN is simply for direction, push-pull pin configuration and HIGH/LOW values controls direction, clock wise, anti clock wise.
RESET INPUT PIN A4988 must get HIGH from your MCU.
ENABLE INPUT PIN A4988 must get LOW from your MCU.
SLEEP INPUT PIN A4988 must get HIGH from your MCU, also it is very useful to control it when your stepper job done, else if you leave it always HIGH, stepper motor will eat current and will heat up at idle state.
Also there are 3 MICROSTEPPING PINS, those are for controlling stepping.
As you just starting to play, it will be enough connect those pins to GND, you'll get full stepping regime.If you'll control those pins you can get other regimes like 1/2 stepping, 1/4,1/8,1/16...
And general pin is STEP pin, it should be driven with TIMER as PWM output with constant pulse width and alternating period.
Here is an example of STEP PIN control:
RCC_AHBPeriphClockCmd(RCC_AHBPeriph_GPIOA,ENABLE);
RCC_APB2PeriphClockCmd(RCC_AHBPeriph_GPIOA,ENABLE);
GPIO_InitTypeDef init;
init.GPIO_Mode = GPIO_Mode_AF;
init.GPIO_OType = GPIO_OType_PP;
init.GPIO_Pin = GPIO_Pin_9;
init.GPIO_PuPd = GPIO_PuPd_UP;
init.GPIO_Speed = GPIO_Speed_Level_2;
GPIO_Init(GPIOA,&init);
GPIO_PinAFConfig(GPIOA,GPIO_PinSource9,GPIO_AF_2);
for example I connect STEP output from MCU PA9 to A4988 STEP input. Which can be driven from timer as PWM. Check your concrete MCU datasheet.
Firstly output pin should be configured as AF, with push-pull and resistor is UP.
Also setup line for alternating pin.
Now configuring timer:
RCC_APB2PeriphClockCmd(RCC_APB2Periph_TIM1, ENABLE);
TIM_TimeBaseInitTypeDef timerInitStructure;
timerInitStructure.TIM_Prescaler = 48;
timerInitStructure.TIM_CounterMode = TIM_CounterMode_Up;
timerInitStructure.TIM_Period = 0;
timerInitStructure.TIM_ClockDivision = 0;
timerInitStructure.TIM_RepetitionCounter = 0;
TIM_TimeBaseInit(TIM1, &timerInitStructure);
TIM_OCInitTypeDef osc;
osc.TIM_OCMode = TIM_OCMode_PWM1;
osc.TIM_OutputState = TIM_OutputState_Enable;
osc.TIM_OutputNState = TIM_OutputNState_Disable;
osc.TIM_Pulse = 1000;
osc.TIM_OCPolarity = TIM_OCNPolarity_High;
osc.TIM_OCNPolarity = TIM_OCNPolarity_Low;
osc.TIM_OCIdleState =TIM_OCIdleState_Reset;
osc.TIM_OCNIdleState =TIM_OCNIdleState_Set;
TIM_OC2Init(TIM1, &osc);
TIM_Cmd(TIM1, ENABLE);
Here I configure 1us timer, as my MCU frequency is 48MHz.
Also you have configure that timer would drive PWM output.
TIM1->CCR = 10; with this register I can control pulse width, in this example it is 10us.
TIM1->ARR = 30; with ARR register I can control period, so it means STEP pulse frequency which is equal to stepper motor speed. In this case 30us.
If you are using HAL and CUBEMX you can get those configurations pretty fast.
I've got wiringpi2 and the the wiringpi2 python wrapper installed on the NOOBS Raspbian PI distro. The Adafruit 4 channel logic level converter kept the PI safe from 5v and sending data to the Arduino was as simple as this on the PI side:
import wiringpi2
wiringpi2.wiringPiSPISetup(1,5000)
wiringpi2.wiringPiSPIDataRW(1,'HELLO WORLD\n')
and the corresponding Arduino code[3].
EDIT: Apologies - from this point on, I can't post any more of the links I carefully added to show my working, sources and example code. You'll have to Google it and thank the 2-link rule.
So, I know the wiring works. But that's not the way round I actually want - I want to read a pin from the Arduino to the PI.
The Arduino SPI reference states:
This library allows you to communicate with SPI devices, with the Arduino as the master device.
The PI must be the master device. I thought I was doomed until I read Nick Gammon's excellent page about SPI which demonstrates 2 Arduinii talking to each other.
Also, the SPI transfer() command would suggest you CAN write from the Arduino.
I'm now at the stage where all the links of the the first 4 result pages of Google show as "followed" - so it's not for lack of Googling!
In theory, shouldn't this work if I use the READ method on the PI end? (Note: this is just one of many, many attempts, not the only one!)
On the Arduino:
#include <SPI.h>
void setup (void)
{
SPI.begin();
pinMode(MISO, OUTPUT);
// turn on SPI in slave mode
SPCR |= _BV(SPE);
}
void loop (void) {
byte data[] = {0x00, 0x00, 0x00, 0x00}; // this is 24 bits (8bits/byte * 4 bytes)
// Transfer 24 bits of data
for (int i=0; i<4; i++) {
SPI.transfer(data[i]); // Send 8 bits
}
}
And on the PI end of things:
import wiringpi2
wiringpi2.wiringPiSPISetup(1,5000)
stuff = wiringpi2.wiringPiSPIDataRW(1,'\n')
print stuff
WiringPI says the incoming data will overwrite my data, and the SPIDataRW takes exactly 2 inputs, so shouldn't I be getting "test" back?
What am I missing here? Any pointers greatly appreciated.
