Given a scenario:
The Client, described as a user of sorts on a home network with a standard router running NAT/PAT on a residential network. Imagine all traffic within their network is allowed, but the router is configured with a Stateful Firewall that performs basic SPI on incoming and outgoing data.
A Primary server that the client can always reach, and has no security, available on the open internet. Only responds to HTTP, and relays the information (IP:PORT) to the secondary server for later processing
A secondary server that can always contact the primary server, has a fundamentally different physical location and IP address/Network scheme from both the primary and client. It cannot contact the Client until the client contacts the Primary Server to relay its ip and port.
Given this data, my question is this:
If the client sends an HTTP GET request to the primary server, and then immediately takes the ephemeral source port attached to that GET request and sets up an HTTP server with that same source port, after the GET is finished, could the secondary server solicit that harvested port and IP address combination with a GET request and receive a response?
This would be effectively, NAT Traversal using ONLY HTTP. Would the stateful firewall reject the packets from the secondary server given that a different IP is now poking at a port that originally had the primary server poke at? Could multiple computers connect to this now opened server on the client?
Related
I am reading the SOCKS5 RFC, it has:
CONNECT
In the reply to a CONNECT, BND.PORT contains the port number that the
server assigned to connect to the target host, while BND.ADDR
contains the associated IP address. The supplied BND.ADDR is often
different from the IP address that the client uses to reach the SOCKS
server, since such servers are often multi-homed. It is expected
that the SOCKS server will use DST.ADDR and DST.PORT, and the
client-side source address and port in evaluating the CONNECT
request.
For the last part of this paragraph, I have two questions:
The doc states that SOCKS servers are often multi-homed, and will reply to the client different bound address and port than the ones the client originally connects to. Does this mean the SOCKS server the client connects to redirects the connection to another SOCKS server? If so, what is point of letting the client sense the presence of the redirected SOCKS server? What will a client normally do with the bound address and port the SOCKS server replies?
The doc states It is expected that the SOCKS server will use DST.ADDR and DST.PORT, and the client-side source address and port in evaluating the CONNECT request, what exactly does it mean by evaluating the CONNECT request? What am I supposed to do in this evaluating process if I am implementing a SOCKS server?
SOCKS proxies are multi-homed because they are often installed at network boundaries like firewalls. The client connects to the internal interface of the firewall but the outgoing address is the external face. Since some protocols like FTP need to include the external visible IP address and port in-band (see FTP data transfer, i.e. PORT and PASV) they need to know this externally visible IP and port.
A normal socks proxy will connect where the clients wants to, i.e. DST. But when an upstream proxy is configured or when firewall ACL say different the proxy might behave differently.
No. It means the server has 2 (or more) network cards/connections -- you communicate with the server on cardA, but when that server connects to the device downstream, it uses cardB.
That's up to you really...perhaps you want to blacklist/whitelist certain clients/servers/ports (ex. only allow clients from your country, or only allow connections to a specific country). Good example is not letting a client connect back to itself (?). Just a guess. Usually RFCs are good about saying "MUST, MIGHT, MUST NOT, etc" ..if it says "expected", to me that sounds like 'might' which basically means 'can, but doesn't have to.'
Can someone describe from a network point of view what RPC (SUN and/or DCE) is and why it deviates from standard TCP behavior?
The way that I understand it is a client reaches out to a server with a unique source port and then switches the source port after the TCP three way handshake finishes. I work with ASA firewalls so this behavior becomes very apparent when the inspection of DCE RPC is not enabled since the firewall will block it because it sees it as a threat. I have read a few MS TechNet articles and other website definitions to include watching about five Youtube videos which all seem to explain it from a programmers perspective but I have yet to fully understand this concept since I am not a programmer.
Note that there is nothing that deviates from standard TCP regarding the RPC protocols.
SunRPC or DCE RPC works on top of UDP(at least SunRPC can use UDP) or on top of TCP.
Typically in order for an RPC client to contact/call an RPCserver, it first contacts some sort of lookup server (called portmapper or rpcbind in the case of SunRPC), which replies with the location (IP address and port number) of where the actual server is running.
So from a networking perspective:
RPC Servers listens on a random port number, which may change each time that server program is (re)started.
At startup the RPC server connects to the portmapper, which runs on a well known port and register itself with which IP address and port number it's listening on.
Normally the portmapper service runs on the same machine as the RPC server programs.
When a client wants to connect to or call an RPC service it performs these actions:
Connects to the portmapper, on a well known/standard destination port and asks it where the particular service it wants to connect to is.
portmapper replies with the IP address and port number of the service the client asked for.
client tears down the connection to the portmapper
client establishes a new connection to the service using the IP address and port number that pormapper gave it.
client calls the RPC service over this new connection, which the client may use for multiple RPC calls.
