I have a requirement to hide multiple blocks using javascript dynamically. Is there anyway? I came across something called flow id which represents the block and it's flow.
I tried hiding it by using below code but it didn't worked -
jQuery("#FL_11").hide();
The survey API returned below survey flow. Each flow represents one block in the survey.
"SurveyFlow": {
"Type": "Root",
"FlowID": "FL_1",
"Flow": [
{
"ID": "BL_0NFTrPQyRUvxwz4",
"Type": "Standard",
"FlowID": "FL_10"
},
{
"Type": "Standard",
"ID": "BL_6AvqNx1Q02Af56m",
"FlowID": "FL_9",
"Autofill": []
},
{
"ID": "BL_071oYhqU9Iz0GeG",
"Type": "Standard",
"FlowID": "FL_11"
},
{
"ID": "BL_1TfHlHMQ3zu4D5Q",
"Type": "Standard",
"FlowID": "FL_12"
}
],
"Properties": {
"Count": 12,
"RemovedFieldsets": []
}
}
Related
I'm trying to get all profiles using ~all option with this endpoint
https://www.googleapis.com/analytics/v3/management/accounts/~all/webproperties/~all/profiles
It doesn't return all profiles due to ~all for accounts. If I include account ID instead of ~all, then it returns profiles based on that account id - which are missing when used with ~all option.
https://www.googleapis.com/analytics/v3/management/accounts/89478503/webproperties/~all/profiles
Am I doing something wrong or is this GA API bug?
I sugst you look into using account summaries list
GET https://www.googleapis.com/analytics/v3/management/accountSummaries
This will return all the account information for a user.
{
"kind": "analytics#accountSummaries",
"username": "me#gmail.com",
"totalResults": 15,
"startIndex": 1,
"itemsPerPage": 1000,
"items": [
{
"id": "59183475",
"kind": "analytics#accountSummary",
"name": "Cube Analytics",
"webProperties": [
{
"kind": "analytics#webPropertySummary",
"id": "UA-59183475-1",
"name": "Cube Analytics",
"internalWebPropertyId": "93305066",
"level": "STANDARD",
"websiteUrl": "XXXXXXX",
"profiles": [
{
"kind": "analytics#profileSummary",
"id": "115455750",
"name": "Alaternate",
"type": "WEB"
},
{
"kind": "analytics#profileSummary",
"id": "97191919",
"name": "All Web Site Data",
"type": "WEB"
},
{
"kind": "analytics#profileSummary",
"id": "178538323",
"name": "MobileView",
"type": "APP"
}
]
}, ]
}
By using this call you should only need to make one call and get all of the information back.
We are seeing different behaviour when we create a workspace in the WebInterface versus when we create the same conversation via the API.
The JSON export for the dialognode is the same:
{ "type": "standard",
"title": "SmallTalk: weerbericht",
"output": {
"text": {
"values": [],
"selection_policy": "sequential" } },
"parent": "smalltalk_container",
"context": { "user_weer": "#weerbericht",
"user_location": "#plaatsnamen" },
"metadata": {
"_customization": {
"mcr": false } },
"next_step": { "behavior": "jump_to", "selector": "condition", "dialog_node": "node_33_1519129633532"
},
"conditions": "#ST_weersbericht",
"description": null,
"dialog_node": "node_9_1517408489377",
"previous_sibling": "node_3_1518680265483" },
But the behaviour is different, which can be explained when we look at the UI
there is a difference
This is the UI for the dialogNode created via the browser
This is the UI for the same dialogNode created via the API
One difference we found is the Multiple Reponse switch:
It should be OFF (image on the right) and as per the JSON (mcr:false).
But even when we switch it on manually, the context variables don't show.
What should I be looking for in the API to fix this ?
The dialog model for multiple condition responses is that the parent node needs to be either standard dialog node or frame. Now when adding a multiple condition response to this node (and hence making an MCR node out of that parent node) you need to add a dialog node with "type":"response_condition" under this node.
This is a way how to create multiple condition responses through the api.
