Related
I wrote a simple code in which I declared a QTimer function and wrote a bunch of commands in it then in another function i used the command timer->stop() (in order to stop and reset the timer) which is making my program crush. I don't know if I can't use it Outside the Timer function... a little view of my code:
timer = new QTimer(this);
connect(timer, SIGNAL(timeout()), this, SLOT(Timer()));
timer->start(2000);
This is how i set up my Timer
void Monitor::on_actionReset_triggered()
{
timer->stop();
timer->setInterval(0);
}
And this is how I'm trying to reset it in another function
I have a subclass of QObject called Updater that I want to use to manage some widgets in my app. I want it to run updateDisp() every 16 ms, so I created a QTimer in the constructor and connected the timeout signal to the updateDisp() slot. However, updateDisp() never runs, and I can't for the life of me figure out why.
in updater.h:
class Updater : public QObject {
Q_OBJECT
ToUpdate* toUpdate;
QTimer* timer;
...
public slots:
void updateDisp();
};
in updater.cpp:
Updater::Updater(ToUpdate* t, QObject *parent)
: QObject(parent) {
toUpdate = t;
timer = new QTimer(this);
connect(timer, SIGNAL(timeout()), this, SLOT(updateDisp()));
timer->setInterval(16);
timer->start();}
I instantiate an Updater object in MainWindow.cpp. Also, I have the GUI thread separate from main() (using winapi CreateThread()); I've seen some other posts about problems with QTimers and QThreads but obviously this is a bit different.
There's some similar issues.
I'd a similar problem in the past: https://github.com/codelol/QtTimer/commit/cef130b7ad27c9ab18e03c15710ace942381c82a#commitcomment-10696869
Basically it seems that Qt5 timer doesn't work as expected while in background, it's sync with the animation timer... which doesn't run often while in background.
This guy solved a similar issue setting the timer type to Qt::PreciseTimer
https://github.com/codelol/QtTimer/commit/cef130b7ad27c9ab18e03c15710ace942381c82a#commitcomment-10696869
timer->setTimerType(Qt::PreciseTimer);
The description of the timer types: http://doc.qt.io/qt-5/qt.html#TimerType-enum
Qt::PreciseTimer 0 Precise timers try to keep millisecond accuracy
Not sure if they're the exactly same problem, but you can give a try on that.
I have recently stumbled upon this while working with QTimer that calls a function with internal QEventLoop
So, say we have a QTimer instance
QTimer* timer = new QTimer;
somewhere in the constructor we start it and it begins ticking away once every 100ms
timer->start(100);
now the fun part, we connect it to a slot that has internal QEventLoop
void SlotFunction()
{
qDebug() << "entered";
QEventLoop loop;
loop.exec();
}
putting aside how stupid this loop really is, we see that we will never finish processing the slot and timer's subsequent timeouts will keep stacking into execution queue. Everything is ok and as it should be.
What is NOT as it should be comes next: since QEventLoop makes sure our app stays responsive while the slot mindlessly idles away we can make a button and its clicked() slot that looks like:
void OnClicked()
{
timer->start(100);
}
what I am doing here is essentially restarting current timer cycle, nothing less, nothing more. Right? Nope! After this restart, SlotFunction fires again suggesting that tick after timer's restart is not in fact equal to all other ticks that were issued before it...
My only question is : WTF?! Why manually restarting the timer enables it to enter the slot additional time? I've asked on freenode but the only answer I got was "It is as it should be"
I tried this and every click creates another "entered" line.
The main Eventloop cannot handle another event since we are stuck in a new eventloop.
This is quite easy to see when implementing a second slot and also connecting this slot to the timeout signal.
The maineventloop will get stuck when calling the next eventloop and not processing any more queued events.
The timer itself will also not queue any more events, since the queueing up itself would be done in the now stuck main-eventloop. The timer does not run in its own eventloop (thats why Qtimers are no precision timers).
