Configuration virtual Vlan instead of physical port - nat

Currently i am studying for NAT and from what i read, vlans on physical port on switch actually not good for NAT.
I search for a couple of times but only sources that i got, configure the vlan on physical port like
interface gi0/1
switchport mode access
switchport access vlan 10
Instead of doing this, i want to do
interface vlan 10
ip add 10.1.12.254 255.255.254.0
ip nat inside
What is the differences between interface gi0/1 and accessing vlan through that port, and interface vlan 10?
I cannot make encapsulation dot1q through interface vlan 10, or it works only for physical ports?
Let's say that i have two vlans, vlan 10 (WLAN) and vlan 99 (USERS). Vlan 10 has an IP address 10.1.12.0/23 and port is gi1/0/24.
Vlan 99 has an IP address 10.1.14.0/24 and range is gi1/0/1-23.
Do I need to configure them like,
interface range gi1/0/1-23
switchport mode access
switchport access vlan 99
or are there any way for me to configure only interface vlan 99?
I know this is a basic configuration but two of them making me so confused.
Many thanks

One of the differences between interface VLAN and the physical interface is, you can add an IP address to an interface VLAN, but in L2 switch you can't add an IP address to a physical interface.
We can say physical interface is a layer 2 interface and doesn't support layer 3 options like IP and Routing and etc.
Network admins use Interface VLAN as a gateway for each VLAN. For example, if you want to use inter-VLAN routing, you can use interface VLAN as a gateway for all traffic in that VLAN.
when you say
int gig 0/0
switchport mode access
switchport access VLAN 2
The switch itself tags the port to dot1q vlan 2. So you don't need to tell the switch anything. You just need to put the physical port in the vlan.

VLAN tagging is an interface-level virtualization - it enables you to connect multiple L2 segments (broadcast domains) to a single physical interface (or an aggregated group), sharing the bandwidth.
On some devices that virtualization may have an impact on its other functions (like NAT), but generally that's not the case. Whether you use a routed/L3 port or a switched port with a switch virtual interface (SVI), a VLAN-to-IP binding, may be a matter of taste, architecture, policy, device capability or performance. On many devices, both approaches work absolutely fine.

Related

Can't route VLAN with UCOPIA

I'm writing to you because I can't solve a problem with a client.
My client has an infrastructure with the following characteristics:
2 ISP routers
1 fortigate firewall
1 dedicated router that broadcasts a UCOPIA US250 guest portal
65 Zyxel switches (1900 - 24) and one 4600 switch (4x 24 ports for the core network)
250 WIFI LIGOWAZE NFT terminals
80 VLANs
I do not manage the first 3 equipments, it is another provider.
Today, I have to pass the VLAN dedicated to the guests.
The other provider has set up the FORTIGATE to broadcast the DHCP and the associated VLAN on the DMZ port to the OUT port of the UCOPIA.
I have to broadcast VLAN 420 from the IN port to the ZYXEL switch and to the LIGOWAVE terminals.
However, when I am connected to the UCOPIA on the IN port, I manage to get the desired IP and to reach the portal, but when I test on the ZYXEL switch, it is impossible to get the dedicated VLAN.
I put myself on another port of the ZYXEL, I TAG the VLAN in question. I have modified the ID of my VLAN on my computer in DHCP that does not work. I tried to use static IP but still nothing. I can't even ping the gateway.
The ZYXEL port to which the UCOPIA is connected is TAGGED on the dedicated VLAN. I have also tried Untagged and excluding all the other VLANs but it is impossible to get this network.
Do you have any other ideas for me?
Here, you can see my diagram network:
MyNetwork
I resolved my problem.
I configured Switch like that:
Untagged dedicated VLAN
But i forgot to change the PVID VLAN.
I changed it and that work !

Linux interface for all tagged vlans, excluding untagged traffic

I know that I can create a VLAN interface by simply creating a new interface and assign the vlan number to the parent interface name with a dot, eg. eth0.5 for vlan 5 on the eth0 NIC.
I wonder if it is possible to separate the traffic on a NIC to one interface with all VLANs, e.g. all tagged packets and another one handling only untagged packets?

