I'm writting a simple network sniffer that should be able to reconstruct network structure.
When an interface has set up a DHCP, I can easily read interface settings such as client IP address, subnet mask, DNS server etc. by catching a DHCP packet and analysing it.
When an interface has a static IP, I'm catching ARP Announcement packet to get static IP address and then ARP request from the gateway, to get geteway IP address. I'm also saving MAC addresses.
My problem is: how to get subnet mask from one or more static IPs in the network and the gateway address. Or by caching some packets. I didn't see packets that could have such informations.
I also need DNS address, but it's less important.
The program should work in OpenWRT (C++).
My problem is: how to get subnet mask from one or more static IPs in the network and the gateway address.
Possibly, you can't.
If the sniffed network uses DHCP then you can monitor the DHCP requests (which should be broadcast) for their subnet mask and router fields which mirror the server's offer.
Without DHCP, all you can do is take an educated guess. If your passive sniffer registers broadcasts from addresses 192.168.1.1 through 192.168.1.29, you know that the prefix length is at most /27. It could also be anything shorter, down to /16, with potential addresses being (currently) absent or silent. The prefix could be even short than /16 if the network admin is ignoring RFC 1918. With public addresses you're mostly on your own.
If you can scan actively you could send ARP requests and see which ones get answered - you'd also see nodes that don't originate any traffic/broadcasts.
The gateway is also just a guess. In a network with mostly Internet-bound traffic, the default gateway is most likely the one being ARPed most often. If the network traffic is mostly server-centric, ARP requests for their addresses outnumber the ones for any gateway.
Your sniffer is severely limited when it is just attached to a switch and listening to broadcast packets only. If the sniffer manages to listen to all traffic on the network (via a monitoring/mirroring switch port) then you can easily identify the gateway by its MAC address that packets for arbitrary IP addresses is sent to and vice versa.
As above, if you can actively send probe packets you could test the gateway(s) with packets that they accept (and hopefully forward) and which ones they reject.
Related
I'm new to the networking world and I'm using Wireshark to learn stuffs about the network.
I was hanging around in Wireshark while I was using my VPN for circumventing the internet filter (living in a dictatorship country).
While I was using the VPN I see packets that their source or destination IP was neither my IP nor VPN server IP.
I considered two things about my problem:
1- I know my VPN uses its VPN server to send my whole packets to that server then forward them to my deserved destination, then take the response and send it to my client (is that correct?).
2- In Wireshark, I just can see the packets that their either source or destination address is my IP address.
My packets before using VPN:
As you can see, their either source or destination IP is my IP (192.168.1.101).
After using VPN, VPN:
Wireshark:
I tried filtering packets with my IP like this ip.addr == 192.168.1.101 to see only the packets that their either source or destination IP was my private IP, and guess what? nothing was changed. Why did this happen? Wasn't that supposed to filter my packets?
I also checked those packets' MAC and compared them with my MAC, and they were identical.
So my main question is why these kinds of wandering packets were showed by Wireshark? Is my VPN client insecure and trying to sending my data to other places? Or I'm wrong about how my VPN works?
Also, I appreciate it If somebody tells me more explanation about how my VPN or Wireshark works so that I have these types of packets in my Wireshark.
First of all your considerations, point no.1 is right, that's how a typical VPN works and point no.2 is wrong.
Wireshark can capture any packet (any source IP or destination IP) flowing in and out of a network adapter technically known as NIC card. NIC cards are the way through which you can connect to a network (Internet). A quick brief of NIC over here
A typical VPN client software would form a virtual NIC to encrypt and send your traffic through it. A quick brief of VPNs over here
So, to see the required traffic in Wireshark, you must capture traffic from an appropriate interface (NIC card). The answer over here might be helpful.
When we establish a TCP connection from PC1 to Server and send data through this connection, how does the Router know to which of the two PCs (PC1 and PC2) should it communicate on the way back from Server to PC1?
And
How does ping (ICMP) know to which internal node it should send the answer?
NAT (Network Address Translation) is stateful. It creates a translation table that has the layer-3 and layer-4 protocols and addresses. By looking up the return traffic addresses in the translation table, the NAT process can determine which inside addresses should be placed in the packet.
Edit:
Per the edit to your question, asking about ICMP (it is very bad form to change the question in order to ask a different question because it can invalidate the perfectly acceptable answers already given):
It is all the same as TCP or UDP. NAT creates a state table that is dynamically built as traffic passes from inside to outside. NAPT will allow you to overload a single IP address with traffic from multiple inside addresses, and it will translate the return traffic by looking up where to send it in its state table.