As soon as the button is clicked the new eventloop checks the timer if an event timeout() should be generated.
As soon as the new event is handled we again are stuck in another eventloop...
This will go on until we exit the application.
When exiting the application we see the loops reversing and calling the second slot as often as we clicked the button and ran into the first slot
Code:
#include <QDebug>
#include <QTime>
MainWindow::MainWindow(QWidget *parent) :
QMainWindow(parent),
ui(new Ui::MainWindow)
{
ui->setupUi(this);
timer = new QTimer;
timer->setInterval(2000);
connect(timer,SIGNAL(timeout()),this,SLOT(timerslot()));
connect(timer,SIGNAL(timeout()),this,SLOT(timerslot2()));
timer->start();
}
MainWindow::~MainWindow()
{
delete ui;
}
void MainWindow::on_pushButton_clicked()
{
timer->start(2000);
}
void MainWindow::timerslot()
{
qDebug()<<"In";
QEventLoop loop;
loop.exec();
}
void MainWindow::timerslot2()
{
qDebug()<<"More";
}
Output on start:
In
Output on every click:
In
Output after 3 clicks:
In
In
In
In
Output exiting the application:
In
In
In
In
More
More
More
More
I'm new to Qt, and want to simply display a video in Qt GUI. I basically got everything figured out, except for some details handling the QThread, which is really annoying.
I reformulate my question into a simpler program, hope it will explains better
first I define this QObject class
#include <QObject>
#include <QDebug>
class myObject : public QObject
{
Q_OBJECT
public:
explicit myObject(QObject *parent = 0);
bool stop;
signals:
void finishWork();
public slots:
void dowork();
void onfinishThread();
};
myObject::myObject(QObject *parent) :
QObject(parent)
{
stop = true;
}
void myObject::dowork(){
qDebug()<<"start working!";
while(!stop){
qDebug()<<"working...";
}
emit finishWork();
qDebug()<<"finish do work!";
}
void myObject::onfinishThread(){
qDebug()<<"thread is finished!";
}
then the main function
#include <QCoreApplication>
#include <QThread>
#include <iostream>
#include <windows.h>
#include "myobject.h"
using namespace std;
int main(int argc, char *argv[])
{
QCoreApplication a(argc, argv);
myObject* myObj = new myObject();
QThread* myThread = new QThread;
myThread->connect(myObj, SIGNAL(finishWork()), SLOT(quit()));
myObj->connect(myThread, SIGNAL(started()), SLOT(dowork()));
myObj->connect(myThread, SIGNAL(finished()), SLOT(onfinishThread()));
myObj->moveToThread(myThread);
myObj->stop = false;
myThread->start();
cout<<"Press ENTER to continue....."<<endl<<endl;
cin.ignore(1);
myObj->stop = true;
Sleep(10);
if(myThread->isRunning()){
qDebug()<<"The thread is still running?!!!";
}
/*
myObj->stop = false;
Sleep(1000);
myThread->start();
myObj->stop = true;
*/
myObj->deleteLater();
myThread->deleteLater();
return a.exec();
}
As you can see, I even used cin to try let the dowork() run first, but it didn't work at all, the output is
so I'm really confused on how scheduling works for QThread...
Also, if you uncomment the part
/*
myObj->stop = false;
Sleep(1000);
myThread->start();
myObj->stop = true;
*/
the output is exactly the same! only stays a while after printing
The thread is still running?!!!
Would anyone help me with this? Thanks a lot. You may simply copy all the code and test it yourself.
