I have a database that I don't control the source of directly and results in errant '0' entries which mess up generated graphs with these drops to zero. I am able to manipulate the data after the fact and update that database.
It is acceptable that the last known good value can be used instead and so I am trying to make a general query that will remove all the zeros and populate it with the last known value.
Luckily, every entry includes the ID of the last entry and so it is a matter of simply looking back and grabbing it.
I have got very close to a final answer, but instead of updating with the last good value, it just uses the first value over and over again.
dummy data
CREATE TABLE tbl(id INT,r INT,oid INT);
INSERT INTO tbl VALUES(1,10,0);
INSERT INTO tbl VALUES(2,20,1);
INSERT INTO tbl VALUES(3,0,2);
INSERT INTO tbl VALUES(4,40,3);
INSERT INTO tbl VALUES(5,50,4);
INSERT INTO tbl VALUES(6,0,5);
INSERT INTO tbl VALUES(7,70,6);
INSERT INTO tbl VALUES(8,80,7);
SELECT * FROM tbl;
OUTPUT:
| id| r |oid|
|---|----|---|
| 1 | 10 | 0 |
| 2 | 20 | 1 |
| 3 | 0 | 2 | ** NEEDS FIXING
| 4 | 40 | 3 |
| 5 | 50 | 4 |
| 6 | 0 | 5 | ** NEEDS UPDATE
| 7 | 70 | 6 |
| 8 | 80 | 7 |
I have worked several queries to get results around what I am after:
All zero entries:
SELECT * FROM tbl WHERE r = 0;
OUTPUT:
| id | r | oid |
|----|----|-----|
| 3 | 0 | 2 |
| 6 | 0 | 5 |
Output only the those rows with the preceding good row
SELECT * FROM tbl WHERE A in (
SELECT id FROM tbl WHERE r = 0
UNION
SELECT oid FROM tbl WHERE r = 0
)
OUTPUT:
| id| r |oid|
|---|----|---|
| 2 | 20 | 1 |
| 3 | 0 | 2 |
| 5 | 50 | 4 |
| 6 | 0 | 5 |
Almost works
This is as close as I have got, it does change all the zero's, but it changes them all to the value of the first lookup
UPDATE tbl
SET r = (SELECT r
FROM tbl
WHERE id in (SELECT oid
FROM tbl
WHERE r = 0)
) WHERE r = 0 ;
OUTPUT:
| id| r |oid|
|---|----|---|
| 1 | 10 | 0 |
| 2 | 20 | 1 |
| 3 | 20 | 2 | ** GOOD
| 4 | 40 | 3 |
| 5 | 50 | 4 |
| 6 | 20 | 5 | ** BAD, should be 50
| 7 | 70 | 6 |
| 8 | 80 | 7 |
If it helps, I created this fiddle here that I've been playing with:
http://sqlfiddle.com/#!5/8afff/1
For this sample data all you have to do is use the correct correlated subquery that returns the value of r from the row with id equal to the current oid in the WHERE clause:
UPDATE tbl AS t
SET r = (SELECT tt.r FROM tbl tt WHERE tt.id = t.oid)
WHERE t.r = 0;
See the demo.
Related
I have a SQLite table just like this:
the table name is 'surat'
But i want to make id_ayat to be split into different rows using SQLite query, and expected result just like this:
_id|id_surat|id_ayat
---+--------+-------
3 | 2 | 112
3 | 2 | 213
3 | 3 | 19
3 | 3 | 83
3 | 3 | 85
3 | 3 | 102
is that possible? what query that i can use in SQLite format?
With a recursive CTE:
with recursive cte as (
select _id, id_surat, id_ayat,
id_ayat + 0 col
from tablename
union all
select _id, id_surat, trim(substr(id_ayat, length(col) + 2)),
trim(substr(id_ayat, length(col) + 2)) + 0
from cte
where instr(id_ayat, ',')
)
select _id, id_surat, col id_ayat
from cte
order by _id, id_surat
See the demo.
Results:
| _id | id_surat | id_ayat |
| --- | -------- | ------- |
| 3 | 2 | 112 |
| 3 | 2 | 213 |
| 3 | 3 | 19 |
| 3 | 3 | 83 |
| 3 | 3 | 85 |
| 3 | 3 | 102 |
Assuming the following table and using sqlite I have the following question:
Node |Loadcase | Fx | Cluster
---------------------------------
1 | 1 | 50 | A
2 | 1 | -40 | A
3 | 1 | 60 | B
4 | 1 | 80 | C
1 | 2 | 50 | A
2 | 2 | -50 | A
3 | 2 | 80 | B
4 | 2 | -100 | C
I am trying to write a query which fetches the maximum absolute value of Fx and the Load case for each Node 1-4.
