Assume I have a simple table in Oracle db
CREATE TABLE schema.d_test
(
id_record integer GENERATED AS IDENTITY START WITH 95000 NOT NULL,
DT DATE NOT NULL,
var varchar(50),
num float,
PRIMARY KEY (ID_RECORD)
)
And I have a dataframe in R
dt = c('2022-01-01', '2005-04-01', '2011-10-02')
var = c('sgdsg', 'hjhgjg', 'rurtur')
num = c(165, 1658.5, 8978.12354)
data = data.frame(dt, var, num)%>%
mutate(dt = as.Date(dt))
I'm trying to insert data into Oracle d_test table using the code
data %>%
dbWriteTable(
oracle_con,
value = .,
date = T,
'D_TEST',
append = T,
row.names=F,
overwrite = F
)
But the following error returned
Error in .oci.WriteTable(conn, name, value, row.names = row.names, overwrite = overwrite, :
Error in .oci.GetQuery(con, stmt, data = value) :
ORA-00947: not enough values
What's the problem?
How can I fix it?
Thank you.
This is pure Oracle (I don't know R).
Sample table:
SQL> create table test_so (id number generated always as identity not null, name varchar2(20));
Table created.
SQL> insert into test_so(name) values ('Name 1');
1 row created.
My initial idea was to suggest you to insert any value into the ID column, hoping that Oracle would discard it and generate its own value. However, that won't work.
SQL> insert into test_so (id, name) values (-100, 'Name 2');
insert into test_so (id, name) values (-100, 'Name 2')
*
ERROR at line 1:
ORA-32795: cannot insert into a generated always identity column
But, if you can afford recreating the table so that it doesn't automatically generate the ID column's value but use a "workaround" (we used anyway, as identity columns are relatively new in Oracle) - a sequence and a trigger - you might be able to "fix" it.
SQL> drop table test_so;
Table dropped.
SQL> create table test_so (id number not null, name varchar2(20));
Table created.
SQL> create sequence seq_so;
Sequence created.
SQL> create or replace trigger trg_bi_so
2 before insert on test_so
3 for each row
4 begin
5 :new.id := seq_so.nextval;
6 end;
7 /
Trigger created.
Inserting only name (Oracle will use a trigger to populate ID):
SQL> insert into test_so(name) values ('Name 1');
1 row created.
This is what you'll do in your code - provide dummy ID value, just to avoid
ORA-00947: not enough values
error you have now. Trigger will discard it and use sequence anyway:
SQL> insert into test_so (id, name) values (-100, 'Name 2');
1 row created.
SQL> select * from test_so;
ID NAME
---------- --------------------
1 Name 1
2 Name 2 --> this is a row which was supposed to have ID = -100
SQL>
The way you can handle this problem is to create table with GENERATED BY DEFAULT ON NULL AS IDENTITY like this
CREATE TABLE CM_RISK.d_test
(
id_record integer GENERATED BY DEFAULT ON NULL AS IDENTITY START WITH 5000 NOT NULL ,
DT date NOT NULL,
var varchar(50),
num float,
PRIMARY KEY (ID_RECORD)
)
Related
I have the following MARIADB code. It's supposed to demonstrate:
Constructing tables using sequences for incrementing the ID.
Using a temporary table+join to INSERT data into a table, while incrementing the ID.
Procedure:
Sequence S1 and table T1 are created. T1_ID is incremented with S1
Sequence S2 and table T2 are created. T2_ID is incremented with S2
Table T1 is filled with data. All is fine.
Temporary table TEMP_T2 is created and filled with data. No ID in this table. Column T1_NAME is a cross reference to SHORT_NAME in table T1.
The T1_ID is introduced into table TEMP_T2 with a join. The result of this SELECT is inserted into T2. Here, the sequence S2 should auto-increment T2_ID.
For some reason, at the end, T2 looks like this:
T2_ID|T1_ID|NAME|
-----+-----+----+
2| 1|y |
4| 2|x |
6| 2|z |
Why was T2_ID double-incremented?
Thanks!