With NAPT, besides looking at and translating the IP address, NAPT looks at the layer-4 protocol (TCP, UDP, ICMP) and translates the layer-4 addresses (TCP or UDP port numbers or ICMP identifies), too, storing the translations in its translation table. When return traffic is destined to a particular layer-3 and layer-4 address combination, from a particular layer-3 and layer-4 address combination, the NAPT process finds that in its translation table, and it can see where to send the traffic on the inside.
NAT is very resource intensive, and it breaks the IP paradigm of end-to-end connectivity, where every host is uniquely identified by its own IP address, which is why it is called a kludge (or worse). NAT was developed to extend the life of IPv4 until IPv6, with its nearly unlimited addressing, can become ubiquitous.
RFC 2663, IP Network Address Translator (NAT) Terminology and Considerations:
4.1.2. Network Address Port Translation (NAPT)
NAPT extends the notion of translation one step further by also
translating transport identifier (e.g., TCP and UDP port numbers, ICMP
query identifiers). This allows the transport identifiers of a number
of private hosts to be multiplexed into the transport identifiers of a
single external address. NAPT allows a set of hosts to share a single
external address. Note that NAPT can be combined with Basic NAT so
that a pool of external addresses are used in conjunction with port
translation.
For packets outbound from the private network, NAPT would translate
the source IP address, source transport identifier and related fields
such as IP, TCP, UDP and ICMP header checksums. Transport identifier
can be one of TCP/UDP port or ICMP query ID. For inbound packets, the
destination IP address, destination transport identifier and the IP
and transport header checksums are translated.
A NAPT router in figure 2 may be configured to translate sessions
originated from N-Pri into a single external address, say Addr-i.
Very often, the external interface address Addr-Nx of NAPT router is
used as the address to map N-Pri to.
There is a large pool of resources describing NAT (Network Address Translation), which is available if you search "nat explained". A great resource is What is NAT and how it work tutorial.
The most important detail is that commonly we use NAPT (commonly used as PAT - Port Address Translation) (Network Address and Port Translation), alongside NAT.
When a device needs to use the Internet, it must open a local (source port) and send the IP request to the other end. For example, a notepad with source IP address 192.168.1.2 needs to communicate with a web server at 216.58.212.35.
It fires up random source port 1234 and requests information from target port 80 (HTTP - Web page).
This goes through the networks NAT device, which stores the information 192.168.1.2/1234 with the next information that it computes, and sends the request as 46.103.93.105 (its own IP public IP) and a new source port, for example 2345.
The web server responds to the NAT device, which in turn finds the correlated information (source port 2345 targets 192.168.1.2/1234). The notepad receives the information and displays it to the user.
The router adds information to the request header sent to the server that allows it to look up the sender when the reply is received. This is usually accomplished by using a table stored in the router's memory that maps the PC's address to the token added to the header.
I recently found that packets are encapsulated within ethernet frames. Packets use IP addresses, frames use MAC addresses.
Why aren't IP addresses used in ethernet frames for routing? I understand that when trying to access a basic website, the computer goes to a DNS to find the IP address relevant to the user-entered domain name. How do computers find the correct MAC address?
Really, how are MAC addresses used in routing internet traffic?
Thanks
IP packets aren't always encapsulated in Ethernet frames. There are other physical media such as ISDN, etc. When packets are routed, IP addresses are used to determine the next hop and the physical address is used to physically identify the interface serving as the next hop. Only the former (determining next-hop) is usually called routing.
To answer your second part, MAC addresses are discovered through ARP (Address Resolution Protocol) in IPv4 & ND6 (Neighbor Discovery) in IPv6.
Update:
The destination IP address in the IP header is the final destination. In the process of routing (at each hop), you get the next hop's IP address to (eventually) reach the final destination from the routing table (this could be a default gateway's IP address). To send the packet to the next hop, you need its MAC address. While hopping through intermediate links, the IP address in the IP header don't change - only the MAC addresses change.
Bit late but still here is my answer :) ...
To send data you need two address, the MAC address and the IP address.
