I feel really dumb for having to post this, but I've been trying to achieve this for an entire week now and I'm getting nowhere!
I'm trying to create a highscore board. Top 10 scores, saved to an INI file. I have searched every single thing on the entire internet ever. I just do not get it.
So what I have tried is this...
I have a "load_room" setup. When this room loads, it runs this code:
ini_open('score.ini')
ini_write_real("Save","highscore_value(1)",highscore_value(1));
ini_write_string("Save","highscore_name(1)",highscore_name(1));
ini_close();
room_goto(room0);
Then when my character dies:
myName = get_string("Enter your name for the highscore list: ","Player1"); //if they enter nothing, "Player1" will get put on the list
highscore_add(myName,score);
ini_open('score.ini')
value1=ini_write_real("Save","highscore_value(1)",0);
name1=ini_write_string("Save","highscore_name(1)","n/a");
ini_close();
highscore_clear();
highscore_add(myName,score);
score = 0;
game_restart();
I'm not worried about including the code to display the scores as I'm checking the score.ini that the game creates for the real values added.
With this, I seem to be able to save ONE score, and that's all. I need to save 10. Again, I'm sorry for asking the same age-old question, but I'm really in need of help and hoping someone out there can assist!
Thanks so much,
Lee.
Why you use save in load_room instead load?
Why you clear the table after die?
You need to use loop for save each result.
For example, loading:
highscore_clear();
ini_open("score.ini");
for (var i=1; i<=10; i++)
{
var name = ini_read_string("Save", "name" + string(i), "");
var value = ini_read_real("Save", "value" + string(i), 0);
if value != 0
highscore_add(name, value);
}
ini_close();
room_goto(room0);
Die:
myName = get_string("Enter your name for the highscore list: ","Player1");
highscore_add(myName, score);
ini_open("score.ini");
for (var i=1; i<=10; i++)
{
ini_write_string("Save", "name" + string(i), highscore_name(i));
ini_write_string("Save", "value" + string(i), string(highscore_value(i)));
}
ini_close();
score = 0;
game_restart();
And few more things...
score = 0;
You need do it when game starts, so here it is unnecessary.
get_string("Enter your name for the highscore list: ","Player1");
Did you read note in help?
NOTE: THIS FUNCTION IS FOR DEBUG USE ONLY. Should you require this functionality in your final game, please use get_string_async.
I used ini_write_string(..., ..., string(...)); instead ini_write_real() because second case will save something like 1000.000000000, and first case will save just 1000.
Related
let thisHotel: number = this.$("#hotelsList").val(); // the selected hotel Id value for the one I want..
let hotels2 = this.getModel().get("hotels"); // all the hotels
I have the selected hotel I want in my massive array...
I can see the hotels in the debug by doing specifically
console.log(hotels2.hotels);
thisHotel currently = 4 which is the value of one of the hotels.
Loop through hotels2 then the object is under hotels then the specific Id is 4.
I need to get the entire object for the specific hotel where Id = 4
I know there are a number of ways to do this. Some people may use Javascript and some people may use Jquery. What would you do?
Every example I see is always referring to a simple array with one or two values.
This is a more complex object.. I guess these are just the way it works in real life examples.
I'm a newbie so please help me get my bearings ...
I did it this way... if you have better suggestions let me know please...
let foundHotel;
//console.log("Hotel Count=" + hotels2.hotels.length);
for (var i = 0; i < hotels2.hotels.length; i++) {
var x = hotels2.hotels[i];
console.log("Looping thru " + x.Id + " checking for " + thisHotel);
if (x.Id == thisHotel) {
console.log("Match on " + x.HotelInformation.Name);
foundHotel = hotels2.hotels[i];
break;
}
}
console.log(foundHotel);
Then I use jquery to prepopulate my form with the info about the selected hotel....
$("#HotelName").val(foundHotel.HotelInformation.Name);
$("#HotelChainCode").val(foundHotel.HotelInformation.ChainCode);
I am trying to pull the Enum chosen from a dialog and assign the label to a table's column.
For example: Dialog opens and allows you to choose from:
Surface
OutOfSpec
Other
These are 0,1,2 respectively.
The user chooses OutOfSpec (the label for this is Out Of Spec), I want to put this enum's Name, or the label, into a table. The column I'm inserting into is set to be a str.
Here's the code I've tried, without success:
SysDictEnum dictEnum = new SysDictEnum(enumNum(SDILF_ScrapReasons));
reason = dialog.addField(enumStr(SDILF_ScrapReasons),"Scrap Reason");
dialog.run();
if (!dialog.closedOk())
{
info(reason.value());
return;
}
ttsBegin;
// For now, this will strip off the order ID from the summary fields.