Cisco Packet Tracer, Vlan issue

https://i.imgur.com/ugyO5C4.png
As you see in the image above, I'm seeking help with making both Vlan connections (Vlan10 and Vlan20) be able to communicate with the Coffe Maker Machine, What should I do?
The way I can think of is via Inter VLAN routing
Inter VLAN routing is a process in which we make different virtual LANs to communicate with each other irrespective of where the VLANs are present (on same switch or different switch). Inter VLAN Routing can be achieved through a layer-3 device i.e. Router or layer-3 Switch. When the Inter VLAN Routing is done through Router the it is known as Router on a stick.
So you can just assign the Coffe Maker Machine to one vlan and have the router handle the communcation. Router on a Stick tutorial

Can devices connect to loopback address of another device?

Can devices connect to loopback address of another device? The loopback address can be assigned to any IP address e.g 12.12.12.12. It's not necessarily to be 127.0.0.1
Device supports multiple loopback addresses.
Other devices can connect to your loopback addresses as long as they have a route to them. For the special address range 127.0.0.0/8, but as you say you can configure other addresses as well. I usually use the dummy interface for this.
Distributing routes can be done manually by configuring manual static routes, or with routing protocols like OSPF and BGP. There are several implementations of those for most common operating systems.
A device can support multiple loopback interfaces (ex : Router/L3), but an interface support only one IP address .
A loopback interface could be connected to another device or not, it depends on your configuration ... you can manage the routes of all your network manually or you can use a routing protocol if Intra-domain then you use (OSPF or RIP) or Inter-domain than you use BGP.

Intervlan routing to share printers between vlans

I have 3 separate vlans and subnets (192.168.175.0/24,192.168.176.0/24, 192.168.178.0/24). I need to have the ability to print from a single network printer from any server on these subnets. I have created a 4th vlan for this purpose but I'm not really sure how to configure the intervlan routing on the main switch where these vlans are.
I'm using a Cisco 3560G and trying to use the routing wizard.
Okay, so... Routing between VLAN's is really very simple. First, a VLAN is nothing more than a broadcast domain. When you try and send a packet to a machine, an ARP broadcast goes out to see if any hosts on the local broadcast domain (VLAN) have the IP address. If so, they respond with the MAC address. When an ARP response isn't received, the packet is sent to the router to do something else with it. If the address is not part of the local broadcast domains network (identified via the subnet mask), it's sent to the networks router.
Take the following in to consideration: You have 4 VLAN's... VLAN1, VLAN2, VLAN3 and VLAN4. Each has their own /24 network: 192.168.1.0/24, 192.168.2.0/24, 192.168.3.0/24 and 192.168.4.0/24 . What you should have on your router is something like this:
(interface names may be different, but you'll get the idea)
int fa0/0
no shut
int fa0/0.1
encapsulation dot1q 1
ip address 192.168.1.1 255.255.255.0
int fa0/0.2
encapsulation dot1q 2
ip address 192.168.2.1 255.255.255.0
int fa0/0.3
encapsulation dot1q 3
ip address 192.168.3.1 255.255.255.0
int fa0/0.4
encapsulation dot1q 4
ip address 192.168.4.1 255.255.255.0
The "encapsulation dot1q #" is telling the router, "Encapsulate any L2 frames on this interface with VLAN ID #" . VLAN's are a L2 concept, not L3. So, that in mind, it's important to understand we need to "transport" that L2 connectivity back to the switch and the hosts on the switch.
With the above configuration, interface fa0/0 should be connected to a trunk port on the switch. If you're plugged in to a Cisco switch, "switch port mode trunk" should do the trick. If you're using a non-cisco switch, it will most likely be:
switchport untagged vlan 1 <- default vlan
switchport tagged vlan 2,3,4 <- other VLAN's allowed
That in mind, any hosts should be on ports in their respective VLAN:
Again, if cisco: switch access vlan #
If not, most likely: untagged vlan #
For each port that has a host.
Each host in each VLAN should have their respective gateways as their default gateway... i.e. VLAN 1 should have the IP of fa0/0.1 (192.168.1.1) . VLAN 2 - fa0/0.2 (192.168.2.1) .
This is a very simple methodology. I'd recommend you grab the CCENT or CCNA library, as it can greatly help you understand these concepts.

Resources