I need to find how many digits there are in Price area after delimeter to compare
I used this code but not working properly because all region dont use same delimeter
Do you have better idea ?
strSalesPrice = conPeek(record,5);
delimeterPosition = strFind(strSalesPrice,",",1,strLen(strSalesPrice));
if (delimeterPosition!=0)
{
afterDelimeter = subStr(strSalesPrice,delimeterPosition+1,strLen(strSalesPrice));
if(strLen(afterDelimeter) > SalesParameters.DfcDigitSize)
{
throw error("Please check the number of digits after the decimal point");
}
}
Related
I ran into an issue where an intersection type wouldn't work with $Diff. I ran into this when trying to implement a react HOC for a component that had an intersection prop.
A simplified example looks like:
type One = { one: number }
type Two = { two: number }
type Three = { three: number }
type Both = One & Two
type All = Both & Three
const both:$Diff<All, Three> = { one: 1, two: 2 }
^ Cannot instantiate `$Diff` because undefined property `three` [1] is incompatible with number [2].
References:
6: type Both = One & Two
^ [1]
5: type Three = { three: number }
^ [2]
If there is a way to correct this, I use One and Both as prop typings for components, and All and $Diff is part of the HOC typing.
Thanks!
https://flow.org/try/#0PTAEAEDMBsHsHcBQAXAngBwKagPIDtsBeUAb1FgIC5Q8BXAWwCNMAnUAXxQ2wBV5ZQxMsn7U6TVhy5ZQPABYtMRUqGQKlYhszac0MgEKw1g3AVAAyWf2nYAgtGgnDxy-MWZEiAMYUAzslBGIzlKABIAEQBLSEgAHntoABpZdUwAPhMyCkxqAEZkkVhqACYOIA
I feel there are some weaknesses in the way flow handles intersection types, compounding them should work but doesn't as expected.
If you can define All as the intersection of One, Two, and Three, it will work as expected.
$Shape<> can sometimes get you around this sort of problem but I couldn't get it to play on this occasion.
// #flow
type One = { one: number }
type Two = { two: number }
type Three = { three: number }
type Both = One & Two
type All = One & Two & Three
const both:$Diff<All, Three> = { one: 1, two: 2 }
I am trying to style just the decimals to look just like this:
Didn't had success, I guess that I need to make my own filter, tried but didn't had success either, I guess it is because I am using it inside a state.
Here the code I am using for the number:
<h2><sup>$</sup>{{salary | number:0}}<sub>.00</sub></h2>
Inside the .app iam using this scope:
$scope.salary = 9000;
Thing is, number can be whatever the user salary is, it get the number from an input, in other places I have more numbers with decimals too.
Possible solutions:
Extract only the decimals from value and print them inside de
tag.
Use a filter to do this?
Use a directive that will split the amount and generate the proper HTML. For example:
app.directive('salary', function(){
return {
restrict: 'E'
, scope: {
salary: '#'
}
, controller: controller
, controllerAs: 'dvm'
, bindToController: true
, template: '<h2><sup>$</sup>{{ dvm.dollar }}<sub>.{{ dvm.cents }}</sub></h2>'
};
function controller(){
var parts = parseFloat(this.salary).toFixed(2).split(/\./);
this.dollar = parts[0];
this.cents = parts[1];
}
});
The easiest solution would be to split out the number into it's decimal portion and the whole number portion:
var number = 90000.99111;
console.log(number % 1);
Use this in your controller, and split your scope variable into an object:
$scope.salary = {
whole: salary,
decimal: salary % 1
}
Protip: Using an object like this is better than using two scope variables for performance
I feel really dumb for having to post this, but I've been trying to achieve this for an entire week now and I'm getting nowhere!
I'm trying to create a highscore board. Top 10 scores, saved to an INI file. I have searched every single thing on the entire internet ever. I just do not get it.
So what I have tried is this...
I have a "load_room" setup. When this room loads, it runs this code:
ini_open('score.ini')
ini_write_real("Save","highscore_value(1)",highscore_value(1));
ini_write_string("Save","highscore_name(1)",highscore_name(1));
ini_close();
room_goto(room0);
Then when my character dies:
myName = get_string("Enter your name for the highscore list: ","Player1"); //if they enter nothing, "Player1" will get put on the list
highscore_add(myName,score);
ini_open('score.ini')
value1=ini_write_real("Save","highscore_value(1)",0);
name1=ini_write_string("Save","highscore_name(1)","n/a");
ini_close();
highscore_clear();
highscore_add(myName,score);
score = 0;
game_restart();
I'm not worried about including the code to display the scores as I'm checking the score.ini that the game creates for the real values added.
With this, I seem to be able to save ONE score, and that's all. I need to save 10. Again, I'm sorry for asking the same age-old question, but I'm really in need of help and hoping someone out there can assist!
Thanks so much,
Lee.
Why you use save in load_room instead load?
Why you clear the table after die?
You need to use loop for save each result.
