I've read around about the communication between battery powered Zigbee devices (sleepy end devices) and the gateway
for example: https://www.qorvo.com/design-hub/blog/demystifying-polling-control-in-zigbee-networks
So I get that the device call the gateway every long_polling to check for new commands/data:
would it be possible to know, for a specific device, the time of the last received packet?
Alternatively, I'd like to know every time a packet arrive, so I could extract the ieee (the device identifier) and update somewhere the current time.
In my case, I have a PC with a connected ConBee II, running Home Assistant and ZHA.
I'm interested in determining if the device is still online, and since it periodically communicate with the gateway, I'd like to leverage this behavior.
(Home Assistant will receive a value update every 15 minutes, but I'd like to know if the device is offline in less than a minute)
The device is a Aeotec Multipurpose Sensor (also reported as Samjin Multi)
These are the configured values
'checkin_interval': 0 = disabled
'long_poll_interval': 28 = 7sec
'short_poll_interval': 1
'fast_poll_timeout': 40 = 10s
'cluster_revision': 1
So my device will communicate with the gateway at least every 7 seconds, right?
I kinda can confirm this because though home assistant I can make a LED on the device blink, and the max observed time is about 7 seconds.
Any help would be appreciated,
cheers
Related
I am working on Android BLE as a peripheral connected to a custom device that runs Nordic NRF51 as a central. The project requires Android peripheral to connect to two NRF51 central devices.
Android is advertising two different Advertisement UUIDs one for left and other for right Nordic NRF51 devices. Ideally, I would like to have both Nordic Centrals to connect to the Android at the same time.
I have two main issues.
First issue. Android can get both connections fine. The problem occurs when Android sending notification or Android sending reply back as result of Write Request from the central. When both Centrals are connected, often notification nor the send reply works. I confirmed that the Nordic central does not receive the notification nor the reply. Does anyone have experiences in Android as a Peripheral supporting multiple connections at the same time? I have tried two BluetoothGattServer instances (one for each device) as well as one instance of BluetoothGattServer and based on the connected device, I can tell which Central the event if for and handle it correctly. It is sending notification or send reply to Write Request that at times it does not get sent from Android. I am using synchronized methods on the GattServerCallback event handlers.
Second Issue. Due to the first issue, I am now only advertising one UUID at a time. The idea is to switch between two advertising UUIDs, thus have only one connection at time. The problem now is switch advertising. About 1 out 3 times, when I start advertising with first UUID with its name (LFDroid), it appears that it is actually advertising second UUID with its name (RTDroid) briefly (1 or 2 seonds) and then advertises what was requested. Note that second UUID advertising was stopped on previous switching. It almost looks like when I ask to advertise, it starts to advertise with the last advertised UUID and name and then quickly advertises what is requested. This now causes problem because both Nordic Centrals sees the advertisement and connects.
Any suggestions would be appreciated.
I am developing a BLE android application where I have used RxAndroidBLe for BLE communication.
Everything working fine except one issue that the application is not receiving every scan response broadcasted by the BLE device (I am not sure whether it is an issue or not). The BLE device is set to broadcast it in every 1 second. It broadcasts the scan response on all the three channels 37,38,39 in round robin fashion. The application is intend to scan continuously until the application gets closed. But I observed that the application is not receiving all the scan response. Means it is not receiving scan response from the devices in every 1 second. Sometimes there is a gap of 2,3 seconds or more. I want to know is there any solution to overcome this issue or this is a valid behavior?
Any suggestion would be appreciated. Thanks in advance.
Due to nature of BLE scanning it is not certain that you will receive each scan response broadcast. At basic, it depend mostly on scan interval and scan window parameters (host side) and the interval you are broadcasting responses.
You can try low latency scan mode to improve your results.
I read in some places that advertising packets are sent to every one in the distance range. However, should the other device be scanning to receive them or it will receive it anyways?
The problem:
let's say I'm establishing a piconet between 5 or 6 BLE devices. At some point I have some connections between the slaves and one master. Then if one of the devices get removed/shut off for a few days I would like it to reconnect back to the network as soon as turned on.
I read about the autoconnect feature but it seems when you set it true, the device creates a background scanning which is actually slower (in frequency) than the manual scanning. This makes me conclude that for the autoConnect to work the device which is being turned on again needs to advertise again, right? Therefore, if autoconnect really runs a slow scan on background so it seems to me that you can never receive the adv packets instantly unless you're scanning somehow. Does that make sense?