// No longer removing the Order ID
batchAttr = PdsBatchAttributes::find(itemId, invDim.inventBatchId, "OrderId");
orders = SDILF_BreakdownOrders::find(batchAttr.PdsBatchAttribValue, true);
if (orders)
{
orders.BoxProduced -= 1;
orders.update();
}
// Adding a batch attribute that will include the reason for scrapping
select forUpdate batchAttr;
batchAttr.PdsBatchAttribId = "ScrapReason";
//batchAttr.PdsBatchAttribValue = any2str(dictEnum.index2Value(reason.value()));
batchAttr.PdsBatchAttribValue = enum2str(reason.value());
batchAttr.InventBatchId = invDim.inventBatchId;
batchAttr.ItemId = itemId;
batchAttr.insert();
Obviously this is not the whole code, but it should be enough to give the issue that I'm trying to solve.
I'm sure there is a way to get the int value and use that to assign the label, I've just not been able to figure it out yet.
EDIT
To add some more information about what I am trying to accomplish. We make our finished goods, sometimes they are out of spec or damaged when this happens we then have to scrap that finished good. When we do this we want to keep track of why it is being scrapped, but we don't want just a bunch of random reasons. I used an enum to limit the reasons. When the operator clicks the button to scrap something they will get a dialog screen pop-up that allows them to select a reason for scrapping. The code will then, eventually, put that assigned reason on that finished items batch attributes so that we can track it later in a report and have a list of all the finished goods that were scrapped and why they were scrapped.
I'm not entirely sure of your question, but I think you're just missing one of the index2[...] calls or you're not getting the return value from your dialog correctly. Just create the below as a new job, run it, make a selection of Open Order and click ok.
I don't know the difference between index2Label and index2Name.
static void Job67(Args _args)
{
Dialog dialog = new dialog();
SysDictEnum dictEnum = new SysDictEnum(enumNum(SalesStatus));
DialogField reason;
SalesStatus salesStatusUserSelection;
str label, name, symbol;
int value;
reason = dialog.addField(enumStr(SalesStatus), "SalesStatus");
dialog.run();
if (dialog.closedOk())
{
salesStatusUserSelection = reason.value();
// Label
label = dictEnum.index2Label(salesStatusUserSelection);
// Name
name = dictEnum.index2Name(salesStatusUserSelection);
// Symbol
symbol = dictEnum.index2Symbol(salesStatusUserSelection);
// Value
value = dictEnum.index2Value(salesStatusUserSelection);
info(strFmt("Label: %1; Name: %2; Symbol: %3; Value: %4", label, name, symbol, value));
}
}
Sorry in advance if I’m not phrasing this question correctly. I know nothing about InDesign scripting, but this would solve a workflow problem I’m having at my company, so I would appreciate any and all help.
I want to find all strings in an InDesign file that are between angle brackets (i.e. <variable>) and export that out into a list. Ideally this list would be a separate document but if it can just be dumped into a text frame or something that’s fine.
Any ideas on how to do this? Thank you in advance for any and all help.
Here is something simple:
app.findGrepPreferences=NothingEnum.NOTHING; //to reset the Grep search
app.findGrepPreferences.findWhat = '<[^<]+?>'; //the word(s) you are searching
var fnd = app.activeDocument.findGrep (); //execute search
var temp_str = ''; //initialize an empty string
for (var i = 0; i < fnd.length; i++) { //loop through results and store the results
temp_str += fnd[i].contents.toString() + '\r'; // add next found item text to string
}
var new_doc = app.documents.add (); //create a new document
app.scriptPreferences.measurementUnit = MeasurementUnits.POINTS; //set measurement units to points
var text_frame = new_doc.pages[0].textFrames.add({geometricBounds:[0,0,100,100]});// create a new text frame on the first page
text_frame.contents = temp_str; //output your text to the text frame in the new document
For more data see here.
So this works but it takes 15 seconds for a spreadsheet with 60 items.
function addToModel(name,birth,age){
var newRecord = app.models.ImportData.newRecord();
newRecord['PRESIDENT'] = name;
newRecord['BIRTH_PLACE'] = birth;
newRecord['AGE_ELECTED'] = age;
app.saveRecords([newRecord]);
}
function getSpreadsheet(){
var sh = SpreadsheetApp.openById("zzz");
var ss = sh.getSheetByName("Sheet1");
var data = ss.getDataRange().getValues();
THIS WAS WAY ONE, TAKES 15 SECONDS
for (var i=1; i<data.length;i++)
{
addToModel(data[i][1],data[i][2],data[i][3].toString());
}//for loop
}
but I noticed that the command is saveRecordS not saveRecord and with anything in google apps script, the fewer calls the better, so I tried this but it doesn't work
//SAME SPREADSHEET INFO
var result = [];
for (var i=0; i<data.length;i++)
{
var newRecord = app.models.ImportData.newRecord();
newRecord['PRESIDENT'] = data[i][1];
newRecord['BIRTH_PLACE'] = data[i][2];
newRecord['AGE_ELECTED'] = data[i][3].toString();
result.push(newRecord);
}//for loop
app.saveRecords([result]);
Expected result: new records in my table, much faster than the first version. Actual result: "Cannot read property "key" from undefined" which is triggered from the last line (saveRecords). I tried both app.saveRecords(result) and ([result]), same problem both times.
