I have applied DBSCAN algorithm on built-in dataset iris in R. But I am getting error when tried to visualise the output using the plot( ).
Following is my code.
library(fpc)
library(dbscan)
data("iris")
head(iris,2)
data1 <- iris[,1:4]
head(data1,2)
set.seed(220)
db <- dbscan(data1,eps = 0.45,minPts = 5)
table(db$cluster,iris$Species)
plot(db,data1,main = 'DBSCAN')
Error: Error in axis(side = side, at = at, labels = labels, ...) :
invalid value specified for graphical parameter "pch"
How to rectify this error?
I have a suggestion below, but first I see two issues:
You're loading two packages, fpc and dbscan, both of which have different functions named dbscan(). This could create tricky bugs later (e.g. if you change the order in which you load the packages, different functions will be run).
It's not clear what you're trying to plot, either what the x- or y-axes should be or the type of plot. The function plot() generally takes a vector of values for the x-axis and another for the y-axis (although not always, consult ?plot), but here you're passing it a data.frame and a dbscan object, and it doesn't know how to handle it.
Here's one way of approaching it, using ggplot() to make a scatterplot, and dplyr for some convenience functions:
# load our packages
# note: only loading dbscacn, not loading fpc since we're not using it
library(dbscan)
library(ggplot2)
library(dplyr)
# run dbscan::dbscan() on the first four columns of iris
db <- dbscan::dbscan(iris[,1:4],eps = 0.45,minPts = 5)
# create a new data frame by binding the derived clusters to the original data
# this keeps our input and output in the same dataframe for ease of reference
data2 <- bind_cols(iris, cluster = factor(db$cluster))
# make a table to confirm it gives the same results as the original code
table(data2$cluster, data2$Species)
# using ggplot, make a point plot with "jitter" so each point is visible
# x-axis is species, y-axis is cluster, also coloured according to cluster
ggplot(data2) +
geom_point(mapping = aes(x=Species, y = cluster, colour = cluster),
position = "jitter") +
labs(title = "DBSCAN")
Here's the image it generates:
If you're looking for something else, please be more specific about what the final plot should look like.
Related
I am plotting my coefficient estimates using the function plot_summs() and would like to divide my coefficients into two separate groups.
The function plot_summs() has an argument groups, however, when I try to use it as explained in the documentation, I do not get any results nor error. Can someone give me an example of how I can use this argument please?
This is the code I currently have:
plot_summs(model.c, scale = TRUE, groups = list(pane_1 = c("AQI_average", "temp_yearly"), pane_2 = c("rain_1h_yearly", "snow_1h_yearly")), coefs = c("AQI Average"= "AQI_average", "Temperature (in Farenheit)" = "temp_yearly","Rain volume in mm" = "rain_1h_yearly", "Snow volume in mm" = "snow_1h_yearly"))
And the image below is what I get as a result. What I would like to get is to have two panes separate panes. One which would include "AQI_average" and "temp_yearly" and the other one that would have "rain_1h_yearly" and "snow_1h_yearly". Event though I use the groups argument, I do not get this.
Output of my code
By minimal reproducible example, markus is refering to a piece of code that enables others to exactly reproduce the issue you are refering to on our respective computers, as described in the link that they provided.
To me, it seems the problem is that the groups function does not seem to work in plot_summs - it seems someone here also pointed it out.
If plot_summs is replaced by plot_coef, the groups function work for me. However, the scale function does not seem to be available. A workaround might be:
r <- lm(Sepal.Length ~ Sepal.Width + Petal.Length + Petal.Width, data = iris)
y <- plot_summs(r, scale = TRUE) #Plot for scaled version
t <- plot_coefs(r, #Plot for unscaled versions but with facetting
groups =
list(
pane_1 = c("Sepal.Width", "Petal.Length"),
pane_2 = c("Petal.Width"))) + theme_linedraw()
y$data$group <- t$data$group #Add faceting column to data for the plot
t$data <- y$data #Replace the data with the scaled version
t
I hope this is what you meant!
I have 2 csv data files. Each file has a "date_time" column and a "temp_c" column. I want to make the x-axis have the "date_time" from both files and then use 2 y-axes to display each "temp_c" with separate lines. I would like to use plot instead of ggplot2 if possible. I haven't been able to find any code help that works with my data and I'm not sure where to really begin. I know how to do 2 separate plots for these 2 datasets, just not combine them into one graph.
plot(grewl$temp_c ~ grewl$date_time)
and
plot(kbll$temp_c ~ kbll$date_time)
work separately but not together.