USE DB1;
SET FOREIGN_KEY_CHECKS = 0;
DROP SEQUENCE IF EXISTS `S2`;
DROP SEQUENCE IF EXISTS `S1`;
DROP TABLE IF EXISTS `T2`;
DROP TABLE IF EXISTS `T1`;
-- Create sequence S1 and able T1
CREATE SEQUENCE `S1` start with 1 minvalue 1 maxvalue 9223372036854775806 increment by 1 cache 1000 nocycle ENGINE=InnoDB;
SELECT SETVAL(`S1`, 1, 0);
CREATE TABLE `T1` (
`T1_ID` tinyint(4) NOT NULL DEFAULT nextval(`S1`),
`SHORT_NAME` varchar(10) NOT NULL,
PRIMARY KEY (`T1_ID`)
) ENGINE=InnoDB DEFAULT CHARSET=utf8mb3;
-- Create sequence T2 and table T2
CREATE SEQUENCE `S2` start with 1 minvalue 1 maxvalue 9223372036854775806 increment by 1 cache 1000 nocycle ENGINE=InnoDB;
SELECT SETVAL(`S2`, 1, 0);
CREATE TABLE `T2` (
`T2_ID` int(11) NOT NULL DEFAULT nextval(`S2`),
`T1_ID` int(11) DEFAULT NULL,
`NAME` varchar(100) DEFAULT NULL COLLATE 'utf8mb3_bin',
PRIMARY KEY (`T2_ID`),
UNIQUE KEY `T2_NAME_UN` (`NAME`)
) ENGINE=InnoDB DEFAULT CHARSET=utf8mb3;
-- Load data into T1
DELETE FROM T1;
INSERT INTO T1(SHORT_NAME) VALUES
('a'),
('b'),
('c');
SELECT * FROM T1;
-- Create temporary file for joining with T1
DROP TABLE IF EXISTS `TEMP_T2`;
CREATE TEMPORARY TABLE `TEMP_T2` (
`T1_NAME` varchar(10) DEFAULT NULL,
`NAME` varchar(100) DEFAULT NULL,
UNIQUE KEY `T2_NAME_UN` (`NAME`)
) ENGINE=InnoDB DEFAULT CHARSET=utf8mb3;
DELETE FROM TEMP_T2 ;
-- Insert data into the temporary table
INSERT INTO TEMP_T2(T1_NAME,NAME) VALUES
('b','x'),
('a','y'),
('b','z');
SELECT * FROM TEMP_T2;
# Do a join with TEMP_T2 x T1 and insert into T2
INSERT INTO T2(T1_ID,NAME)
SELECT
t1.T1_ID ,
t2.NAME
FROM TEMP_T2 AS t2
INNER JOIN T1 AS t1
ON t2.T1_NAME =t1.SHORT_NAME ;
SELECT * FROM T2;
Thanks for the responses.
I'm using SEQUENCE rather than AUTO_INCREMENT because I was told that it is the more modern way. It also enables retrieving the last ID of any specific table.
It's strange that this should be a bug. It seems like really basic functionality. But so it is...
I've found this as a reported existing bug MDEV-29540 in INSERT ... SELECT as it pertains to sequences in default values of columns.
Because this bug is reported and fix, this problem is/will not occur in the 10.3.37, 10.4.27, 10.5.18, 10.6.11, 10.7.7, 10.8.6, 10.9.4, 10.10.2, 10.11.1 and later versions.
I am trying out SQLite and encountered a problem. There are 3 Tables A, B, and C.
I want to update Table A using the sum of B and C.
Table A.
James null.
Table B.
James 5.
Table C
James 2
so with the update, I want table A to have
James 3. (5-2)
Thank You
SQLite does not support joins in an UPDATE statement so you can do it by accessing directly the corresponding rows of the tables A and B like this:
update A
set value =
(select value from B where name = A.name) -
(select value from C where name = A.name)
If you want to update only the row with name = 'James' then add:
where name = 'James'
See the demo
Works in every DB:
UPDATE
"A"
SET
"x" =
(
SELECT
SUM("x")
FROM "B"
WHERE "B"."id"="A"."id"
) +
(
SELECT
SUM("x")
FROM "C"
WHERE "C"."id"="A"."id"
)
I believe the following demonstrates that Yes you can:-
DROP TABLE IF EXISTS ta;
DROP TABLE IF EXISTS tb;
DROP TABLE IF EXISTS tc;
CREATE TABLE IF NOT EXISTS ta (name TEXT, numb INTEGER);
CREATE TABLE IF NOT EXISTS tb (name TEXT, numb INTEGER);
CREATE TABLE IF NOT EXISTS tc (name TEXT, numb INTEGER);
INSERT INTO ta VALUES ('JAMES',null),('Mary',100);
INSERT INTO tb VALUES ('JAMES',5),('Sue',33);
INSERT INTO tc VALUES ('JAMES',2),('Anne',45);
UPDATE ta SET numb =
(SELECT sum(numb) FROM tb WHERE name = 'JAMES')
-
(SELECT sum(numb) FROM tc WHERE name = 'JAMES')
WHERE name = 'JAMES';
SELECT * FROM ta;
SELECT * FROM tb;
SELECT * FROM tc;
This :-
Drops the tables if they exist allowing it to be rerun (simplifies modifications if need be).