-------------------------Original Question, bad explanation, please ignore....----------------------------------------
I made a videoObj Class with only one function to Query the frames, the function is defined as:
void videoObj::ProcessFrame(){
bool getframe;
qDebug()<<"get in ProcessFrame";
while(!stop_flag){
getframe = capture_.read(imgOriginal_);
if(!getframe){
qDebug()<<"Video End!";
break;
}
cv::cvtColor(imgOriginal_, imgOriginal_, CV_BGR2RGB);
QImage qimgOriginal((uchar*)imgOriginal_.data, imgOriginal_.cols, imgOriginal_.rows, imgOriginal_.step, QImage::Format_RGB888);
emit imgProcessed(qimgOriginal);
this->thread()->msleep(10);
//qDebug()<<"processing frames";
}
emit stopProcess();
qDebug()<<"Stop thread";
}
Basically above code is just query frames and whenever got one emit the
SIGNAL imgProcessed(qimgOriginal)
and whenever the stop_flag is set on, stop the while loop and emit the
SIGNAL stopProcess()
I use this class in the MainWindow Class, here is how I define the connection in the constructor:
MainWindow::MainWindow(QWidget *parent) :
QMainWindow(parent),
ui(new Ui::MainWindow)
{
ui->setupUi(this);
video_obj_ = new videoObj();
video_thread_ = new QThread;
this->connect(video_obj_, SIGNAL(imgProcessed(QImage)), SLOT(onImgProcssed(QImage))); \\this is for displaying the image
video_obj_->connect(video_thread_, SIGNAL(started()), SLOT(ProcessFrame()));
video_obj_->moveToThread(video_thread_);
video_thread_->connect(video_obj_, SIGNAL(stopProcess()), SLOT(quit()));
}
Above code works fine in frame query. The problem I don't understand is, if I set video_obj_->stop_flag on in any MainWiow member function, the ProcessFrame() in videoObj Class should emit stopProcess() signal and trigger quit() of video_thread_, and then the thread should finish, that is video_thread_->finished() is true.
However, if I do something like:
connect(video_thread_, SIGNAL(finished()), this, SLOT(onStopProcess())); //onStopProcess() see below
void MainWindow::on_btnStart_clicked()
{
video_obj_->stop_flag = 1;
this->thread()->msleep(10);
video_obj_->capture_.open(ui->lineEditVidoeAddress->text().toStdString());
//... something about videoCapture setting here, not related
video_obj_->capture_.set(CV_CAP_PROP_POS_FRAMES, 0);
video_obj_->stop_flag = 0;
this->thread()->msleep(10);
if(video_thread_->isRunning()){
qDebug()<<"The thread is still running?!!!";
}
video_thread_->start();
}
void MainWindow::onStopProcess(){
qDebug()<<"thread is finished";
}
It will give me the output:
Stop thread
The thread is still running?!!!
thread is finished
Which means triggering the quit() is not finish the thread, or quit() has not been triggered.
If I use:
video_thread_->wait(); //instead of video_thread_->wait(10);
The program will just freeze.
Is anyone can help me with this, it really confuse me about this quit() and finished()...
Thanks!
Since when you call stop_flag=1, the video_thread_ finishes the current function which is
ProcessFrame
before ProcessFrame finish, quit is called on the video_thread_ through emit stopProcess().
However, quit is different from terminate, terminate can exit the thread any time (but it is not safe), quit works with the event loop, if the thread has no eventloop, quit has no effect.
I guess before qthread execute the next event in the eventloop, it checks some flag, which can be set by quit, it the flag is set by quit, then it won't execute the next event in the eventloop. Or it can also be that a quit event is inserted into the eventloop, and the next event in the eventloop will be quit.
After stop_flag = 1, you called video_thread_->wait, that will block the video_thread_ from executing the next event in the eventloop, thus the quit will not take effect before time out, however, the nextlines which print "not finished?!!!" is executed immediately. Instead of calling video_thread->wait, if you call currentThread()->Sleep(some_enough_time), then there will be time for the video_thread_ to execute the next event and quit.
You can read the Qt documentation of QThread, wait is used with terminate to terminate a thread synchronously.
============================== The new code ================================
When you do:
myObj->connect(myThread, SIGNAL(started()), SLOT(dowork()));
The signal source is myThread, the slot also belongs to myThread, since the object "myThread" is created in the main thread, thus as a object it lives in the main thread. You can call myThread->thread() to see this, it will return the main thread instead of the new thread.