As others indicated, it is easy to add new data to a graph using points() or lines(). One thing to be careful about is how you format the axes as they will not be automatically adjusted to fit any new data you input using points() and the like.
I've included a small example below that you can copy, paste, run, and examine. Pay attention to why the first plot fails to produce what you want (axes are bad). Also note how I set this example up generally - by making fake data that showcase the same "problem" you are having. Doing this is often a better strategy than simply pasting in your data since it forces you to think about the core component of the problem you are facing.
#for same result each time
set.seed(1234)
#make data
set1<-data.frame("date1" = seq(1,10),
"temp1" = rnorm(10))
set2<-data.frame("date2" = seq(8,17),
"temp2" = rnorm(10, 1, 1))
#first attempt fails
#plot one
plot(set1$date1, set1$temp1, type = "b")
#add points - oops only three showed up bc the axes are all wrong
lines(set2$date2, set2$temp2, type = "b")
#second attempt
#adjust axes to fit everything (set to min and max of either dataset)
plot(set1$date1, set1$temp1,
xlim = c(min(set1$date1,set2$date2),max(set1$date1,set2$date2)),
ylim = c(min(set1$temp1,set2$temp2),max(set1$temp1,set2$temp2)),
type = "b")
#now add the other points
lines(set2$date2, set2$temp2, type = "b")
# we can even add regression lines
abline(reg = lm(set1$temp1 ~ set1$date1))
abline(reg = lm(set2$temp2 ~ set2$date2))
I'm new to R and want to plot specific points over an existing plot. I'm using the swiss data frame, which I visualize through the plot(swiss) function.
After this, want to add outliers given by the Mahalanobis distance:
mu_hat <- apply(swiss, 2, mean); sigma_hat <- cov(swiss)
mahalanobis_distance <- mahalanobis(swiss, mu_hat, sigma_hat)
outliers <- swiss[names(mahalanobis_distance[mahalanobis_distance > 10]),]
points(outliers, pch = 'x', col = 'red')
but this last line has no effect, as the outlier points aren't added to the previous plot. I see that if repeat this procedure on a pair of variables, say
plot(swiss[2:3])
points(outliers[2:3], pch = 'x', col = 'red')
the red points are added to the plot.
Ask: is there any restriction to how the points() function can be used for a multivariate data frame?
Here's a solution using GGally::ggpairs. It's a little ugly as we need to modify the ggally_points function to specify the desired color scheme.
I've assumed that mu_hat = colMeans(swiss) and sigma_hat = cov(swiss).
library(dplyr)
library(GGally)
swiss %>%
bind_cols(distance = mahalanobis(swiss, colMeans(swiss), cov(swiss))) %>%
mutate(is_outlier = ifelse(distance > 10, "yes", "no")) %>%
ggpairs(columns = 1:6,
mapping = aes(color = is_outlier),
upper = list(continuous = function(data, mapping, ...) {
ggally_points(data = data, mapping = mapping) +
scale_colour_manual(values = c("black", "red"))
}),
lower = list(continuous = function(data, mapping, ...) {
ggally_points(data = data, mapping = mapping) +
scale_colour_manual(values = c("black", "red"))
}),
axisLabels = "internal")
Unfortunately this isn't possible the way you're currently doing things. When plotting a data frame R produces many plots and aligns them. What you're actually seeing there is 6 by 6 = 36 individual plots which have all been aligned to look nice.
When you use the dots command, it tells it to place the dots on the current plot. Which doesn't really make sense when you have 36 plots, at least not the way you want it to.
ggplot is a really powerful tool in R, it provides far greater combustibility. For example you could set up the dataframe to include your outliers, but have them labelled as "outlier" and place it in each plot that you have set up as facets. The more you explore it you might find there are better plots which suit your needs as well.
Plotting a dataframe in base R is a good exploratory tool. You could set up those outliers as a separate dataframe and plot it, so you can see each of the 6 by 6 plots side by side and compare. It all depends on your goal. If you're goal is to produce exactly as you've described, the ggplot2 package will help you create something more professional. As #Gregor suggested in the comments, looking up the function ggpairs from the GGally package would be a good place to start.
A quick google image search shows some funky plots akin to what you're after and then some!
