I have a single ADFS Server configured Non-Claims Aware relying party trust for my Application1, and now i have another application2 running in my LAN and i would like to add that application to the same ADFS server for Authentication.
Application1 --> https://app1login.domain.com/adfs/services/trust -- Working
Application2 --> https://app2login.domain.com/adfs/services/trust -- Http error 400
for point 2) i have setup netsh http add sslcert hostnameport="app2login.domain.com:443" certhash="1255684215479212622" appid="{xxx-xxx-xxx-xx-xxxxxxxx}" certstorename=MY and now i am able to telnet to the app2login.domain.com and is working, but the URL https://app2login.domain.com/adfs/services/trust gives me http 400 error, where app1login.domain.com works fine.
Tried Set-AdfsAlternateTlsClientBinding -Member hostname.domain.com -Thumbprint 'xxx2548526978456xxx' but there is no Change, still http400
is there a possibility to make two different URL and sing-in page in a single ADFS Server for Two Different Application in the same domain
Related
I'm looking for how to add hostname bindings to ADFS like you would add additional hostname bindings for a website in IIS. e.g. adfs.mydomain.com is the domain used for ADFS. In addition I'd like to add server1.adfs.mydomain.com. This has nothing to do with SSL certs. I know this can be done as I did it on the ADFS server I'm retiring.
For those who ask why I want to do this. There is a farm of ADFS servers behind a load balancer all using adfs.mydomain.com hostname. I'd like specific bindings for each server e.g. server1.adfs.mydomain.com so I can probe the service on a specific server from our monitoring system to verify the ADFS service is online.
The old ADFS server is whatever role service comes with Win2k16. The new ADFS server is the role service on Win2k22. This used the be easier to find searching google, but now adfs related postings have become littered with references to Azure and O365 implementations. Anyone know how to add the additional binding? I feel like previously it was powershell or netsh command, but I could be wrong.
• Since, the ADFS servers in your ADFS farm are behind a load balancer which has a hostname of ‘adfs.mydomain.com’, the ADFS servers in the farm also are domain joined servers with their DNS records hosted in your environment’s local DNS server. Thus, to identify those ADFS servers with additional hostnames other than that assigned them during domain joining, you need to add these additional hostnames in the local hosts file of the ADFS servers serviced by the load balancer as shown below: -
Go to the path, ‘C:\Windows\System32\drivers\etc\hosts’ and open the hosts file with notepad and add the IP address of the respective ADFS Server as shown below in the screenshot: -
Thus, in this way, the monitoring server will be able to find out the ADFS server and query the ADFS service for its proper functioning. Also, it will be able to resolve them through the load balancer if it has to pass through them for service availability.
I have an API built with asp.net and its hosted using OWIN.hosting.WebApp as a Windows Service at https://example.com/api/v1/myEndpoint. Its bound to port 443 through netsh. When i start the OWIN application, its done like:
Dim Address As String = "https://*:443/
WebApp.Start(Of Application)(Address)
I also have my website hosted in IIS using SSL and bound to port 443 - https://example.com/web
They both start up and run without error. But it seems like IIS is blocking requests to the https://example.com/api/v1/myEndpoint. Postman cannot reach the API while IIS is running. If i stop IIS and try the exact same postman request the API returns back data like it should. As soon as i start IIS back up, the API will no longer respond.
Is there a rewrite rule i can add to forward the API requests the API service?
In my opinion, you could not host the asp.net web API windows service in iis.
a single IIS server can host multiple websites, but in order IIS to distribute HTTP requests correctly, each website has to be identified with some unique value. In case of an IIS website, it consists of three attributes that make up a unique combination for each website. These are:
a TCP port number
an IP address
a host header
The information about the hosted websites is stored in the ServerBindings attribute of the IIS Metabase in the following format: IP:Port:Hostname. Thus, if you want to host multiple websites on the same port, you will have to use a unique Host header or Ip address.
You could refer below link for more detail:
http://woshub.com/run-multiple-websites-on-the-same-port-and-ip-address-on-iis/
i m using Weblogic 12c.
I would like to set up client certificate authentication (2-way SSL). But i do not want to enforce client certificates for the whole server. Basically, in our webapp most of the servlets should work with regular 1-way SSL (only server certificate is verified) without requiring client to provide the certificate. But for one of the servlets client certificate authentication is needed.