For example, loading:
highscore_clear();
ini_open("score.ini");
for (var i=1; i<=10; i++)
{
var name = ini_read_string("Save", "name" + string(i), "");
var value = ini_read_real("Save", "value" + string(i), 0);
if value != 0
highscore_add(name, value);
}
ini_close();
room_goto(room0);
Die:
myName = get_string("Enter your name for the highscore list: ","Player1");
highscore_add(myName, score);
ini_open("score.ini");
for (var i=1; i<=10; i++)
{
ini_write_string("Save", "name" + string(i), highscore_name(i));
ini_write_string("Save", "value" + string(i), string(highscore_value(i)));
}
ini_close();
score = 0;
game_restart();
And few more things...
score = 0;
You need do it when game starts, so here it is unnecessary.
get_string("Enter your name for the highscore list: ","Player1");
Did you read note in help?
NOTE: THIS FUNCTION IS FOR DEBUG USE ONLY. Should you require this functionality in your final game, please use get_string_async.
I used ini_write_string(..., ..., string(...)); instead ini_write_real() because second case will save something like 1000.000000000, and first case will save just 1000.
I have a 2D array structure to represent a grid of tiles that is a part of the game I am making. One aspect of the game is that the grid is filled in in a somewhat random fashion, based on analysis of a text file. Right from the outset though, I already realised that just leaving it be pretty much randomly done like this without sticking in some kind of validity checks or prevention mechanism, to stop really badly configured grid from forming, would not work out. The main problem I want to avoid is too many tiles that would be untraversable being close together, potentially severing chunks of the grid from the rest.
The idea I came up with to try avoid some really bad grids is to check when assigning a tile value to each "grid square" during generation with logic like this
if (tileBeingInserted.isTraversable()) {
//all is well
return true;
} else {
//we may have a problem, are there too many untraversables nearby?
//Proceed to check all squares "around" the current one.
}
To be clear, checking around the current square means checking the square immediately adjacent in each of the 8 cardinal directions. Now, my problem is that I am trying to reason out how to code this so that it will certainly not give a RangeErrorat any point or at least catch it and recover if it must. As an example, you could clearly take one of the corner squares to be the worst scenario in the sense that only 2 of the squares the algorithm would want to check are within the array's bounds. Naturally, if a RangeErrorhappens for this reason I just want the program to progress onward without issue so the structure
try {
//check1
//check2...8
} catch (RangeError e) {
}
is unacceptable because as soon as a single out of range square is tested the code falls out of the check block. An alternative I thought of, but do not like because of its messiness, would be to individually wrap each check in a try-catch and yes that would work I guess but that's some horrid looking code...so can anyone help me out here? Is there perhaps a different angle from which to come at this problem of avoiding the RangeErrors that I am not seeing?
So my code for testing whether another untraversable tile should be placed has shaped up like this:
bool _tileFitsWell(int tileTypeInt, int row, int col)
{
//...initialise some things, set stuff up
...
if (tile.traversable == true) {
//In this case a new traversable tile is being put in, so no problems.
return true;
} else {
//begin testing what tiles are around the current tile
//Test NW adjacent
if (row > 0 && col > 0) {
temp = tileAt(row - 1, col - 1);
if (!temp.traversable) {
strikeCount++;
}
}
//Test N adjacent
if (row > 0) {
temp = tileAt(row - 1, col - 1);
if (!temp.traversable) {
strikeCount++;
}
}
//Test NE adjacent
if (row > 0 && col < _grid[0].length - 2) {
temp = tileAt(row - 1, col 1);
if (!temp.traversable) {
strikeCount++;
}
}
//Test W adjacent
if (col > 0) {
temp = tileAt(row, col - 1);
if (!temp.traversable) {
strikeCount++;
}
}
}
return strikeCount < 2;
}
The code inside each "initial" if-statement (the ones that check row and col) is a bit pseudocode-ish for simplicity's sake. As I explained in a previous comment, the reason why I don't need to check tiles in the other 4 cardinal directions is since these checks are done while filling the map, tiles in those positions will always be either uninitialised or just out of bounds, depending on what tile the function is called to check at a given time.
I'm not sure how to ask it, so if you need anymore additional information, please ask for it!
Situation
I've got a website in three languages. I got a lot of customer cases online each connected to a sector (depending in which sector they belong). Each sector and reference has it's own unique nid.
In my template.php it's stated like this:
if ('sector' == $vars['node']->type) {
$lang = '/'.$vars['language'].'/';
$key_path = $_SERVER['REQUEST_URI'];
$key_path = substr_count($key_path, $lang) ? substr($key_path, strlen($lang)) : $key_path;
if (strpos($key_path, '?')) $key_path = substr_replace($key_path, '', strpos($key_path, '?'));
if (strpos($key_path, 'sectors-references') === 0) {
$view = views_get_view('references');
if (!empty($view)) {
$view->set_arguments((int)$vars['node']->nid);
$vars['content']['suffix'] = $view->render();
}
}
}
And yet, every sector shows me the same references... What do I have to change to get the correct reference under the right sector?
Usually arguments are passed to set_arguments using an array, if you pass a non-array the argument will probably be ignored which is why you're always getting the same result. Try:
$view->set_arguments(array((int)$vars['node']->nid));