I am trying to run this fixture code:
|script |Browser Test |
|open |https://jsfiddle.net/ygjL7hnm/3/show|
|click |Run this fiddle |
|click if available|id=test |
|click if available|id=test2 |
|click if available|id=test3 |
|click if available|id=test4 |
|wait |2 |seconds |
The problem is I want to ignore the result of "click if available", meaning the test should be all green. I could do that with "reject". That would work perfectly fine but the problem is I don't know which buttons are missing or not missing. So I would have to write "reject" before every "click if available". That results in an error if the button is actually available. As you can see here:
But what I want is that no matter if the button is there or not, it should just try to click it and ignore the result of the method. It should not check wether it found the button or not. I hope its clear what I want, if not feel free to ask. Thanks.
Edit: Worth noting I am using this fitnesse version with the HSAC PlugIn.
For slim tests (which in this case, you are using), prepend the script table row with the show keyword. It will just output the function's return value. (true/false in case of 'click if available')
More info: http://fitnesse.org/FitNesse.UserGuide.WritingAcceptanceTests.SliM.ScriptTable
From that link:
If the word show is in the first cell, then it should be followed by a function. A new cell will be added when the test is run, and it will contain the return value of the function.
The script below should not fail on the execution of click if available:
|script |Browser Test |
|open |https://jsfiddle.net/ygjL7hnm/3/show |
|click |Run this fiddle |
|show |click if available |this does not exist |
Related
In my angular application I am tracking filters that users utilize on one of the pages. What I can later see in Logs, is the following (query for last 24 hours)
What I am interested in, is the count of filters groupped by its name. So I created the following query:
However the problem as you can see, is that my y-axis starts from 1 instead of 0. To users this looks like the last two filters don't have any values, where in reality they both have count of 1.
I have tried to use ymin=0 together with render function, however it did not work (chart still starts from 1). Then I have read I need to use make-series() function and so I tried:
customEvents
| where timestamp >= ago(24h)
| where customDimensions.pageName == 'product'
| make-series Count=count(name) default=0 on timestamp from datetime(2019-10-10) to datetime(2019-10-11) step 1d by name
| project name, Count
However the result is some weird matrix instead of a regular table:
I have just started with application insights thus any help in respect to this matter would be more than appreciated. Thank you
in Workbooks in application insights you could do almost this query (see below for a simplification?), then use the chart settings and set the axis min/max explicitly:
but why are you using make-series but then summarizing to just one series?
in this specific case is summarize simpler:
customEvents
| where timestamp between(datetime(2019-10-10) .. datetime(2019-10-11))
| where customDimensions.pageName == 'product'
| summarize Count=count(name) by name
| render barchart
in the logs blade (where you are), you could do this query, and I believe you can use
render barchart title="blah" ymin=0
(at some point workbooks will be able to "see" all the rendeer options like ymin/ymax/xmin/xmax/title/etc, but right now they're all stripped out at service layer)
A bit late to the party, but the correct syntax to pass in ymin and ymax when using a query is this:
| ...
| render barchart with (ymin=0, ymax=100)
See https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/data-explorer/kusto/query/renderoperator?pivots=azuremonitor
I'm not sure if there is already a command like this existing, but what about a command like that in a code language:
do this
do that
<point2>
if (something){
GOTO ('point1')
}
do this
do that
<point1>
do this
do that
if (something){
go to ('point2')
}
a command which just leads the program to a point forward or backward in the code
i know you can do this with if clauses and functions and have the same effect
otherwise with this command you can portray code in blocks:
_____________ <-----
| start motor | | Go to command
| if failure -------
|_____________|
|
|
\/
Drive
My questions:
do we need this command? , is it useful in languages like java or php or else? and why is it unset in java? Could it be upgraded or made better and how? is it enough for not using loops anymore? Or has a goto command a major downside? Maybe in compiling or so its performance is bad... ----why dont i use it or find it in any tutorial when it could be a standard command like loops... why????
I'm thankful for a nice discussion about this command and for not writing how many grammar mistakes I made ...
"a command which just leads the program to a point forward or backward in the code" <-- it is called GOTO command. Different programming language may implement it differently.
"nice discussion about this command" <--- After your research, mind sharing which part of the reading materials/reference/code that you don't understand or can't be execute? A sample code and screenshot may help too.. (:
I'm quite new with Robot Framework, and I cannot find a way to run a process with arguments on windows. I am quite sure I did not understand the documentation and there is a simple way of doing that though...
Ok, let's say I can start my program using this command:
c:\myappdir>MyApp.exe /I ..\params\myAppParams.bin
How to do that in RF?
Any kind of help would be appreciated.
Thank you very much :)
Edit 1:
Here is a piece of my code:
| *Setting* | *Value*
| Resource | compilationResource.robot
#(Process lib is included in compilationResource)
#I removed the "|" for readability
...
TEST1
...
${REPLAYEXEDIR}= get_replay_exe_dir #from a custom lib included in compilationResource
${EXEFULLPATH}= Join Path ${WORKSPACEDIR} ${REPLAYEXEDIR} SDataProc.exe
Should Exist ${EXEFULLPATH}
${REPLAYLOGPATH}= Join Path ${WORKSPACEDIR} ReplayLog.log
${REPLAYFILEPATH}= Join Path ${WORKSPACEDIR} params params.bin
Should Exist ${REPLAYFILEPATH}
Start Process ${EXEFULLPATH} stderr=${REPLAYLOGPATH} stdout=${REPLAYLOGPATH} alias=replayjob
Process Should Be Running replayjob
Terminate Process replayjob
Process Should Be Stopped replayjob
This works. As soon as I try to include the arguments like this:
Start Process ${EXEFULLPATH} ${/}I ${REPLAYFILEPATH} stderr=${REPLAYLOGPATH} stdout=${REPLAYLOGPATH} alias=replayjob
I get this error:
WindowsError: [Error 2] The system cannot find the file specified
and this error comes from the start process line.
