Please assist
I can't find any documentation about how can I get or create test LinkedIn profiles for testing proposes
What I've found here https://legal.linkedin.com/api-terms-of-use
it's only what I got
2.3 Test Profiles
You may create up to five test LinkedIn profiles for purposes of
testing your Application only. You must create the profiles manually
and not via automated means, such as scripts.
Test profiles must: (a) be standard LinkedIn member profiles; (b) not
interact with non-test profiles (for example, you cannot use test
accounts to comment on posts and you cannot connect test profiles with
non-test profiles, such as your own personal LinkedIn profile); and
(c) not override our API call limits. You must clearly identify the
profiles as test profiles, and you must identify these additional
account profiles as “developers” in your Application registration. You
may not create any profile positions at real companies (besides your
own) for the test profiles.
Related
I'm using Microsoft Graph SDK for .NET Core. I'm trying to get a list of all Office 365 plans in all Azure Active Directory groups within my organization.
I have been reading through a lot of questions, but haven't found a clear answer to my problem: As it's stated in the official documentation, you cannot list plans in a group using client credentials (application permissions), which is the exact authentication method I'm using. Given this, how can I achieve my objective?
As per documentation, the only way to list plans in groups is to use Delegated Permissions, but in that case, and according to the Microsoft Graph permissions:
either the user or an administrator consents to the permissions that the app requests and the app can act as the signed-in user when making calls to Microsoft Graph.
If the signed-in user is a regular user then the application will only access the groups that user is a member of. Bear in mind that there may not be a single user that is a member of all groups.
Is there a way to get my application to list all plans in all groups within my organization?
You can now use application permissions.
Outdated Reply:
Planner currently does not support application permissions. Depending
on what your scenario is, you have couple of options. One option is to
create a user account to be used by your app, and add that user to all
the groups. Then you'll be able to query the plans with the
credentials of that user.
I want to give users permission to only add utterances to Intents which owner gave them access.
Author is one who should have full access like adding, removing or modifying Entity, Intent, Etc,..
There is concept called collaborate but that will have all access to author the model, train and publish which doesn't seems to really good.
Is there concept with role based actions in LUIS portal or is Microsoft is coming up with in latest luis portal which is under preview now .
Any help is appreciated. Thanks ...
As of now, there is no such provision to allow the users to just get the permission to add utterances to intents. Role based assignments do not allow you to give access to users just to add utterances and are basically classified as contributors, collaborators, owner and so on. LUIS allows you to collaborate and contribute with Azure AD and RBAC based on Azure Active Directory resource and Azure Active Directory tenant user.
You can request for this feature by posting the idea on the feedback forum for cognitive services.
I'm exploring WSO2 API Manager platform to use in Open API project. The idea is that we forbid registration in Store and creating users by ourselves. But we also want to give them only Sandbox API as a starting point and then, explicitly allow particular users to consume Production API. Haven't find any information. Is it possible? If yes - where to look?
You can restrict the token generation for the Production endpoints by using Workflows. Follow the documentation[1].
You could configure ProductionApplicationGeneration to use ApplicationRegistrationWSWorkflowExecutor and SandbobApplicationGeneration to use ApplicationRegistrationSimpleWorkflowExecutor.
With this approach if the subscriber tried to generate a token for production endpoints, it will trigger a human task, which needs to be approved from the Admin Portal.
For your requirement, you could write a custom workflow extension which allows restriction by role or user name. For more information on Writing custom workglow extension please follow [2]
[1] https://docs.wso2.com/display/AM210/Adding+an+Application+Registration+Workflow
[2] https://docs.wso2.com/display/AM210/Customizing+a+Workflow+Extension
Thanks and Regards
Our company has several organizations within it. We'd like our API Owners to be responsible for publishing their APIs via the publisher. However, my current understanding is that if you have the ability to publish an API, you get the ability to publish all APIs in the system.
Is it possible to establish publisher roles by team, and the appropriate ownership of APIs?
For example:
Team 1 owns APIs A,B,C
Team 2 owns APIs X,Y,Z
A member of Team 1 can only edit/publish A,B,C.
Thanks
WSO2 API Manager support publisher access control. With that, you can define role-based access control to your APIs. So you can enable read/update(publish) restrictions to user groups with roles.
I've just created custom ASP.NET Membership, Role, Profile and Session State providers, and I was wondering whether there exists a test suite or something similar to test the implementation of the providers. I've checked some of the open source providers I could find (like the NauckIt.PostgreSQL provider), but neither of them contained unit tests, and all of the forum topics I've found mentioned only a few test cases (like checking whether creating a user works), but this is clearly not a complete test suite for a Membership provider. (And I couldn't find anything for the other three providers)
Are there more or less complete test suites for the above mentioned providers, or are there custom providers out there that have at least some testing avaialable?
The short answer is that there is no such open test suite for providers.
Perhaps you can start one on codeplex...