These RPC calls are just application message exchanged on top of a TCP connection.
(In the case UDP is used instead of TCP, it works much the same, but there's no naturally no connection setup/teardown being performed over the network)
This presents a problem for firewalls, since the servers listens on randomly chosen port numbers, one cannot administratively allow access to a particular port number. Instead a firewall wanting to support this kind of setup would need to open up the portmapper port, catch the RPC messages going to that well known port of portmapper, inspect the message content exchanged with the portmapper to extract the IP address and port number from the RPC messages(the portmapper is itself implemented as an RPC server) in order to dynamically open a port between the RPC server and client.
Given that you have multiple web browsers running, all which obviously listen on port 80, how would a browser figure if an incoming HTTP response was originated by itself? And whether or not catch the response and show it?
As part of the connection process a TCP/IP connection is assigned a client port. Browsers do not "listen on port 80"; rather a browser/clients initiate a request to port 80 on the server and waits for a reply on the client port from the server's IP.
After the client port is assigned (locally), each client [TCP/IP] connection is uniquely identified by (server IP, server port, client IP, client port) and the connection (and response sent over such) can be "connected back" to the correct browser. This same connection-identifying tuple is how a server doesn't confuse multiple requests coming from the same client/IP1
HTTP sits on top of the TCP/IP layer and doesn't have to concern itself with mixing up connection streams. (HTTP/2 introduces multiplexing, but that is a different beast and only affects connection from the same browser.)
See The Ephemeral Port Range for an overview:
A TCP/IPv4 connection consists of two endpoints, and each endpoint consists of an IP address and a port number. Therefore, when a client user connects to a server computer, an established connection can be thought of as the 4-tuple of (server IP, server port, client IP, client port). Usually three of the four are readily known -- client machine uses its own IP address and when connecting to a remote service, the server machine's IP address and service port number are required [leaving only the client port unknown and to be automatically assigned].
What is not immediately evident is that when a connection is established that the client side of the connection uses a port number. Unless a client program explicitly requests a specific port number, the port number used is an ephemeral port number. Ephemeral ports are temporary ports assigned by a machine's IP stack, and are assigned from a designated range of ports for this purpose. When the connection terminates, the ephemeral port is available for reuse, although most IP stacks won't reuse that port number until the entire pool of ephemeral ports have been used. So, if the client program reconnects, it will be assigned a different ephemeral port number for its side of the new connection.
See TCP/IP Client (Ephemeral) Ports and Client/Server Application Port Use for an additional gentle explanation:
To know where to send the reply, the server must know the port number the client is using. This [client port] is supplied by the client as the Source Port in the request, and then used by the server as the destination port to send the reply. Client processes don't use well-known or registered ports. Instead, each client process is assigned a temporary port number for its use. This is commonly called an ephemeral port number.
1 If there are multiple client computers (ie. different TCP/IP stacks each assigning possibly-duplicate ephemeral ports) using the same external IP then something like Network Address Translation must be used so the server still has a unique tuple per connection:
Network address translation (NAT) is a methodology of modifying network address information in Internet Protocol (IP) datagram packet headers while they are in transit across a traffic routing device for the purpose of remapping one IP address space into another.
thank you all for answers.
the hole listening thing over port 80 was my bad,I must have been dizzy last night :D
anyway,as I have read HTTP is connectionless.
browser initiates an HTTP request and after a request is made, the client disconnects from >the server and waits for a response. The server process the request and re-establish the >connection with the client to send response back.
therefor the browser does not maintain connection waiting for a response.so the answer is not that easy to just send the response back to the open socket.
here's the source
Pay attention browesers aren't listening on specific port to receive HTTP response. Web server listening on specific ports (usually 80 or 443). Browser open connection to web server, and send HTTP request to web server. Browser don't close connection before receive HTTP response. Web server writes HTTP response on opened connection.
Given that you have multiple web browsers running, all which obviously listen on port 80
Not obvious: just wrong. The HTTP server listens on port 80. The browsers connect to port 80.
how would a browser figure if an incoming HTTP response was originated by itself?
Because it comes back on the same connection and socket that was used to send the request.
And whether or not catch the response and show it?
Anything that comes back on the connected socket belongs to the guy who connected the socket.
And in any case all this is the function of TCP, not the browser.
To my understanding by serverSocket = new ServerSocket(portNumber) we create an object which potentially can "listen" to the indicated port. By clientSocket = serverSocket.accept() we force the server socket to "listen" to its port and to "accept" a connection from any client which tries to connect to the server through the port associated with the server. When I say "client tries to connect to the server" I mean that client program executes "nameSocket = new Socket(serverIP,serverPort)".
If client is trying to connect to the server, the server "accepts" this client (i.e. creates a "client socket" associated with this client).
