security:
enable_authenticator_manager: true
# https://symfony.com/doc/current/security.html#registering-the-user-hashing-passwords
password_hashers:
Symfony\Component\Security\Core\User\PasswordAuthenticatedUserInterface: 'auto'
# https://symfony.com/doc/current/security.html#loading-the-user-the-user-provider
providers:
users_in_memory: { memory: null }
firewalls:
dev:
pattern: ^/(_(profiler|wdt)|css|images|js)/
security: false
main:
lazy: true
provider: users_in_memory
# activate different ways to authenticate
# https://symfony.com/doc/current/security.html#the-firewall
# https://symfony.com/doc/current/security/impersonating_user.html
# switch_user: true
# Easy way to control access for large sections of your site
# Note: Only the *first* access control that matches will be used
access_control:
# - { path: ^/admin, roles: ROLE_ADMIN }
# - { path: ^/profile, roles: ROLE_USER }
- { path: '^/', roles: ROLE_USER_IP, ips: [127.0.0.1, ::1] }
when#test:
security:
password_hashers:
# By default, password hashers are resource intensive and take time. This is
# important to generate secure password hashes. In tests however, secure hashes
# are not important, waste resources and increase test times. The following
# reduces the work factor to the lowest possible values.
Symfony\Component\Security\Core\User\PasswordAuthenticatedUserInterface:
algorithm: auto
cost: 4 # Lowest possible value for bcrypt
time_cost: 3 # Lowest possible value for argon
memory_cost: 10 # Lowest possible value for argon
my local built-in symfony server IP doesn't know ROLE_USER_IP parameter. I can set ROLE_USER_IPPPPP there is no error on URL as http://localhost:8000/test
how to refuse access from IP ::3 or 127.0.0.3 ?
- { path: '^/internal', roles: IS_AUTHENTICATED_ANONYMOUSLY, ips: [127.0.0.1, 221.64.45.214] }
- { path: '^/internal', roles: ROLE_NO_ACCESS }
this is the solution to only accept request from IP as 127.0.0.1 or 221.64.45.214. Others match second rule (ROLE_NO_ACCESS)
Related
I use lexik JWT to secure my api and i can login with it.
But the login route works with get and post request when i test with postman.
I want to restrict with POST only.
To do so i tried to add - { path: ^/auth/login_check, roles: PUBLIC_ACCESS, methods:['POST'] } in the access control but it does not do the trick.
I have no error but i still can do get request and have my token back.
security:
enable_authenticator_manager: true
# https://symfony.com/doc/current/security.html#registering-the-user-hashing-passwords
password_hashers:
Symfony\Component\Security\Core\User\PasswordAuthenticatedUserInterface: 'auto'
# https://symfony.com/doc/current/security.html#loading-the-user-the-user-provider
providers:
# used to reload user from session & other features (e.g. switch_user)
app_user_provider:
entity:
class: App\Entity\User
property: email
# used to reload user from session & other features (e.g. switch_user)
# used to reload user from session & other features (e.g. switch_user)
# used to reload user from session & other features (e.g. switch_user)
firewalls:
dev:
pattern: ^/(_(profiler|wdt)|css|images|js)/
security: false
api_login:
pattern: ^/auth/login
provider: app_user_provider
stateless: true
json_login:
username_path: email
check_path: /auth/login_check
success_handler: lexik_jwt_authentication.handler.authentication_success
failure_handler: lexik_jwt_authentication.handler.authentication_failure
api:
pattern: ^/api
stateless: true
jwt: ~
# activate different ways to authenticate
# https://symfony.com/doc/current/security.html#the-firewall
# https://symfony.com/doc/current/security/impersonating_user.html
# switch_user: true
# Easy way to control access for large sections of your site
# Note: Only the *first* access control that matches will be used
access_control:
- { path: ^/auth/login, roles: PUBLIC_ACCESS }
- { path: ^/auth/login_check, roles: PUBLIC_ACCESS, methods:['POST'] }
- { path: ^/api, roles: IS_AUTHENTICATED_FULLY }
So i found the answer myself. The methods option in access_control is a matching option and it does not restrict.