Let me know if I was unclear or if nmore info is needed.
Thank you all for your help on this.
Edit 2: SOLUTION
Each argument must be separated form the other (when not running in shell) with a double space. I was not using double spaces, hence the error.
| | Start Process | ${EXEFULLPATH} | /I | ${REPLAYFILEPATH} | stderr=${REPLAYLOGPATH} | stdout=${REPLAYLOGPATH} | alias=replayjob
To launch your program from a Robot Framework Test, use the Process library like:
*** Settings ***
Library Process
*** Test Cases ***
First test
Run Process c:${/}myappdir${/}prog.py /I ..\params\myAppParams.bin
# and then do some tests....
In a robot framework test case I set a variable and then do a process.
Because the setting of the variable is not a very interesting bit of information, I don't want to include that in my report.
| Verifying STUFF |
| | ${endpoint}= | set variable | STUFF
| | Verify
My report contains this:
KEYWORD: ${endpoint} = BuiltIn.Set Variable STUFF
But I would rather not have it there. How can I tell Robot Framework to just not log that line?
------edit------
It looks like this should do it:
pybot --removekeywords NAME:SetVariable testcase.txt
But the Set Variable keywords are still there.
(And yes, I upgraded my robot framework to 2.8.3 to take advantage of this function.)
The best you can do is to use
Set Log Level NONE
but it will still log all the keyword calls, just not anything inside those.
Or if you call a python function which calls another function, then the call to the second function is not logged.
Like this:
*** Settings ***
Library lib.py
*** Test Cases ***
demo
Set Log Level NONE
${a} foo
xyzzy
*** Keywords ***
xyzzy
qwerty
qwerty
No Operation
Log 123
and lib.py being like this:
def foo():
abc = bar()
return abc
def bar():
c = 1
print c
return c
The problem is that when you assign a variable like ${var} = Keyword, the name of the keyword in Robot Framework outputs is ${var} = Keyword, not Keyword as you would expect. If your keyword is from a library or a resource file, its name will also be included like ${var} = MyLibrary.Keyword. The latter is a feature but the former is a bug that is hopefully fixed in RF 2.9.
An easy workaround for the keyword name, for now, including the variable name is using wildcards. Something like this ought to work for you:
--RemoveKeywords 'name:* = BuiltIn.Set Variable'
You can use --removekeywords or --flattenkeywords option on pybot to remove the content of keyword So if you have e.g. keyword "foo" that contains lot's of logging keywords, you can set "--flattenkeywords name:foo" option to pybot, and In the log you'll only see the primary keyword, but no keywords inside it.
http://robotframework.googlecode.com/hg/doc/userguide/RobotFrameworkUserGuide.html?r=2.8.3#removing-and-flattening-keywords
If you use a python library, the following monkey-patching works for me:
from robot.libraries.BuiltIn import BuiltIn
from robot.output.logger import LOGGER
import types
def _nothing(*args, **kwargs):
pass
def disable_keyword_logging(self):
self._logging_methods = (LOGGER.start_keyword, LOGGER.end_keyword)
LOGGER.start_keyword = types.MethodType(_nothing,LOGGER)
LOGGER.end_keyword = types.MethodType(_nothing,LOGGER)
def enable_keyword_logging(self):
LOGGER.start_keyword, LOGGER.end_keyword = self._logging_methods
Then when this script is run:
Disable keyword logging
Log Hello world
Enable keyword logging
the "Log" keyword is not logged to the output but the output is.
If you really want nothing (also no debug/info/warn information logged by the called keywords), you will still have to set the log level to "NONE".
Robot Framework doesn't log "global" variables as part of a variable table. Global is in quotation marks because Set Global Variable actually is logged, but if you initialize your variable like so...
*** Variables ***
${endpoint} stuff
*** Keywords ***
...then it will not be in the Log. Additionally, if you don't want anyone to see the variable at all if they're just looking at the front end of your testing suite, you can bury it in a Resource file and the call the Resource file.
Robot Framework logs your Set Variable keywords and results because Set Variable implies that you're setting a variable dynamically and might be setting it based on the result of a keyword, in which case you'd probably want to know what the result of the keyword is. If you're just creating a static variable, then no extra work beyond the table is required. Is a dynamic variable a required part of your code?
I'm working on a patch that plays samples from a piano, which works in xcode to build an piano app for ipad. I'm trying to add an adsr to create sustain, but I can't seem to get it working. Could someone point me in the right direction? Thanks!
Patch:
https://docs.google.com/file/d/0B4-qHDgzbDB3VUlwM09FSEowZWM/edit
The ADSR is just an evelope which you are using to multiply the sound output with. However it is meant to be on a temporal axis together with the trigger of the sound. When I look at your patch I notice another thing: Why are you reloading the samples into the arrays every time you trigger them? The arrays should be filled on startup of the app, like this:
[loadbang]
|
[read -resize c1.wav c1Array(
|
[soundfiler]
Later, when you actually just want to play back, you do
[r c1]
|
[t b]
|
[tabplay~ c1Array]
|
[throw~]
and at one central point in your patch you can have
[catch~]
|
[dac~]
(add the main voulme there). Notice there are no connections between the three parts!