If so, is there any way around it? I mean, detect the device that is comming back to the range instantly?
Nothing is "Instant". You are talking about radio protocols with delays, timeouts, retransmits, jamming, etc. There are always delays. The important thing is what you consider acceptable for your application.
A radio transceiver is either receiving, sleeping or transmitting, on one given channel at a time. Transmitting and receiving implies power consumption.
When a Central is idle (not handling any connection at all), all it has to do is scanning. It can do it full time (even if spec says this should be duty cycled). You can expect to actually receive an advertising packet from peer Peripheral the first time it is transmitted.
When a Central is maintaining a connection to multiple peripherals, its transceiver time is shared between all the connections to maintain. Background scanning is considered low priority, and takes some of the remaining transceiver time. Then an advertising Peripheral may send its ADV packet while Central is not listening.
Here comes statistical magic:
Spec says interval between two advertising events must be augmented with a (pseudo-)random delay. This ensures Central (scanner) and Peripheral (advertiser) will manage to see each other at some point in time. Without this random delay, their timing allocations could become harmonic, but out of phase, and it could happen they never see each other.
Depending on the parameters used on Central and Peripheral (advInterval, advDelay, scanWindow, scanInterval) and radio link quality, you can compute the probability to be able to reach a node after a given time. This is left as an exercise to the reader... :)
In the end, the question you should ask yourself looks like "is it acceptable my Peripheral is reconnected to my Central after 300 ms in 95% of cases" ?
My requirement is as follows:
I need to send Proximity Sensor (Reed Switches/Magnetic Sensor) reading (On/Off) from two Input Pins to a central PC.
I need to use coin cell. So basically the app should be in sleep mode and once there is any interrupt on any of these two pins it should wake up to send its state to the central PC.
I have DA18450 chip and development board (murata ZY type) with me.
Dialog Semiconductor 18450
Murata Bluetooth Smart Development Board
I am a beginner to bluetooth technology and started reading about it just a week back.
Could someone guide me about the most apt Profile/Service suitable for my application?
If you want the device to actually sleep then it'd probably be best for it to just transmit data via advertising packets when the device awakens. Otherwise you have to maintain a connection which requires staying awake at some level. However, advertising packets are broadcast and the device can't know if anything received those packets (you could have it broadcast several times for a fixed period of time or have it constantly broadcast while the proximity alert is valid). Also, on the receiving end, with no connection there's no way of knowing the transmitting device is even there when nothing is being transmitted.
The advertising packets have a section for limited information and that's where you'd transmit data if you don't want to establish a connection.
I read a lot about WiFi sensors being used to track smart phones in Retail environment. The location triangulation is done on basis that a smart phone has its WiFi turned ON, be it in connected or unconnected state.
Case 1 : WiFi turned ON but unconnected
Why should a smart phone which has its WiFi turned ON need to transmit the packets, unless the user 'scans' for nearby WiFi networks?
Case 2 : WiFi turned ON and connected
Why should a smart phone transmit any packets, unless the user is browsing the net?
In both the above cases, there is a high chance that most of the time the WiFi device does not send any packet, which means none of the WiFi sensors detect it. If that is true, then the whole idea behind WiFi sensor based triangulation in Retail goes for toss, clearly with so many companies working on this, I must be wrong. Please answer with more than a yes or no, as to which packets are generally sent in both the above scenarios.
If wifi is turned on it will periodically search for new networks. This happens even if you are already connected to one, as it allows the device to connect to a 'better' network, if available.
Scanning/network discovery can be done in two ways. First is passive when a device listens to surrounding access point's (AP) beacon frames. These are basically advertisements for their network. The second method is called active. This is the most likely explanation of how the technology you mentioned works. Active scanning is when the device sends out a probe frame asking for available APs. These are generally ones that you have associated with previously, e.g. Your home network. These probes can be listened to from nearby 802.11 (wifi) devices, therefore tracking you.
Active and passive scanning
801.11 frames
As mentioned in #AndrewLeeming answer, one of the causes for data transmission data is scanning.
It's not necessary but normally it will be performed to find a network to connect to (or a better network in case of already connected). Active scanning can be turned off for power saving reasons. Passive scanning doesn't involve transmissions, so it's irrelevant to this question.
However, the most important reason for WiFi devices to transmit packets while connected is to let the AP know that the client is still available. Otherwise the AP will drop the link after a certain period of time without activity. Additionally, the clients might be in power save mode and instruct the AP not to transmit data to them. From time to time the client will inquire the AP to see if there are any pending packets for it.