The SPI library assumes you want the arduino to act as a master. You can't use it to get an arduino to act as a slave. Sometimes you have to dive past the libraries into the chip's datasheet and see how things work. (and then, ideally, make a library from all your troubles)
An SPI slave device has to react to the master initiating the communication.
So the Pi, as the SPI master, will have to send dummy bytes over the MOSI line and read what the Arduino replies on the MISO line. ie, master initiate communication.
On the arduino side you can turn on the SPI interrupt with:
SPCR |= _BV(SPIE);
It's built into the atmega328 chip. So include this next bit on the arduino side to see incoming messages and set the response for the next message. The data that the arduino SPI slave responds with is whatever is in the data register when the master sends the message.
int gCurrentSpiByte; //or set up your a buffer or whatever
ISR (SPI_STC_vect)
{
gCurrentSpiByte = SPDR; // grab byte from SPI Data Register
SPDR = buf[messageCount++]; //Set the data to be sent out on the NEXT message.
}
And remember, you GOTTAGOFAST. If the arduino doesn't exit that interrupt service routine before the next SPI message comes it, it all goes to hell.
Also also, check to make sure the clock's polarity and phase are the same between the Pi and the Arduino (otherwise known as modes 0-3).
| 7 | 6 | 5 | 4 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 0 |
| SPIE | SPE | DORD | MSTR | CPOL | CPHA | SPR1 | SPR0 |
SPIE - Enables the SPI interrupt when 1
SPE - Enables the SPI when 1
DORD - Sends data least Significant Bit First when 1, most Significant Bit first when 0
MSTR - Sets the Arduino in master mode when 1, slave mode when 0
CPOL - Sets the data clock to be idle when high if set to 1, idle when low if set to 0
CPHA - Samples data on the falling edge of the data clock when 1, rising edge when 0
SPR1 and SPR0 - Sets the SPI speed, 00 is fastest (4MHz) 11 is slowest (250KHz)
So to turn on SPI, the SPI interrupt, and to set the polarity to... whatever that is...
SPCR |= _BV(SPIE) | _BV(SPE) | _BV(CPOL) ;
Anyway, I spent a couple days banging around with the Arduino SPI and that's what I learned.
i am having trouble getting data from two sensors using two software serial ports with an arduino board. I noticed a similar question might have been asked before but the answers suggest it can't be done and I know fully well it can based on the example here (http://arduino.cc/en/Tutorial/TwoPortReceive)!
I am using an arduino ethernet. The devices I am trying to get data from include a GPS and an IMU both from sparkfun.
I can get data from either devices using just on software serial port but as soon as I add the second software serial port, neither ports will work. I can't use the hardware serial port because that is being used byt another device.
My code is exactly similar to the example:
#include <SoftwareSerial.h>
SoftwareSerial portOne(7,8);
SoftwareSerial portTwo(5,6);
void setup()
{
Serial.begin(9600);
portOne.begin(9600);
portTwo.begin(9600);
}
void loop()
{
portOne.listen();
while (portOne.available() > 0) {
char inByte = portOne.read();
Serial.write(inByte);
}
delay(500);
portTwo.listen();
while (portTwo.available() > 0) {
char inByte = portTwo.read();
Serial.write(inByte);
}
Serial.println();
}
Anyone with any ideas?
This code will not work, or will work poorly if it works at all. SoftwareSerial only has one internal buffer. Yes, you can have multiple SoftwareSerial objects in existence, but only one of them controls the internal buffer. When any RX pin gets asserted, that generates an interrupt, but only the listen()ing RX pin gets checked for a start bit.
What's really needed is the ability to check on multiple pins when an interrupt comes along from the start bit. Then you'd have to set up pointers to the appropriate data structures. It would be complicated, but possible.
Or maybe just give up on interrupt-driven reception, and spin on checking both/all of the RX pins, and start the receive based on the pin you see. Be forwarned that this code has much hair, and you WILL need an oscilloscope to make it work.
I'm having a similar problem, which is why I found your sensor. After talking it over with my co-workers, we've decided to read our sensors in rotating order. Our sensors report the current state of the sensor, and not specific events, so it's okay if we lose some reports. So we'll read from port 1, then read from port 2, then port 1, etc. Our sensors spit out lines of text, so we know when to switch to the next sensor.
The referenced example only actively listens to one port at a time. The recommended solution would be to upgrade to an Arduino Mega (https://www.sparkfun.com/products/11061) which has 4 hardware serial ports.
In order to simultaneously support two software serial ports is going to require a lot of the CPU resources. It also be a difficult design and excessive programming time far outweighing the cost of $58 + shipping.
Looking at you code again it occurs to me that you are immediately checking for characters after your portOne.listen command. At 9600 baud it will take approximately 1ms for the first character to arrive, your while test will have been completed and the portTwo.listen command executed long before the first character arrives.
For testing purposes try adding a 1-2 ms delay after the portOne.listen command and see if you get a character.
As an example (untested and note, if port one is sending characters with no intercharacter gaps, the first while will never fail, preventing reading portTwo characters):
void loop()
{
portOne.listen();
delay(2);
while (portOne.available() > 0) {
char inByte = portOne.read();
Serial.write(inByte);
delay(1);
}
portTwo.listen();
delay(2);
while (portTwo.available() > 0) {
char inByte = portTwo.read();
Serial.write(inByte);
delay(1);
}
Serial.println();
}
Don't use while ......
Use:
{ portOne.listen();
if (PortOne.available() ) {
ricevo = myPort1.read(); }
// delay(2); // ridiculos waiting time
// delay(1); // extra ridiculos waiting time
Than 500 ms is a too big time for switching, no time.....