column names name and numb have been assumed as they weren't given.
Creates the 3 tables (note table names used for the demo are ta, tb and tc)
Adds some data (note that additional rows have been added to show how to distinguish (at least to a fashion))
Updates column numb of table A (ta) where the name column has a value of JAMES according to the sum of the numb column from all rows with the same name (JAMES) from table tb minus the sum of the numb column from all rows with the same name (JAMES) from table tc
This may not be exactly what you want so it assumes that you want to sum all rows with the same name per table (ta and tc)
Queries all the tables (first is shown below as that is the table that has been updated.)
The first result showing that the row has been updated from null to 3 (5 - 2) and that the row for Mary has remained as it was :-
The following change to the UPDATE gets the name (rather than hard-coding 'JAMES' multiple times, as per the row(s) extract from the ta table, the use of hard-coded names perhaps making it easier to understand the working of the SQL).
UPDATE ta SET numb = (SELECT sum(numb) FROM tb WHERE name = ta.name) - (SELECT sum(numb) FROM tc WHERE name = ta.name) WHERE name = 'JAMES';
Note that should there not be an associated row (i.e. with the same name) in either tb or tc then the result will be null (whether or not sum is used).
ALTER PROCEDURE [dbo].[K_FS_InsertMrpDetails]
#date datetime,
#feedtype varchar(50),
#rateperkg float,
#rateper50kg float,
#updatedby varchar(50)
AS
BEGIN
INSERT INTO K_FS_FeedMrpDetails([date], feedtype, rateperkg, rateper50kg, updatedby, updatedon)
VALUES(#date, #feedtype, #rateperkg, #rateper50kg, #updatedby, getdate())
SELECT '1' AS status
END
With this query we insert 9 rows at a time but what I want is in one same date do not insert again different details. How can I please help me.
Add a unique constraint on the column [date]. That will prevent you from adding more than one row with the same [date] value.
Update:
To allow 9 rows for each date you can add a computed column D that removes the time part and you need to add a column that will hold the values 1 to 9 R. Use a check constraint on R to only allow 1-9. Finally you create a unique constraint on (R, D).
Sample table definition:
create table T
(
ID int identity primary key,
DT datetime not null,
R tinyint check (R in (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9)) not null,
D as dateadd(day, datediff(day, 0, DT), 0),
constraint ux_RD unique (R,D)
)
Try with this:
insert into T(DT, R) values(getdate(), 1)
insert into T(DT, R) values(getdate(), 2)
insert into T(DT, R) values(getdate(), 1)
First and second insert works fine, the third raises a unique constraint exception.
I can not figure out how to query a SQLite.
needed:
1) Replace the record (the primary key), if the condition (comparison of new and old fields entries)
2) Insert an entry if no such entry exists in the database on the primary key.
Importantly, it has to work very fast!
I can not come up with an effective inquiry.
Edit.
MyInsertRequest - the desired expression.