However, the started signal is emitted from the new thread namely the thread that myThread represents, thus the connection is a Qt::QueuedConnection. dowork() is posted in the event queue of main thread, and it'll be executed only after a.exec() which executes the main threads eventloop.
The same thing happens to the other 2 connect calls, all the slots will be executed in the eventloop of the main thread.
First the start is emitted from the new thread when myThread->start is called, dowork is posted in the main thread's event queue.
Nothing really happens before you call a.exec();
So the program will go ahead to cin and then set stop to true, and then print "Thread is still running?!!".
Second When a.exec() is called, the dowork is executed in the main thread and "start work" is printed. Nothing is done because the stop flag is already true, and the finishwork signal is emitted from the main thread, print "finish do work";
Third The last step the finishwork is emitted, and the quit slot is directly called. However, before the new thread can really quit, the main thread has already finished the eventqueue, because no more events are posted to the main thread. The application exits without waiting for quit() to take effect.
To test this is true, do not modify any of your code, just add after
emit finishWork();
currentThread()->sleep(1000);
you will see "thread is finished!" printed, because this make time for the new thread to emit finished(), and the onfinishThread() will be add to the main thread's eventqueue.
BTW, your way of working with thread looks like java style, which is not the standard qt way. You can read this before you work on qt thread.
This is not a scheduling issue.
That you did in your code looks like:
Create a thread.
Then this thread emits a signal that it started, run slot dowork()
start a thread.
Wait for user input
echo about thread is running
execute event loop
At point 3 thread is already running and signalled about that. Because myObj is created in main thread and not moved to any other thread (to process events there), your thread does not do anything else now, but just spins event loop. At the same time event that tells you want to run myObj's dowork() is posted on the main thread. At last then it comes to step 6 you start to execute event loop of it, and first thing it finds is event that it needs to call dowork() on myObj.
To make it clear to you how Qt threads and signal-slot connection works, I recommend you to read this article on Qt blog.
In simple to fix it, you can move your object myObj to the thread that you wan't to run.
But to make this really correct, I bet that you really want is to subclass QRunnable and (re-)implement it's run method to do the stuff you wan't in QThread, so that thread does it's job, than finished correctly, so you can join on it. Or depending on your goal you might be even better with using QtConcurrent::run(aFunction)
Please refer to the following link as I tried to simplify the problem I was having and now have run into a problem that I cannot solve.
Link: Qt: How to use QTimer to print a message to a QTextBrowser every 10 seconds?
In the posting for the link above I simplified the task I am trying to do by simply saying that I wanted to push a button and have it display something in a QTextBrowser every 10 seconds. I was having trouble getting QTimer working at the time so I thought that if I could get QTimer to work then I could finish my task.
What I am really trying to do is read lines from a file and after every 2500 lines I would like to print a message and then wait 10 seconds.
Pseudocode:
while(not at the end of the file)
{
read in 2500 lines
print a message
wait 10 seconds
}
QTimer is nice but it does opposite of what I want it to do. Instead of transmitting a message and waiting 10 seconds, first they wait 10 seconds, timeout and then send the message.
So to get it to work the way I want I first called the printMessage() SLOT and then I made a SLOT called stopTimer() that simply stops the timer. So after the 10 seconds has passed it will simply call stopTimer() and then continue processing the input file.
Onto the REAL problem:
Qt does not wait for a QTimer to finish before it moves on through the code. I want the code to wait the full 10 seconds before it reads the next 2500 lines of code. I found that QTimer has an isActive() function that returns a bool value.
So in the place where I wanted the 10 second delay to finish I put the following:
while(timer->isActive());
I figured the program would stay in this loop for 10 seconds and then exit after the QTimer timed out because the condition would then be false. The problem is that it doesn’t exit the loop because the status of the timer never changes regardless of how long it waits in this loop! I checked with the debugger and isActive( ) remains true regardless of elapsed time.