If a new client tries to connect to the server, the server creates another client socket (associated with the new client). But how the server knows if it is a "new" client or an "old" one which has already its socket? Or, in other words, how the clients are identified? By their IP? By their IP and port? By some "signatures"?
What happens if an "old" client tries to use Socket(serverIP,serverIP) again? Will server create the second socket associated with this client?
The server listens on an address and port. For example, your server's IP address is 10.0.0.1, and it is listening on port 8000.
Your client IP address is 10.0.0.2, and the client "connects" to the server at 10.0.0.1 port 8000. In the TCP connect, you are giving the port of the server that you want to connect to. Your client will actually get its own port number, but you don't control this, and it will be different on each connection. The client chooses the server port that it wants to connect to and not the client port that it is connecting from.
For example, on the first connection, your client may get client-side port 12345. It is connecting from 10.0.0.2 port 12345 to the server 10.0.0.1 port 8000. Your server can see what port the client is connecting from by calling getpeername on its side of the connection.
When the client connects a second time, the port number is going to be different, say port 12377. The server can see this by calling getpeername on the second connection -- it will see a different port number on the client side. (getpeername also shows the client's IP address.)
Also, each time you call accept on the server, you are getting a new socket. You still have the original socket listening, and on each accept you get a new socket. Call getpeername on the accepted socket to see which client port the connection is coming from. If two clients connect to your server, you now have three sockets -- the original listening socket, and the sockets of each of the two clients.
You can have many clients connected to the same server port 8000 at the same time. And, many clients can be connected from the same client port (e.g. port 12345), only not from the same IP address. From the same client IP address, e.g. 10.0.0.2, each client connection to the server port 8000 will be from a unique client port, e.g. 12345, 12377, etc. You can tell the clients apart by their combination of IP address and port.
The same client can also have multiple connections to the server at the same time, e.g. one connection from client port 12345 and another from 12377 at the same time. By client I mean the originating IP address, and not a particular software object. You'll just see two active connections having the same client IP address.
Also, eventually over time, the combination of client-address and client-port can be reused. That is, eventually, you may see a new client come in from 10.0.0.2 port 12345, long after the first client at 10.0.0.2 port 12345 has disconnected.
Every TCP connection has as identifier the quadruple (src port, src address, dest port, dest address).
Whenever your server accepts a new client, a new Socket is created and it's indipendent from every other socket created so far. The identification of clients is not implictly handled somehow..
You don't have to think sockets as associated to "clients", they are associated with an ip and a port, but there is not direct correlation between these two.
If the same client tries to open another socket by creating a new one you'll have two unrelated sockets (because ports will be different for sure). This because the client cannot use the same port to open the new connection so the quadruple will be different, same client ip, same server ip, same server port but different client port.
EDIT for your questions:
clients don't specify a port because it's randomly choosen from the free ones (> 1024 if I'm not wrong) from the underlying operating system
a connection cannot be opened from a client using the same port, the operating system won't let you do that (actually you don't specify any port at all) and in any case it would tell you that port is already bound to a socket so this issue cannot happen.
whenever the server receives a new connection request it's is considered new, because also if ip is the same port will be different for sure (in case of old packet resend or similar caveats I think that the request will be discarded)
By the way all these situations are clearly explained in TCP RFC here.
I think the question here is why do you care if the client is new or old. What is new and old?
For example, a web browser could connect to a web server to request a web page. This will create a connection so serverSocket.accept() will return a new Socket. Then the connection is closed by the web browser.
Afer a couple of minutes, the end used click on a link in the web page and the browser request a new page to the server. This will create a connection so serverSocket.accept() will return a new Socket.
Now, the web server do not care if this is a new or old client. It just need to server the requested page. If the server do care if the "client" already requested a page in the past, it should do so using some information in the protocol used on the socket. Check out http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/OSI_model
In this case, the ServerSocket and Socket ack on the transport level. The question "does this client already requested a page on the server" should be answered by information on the session or even application layer.
In the web browser/server example, the http protocol (which is an application) protocol hold information about who is this browser in the parameters of the request (the browser transmit cookie informations with every request). The http server can then set/read cookie information to known if the browser connected before and eventually maintain a server side session for that browser.
So back to your question: why do you care if it's a new or old client?
A socket is identified by:
(Local IP,Local Port, Remote IP,
Remote Port,IP Protocol(UDP/TCP/SCTP/etc.)
And that's the information the OS uses to map the packets/data to the right handle/file descriptor of your program. For some kinds of sockets,(e.g. an non-connected UDP socket)the remote port/remote IP might be wildcards.
By definition, this is not a Java related question, but about networking in general, since Sockets and SeverSockets apply to any networking-enabled programming language.