To give you and example to create MCR node:
The JSON of dialog nodes that need to pushed through the API will look like:
{
"type": "standard",
"title": "mcr node",
"output": {
},
"parent": null,
"context": null,
"metadata": {
"_customization": {
"mcr": true
}
},
"next_step": null,
"conditions": "#book_flight",
"digress_in": "does_not_return",
"description": null,
"dialog_node": "node_8_1525086089064",
"digress_out": "allow_all",
"previous_sibling": null
},
{
"type": "response_condition",
"title": null,
"output": {
"text": {
"values": ["I see city entity!"]
}
},
"parent": "node_8_1525086089064",
"context": null,
"metadata": {
},
"next_step": null,
"conditions": "#city",
"description": null,
"dialog_node": "node_9_1525086100114",
"previous_sibling": null
},
{
"type": "response_condition",
"title": null,
"output": {
"text": {
"values": ["I don't see anything."]
}
},
"parent": "node_8_1525086089064",
"context": null,
"metadata": {
},
"next_step": null,
"conditions": "anything_else",
"description": null,
"dialog_node": "node_10_1525086122332",
"previous_sibling": "node_9_1525086100114"
}
I have been successfully using this awesome library and concept called json schema form.
https://www.npmjs.com/package/angular2-json-schema-form
Now using the schema patterns given I am able to generate a form based on a dynamically created schema from database. I want to convert the single form in multiple tabs. I.E I want to group certain kind of fields in one panel.
Is there any kind of support for this functionality? So that I can assign the css class according to the layout.
https://angular2-json-schema-form.firebaseapp.com/?set=ng-jsf&example=ng-jsf-flex-layout&framework=material-design&language=en
You can split group of fields into separate tabs using the fieldsets property.
See the following example from README.md:
{
"properties": {
"firstName": {
"type": "string",
"description": "First name"
},
"lastName": {
"type": "string",
"description": "Last name"
},
"email": {
"type": "string",
"description": "Email"
},
"notificationsFrequency": {
"type": "string",
"description": "Notifications frequency",
"widget": "select",
"oneOf": [
{
"description": "Daily",
"enum": [
"daily"
]
},
{
"description": "Weekly",
"enum": [
"weekly"
]
},
{
"description": "Monthly",
"enum": [
"monthly"
]
}
],
"default": "daily"
}
},
"fieldsets": [
{
"title": "Personal information",
"fields": [
"firstName",
"lastName",
"email"
]
},
{
"title": "Account settings",
"fields": [
"notificationsFrequency"
]
}
]
}
We're trying to deploy an ARM template which deploys a Stream Analytics job with n Event Hubs outputs depending on an input parameter.
Right now we're having success with all but the listKeys() function inside the outputs property copy loop function which gets each Event Hub's primary keys:
"sharedAccessPolicyKey": "[listKeys(resourceId('Microsoft.EventHub/namespaces/eventhubs/authorizationRules', variables('clientEventHubNamespace'), parameters('clients')[copyIndex('outputs')].id, variables('clientEventHubClientSharedAccessName')), '2015-08-01').primaryKey]"
We get the error:
17:44:31 - Error: Code=InvalidTemplate; Message=Deployment template
validation failed: 'The template resource
'tailor-router-axgf7t3gtspue' at line '129' and column '10' is not
valid: The template function 'copyIndex' is not expected at this
location. The function can only be used in a resource with copy
specified. Please see https://aka.ms/arm-copy for usage details..
Please see https://aka.ms/arm-template-expressions for usage
details.'.
However, if we change this to be a specific index:
"sharedAccessPolicyKey": "[listKeys(resourceId('Microsoft.EventHub/namespaces/eventhubs/authorizationRules', variables('clientEventHubNamespace'), parameters('clients')[0].id, variables('clientEventHubClientSharedAccessName')), '2015-08-01').primaryKey]"
it works.
Is copyIndex('propertyName') inside a listKeys() a supported function?
If not, is there a workaround that would achieve the same effect?