I then omitted the while(timer->isActive()) loop and observed the timer in the debugger. It seems that the timer does not actually start timing until it exits the while(not at the end of the file). So I believe that since the while(timer->isActive()) loop is nested inside this, it is causing it to never timeout. I could be wrong but this is what seems like is happening. Also, what is annoying is that the QTimer object has no field that shows the elapsed time of the timer when it is active. Therefore, I cannot check the elapsed time at all to further debug.
Someone please test this out or let me know a workaround for this!
For something that sounds so easy, this has been the biggest pain I have had in recent time, but I generally don’t use Qt so it could be my lack of experience.
Here is an excerpt from code I have which currently freezes as stated above:
void Form::startBtn_pushed()
{
QTimer *timer = new QTimer(this);
QFile file(“file.txt”);
QTextStream stream(&file);
QString line;
int lineCount = 0;
connect(timer, SIGNAL(timeout()), this, SLOT(stopTimer()));
while(!(stream.atEnd())
{
line = stream.readLine();
lineCount++;
if(lineCount == 2500)
{
printMessage();
timer->start(10000);
while(timer->isActive()); //Wait for timer to timeout before continuing
}
}
}
Sorry for the long post and if I might have made any grammatical errors with my code here. I do not have internet access on my dev machine so I had to retype this here.
Doing something like while(timer.isActive()) is not a good idea at all as it will cause your application to consume around 100% CPU time. It will also cause your application to never return to the event processing loop where the actual code for timer is executed, that's why it freezes.
If you still want to use this approach, you should call QCoreApplication::processEvents() in the loop. It will temporarily pass control back to the event loop, so it will cause timer to time out. Instead of connecting timeout() to stopTimer(), you can just call timer.setSingleShot(true) before you start it, it will cause it to stop automatically after the first timeout.
Note that you have a memory leak there as you create a new timer on each button push. Surely they are children of your form and will be destroyed, but only when the form is destroyed.
If you want a more elegant approach, you can create a separate class for reading that file. In the constructor you'd open your file and stream which should be fields in this class. This class should also have a sort of readMore() slot which will read 2500 lines, then put a message and return. If it doesn't reach the end of the stream, then it would call QTimer::singleShot(10000, this, SLOT(readMore())), which will cause the event loop to call readMore() again in 10 seconds. The code would looks something like this (didn't check for errors):
// myfilereader.h
class Form;
class MyFileReader: public QObject {
Q_OBJECT
public:
MyFileReader(const QString &fileName);
// this should be called after you create an instance of MyFileReader
void startReading() {readMore();}
private:
QFile file;
QTextStream stream;
private slots:
void readMore();
signals:
void message(); // this should be connected to printMessage() in the Form
void finished();
};
// myfilereader.cpp
MyFileReader::MyFileReader(const QString &fileName):
file(fileName),
stream(&file),
{
// open the file, possibly throwing an exception
// or setting some sort of "invalid" flag on failure
}
void MyFileReader::readMore()
{
QString line;
int lineCount = 0;
while(!(stream.atEnd())
{
line = stream.readLine();
lineCount++;
if(lineCount == 2500)
{
emit message();
break;
}
}
if (stream.atEnd())
emit finished();
else
QTimer::singleShot(10000, this, SLOT(readMore()));
}
This is a kind of more heavyweight approach, but this is the price of asynchronous event handling. You could also put all this stuff into the Form class, but I think using a separate class is better.