A Socket is bounded to a local-port. The client will open a connection to the server (by the Operating System/drivers/adapters/hardware/line/.../line/hardware/adapters/drivers/Server OS). This "connection" is done by a protocol, called the IP (Internet Protocol) when you are connected to the Internet. When you use "Sockets", it will use another protocol, which is the TCP/IP-protocol.
The Internet Protocol will identify nodes on a network by two things: their IP-address and their port. The TCP/IP-protocol will send messages using the IP, and making sure messages are correctly received.
Now; to answer your question: it all depends! It depends on your drivers, your adapters, your hardware, your line. When you connect to your localhost machine, you will not get further than the adapter. The hardware isn't necessairy, since no data is actually sent over the line. (Though often you need hardware before you can have an adapter.)
By definition, the Internet Protocol defines a connection as pair of nodes (thus four things: two IP-adresses and two ports). Also, the Internet Protocol defines that one node can only use one port at a time to initiate a connection with another node (note: this only applies for the client, not the server).
To answer your second question: if there are two Sockets: the "new" and the "old". Since, by the Internet Protocol, a connection is a pair of nodes, and nodes can only use one port at a time for a connection, the ports of "new" and "old" must be different. And because this is different, the "new" client can be discriminated from the "old", since the port-number is differently.
The socket API is the de-facto standard for TCP/IP and UDP/IP communications (that is, networking code as we know it). However, one of its core functions, accept() is a bit magical.
To borrow a semi-formal definition:
accept() is used on the server side.
It accepts a received incoming attempt
to create a new TCP connection from
the remote client, and creates a new
socket associated with the socket
address pair of this connection.
In other words, accept returns a new socket through which the server can communicate with the newly connected client. The old socket (on which accept was called) stays open, on the same port, listening for new connections.
How does accept work? How is it implemented? There's a lot of confusion on this topic. Many people claim accept opens a new port and you communicate with the client through it. But this obviously isn't true, as no new port is opened. You actually can communicate through the same port with different clients, but how? When several threads call recv on the same port, how does the data know where to go?
I guess it's something along the lines of the client's address being associated with a socket descriptor, and whenever data comes through recv it's routed to the correct socket, but I'm not sure.
It'd be great to get a thorough explanation of the inner-workings of this mechanism.
Your confusion lies in thinking that a socket is identified by Server IP : Server Port. When in actuality, sockets are uniquely identified by a quartet of information:
Client IP : Client Port and Server IP : Server Port
So while the Server IP and Server Port are constant in all accepted connections, the client side information is what allows it to keep track of where everything is going.
Example to clarify things:
Say we have a server at 192.168.1.1:80 and two clients, 10.0.0.1 and 10.0.0.2.
10.0.0.1 opens a connection on local port 1234 and connects to the server. Now the server has one socket identified as follows:
10.0.0.1:1234 - 192.168.1.1:80
Now 10.0.0.2 opens a connection on local port 5678 and connects to the server. Now the server has two sockets identified as follows:
10.0.0.1:1234 - 192.168.1.1:80
10.0.0.2:5678 - 192.168.1.1:80
Just to add to the answer given by user "17 of 26"
The socket actually consists of 5 tuple - (source ip, source port, destination ip, destination port, protocol). Here the protocol could TCP or UDP or any transport layer protocol. This protocol is identified in the packet from the 'protocol' field in the IP datagram.
Thus it is possible to have to different applications on the server communicating to to the same client on exactly the same 4-tuples but different in protocol field. For example
Apache at server side talking on (server1.com:880-client1:1234 on TCP)
and
World of Warcraft talking on (server1.com:880-client1:1234 on UDP)
Both the client and server will handle this as protocol field in the IP packet in both cases is different even if all the other 4 fields are same.
What confused me when I was learning this, was that the terms socket and port suggest that they are something physical, when in fact they're just data structures the kernel uses to abstract the details of networking.
As such, the data structures are implemented to be able to distinguish connections from different clients. As to how they're implemented, the answer is either a.) it doesn't matter, the purpose of the sockets API is precisely that the implementation shouldn't matter or b.) just have a look. Apart from the highly recommended Stevens books providing a detailed description of one implementation, check out the source in Linux or Solaris or one of the BSD's.
As the other guy said, a socket is uniquely identified by a 4-tuple (Client IP, Client Port, Server IP, Server Port).
The server process running on the Server IP maintains a database (meaning I don't care what kind of table/list/tree/array/magic data structure it uses) of active sockets and listens on the Server Port. When it receives a message (via the server's TCP/IP stack), it checks the Client IP and Port against the database. If the Client IP and Client Port are found in a database entry, the message is handed off to an existing handler, else a new database entry is created and a new handler spawned to handle that socket.
In the early days of the ARPAnet, certain protocols (FTP for one) would listen to a specified port for connection requests, and reply with a handoff port. Further communications for that connection would go over the handoff port. This was done to improve per-packet performance: computers were several orders of magnitude slower in those days.