Find it here
Does anyone have an idea how is this kind of chart plotted? It seems like heat map. However, instead of using color, size of each cell is used to indicate the magnitude. I want to plot a figure like this but I don't know how to realize it. Can this be done in R or Matlab?
Try scatter:
scatter(x,y,sz,c,'s','filled');
where x and y are the positions of each square, sz is the size (must be a vector of the same length as x and y), and c is a 3xlength(x) matrix with the color value for each entry. The labels for the plot can be input with set(gcf,properties) or xticklabels:
X=30;
Y=10;
[x,y]=meshgrid(1:X,1:Y);
x=reshape(x,[size(x,1)*size(x,2) 1]);
y=reshape(y,[size(y,1)*size(y,2) 1]);
sz=50;
sz=sz*(1+rand(size(x)));
c=[1*ones(length(x),1) repmat(rand(size(x)),[1 2])];
scatter(x,y,sz,c,'s','filled');
xlab={'ACC';'BLCA';etc}
xticks(1:X)
xticklabels(xlab)
set(get(gca,'XLabel'),'Rotation',90);
ylab={'RAPGEB6';etc}
yticks(1:Y)
yticklabels(ylab)
EDIT: yticks & co are only available for >R2016b, if you don't have a newer version you should use set instead:
set(gca,'XTick',1:X,'XTickLabel',xlab,'XTickLabelRotation',90) %rotation only available for >R2014b
set(gca,'YTick',1:Y,'YTickLabel',ylab)
in R, you should use ggplot2 that allows you to map your values (gene expression in your case?) onto the size variable. Here, I did a simulation that resembles your data structure:
my_data <- matrix(rnorm(8*26,mean=0,sd=1), nrow=8, ncol=26,
dimnames = list(paste0("gene",1:8), LETTERS))
Then, you can process the data frame to be ready for ggplot2 data visualization:
library(reshape)
dat_m <- melt(my_data, varnames = c("gene", "cancer"))
Now, use ggplot2::geom_tile() to map the values onto the size variable. You may update additional features of the plot.
library(ggplot2)
ggplot(data=dat_m, aes(cancer, gene)) +
geom_tile(aes(size=value, fill="red"), color="white") +
scale_fill_discrete(guide=FALSE) + ##hide scale
scale_size_continuous(guide=FALSE) ##hide another scale
In R, corrplotpackage can be used. Specifically, you have to use method = 'square' when creating the plot.
Try this as an example:
library(corrplot)
corrplot(cor(mtcars), method = 'square', col = 'red')
I have found that the beanplot is the best way to represent my data. I want to look at multiple beanplots together to visualize my data. Each of my plots contains 3 variables, so each one looks something like what would be generated by this code:
library(beanplot)
a <- rnorm(100)
b <- rnorm(100)
c <- rnorm(100)
beanplot(a, b ,c ,ylim = c(-4, 4), main = "Beanplot",
col = c("#CAB2D6", "#33A02C", "#B2DF8A"), border = "#CAB2D6")
(Would have just included an image but my reputation score is not high enough, sorry)
I have 421 of these that I want to put into one long PDF (EDIT: One plot per page is fine, this was just poor wording on my part). The approach I have taken was to first generate the beanplots in a for loop and store them in a list at each iteration. Then I will use the multiplot function (from the R Cookbook page on multiplot) to display all of my plots on one long column so I can begin my analysis.
The problem is that the beanplot function does not appear to be set up to assign plot objects as a variable. Example:
library(beanplot)
a <- rnorm(100)
b <- rnorm(100)
plot1 <- beanplot(a, b, ylim = c(-5,5), main = "Beanplot",
col = c("#CAB2D6", "#33A02C", "#B2DF8A"), border = "#CAB2D6")
plot1
If you then type plot1 into the R console, you will get back two of the plot parameters but not the plot itself. This means that when I store the plots in the list, I am unable to graph them with multiplot. It will simply return the plot parameters and a blank plot.
This behavior does not seem to be the case with qplot for example which will return a plot when you recall the stored plot. Example:
library(ggplot2)
a <- rnorm(100)
b <- rnorm(100)
plot2 <- qplot(a,b)
plot2
There is no equivalent to the beanplot that I know of in ggplot. Is there some sort of workaround I can use for this issue?
Thank you.
You can simply open a PDF device with pdf() and keep the default parameter onefile=TRUE. Then call all your beanplot()s, one after the other. They will all be in one PDF document, each one on a separate page. See here.