I have a SIM7000A device that sees the Verizon tower. I am using Ting wireless SIM to create an IoT device to send emergency information to a homeowner. The SIM works on T-Mobile and Verizon networks.
You can see the tower:
I have selected the wireless.dish.com APN to connect to.
When I try to connect I get this:
My IMEI number is a registered device with Ting. I've verified that.
Using the AT Command Tester for Simcom Modules I get an error when I try to check the Preferred Operators list. I'm not sure if this has anything to do with it.
It seems like when I try to connect, Verizon is trying to validate my device and halting me. How do I connect "through" Verizon's network to the Ting network?
Well, I figured it out. The SIM7000A is not compatible with the Verizon network. According to the person I spoke with at Ting.com, this device only works on T-mobile. With that network, it is not even worth trying to distribute my product to consumers if it uses this chip. I show AT&T as available from this chip but it won't connect to Ting.com regardless. She said it is only compatible with T-Mobile.
I guess I will have to find a new chip.
Related
Just for reference the Sony Remote Camera API only works by using a 1:1 Wifi Connection
The Wifi signal strength of my Sony DSC-HX60V camera already drops after a few meters distance. But I want to be able to remotely control the camera over a range of 50 meter. There is no way that the onboard Wifi can achieve this range.
So now Iam looking for a solution to this problem. If it helps a local Wifi router exists that covers the whole range:
A normal Wifi repeater seems to be the best option, but according to a Forum Post using a repeater does not work, because the repeater acts a client and the camera can only connect to one client at the same time. Did someone got it to work with a repeater?
Additionaly I was thinking about using a Raspberry Pi with a second Wifi adapter that connect to the local Wifi and manages the API requests.
Any other ideas?
Disclaimer:
Even tho this Question may be more Hardware and Network related and thereby fits more into the SuperUser Network. A working Network connection does not necessary imply that the API is working aswell. This is why I posted this Question here
If you have a router which can work in 'client mode' that should be able to make a 1:1 connection with the camera, and then present that link over ethernet - you may have issues with network addresses and/or discovery if your main network is a different IP range to what the camera offers/DHCP's.
Some of the Sony cameras support 'multi-wifi' where the camera connects to an external device (normally the LiveViewRemote, but can be a router). Unfortunately the HX60 (and presumably any of the Play Memories SmartRemote app based ones) does not seem capable of this.... maybe the QX1 is an exception as it's supposed to work like this.
This connection connection is managed via WPS, and once connected the RemoteAPI works well. Works for my AS100.
If you are looking to set up a RaspPi, I can confirm that it works with this Python library:
https://github.com/Bloodevil/sony_camera_api
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xR3gAfu4Hfw
Firstly, I'll just give you a brief introduction about our project... its "Speech controlled Home Automation System" where we are controlling the Home appliances by the voice or speech commands. We're successfully done with the voice recognition module. But our problem is with achieving the communication between the transmitter {where the user gives the voice command} and receiver {where the home appliances are present} through WiFi i.e. we have got 2 ESP8266 12E modules interfaced with Arduino both at the transmitter and receiver side and these two WiFi modules need to be communicated(To interchange some data sent by Arduinos).So please let us know which Arduino code need to be used at transmitter side wifi module and at Receiver side wifi module and also about the header files or additional softwares(if any)to be used.
you can achieve this by starting one of wifi modules in Access Point Mode and the other one has to be set to Station Mode in order to connect to the first one.
In case you want to add a router, just set both ESP8266 modules to Station Mode and connect them to the router.
And then transfer any data you want through AT commands of ESP8266.
Here is the refrence to them.
https://room-15.github.io/blog/2015/03/26/esp8266-at-command-reference/
If you are newbie to Esp8266 and Arduino , this will help you.
http://www.teomaragakis.com/hardware/electronics/how-to-connect-an-esp8266-to-an-arduino-uno/
Good Luck !
I worked on a similar system a year ago. I was developing a remote controlled toy. My main difference was I used the ESP8266 without an Arduino attached.
One ESP worked as a a WiFi hotspot and the other connected to it, sending messages through UDP.
For some reason, I could not get the two ESP modules to connect (I think it was a problem with the board I had), but I sent messages from my computer, and it worked out fine. I will not burden you with all of the code, but here is the GitHub link.
All that needs to happen is they will be on the same WiFi network, and then you can use the ESP8266 WiFi library to send messages between the two. Like I said above, I used UDP, which is good for high speed, with no error checking. But there is also TCP (higher up, has error checking code), or you can use the server/client part of the library to set up a full web server and read/write data to it. Without knowing what type of data, I cannot comment on what would be the best method.
As for headers, you will need WiFi.h, and if you are using UDP you will need WiFiUdp.h
You should not need any external software besides the Arduino IDE.
I taught myself from scratch for this product, using two main resources: the Arduino library reference, and the docs on the ESP8266 Arduino GitHub page
I'm having the hardest time to get the solution of the following problem.
Main issue:
Several smartphones(up to 30) must communicate with a MCU at the same time.
System overview:
There are many rooms(each room is a cabinet that 30 people can go into), and every cabinet will have one MCU for the smartphone users.