Basically the sending host will ARP for a MAC address, this occurs when the local host doesn't know the MAC address of the host it has an IP address for or it will ARP for the default gateway MAC address (if it doesn't already know it) if the IP address in on a different subnet/ network. Once it obtains a MAC address the IP packet is encapsulated in a L2 frame and sent across the media. If the IP packet is meant for a host on a different subnet/ network, it will be sent to the default gateway, this router will de-encapsulate the L2 frame (remove and discard it) check the IP address and will forward it. For the router to do this it needs a MAC address to send it over the media, It will look up the next hop in it's routing table, encapsulate the IP packet with the same source and destination IP address that was sent from the original host into a new L2 frame. This time the MAC address for the source address will be that of the forwarding interface of the router, and the receiving interface of the next hop will be the destination MAC address. This will continue from hop to hop until it reaches the final host, each time the MAC addresses will change, but the original IP address will remain the same.
Here's the key point -- there can be more types of packets than INTERNET traffic. You could be using IPX, which is non-routable. How do clients identify each other? By the MAC address.
Routing != Addressing, which is really where the MAC comes into play.
In order to be routed, the OSI model adds a layer to allow for path discovery to the next gateway. This layer is responsible for routing, but knows nothing about the MAC address.
As a side note, at the hardware level, MAC addresses ARE used by switches, but not for routing. From How Stuff Works:
The switch gets the first packet of data from Node A. It reads the MAC
address and saves it to the lookup table for Segment A. The switch now
knows where to find Node A anytime a packet is addressed to it. This
process is called learning.
In this way, a switch can make sure that traffic is only outputted to the correct port. This isn't accomplishing routing so much as reducing network congestion. Only broadcasts and traffic destined specifically for that MAC address should be sent out the port.
Recently I have been thinking about the same and came upon this question. Here is my answer to this question. Actually MAC address is needed for correctly sending the packet to right destination. This is specially true when packet is needed to sent over a VLAN. There can be multiple switches/routes connected on that VLAN over multiple physical interfaces. However IP Routing is unaware of these physical interface. It only knows about the logical connectivity. For example, route 10.10.10.0/24 is reachable via VE/VIF0.10(logical VLAN interface) and/or nexthop neighbor is 20.20.20.1. There could be multiple interfaces under VLAN 10. Then to which interface packet is sent out? This is where ARP comes in the picture. ARP helps to discover the MAC address associated with the next-hop IP address. When switch/router learns the nexthop MAC. along with that it learns the physical interface also via which that MAC is reachable. Hence while routing packet, firstly MAC corresponding to the destination IP is searched and then the physical interface associated with that MAC is searched. Finally packet is sent out via that physical interface. The MAC corresponding to that destination IP is used as destination MAC. In absence of this, routed packets will always be flooded in the outgoing VLAN.
Hope this helps.
Thanks.
Answer: MAC addresses are not used in the process of routing of a packet.
segment -> transport layer (TCP ports)
packets -> network layer (IP addresses)
frame -> data link layer (MAC addresses)
bits -> physical layer (electric/optical signals)
Create your own packet/segment visit http://wirefloss.com/wireit/
There are 2 models (TCP/IP and ISO/OSI)
In detail:
Your app has some data. This is encapsulated by mentioned layers. Encapsulation means that a header with fields is added at each layer. If your data never leave the local network the MAC address will be the same. Once your data needs to be delivered outside your network the frame header is stripped by router and is replaced by router fields.
UPDATE 2021: Some people seems never heard of ISO OSI model and put this answer as incorrect.
I am given to understand that in order to send data using the TCP/IP protocol suite you need two IP addresses (sender and receiver). My question is, how does communication happen on an isolated LAN. Say I have two PCs connected with an ethernet cable (There is no DHCP sever and IP addresses weren't set manually), do they choose random IP addresses (to please the TCP/IP suite), or do they send IP packets with emtpy TO and FROM fields? or something else?
If you want to use IP, you must have an IP address. Most devices will auto-assign themselves an address in the 169.254.0.0/16 block if a DHCP server is unavailable.
You should also note though that there are many other protocols available, such as IPX/SPX, but most of them are not used these days.
If I have two internal computers connecting to the same external IP address through a NAT router, how is the router able to get the traffic to the correct internal computer? It is my understanding that NAT forwards incoming packets to the computer that recently sent outgoing packets to the [incoming packet's] sender's IP address. Since both computers are sending to the same address, does the router forward the packet to both? If that is the case, is it the responsibility of the client software to determine which packets are relevant?
Is it possible if both computers are attempting to connect to the same port?
When you open a socket, you need to address a port of the destination system and open a conjugate listening port on your own system to receive any response. You have to send the destination system your listening port.
Having more than one system using the same modem
When you start a web browser, and go to www.google.com:80, your browser obtains/searches for a free non-system conjugate port from the system for listening. Let us say, the conjugate port is 10000. The listener port is for receiving the http stream back from google.