Script:
CREATE TABLE testtable (a INT PRIMARY KEY, b INT, c INT)
INSERT INTO testtable VALUES (1, 2, 3)
select * from testtable
1|2|3
-- Adds an entry, because the primary key is not
++ MyInsertRequest VALUES (2, 2, 3) {if c>4 then replace}
select * from testtable
1|2|3
2|2|3
-- Adds
++ MyInsertRequest VALUES (3, 8, 3) {if c>4 then replace}
select * from testtable
1|2|3
2|2|3
3|8|3
-- Does nothing, because such a record (from primary key field 'a')
-- is in the database and none c>4
++ MyInsertRequest VALUES (1, 2, 3) {if c>4 then replace}
select * from testtable
1|2|3
2|2|3
3|8|3
-- Does nothing
++ MyInsertRequest VALUES (3, 34, 3) {if c>4 then replace}
select * from testtable
1|2|3
2|2|3
3|8|3
-- replace, because such a record (from primary key field 'a')
-- is in the database and c>2
++ MyInsertRequest VALUES (3, 34, 1) {if c>2 then replace}
select * from testtable
1|2|3
2|2|3
3|34|1
Isn't INSERT OR REPLACE what you need ? e.g. :
INSERT OR REPLACE INTO table (cola, colb) values (valuea, valueb)
When a UNIQUE constraint violation occurs, the REPLACE algorithm
deletes pre-existing rows that are causing the constraint violation
prior to inserting or updating the current row and the command
continues executing normally.
You have to put the condition in a unique constraint on the table. It will automatically create an index to make the check efficient.
e.g.
-- here the condition is on columnA, columnB
CREATE TABLE sometable (columnPK INT PRIMARY KEY,
columnA INT,
columnB INT,
columnC INT,
CONSTRAINT constname UNIQUE (columnA, columnB)
)
INSERT INTO sometable VALUES (1, 1, 1, 0);
INSERT INTO sometable VALUES (2, 1, 2, 0);
select * from sometable
1|1|1|0
2|1|2|0
-- insert a line with a new PK, but with existing values for (columnA, columnB)
-- the line with PK 2 will be replaced
INSERT OR REPLACE INTO sometable VALUES (12, 1, 2, 6)
select * from sometable
1|1|1|0
12|1|2|6
Assuming your requirements are:
Insert a new row when a doesn't exists;
Replacing row when a exist and existing c greater then new c;
Do nothing when a exist and existing c lesser or equal then new c;
INSERT OR REPLACE fits first two requirements.
For last requirement, the only way I know to make an INSERT ineffective is supplying a empty rowset.
A SQLite command like following whould make the job:
INSERT OR REPLACE INTO sometable SELECT newdata.* FROM
(SELECT 3 AS a, 2 AS b, 1 AS c) AS newdata
LEFT JOIN sometable ON newdata.a=sometable.a
WHERE newdata.c<sometable.c OR sometable.a IS NULL;
New data (3,2,1 in this example) is LEFT JOINen with current table data.
Then WHERE will "de-select" the row when new c is not less then existing c, keeping it when row is new, ie, sometable.* IS NULL.
I tried the others answers because I was also suffering from a solution to this problem.
This should work, however I am unsure about the performance implications. I believe that you may need the first column to be unique as a primary key else it will simply insert a new record each time.
INSERT OR REPLACE INTO sometable
SELECT columnA, columnB, columnC FROM (
SELECT columnA, columnB, columnC, 1 AS tmp FROM sometable
WHERE sometable.columnA = 1 AND
sometable.columnB > 9
UNION
SELECT 1 AS columnA, 1 As columnB, 404 as columnC, 0 AS tmp)
ORDER BY tmp DESC
LIMIT 1
In this case one dummy query is executed and union-ed onto a second query which would have a performance impact depending on how it is written and how the table is indexed. The next performance problem has potential where the results are ordered and limited. However, I expect that the second query should only return one record and therefore it should not be too much of a performance hit.
You can also omit the ORDER BY tmp LIMIT 1 and it works with my version of sqlite, but it may impact performance since it can end up updating the record twice (writing the original value then the new value if applicable).
The other problem is that you end up with a write to the table even if the condition states that it should not be updated.
I have 7 Sqlite tables and i want to join all these into one table or say a new table .Every tables has same number of column names.I am getting error ambiguity with column name.How can join all these tables.
To avoid ambiguity, you should prefix the columns with the table names and use column aliases:
create table tab1(id number, value varchar2(20));
create table tab2(id number, value varchar2(20));
create table tab3(id number, value varchar2(20));
insert into tab1(id, value) values(1, 'a');
insert into tab2(id, value) values(1, 'b');
insert into tab3(id, value) values(1, 'c');
create table t4 as
select tab1.id id, tab1.value value1, tab2.value value2, tab3.value value3
from tab1, tab2, tab3
where tab1.id = tab2.id
and tab1.id = tab3.id;