MCU will control some device of the cabinet.
The scenario of this system is as follows:
1. The users go into the cabinet.
2. Smartphone app will recognize the MCU(or MCU will recognize the smartphone) and the MCU will send some data to the smartphone and this data will be noticed to the user.
3. User inputs some data at the smartphone app and this data will be sent to the MCU to control the cabinet device.
4. Up to 30 people can go into the cabinet at the same time and the system should handle all the users simultaneously.
I'm going to develop smartphone application and MCU firmware for this system.
My thought:
I'm thinking to use Arduino/RFduino/Raspberry Pi as MCU and I'm thinking to use Bluetooth LE/Wifi/3G as communication material.
I've tried the following solutions
1. Using bluetooth low energy on Arduino/RFduino/Raspberry Pi.
MCU will be BLE peripheral and my smartphone app will be BLE central.
But I found that a BLE peripheral can only be connected to a BLE central at the same time so I can't use this method.
2. Using wifi on Raspberry Pi
I think that Raspberry Pi can run web service and my smartphone app can communicate with the server through http.
But every time the smartphone user go into the Raspberry Pi based wifi-zone, the user should select the wifi-hotspot at the network setting if he registered this wifi already, and the user should register the wifi-hotspot if this is the first time at the wifi-zone(cabinet).
This is very inconvenient for the users so can't be used for me.
3. Using 3G network on Raspberry Pi
Unfortunately, there's no 3G signal in the cabinet so I can't use this method.
I'm looking forward your kind answer.
Any hints or comments will be welcome.
Thanks for your attention.
Thanks for your answer in advance.
Toltori Kim
Well... I'd go with wifi. And QR codes.
I'd make either a single wifi network for all the cabinets (so only one set of credentials, or even an open one - without security) and then the app can connect to the raspberries using a sort of authentication (where the credentials are written in a QR code inside the cabinet) or a wifi network for each cabinet and its credentials are written in a QR code.
I'd use the first one, maybe without security. So the user has just to go in the cabinet, connect to the common wifi, make a photo at the qr code and then can use the RPi
Hope this is the right place to ask - assuming so as it is related to programming.
I am looking for some hardware (say a dongle) that would open up an API for my computer to a SIM card. Does that exist anywhere?
The idea would be that I can then use my existing SIM card on its existing network/contract and with a bit of code, send/receive calls and texts. I figured that if a phone can be programmed to do it why can't a computer? I just need the hardware.
Any suggestions if this kind of thing is possible? Even by maybe integrating a phone?
You can use AT commands with any modem or phone, whose driver exposes a modem port when you connect it to a computer. Plug in the phone or modem, and go to Windows Device Manager, and look under "Modems" and see what you've got. From "properties" of the Modem, you can see which COM port it is on.
AT commands are an older method of communicating with a modem. There is a standard set of commands for GSM/GPRS/3G/4G devices available from 3GPP.org, here. Manufacturers add their own proprietary commands for more obscure functions. Many but not all of these are in the public domain.
Some newer plug-in modems may appear as a network adapter (you can see this in Windows), due to their drivers. In this case, you can use the following interfaces:
on Vista: NDIS, proprietary interfaces
on Windows 7 and 8.x Desktop apps: Windows Mobile Broadband API
on Windows 8.x, in the Metro/app area: Windows.Networking and MobileBroadband APIs.
on Windows 10, UWP, there are UWP APIs here. But they do not give as much functionality as the Desktop APIs.
On Windows 8.1 and Windows 10, if the appropriate drives are present it is possible to use the new MBIM interface via the desktop Mobile Broadband DeviceServices API. Mobile Broadband Interface Model spec available here.
On Linux, use AT commands via the serial port.
I'm a bit puzzled by your requirement to make (voice?) calls via a phone connected to a computer. Do you mean Skype? In this case, of course, you wouldn't need any interface for making calls, you would just open an IP connection over a data session - which can be done via any of the above interfaces.
(added this comment as an answer, as there was more information)
I use this GSM device: http://www.mikroe.com/click/gsm2/ connected to a basic UART like: https://www.sparkfun.com/products/718?gclid=CIj1xOzbur4CFUVbfgodCpQASQ
Then use AT COMMANDS.
I also use a piece of software called QNavigator to inspect the modem/gsm: http://www.soselectronic.com/?str=1329
I wrote a piece of software which does nothing else than reading network status and signal strength for each network mode (gsm, wlan (wifi), bluetooth, ...) on my device (Nokia E51) and printing it out.
My test device is connected to bluetooth, wlan (wifi) and 3G (wcdma), but it's only able to give me the signal strength of 3G (and also returns the correct name of my carrier). for wlan and bluetooth it gives me the undefined state und isn't able to read any signal strenght. But I am able to receive the IP address of the network I'm connected via wlan.
All I do is:
QSystemNetworkInformation::networkSignalStrength(QSystemNetworkInformation::WlanMode);
and calling the method for the network status.
As I said, it works flawless for 3G.
Any ideas? Thanks a lot.
After an SDK update, everything works fine without any code changes. So the problem wasn't in the coede, but in the QtMobility backend.