As Daniel points out, if reading 2500 lines takes a long time, say 5 seconds, the message will be printed after 10 seconds after the reading has finished, that is, 15 seconds after it has started. If you want the message to be printed approximately each 10 seconds no matter how long reading takes, you should add a QTimer timer field to the class, connect it's timeout() signal to the readMore() slot in the MyFileReader constructor, then in the startReading() method call timer.start() before calling readMore(). Now, at the end of readMore() do this:
if (stream.atEnd()) {
timer.stop();
emit finished();
}
You need a QTimer field in this case because you can't cancel a QTimer::singleShot() call, but you need to do it if you have reached the end of the stream, otherwise your readMore() will just keep on getting called again and again, even if there is nothing more to read. Note that even in this case, it is still possible for the message to appear less frequently than every 10 seconds in case if reading 2500 lines takes longer than these 10 seconds. If you want exactly 10 seconds, you should probably check the elapsed time in the loop instead, but I think that's an overkill, unless you expect reading to be very slow.
Slightly off topic, but if you want an easy way to avoid memory leaks, you can also do this in the constructor:
connect(this, SIGNAL(finished()), this, SLOT(deleteLater()));
It will automatically mark your reader for deletion when you emit finished(), and, once that happens, the reader will be deleted as soon as the control goes back to the event loop. That is, after all slots connected to the finished() signal return. This approach allows you to just allocate a MyFileReader on the heap, then discard the pointer without worrying about memory leaks.
QTimer has a signal called timedout(). If you connect a slot to this, you can set the initial timer to a REALLY short interval (1 MS maybe). When the timer expires, inside the slot, you can send your message. At the end of the slot, set the interval to 10 seconds, set singleshot to false, and the start the timer again.
If you don't want to do the setting each and every time the slot is called, you can simply make 2 slots. The first time, the slot does the setup for the rest of the calls. It also disconnects itself from the QTimer and connects the second slot. Then things continue merrily on their way.
Edit:
Also, realize that when slots are called they are called on the event thread. So, by clicking a button and putting a loop that spin-blocks/busy-waits until the timer expires, you are guaranteeing that you will not enter this state because you are blocking the very thread that the timeout signal will be processed on.
QTimer does all of its processing inside Qt's event loop, so your code must return to the event loop to cause the timer to time out. So what you want to do is have startBtn_pushed set up the timer, connect a slot to the timer's timeout signal, then probably call that slot itself (so that it is called immediately). It would look something like this:
// timer, file, and stream are now instance variables (or maybe file and stream
// are broken out into their own class... up to you.
void Form::startBtn_pushed()
{
// timer has been allocated before (but not started)
file.open(“file.txt”);
stream.setDevice(&file);
connect(timer, SIGNAL(timeout()), this, SLOT(readAndPrint()));
timer->start(10000);
readAndPrint(); // respond to the button press immediately
}
void Form::readAndPrint()
{
int lineCount = 0;
while(!(stream.atEnd() && lineCount < 2500)
{
line = stream.readLine();
lineCount++;
if(lineCount == 2500)
{
printMessage();
}
}
}
I have figured out a solution that is much simpler than those proposed here.
I realized it was much easier to use a QTime object instead of a QTimer object.
Basically you start a QTime object and then you use its elapsed() function to check how much time has passed to since it was started.
Thanks to everyone for taking the time to help. I did try to implement a couple of your solutions into my code but had some trouble since I am not a pro at Qt and they were more complex than I would have thought. In the end I find this solution to be a easy solution to what should have been an easy problem.
I certainly learned a lot from this problem and I hope you all did too.
My question to you is why didn't anyone suggest using QTime from the start?
Thanks again!
My solution:
void Form::startBtn_pushed()
{
QTime *timer = new QTime();
QFile file(“file.txt”);
QTextStream stream(&file);
QString line;
int lineCount = 0;
connect(timer, SIGNAL(timeout()), this, SLOT(stopTimer()));
while(!(stream.atEnd())
{
line = stream.readLine();
lineCount++;
if(lineCount == 2500)
{
timer->start();
while(1)
{
QApplication::processEvents();
if(timer->elapsed() == 10000)
{
printMessage();
break;
}
}
}
}
}
QEventLoop l;
connect( timer, SIGNAL( timeout() ), &l, SLOT( quit() ) );
l.exec(); // Waiting without freezing ui