Kind regards,
Nick
Stream Analytics job resource definition:
{
"apiVersion": "2016-03-01",
"type": "Microsoft.StreamAnalytics/StreamingJobs",
"name": "[variables('routerStreamAnalyticsName')]",
"location": "[variables('location')]",
"dependsOn": [ "clientsEventHubCopy" ],
"tags": {
"boundedContext": "[variables('boundedContextName')]"
},
"properties": {
"sku": {
"name": "[parameters('routerStreamAnalyticsSkuTier')]"
},
"outputErrorPolicy": "drop",
"eventsOutOfOrderPolicy": "adjust",
"eventsOutOfOrderMaxDelayInSeconds": 0,
"eventsLateArrivalMaxDelayInSeconds": 5,
"dataLocale": "en-US",
"compatibilityLevel": "1.0",
"inputs": [
{
"name": "input0",
"properties": {
"type": "stream",
"serialization": {
"type": "Avro"
},
"datasource": {
"type": "Microsoft.ServiceBus/EventHub",
"properties": {
"serviceBusNamespace": "[parameters('input0EventHubNamespace')]",
"sharedAccessPolicyName": "[parameters('input0EventHubSharedAccessPolicyName')]",
"sharedAccessPolicyKey": "[parameters('input0EventHubSharedAccessPolicyKey')]",
"eventHubName": "[parameters('input0EventHubName')]"
}
}
}
}
],
"transformation": {
"name": "routing",
"properties": {
"streamingUnits": "[parameters('routerStreamAnalyticsSkuTier')]",
"query": "omitted"
}
},
"copy": [
{
"name": "outputs",
"count": "[length(parameters('clients'))]",
"input": {
"name": "[parameters('clients')[copyIndex('outputs')].id]",
"properties": {
"datasource": {
"type": "Microsoft.ServiceBus/EventHub",
"properties": {
"serviceBusNamespace": "[variables('clientEventHubNamespace')]",
"sharedAccessPolicyName": "[variables('clientEventHubClientSharedAccessName')]",
"sharedAccessPolicyKey": "[listKeys(resourceId('Microsoft.EventHub/namespaces/eventhubs/authorizationRules', variables('clientEventHubNamespace'), parameters('clients')[copyIndex('outputs')].id, variables('clientEventHubClientSharedAccessName')), '2015-08-01').primaryKey]",
"eventHubName": "[parameters('clients')[copyIndex('outputs')].id]"
}
},
"serialization": {
"type": "Avro"
}
}
}
}
]
}
},
Thanks for reporting this and sorry for the inconvenience.
I just talked to the ARM team, we had an issue when copyindex was inside the index tags eg 'array[copyindex()]'. It should be fixed now.
Let us know how it goes.
Thanks,
JS - Azure Stream Analytics
I'm thinking of using the JSONAPI standard for the design of our API. One thing this API must be able to do, is accept a compound document (several layers deep) and create it. The root object owns all descendants ('to-many' relationships) which the server knows nothing about at that point, so it's not possible for the client to provide an id.
Is this supported by the specification or does the client have to issue http requests for every object in the document in order?
from http://jsonapi.org/format/#document-compound-documents
Compound documents require "full linkage", meaning that every included
resource MUST be identified by at least one resource identifier object
in the same document. These resource identifier objects could either
be primary data or represent resource linkage contained within primary
or included resources. The only exception to the full linkage
requirement is when relationship fields that would otherwise contain
linkage data are excluded via sparse fieldsets.
{
"data": [{
"type": "articles",
"id": "1",
"attributes": {
"title": "JSON API paints my bikeshed!"
},
"links": {
"self": "http://example.com/articles/1"
},
"relationships": {
"author": {
"links": {
"self": "http://example.com/articles/1/relationships/author",
"related": "http://example.com/articles/1/author"
},
"data": { "type": "people", "id": "9" }
},
"comments": {
"links": {
"self": "http://example.com/articles/1/relationships/comments",
"related": "http://example.com/articles/1/comments"
},
"data": [
{ "type": "comments", "id": "5" },
{ "type": "comments", "id": "12" }
]
}
}
}],
"included": [{
"type": "people",
"id": "9",
"attributes": {
"first-name": "Dan",
"last-name": "Gebhardt",
"twitter": "dgeb"
},
"links": {
"self": "http://example.com/people/9"
}
}, {
"type": "comments",
"id": "5",
"attributes": {
"body": "First!"
},
"links": {
"self": "http://example.com/comments/5"
}
}, {
"type": "comments",
"id": "12",
"attributes": {
"body": "I like XML better"
},
"links": {
"self": "http://example.com/comments/12"
}
}]
}