To restrict a route to a specific option, it has to be set in the route like this
#[Route('/my_route', name: 'my_route',methods: ['POST'])]
I don't know if what I'm trying to do is possible but I have the following configuration in my security.yaml and it shows me the following error:
Because you have multiple authenticators in firewall "administrator_secured_area", you need to set the "entry_point" key to one of your authenticators ("App\Security\AdministratorAuthenticator", "form_login") or a service ID implementing "Symfony\Component\Security\Http\EntryPoint\AuthenticationEntryPointInterface". The "entry_point" determines what should happen (e.g. redirect to "/login") when an anonymous user tries to access a protected page.
I have searched various solutions but none suits my current setup
security:
enable_authenticator_manager: true
# https://symfony.com/doc/current/security.html#registering-the-user-hashing-passwords
password_hashers:
Symfony\Component\Security\Core\User\PasswordAuthenticatedUserInterface: 'auto'
App\Entity\Administrator:
algorithm: auto
App\Entity\Instructor:
algorithm: auto
# https://symfony.com/doc/current/security.html#loading-the-user-the-user-provider
providers:
# used to reload user from session & other features (e.g. switch_user)
app_administrator_provider:
entity:
class: App\Entity\Administrator
property: email
app_instructor_provider:
entity:
class: App\Entity\Instructor
property: email
# used to reload user from session & other features (e.g. switch_user)
firewalls:
dev:
pattern: ^/(_(profiler|wdt)|css|images|js)/
security: false
administrator_secured_area:
lazy: true
provider: app_administrator_provider
custom_authenticator: App\Security\AdministratorAuthenticator
form_login:
login_path: /login/administrator
check_path: /app_login_administrator
default_target_path: /login/administrator
logout:
path: app_logout
# where to redirect after logout
target: app_login_administrator
instructor_secured_area:
lazy: true
provider: app_instructor_provider
custom_authenticator: App\Security\InstructorAuthenticator
form_login:
login_path: /login/instructor
check_path: /app_login_instructor
default_target_path: /login/instructor
logout:
path: app_logout
# where to redirect after logout
target: app_login_instructor
# activate different ways to authenticate
# https://symfony.com/doc/current/security.html#the-firewall
# https://symfony.com/doc/current/security/impersonating_user.html
# switch_user: true
# Easy way to control access for large sections of your site
# Note: Only the *first* access control that matches will be used
access_control:
# - { path: ^/admin, roles: ROLE_ADMIN }
# - { path: ^/profile, roles: ROLE_USER }
when#test:
security:
password_hashers:
# By default, password hashers are resource intensive and take time. This is
# important to generate secure password hashes. In tests however, secure hashes
# are not important, waste resources and increase test times. The following
# reduces the work factor to the lowest possible values.
Symfony\Component\Security\Core\User\PasswordAuthenticatedUserInterface:
algorithm: auto
cost: 4 # Lowest possible value for bcrypt
time_cost: 3 # Lowest possible value for argon
memory_cost: 10 # Lowest possible value for argon
As the error message suggests you should set the entry_point key to one of your authenticators, here is an example, you could choose to set in one of them, or you could try to set it in both:
administrator_secured_area:
lazy: true
provider: app_administrator_provider
custom_authenticator: App\Security\AdministratorAuthenticator
form_login:
login_path: /login/administrator
check_path: /app_login_administrator
default_target_path: /login/administrator
logout:
path: app_logout
# where to redirect after logout
target: app_login_administrator
entry_point: 'form_login'
instructor_secured_area:
lazy: true
provider: app_instructor_provider
custom_authenticator: App\Security\InstructorAuthenticator
form_login:
login_path: /login/instructor
check_path: /app_login_instructor
default_target_path: /login/instructor
logout:
path: app_logout
# where to redirect after logout
target: app_login_instructor
I want two authentications methods in my application.