I have set up similar thing for Glassfish using separate module for the servlet where 2-way SSL is required with web.xml deployment descriptor with login-config element indicating CLIENT-CERT authentication type. I have also set up appropriate security constraints, roles and groups.
However this does not seem to work with Weblogic. In the admin console under SSL i see "Two Way Client Cert Behavior" with 3 possible values: "client cert not requested", "requested but not enforced" and "requested and enforced".
If i set it to "not requested", client does not present any certificates at all (even though i have the same web.xml with CLIENT-CERT which works with Glassfish). Setting to "requested and enforced" is not an option. I also tried setting to "requested but not enforced" but that's also bad since the browser will ask for client certificate even for those pages where it is not needed (most of them) and we don't want that behavior.
Basically, it seems to me that Weblogic wants to enforce 2-way SSL for the whole server, but that's not what we need, we need it only for one webapp module. Is it possible to do so?
Edit:
To clarify, i set up DefaultIdentityAsserter and created custom UserNameMapper to map client certificate to user name. The problem however that if SSL setting (described above) is set to "not requested" then client certificate is not presented at all so the server cannot authenticate and i get 401 response. And i can't use the other 2 SSL settings because then the server will ask for client certificate for all webpages and that's not what we want.
You could create 2 Network Channels. See NetworkAccessPointMBean in WLST, or Environment/Servers/yourServer/Protocols/Channels in Admin Console.
Channel 1: SSL enabled w/ one-way SSL, on a specific port
Channel 2: SSL enabled w/ two-way SSL and client cert enforced, on a specific port
Then, access your web module on the appropriate port based on your client cert requirements.
This would only require one server.
For your specific need, I would create 2 managed servers, setting up only one with 2 way SSL.
You can then deploy your applications on the appropriate managed server, depending if you want the 2 way SSL or not for it.
Then you need to add a reverse proxy in front of your WebLogic server in order to forward your user to the correct port, as you probably don't want to expose several ports.
Blockquote
I'm trying to test an already deployed web service through SoapUI. The service URL is https://hostname:82/Service.asmx. I modified the test Endpoint to reflect this. Web requests go through a proxy that uses Windows Authentication.
First I attempted to run the test directly but without success. All I got was an error:
401 - Unauthorized: Access is denied due to invalid credentials
Next, I entered proxy details and domain username/password into SoapUI proxy settings. This creates another error:
status# HTTP/1.1 502 Proxy Error ( The specified Secure Sockets Layer (SSL) port is not allowed. Forefront TMG is not configured to allow
SSL requests from this port. Most Web browsers use port 443 for SSL requests. )
I wasn't really paying attention to this until now so I ignored the error and went on to install Burp Suite hoping that this would help with Windows Authentication. I got the Internet working through Burp Suite but soapUI still doesn't do anything and I can't run any tests. This time the error is a bit different:
XML Parsing Error: syntax error Location:
https://hostname:82/Service.asmx Line Number 1, Column 1:Burp proxy
error: failed to connect to IP.
What am I doing wrong? :)
Figured it out in the end. I configured Burp proxy the wrong way. Instead of redirecting to my WS server, I was redirecting to our internet proxy which of course didn't know what to do.
I have a WCF service which is being called from my web application.
The WCF service call is made on SSL port 443.
When my application makes the call, i recieve the following error message in my log file:
The HTTP request is unauthorized with client authentication scheme 'Ntlm'. The authentication header received from the server was 'Negotiate,NTLM'
I checked the iis authentication headers on my machine(IIs 5.1) and the machine where the WCF service is deployed(IIS 6.0) using the cscript command:
For iis 5.1
adsutil set w3svc/1/ntauthenticationproviders "Negotiate,NTLM"
Simlilarly, the header has been set on server machine IIS 6.0 using the command:
adsutil set w3svc/1/root/ntauthenticationproviders "Negotiate,NTLM"
I have repeatedly checked the headers and they have the same value of "Negotiate,NTLM" at both ends, yet my service call is failing.
Kindly help.
With NTLM authentication, the user executing on the calling server must be verifiable within the domain within the headers. This would mean that your IIS 5.1 machine would have to have its IIS instance (application pool) running under a domain viable user. Since the application pool is almost universally run by either Local System, Network Service, or AppPoolService (or similar system account) nome of which are domain available, you will need to configure the IIS instance that is performing the call to be run by a service account with appropriate permissions in the domain.