An additional requirement is that Fx having the same Cluster shall be summed up before making this query .
In the example above I would expect the following results:
Node | Loadcase | MaxAbsClusteredFx
-----|-----------|-------------------
1 | 1 | 10
2* | |
3 | 2 | 80
4 | 2 | 100
N/A because summed up with node one. Both belonging to cluster A
Query:
For Node 1 I would execute a query similar to this
SELECT Loadcase,abs(Fx GROUP BY Cluster) FROM MyTable WHERE abs(Fx GROUP BY Cluster) = max(abs(Fx GROUP BY Cluster)) AND Node = 1
I keep getting " Error while executing query: near "Forces": syntax error " or alike.
Thankful for any help!
I have the following table in an sqlite database
+----+-------------+-------+
| ID | Week Number | Count |
+----+-------------+-------+
| 1 | 1 | 31 |
| 2 | 2 | 16 |
| 3 | 3 | 73 |
| 4 | 4 | 59 |
| 5 | 5 | 44 |
| 6 | 6 | 73 |
+----+-------------+-------+
I want to get the following table out. Where I get this weeks sales as one column and then the next column will be last weeks sales.
+-------------+-----------+-----------+
| Week Number | This_Week | Last_Week |
+-------------+-----------+-----------+
| 1 | 31 | null |
| 2 | 16 | 31 |
| 3 | 73 | 16 |
| 4 | 59 | 73 |
| 5 | 44 | 59 |
| 6 | 73 | 44 |
+-------------+-----------+-----------+
This is the select statement i was going to use:
select
id, week_number, count,
(select count from tempTable
where week_number = (week_number-1))
from
tempTable;
You are comparing values in two different rows. When you are just writing week_number, the database does not know which one you mean.
To refer to a column in a specific table, you have to prefix it with the table name: tempTable.week_number.
And if both tables have the same name, you have to rename at least one of them:
SELECT id,
week_number,
count AS This_Week,
(SELECT count
FROM tempTable AS T2
WHERE T2.week_number = tempTable.week_number - 1
) AS Last_Week
FROM tempTable;
In case of you want to take a query upon a same table twice, you have to put aliases on the original one and its replicated one to differentiate them
select a.week_number,a.count this_week,
(select b.count from tempTable b
where b.week_number=(a.week_number-1)) last_week
from tempTable a;
I'm looking for a way to do a "grand total" column across ALL groups in Impala.
It's easy to use window functions to obtain total of partitioned groups like this:
sum(x) over (partition by A)
however it does not appear that there is an expression to partition by 'all'. Is this a shortcoming in Impala? It looks like in postgress you can leave the over statement blank.
The partition clause is optional. You can write a query like this:
select sum(x) over () from t;
For example:
[localhost:21000] > select id, sum(id) over () from tbl;
+----+-------------------+
| id | sum(id) OVER(...) |
+----+-------------------+
| 0 | 28 |
| 1 | 28 |
| 2 | 28 |
| 3 | 28 |
| 6 | 28 |
| 7 | 28 |
| 4 | 28 |
| 5 | 28 |
+----+-------------------+
Fetched 8 row(s) in 0.08s
I am trying to update Data1's ID to Record2's ID when:
Record1's and Record2's Name are the same, and
Weight is greater in Record2.
Record1
| ID | Weight | Name |
|----|--------|------|
| 1 | 10 | a |
| 2 | 10 | b |
| 3 | 10 | c |
Record2
| ID | Weight | Name |
|----|--------|------|
| 4 | 20 | a |
| 5 | 20 | b |
| 6 | 20 | c |
Data1
| ID | Weight |
|----|--------|
| 4 | 40 |
| 5 | 40 |
I have tried the following SQLite query:
update data1
set id =
(select record2.id
from record2,record1
where record1.name=record2.name
and record1.weight<record2.weight)
where id in
(select record1.id
from record1, record2
where record1.name=record2.name
and record1.weight<record2.weight)
Using the above query Data1's id is updated to 4 for all records.
NOTE: Record1's ID is the foreign key for Data1.
For the given data set the following seems to serve the cause:
update data1
set id =
(select record2.id
from record2,record1
where
data1.id = record1.id
and record1.name=record2.name
and record1.weight<record2.weight)
where id in
(select record1.id
from record1, record2
where
record1.id in (select id from data1)
and record1.name=record2.name
and record1.weight<record2.weight)
;
See it in action: SQL Fiddle.
Please comment if and as this requires adjustment / further detail.