One for the entity User, and other (admin) with a plaintext.
Very simple.
Thus, when I configure security.yaml, I specify the providers:
security:
providers:
user:
entity:
class: App\Entity\User
property: username
in_memory:
memory:
users:
admin:
password: admin
roles: 'ROLE_ADMIN'
encoders:
App\Entity\User: bcrypt
Symfony\Component\Security\Core\User\User: plaintext
firewalls:
dev:
pattern: ^/(_(profiler|wdt)|css|images|js)/
security: false
admin:
provider: in_memory
pattern: ^/admin/
guard:
provider: in_memory
form_login:
login_path: admin_login
check_path: admin_login
logout:
path: /admin/logout
target: /
default:
provider: user
anonymous: ~
guard:
provider: user
form_login:
login_path: login
check_path: login
default_target_path: login_redirect
use_referer: true
logout:
path: /logout
target: /
access_control:
- { path: ^/admin/login, roles: IS_AUTHENTICATED_ANONYMOUSLY }
- { path: ^/login, roles: IS_AUTHENTICATED_ANONYMOUSLY }
- { path: ^/admin, roles: ROLE_ADMIN }
- { path: ^/dashboard, roles: ROLE_USER }
And return the error:
In GuardAuthenticationFactory.php line 121:
Because you have multiple guard configurators, you need to set the "guard.e
ntry_point" key to one of your configurators ()
Then, if I have to set the guard.entry_point, I need do something like this:
admin:
entry_point: app.form_admin_authenticator
main:
entry_point: app.form_user_authenticator
And therefore, if I undestard, I need to configure a Authentication Listener like this: https://symfony.com/doc/current/components/security/authentication.html
(btw, this particular help page is very ambiguous and incomplete)
Is it necessary? It seems too complex for my purpose
I ran into this particular error. My situation might be a little different, but I had a similar need to authenticate using different authentication strategies depending on the entry point to the application.
One thing your config doesn't include is a reference to any Guard Authenticator objects. See this documentation for an intro to what role those objects play, and how to define them. Symfony's Security package is pretty complicated, and I found that using Guard Authenticators made the process a lot simpler for my use case.
Here is an example of a security.yaml config referencing two different authenticators. The entry_point configuration tells Symfony which one to try first, because in my particular case, Symfony otherwise wouldn't know which authentication strategy to apply first to an incoming request.
security:
providers:
user:
id: App\My\UserProviderClass
firewalls:
dev:
pattern: ^/(_(profiler|wdt)|css|images|js)/
security: false
main:
anonymous: ~
logout:
path: app_logout
guard:
entry_point: App\My\MainAuthenticator
authenticators:
- App\My\MainAuthenticator
- App\My\OtherAuthenticator
Custom Guard Authenticators contain a method called supports. This method takes the incoming request as its only argument, and returns true or false based on whether the given authenticator should be applied to the incoming request. A common practice might be to check the request's Symfony route name (as defined by the controller) or perhaps something like the full URI for the request. For example:
/**
* Does the authenticator support the given Request?
*
* If this returns false, the authenticator will be skipped.
*
* #param Request $request
*
* #return bool
*/
public function supports(Request $request): bool
{
$matchesMyRoute = 'some_route_name' ===
$request->attributes->get('_route');
$matchesMyUri = '/path/to/secured/resource' ===
$request->getUri();
return $matchesMyRoute || $matchesMyUri;
}
You can imagine that if multiple Guard Authenticators exist in the same application, it's likely the case that one would only want them to apply to a request of a certain type, whether the differentiation is based on the kind of auth applied (eg. a header with an API key vs. a stateful session cookie), whether the difference is more about the specific route being hit, or perhaps a combination of factors.