Then your kid sitting next to you incidentally also browses www.google.com:80 and his/her google session of the play station or xbox-whatever also incidentally is assigned conjugate port 10000.
Both of you are sitting behind a cable modem, and behind the cable modem is your wireless router. And both of your systems are behind the wireless router - All sitting in that sequence, network topology-wise.
To prevent port address collision on the router/modem
Let us say that your cable company DHCP assigns your modem ip4 adress 72.72.72.72. But your wireless router DHCP assigns 192.168.0.10 to your system and to 192.168.0.11 to your kid's system.
When the frame carrying the information of your listener ports passes thro your NAT router, it would translate either one or both listening- ports. Let's say port 15000 for your page and port 16000 for your kid's page.
Your wireless router then sends your requests to google server as coming from 72.72.72.72:15000 and 72.72.72.72:16000.
The google server then responds individually to 72.72.72.72:15000 and 72.72.72.72:16000 and when you wireless router encounters the response, it reaches into the mapping that it has stored and translates 72.72.72.72:15000 to 192.168.0.10:10000 to reach your system but translates 72.72.72.72:16000 to 192.168.0.11:10000 to reach your kid's system.
Running web/game/ftp/etc servers
But what if you have a web server or an ftp server running on your system. What if you have two systems and both have a web server and both web servers are listening on port 80?
Let us say the local ip addresses registered/assigned with your wireless router of your first web server system is 192.168.0.30 and your second web server system is 192.168.0.40.
The wireless router would have a configuration web page usually by default 192.168.0.1:80, unless you changed it. There would be a tab to on the page where you could define/reserve application port mappings.
You could register with your wireless router to reserve the mapping
192.168.0.30:80 => outgoing port 8080
192.168.0.40:80 => outgoing port 8088
So that you have to phone your friends your web/game servers are addressable through
72.72.72.72:8080 and 72.72.72.72:8088 respectively,
where the wireless router would preclude its port 8080 and 8088 from its own dynamic NAT usage.
Of course, 72.72.72.72 is as good as only before your ISP DHCP decide to renew the ip4 address of your modem to say, 72.72.90.200. After which you would have to phone/email your friends and say
Hey, the servers' addresses have changed to 72.72.90.200:8080 and 72.72.90.200:8088 respectively. Or you could subscribe to dynamic dns (ddns) service to use a named domain where the ddns service will need you to install a simple heartbeat utility on your system to help them monitor the address variation. DDNS translation is a separate issue/strategy.
NAT modems
Newer ISP contracts supply you with a modem that has NAT. If so, you have to switch off either the one on your modem or the one on your wireless router. You should not use both - what's the point in translating twice because NAT is simply to prevent address collision. When you switch off NAT from your wireless router, it can operate as a hub switch and not a router anymore so that you could connect it to the modem using one of its LAN socket instead of thro its WAN socket.
The router manages "source" ports that are separate for each computer. While you may be connecting to port 80 on the "destination" the router may assign the source port to some high number port.
Wikipedia sums it up as
Network address translation involves
re-writing the source and/or
destination IP addresses and usually
also the TCP/UDP port numbers of IP
packets as they pass through the NAT.
Checksums (both IP and TCP/UDP) must
also be rewritten to take account of
the changes.
Already good answers are provided, but here is another example:
HOST A addr HOST B addr
10.1.0.2:4040 10.1.0.3:4040
-----------------------------------------
NAT 200.50.50.28:4040 200.50.50.28:4041 (what external host sees)
200.50.50.28 is router's global (internet) IP.
Every port number is unique in the NAT table. And of course the router does all the dirty job of modifying the source and destination addresses transparently.
It uses different ports for incoming external traffic, and the NAT then routes the packets on one port to one internal IP address, and the packets from the other port to the other internal IP address... The iniital request from each internal computer, when it goes through the NAT on the way out, establishes which port will be used for the incoming traffic from the external ip address, and it tells the external server what port to send it's traffic back on for that connection.
RFC3022 provides a lot of information on how this works
Since public facing or external IP Address that was given by Internet Service Provider (ISP) has been discussed, I would like to add on this.
You can ask your ISP to have your public IP Address not change. It will become static, so that you do not have to inform your friends to change the IP Address if they want to access your server inside your Network Address Translator (NAT).
As of this writing, static IP Address cost around 100 bucks. Most of the ISP they call it business account.
You can determine your public facing IP Address by googling "what is my ip address".