when I click the Start button to run the workflow, I meet the following situation: the task status always in the successfully submitted status, how can I solve this problem?
1、first check whether the WorkerServer service exists through jps, or directly check whether there is a worker service in zk from the service monitoring.
2、If the WorkerServer service is normal, you need to check whether the MasterServer puts the task task in the zk queue. You need to check whether the task is blocked in the MasterServer log and the zk queue.
3、If there is no problem above, you need to locate whether the Worker group is specified, but the machine grouped by the worker is not online.
Related
Lets say i have a job that runs for 10mins(lets say the time as 10.00). i set max_run_alarm as 3. i should get an email at 10.03 where i can goahead and see why the job is running more than the max_run_alarm. if i use max_run_alarm i am able to see in the logs triggering that alarm, but I cannot spend all day monitoring the logs to see which job is taking long as i have many jobs. my question is am i using max_run_alarm in the correct way or is there something else i am missing or is there entirely different way for the emails to generate.
There is an added functionality where you can configure the email id where all Autosys notification to be sent out.
Incase of any event such as Job Failure / Termination / Run Alarms etc are notified to that email address.
This is configured by the Autosys Admin or the Scheduling Team which i call them as.
We get many number of requests in a queue. We are instantiating the workermanager work as and when we get any request. How does the ExistingWorkPolicy.REPLACE work?
Document says
If there is existing pending (uncompleted) work with the same unique name, cancel and delete it.
Will it also kill the existing running worker in the middle? We really do not want the existing worker to stop in the middle, it is ok to be replaced when the worker is enqueued but not in running state. Can we use REPLACE option here?
https://developer.android.com/reference/androidx/work/ExistingWorkPolicy
As explained in WorkManager's guide and in your question, when you enqueue a new UniqueWorkRequest using REPLACE as the existing worker policy, this is going to stop a previous worker that is currently running.
What happens to your worker really depends on how you implemented it (Worker, CoroutineWorker, or another ListenableWorker subclass) and how you handle stoppages and cancellations]2.
What this means, is that your Worker needs to "cooperatively" finish and cleanup your worker:
In the case of unique work, you explicitly enqueued a new WorkRequest with an ExistingWorkPolicy of REPLACE. The old WorkRequest is immediately considered terminated.
Under these conditions, your worker will receive a call to ListenableWorker.onStopped(). You should perform cleanup and cooperatively finish your worker in case the OS decides to shut down your app.
My level of experience with the product is basic at best, but I'm expected to be a developer; I have a basic understanding of many things.
Right now my job is to investigate canceling lines in Purchase Orders. We have a workflow set up to handle those, and I'm trying to duplicate the scenario in my dev instance. Whenever a user cancels a line, the workflow is supposed to engage, and I've found that a batch job is what triggers that workflow to work (maybe that's the case with all workflows, but I don't know that for sure).
I've set up my personal Dev AX Instance under System Configuration => System => Server Configuration to use my personal Dev AOS server that my client is also running under, but when I go to System Configuration => Batch Jobs => Batch Jobs, then find the Batch Job I've been looking for and set the status to Waiting, the Batch Job never runs.
On our Test instance, the jobs is configured exactly the same way, except they use the AOS Server allotted for it.
I did a SQL script to change the batch job to use my personal Dev AOS Server, then did a restart of the Dynamics AX Servers.
There must be something I'm doing wrong for my personal dev instance. I've been reading some things from here about what may be going on and following down the list, but I'm pretty sure the problem is even stupider => https://www.daxrunbase.com/2017/07/02/troubleshooting-batch-jobs-in-ax/
First of all, do you have all 3 workflow jobs set up?
Workflow message processing
Workflow due date processing
Workflow line-item notifications
They can be set up from System administration > Setup > Workflow > Workflow infrastructure configuration.
Secondly, it is OK for the periodic batch jobs to have status Waiting. They will be in status Executing for a short time and then they will be Waiting for the next run. If the Scheduled start date/time value in this batch job is in the past, that could be a problem. Otherwise everything is OK.
Lastly, if you have already ticked the Is batch server check-box in System administration > Setup > System > Server configuration, please also make sure to move the workflow batch group in the Batch server groups section in the same form from Remaining groups to Selected groups.
The batch jobs should start at Scheduled start date/time - or a bit later, you'd need to wait a minute and refresh the grid.
as part of a batch job I create 4 command lines through control-m which invoke a legacy console application written in VB6. The console application invokes an ActiveEx server which performs a set of analytic jobs calculating outputs. The ActiveEx server was coded as a singleton but when invoked through control-m I get 4 instances running. the ActiveEx server does not tear down once the job has completed and the command line has closed it self.
I created 4 .bat files which once launced manually on the server, simulate the calls made through control-m and the ActiveEx server behaves as expected, i.e. there is only 1 instance ever running and once complete it closes down gracefully.
What am I doing wrong?
Control-M jobs are run under a service account and it same as we login as a user and execute a job. How did you test this? Did you manually executed each batch job one after another or you have executed all the batch job at the same time from different terminals? You can do one thing. Run the control-M jobs with a time interval like first one at 09.00 second one at 09.05, third one at 09.10 and forth one at 09.15 and see if that fix your issue.
Maybe your job cannot use the Desktop environment.
Check your agent service settings:
Log on As:
User account under which Control‑M Agent service will run.
Valid values:
Local System Account – Service logs on as the system account.
Allow Service to Interact with Desktop – This option is valid only if the service is running as a local system account.
Selected – the service provides a user interface on a desktop that can
be used by whoever is logged in when the service is started. Default.
Unselected – the service does not provide a user interface.
This Account – User account under which Control‑M Agent service will run.
NOTE: If the owner of any Control-M/Server jobs has a "roaming profile" or if job output (OUTPUT) will be copied to or from other computers, the Log in mode must be set to This Account.
Default: Local System Account
Having a question on how the build queue is configured in CC.net.
I believe we have an issue , when trying to “force” build a scheduled project, the server tries to run several builds at the same time and fails
Most of them except the one that started first.
We need to get to a state when regardless how many builds are scheduled or how many we “force” start in about the same time, all build requests are placed in to a build queue and
executed one after finishing another in the order they were placed, and no extra request are generated.
Build Failed email is sent but the build was actually successful.
In short,The erroneous email is likely due to an error in the build server’s build scheduler/queue, trying to run 2 builds instead of one when asked for a “forced” build, as a result the first one is successful and the second one fails.
How to correct/resolve this issue....?
Thanks
Nilesh
To specify your projects' queue you need to set the queue property like this :
<project name="MyFirstProject" queue="Q1" queuePriority="1">
The default value is a queue per project. If you manually set the same queue (for example Q1) for all you project then, you will have a unique queue.
As for the queuePriority, the project (not yet started) in the queue are ordonned by queuePriority, low queuePriority projects start first.
It's all described in the cc net documentation which is now offline due to a problem at sourceforge.