In this case, telling Symfony which Guard Authenticator to try first may be important for your security strategy, or may have performance ramifications. For example, if you had two authenticators, and one had to hit the database to verify a stateful session, but another could verify the request's authentication statelessly, eg. by verifying a JWT's signature, you'd probably want to make the JWT authenticator run first, because it might not need to make a round trip to the database to authenticate the request.
See this article for a deeper explanation: https://symfonycasts.com/screencast/symfony-security/entry-point
With Symfony 3.3.16, my users are disconnected in 5/6 minutes. I don't understand.
This problem is only in production (OVH), not in dev.
session.gc_maxlifetime : 1440
security.yml :
security:
encoders:
AppBundle\Entity\User: bcrypt
providers:
database_users:
entity:
class: AppBundle\Entity\User
firewalls:
dev:
pattern: ^/(_(profiler|wdt)|css|images|js)/
security: false
main:
pattern: ^/
anonymous: true
simple_form:
username_parameter: _email
authenticator: AppBundle\Security\Authenticator
check_path: login
login_path: login
success_handler: AppBundle\Handler\AuthenticationSuccessHandler
logout:
path: logout
handlers: [AppBundle\Handler\LogoutHandler]
success_handler: AppBundle\Handler\LogoutSuccessHandler
access_control:
- { path: '^/administration', roles: ROLE_ADMIN }
- { path: '^/user', roles: ROLE_USER }
Can you help me ?
In the symfony configuration reference, you can configure the session lifetime setting:
cookie_lifetime
This determines the lifetime of the session - in seconds. The default
value - null - means that the session.cookie_lifetime value from
php.ini will be used. Setting this value to 0 means the cookie is
valid for the length of the browser session.
gc_maxlifetime
This determines the number of seconds after which data will be seen as "garbage" and potentially cleaned up. Garbage collection may occur during session start and depends on gc_divisor and gc_probability.
Check their value in the config.yml and config_prod.yml
I understand you have already checked the the value of the php.ini value session.gc_maxlifetime
Morning folks,
mainly i want to secure all call against a url that starts with /api/internal.
All endpoints that start with this path are only for internal calls, e.g. in a ajax-search box. So right me when i am wrong but i thought it would be a good idea to secure this via host definition in access_roles
I tried it with the following security.yml
security:
role_hierarchy:
ROLE_myproject_USER: ROLE_USER
ROLE_TEAMMANAGER: ROLE_USER
ROLE_ADMIN: [ROLE_TEAMMANAGER]
providers:
dashboard_users:
ldap:
service: myproject.ldap
# my ldap config
custom_user_provider:
id: myproject.factory.scale_user
firewalls:
dev:
pattern: ^/(_(profiler|wdt)|css|images|js)/
security: false
api_internal:
pattern: ^/api/internal
security: true
host: myproject.dev
api_doc:
pattern: ^/api/doc
security: false
api_login:
pattern: ^/api/login
stateless: true
anonymous: true
api:
pattern: ^/api
stateless: true
provider: custom_user_provider
guard:
authenticators:
- myproject.api_login_authenticator
main:
anonymous: ~
form_login_ldap:
login_path: myproject_login
check_path: myproject_login
service: myproject.ldap
dn_string: 'Verbund\{username}'
logout:
path: myproject_logout
target: /
access_control:
- { path: ^/api/internal, host: myproject.dev }
But i get this error:
InvalidConfigurationException in SecurityExtension.php line 481:
No authentication listener registered for firewall "api_internal".
Side information: In this project there a 3 different sections:
/api/internal/**** - should only be accessible from the website itself
/api/ - should be accessible via REST, is secured via JWTToken
the Website itself - is secured via form login and LDAP
Thankful for any help you can provide.
Max
In order to have hosts secured, use access_control
access_control:
# require ROLE_ADMIN for /admin*
- { path: ^/admin, roles: ROLE_ADMIN }
where the path is your desired host.
In order to have everything for a subhost secured use
- { path: ^/admin/*, roles: ROLE_ADMIN }
remove other firewalls than main and dev!
Please refer to http://symfony.com/doc/2.8/security.html for more information