Note: this example is from an appmaker university tutorial that no longer works because of the changes for appmaker v2.
I think that it's model.newRecord() takes time for each new item created, while time on app.saveRecords() is ignorable.
Could you please confirm that you are EU user? as we EU user are facing same issue (link) due to the server location, if it is the case, please help star that issue and give more info to help Google solve that issue. Thanks.
I'm currently developing an android app for reading out multiple sensor values via Bluetooth and display them in a graph. When I stumbled upon jjoe64's GraphViewLibrary, I knew this would fit my purposes perfectly. But now I'm kind of stuck. Basically, I wrote a little function that would generate and display the values of three sensors in 3 different graphs one under the other. This works just fine when the activity is started first, all three graphs a nicely rendered and displayed. But when I want to update the graphs with different values using the resetData()-method to render the new values in each graph, only the last of the three graphs is updated. Obviously, because it's the last graph generated using this rather simple function. My question is: Is there any other elegant way to use a function like mine for generating and updating all three graphs one after the other? I already tried to set the GraphView variable back to null and different combinations of removing and adding the view. Passing the function a individual GraphView-variable like graphView1, graphView2... does also not work.
Here is the function:
private GraphView graphView;
private GraphViewSeries graphViewSerie;
private Boolean graphExisting = false;
...
public void makeGraphs (float[] valueArray, String heading, int graphId) {
String graphNumber = "graph"+graphId;
int resId = getResources().getIdentifier(graphNumber,"id", getPackageName());
LinearLayout layout = (LinearLayout) findViewById(resId);
int numElements = valueArray.length;
GraphViewData[] data = new GraphViewData[numElements];
for (int c = 0; c<numElements; c++) {
data[c] = new GraphViewData(c+1, valueArray[c]);
Log.i(tag, "GraphView Graph"+graphId+": ["+(c+1)+"] ["+valueArray[c]+"].");
}
if (!graphExisting) {
// init temperature series data
graphView = new LineGraphView(
this // context
, heading // heading
);
graphViewSerie = new GraphViewSeries(data);
graphView.addSeries(graphViewSerie);
((LineGraphView) graphView).setDrawBackground(true);
graphView.getGraphViewStyle().setNumHorizontalLabels(numElements);
graphView.getGraphViewStyle().setNumVerticalLabels(5);
graphView.getGraphViewStyle().setTextSize(10);
layout.addView(graphView);
}
else {
//graphViewSerie = new GraphViewSeries(data);
//graphViewSerie.resetData(data);
graphViewSerie.resetData(new GraphViewData[] {
new GraphViewData(1, 1.2f)
, new GraphViewData(2, 1.4f)
, new GraphViewData(2.5, 1.5f) // another frequency
, new GraphViewData(3, 1.7f)
, new GraphViewData(4, 1.3f)
, new GraphViewData(5, 1.0f)
});
}
And this is the function-call depending on an previously generated array (which is being monitored to be filled with the right values):
makeGraphs(graphData[0], "TempHistory", 1);
makeGraphs(graphData[1], "AirHistory", 2);
makeGraphs(graphData[2], "SensHistory", 3);
graphExisting = true;
Any help and / or any feedback in general is greatly appreciated! Lots of thanks in advance!
EDIT / UPDATE:
Thanks to jjoe64's answer I was able to modify the function to work properly. I was clearly having a mistake in my thinking, since I thought I'd also be changing a GraphViewSeries-object I would handle my function as additional parameter (which I tried before). Of course this does not work. However, with this minor Improvements I managed to make this work using a Graphviewseries Array. To give people struggling with a similar problem an idea of what I had to change, here the quick-and-dirty draft of the solution.
I just changed
private GraphViewSeries graphViewSerie;
to
private GraphViewSeries graphViewSerie[] = new GraphViewSeries[3];
and access the right Series using the already given parameter graphId within the function (if-clause) like this:
int graphIndex = graphId - 1;
graphViewSerie[graphIndex] = new GraphViewSeries(data);
In the else-clause I'm updating the series likewise by calling
graphViewSerie[graphIndex].resetData(data);
So, once again many thanks for your support, jjoe64. I'm sorry I wasn't able to update the question earlier, but I did not find time for it.
of course it is not working correct, because you save always the latest graphseries-object in the member graphViewSerie.
First you have to store the 3 different graphviewseries (maybe via array or map) and then you have to access the correct graphviewseries-object in the else clause.