I installed an Amplify developer app on my phone, now I can't get rid of this.
It keeps popping up every time.
How do I get rid of it?
Java
structed
AmplifyConfiguration config = AmplifyConfiguration.builder(getApplicationContext())
.devMenuEnabled(false)
.build(),
getApplicationContext());
minified
AmplifyConfiguration config = AmplifyConfiguration.builder(getApplicationContext()).devMenuEnabled(false).build(), getApplicationContext());
Kotlin
structed
val config = AmplifyConfiguration.builder(applicationContext)
.devMenuEnabled(false)
.build()
Amplify.configure(config, applicationContext)
minified
val config = AmplifyConfiguration.builder(applicationContext).devMenuEnabled(false).build()Amplify.configure(config, applicationContext)
Kotlin:
val config = AmplifyConfiguration.builder(applicationContext).devMenuEnabled(false).build()
Amplify.configure(config, applicationContext)
Java:
Amplify.configure(AmplifyConfiguration.builder(getApplicationContext()).devMenuEnabled(false).build(), getApplicationContext());
Related
Issue
When deploying a Ktor Kotlin application to AppEngine per the Ktor tutorial, the Firestore server authentication is not working, thus data is not being written to the specified Firestore database.
Data is written as expected to Firestore both when the app is run directly in the IntelliJ IDE as well as when it is run with ktor's implementation via the gradle appengineRun command.
There are two sets of AppEngine/Firebase projects for both a staging and production environment. Prior to deploying with the gradle appengineDeploy command the correct SDK configuration been activated and verified via the command gcloud config configurations list.
The strange part is that a few of the apps deployed with these strategies did write to Firestore, however upon deploying the app again Firestore did not show new data being written to it.
Implementation
Ktor Setup
I have the standard ktor required files. I also have an old MANIFEST.MF file from an older implementation. Could that be causing issues?
src/main/resources/application.conf
ktor {
application {
modules = [ Initialization.main ]
}
}
src/main/resources/webapp/WEB-INF/
appengine-web.xml
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<appengine-web-app xmlns="http://appengine.google.com/ns/1.0">
<threadsafe>true</threadsafe>
<runtime>java8</runtime>
</appengine-web-app>
web.xml
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="ISO-8859-1" ?>
<web-app xmlns="http://java.sun.com/xml/ns/javaee" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://java.sun.com/xml/ns/javaee http://java.sun.com/xml/ns/javaee/web-app_3_0.xsd" version="3.0">
<servlet>
<display-name>KtorServlet</display-name>
<servlet-name>KtorServlet</servlet-name>
<servlet-class>io.ktor.server.servlet.ServletApplicationEngine</servlet-class>
<!-- path to application.conf file, required -->
<init-param>
<param-name>io.ktor.config</param-name>
<param-value>application.conf</param-value>
</init-param>
</servlet>
<servlet-mapping>
<servlet-name>KtorServlet</servlet-name>
<url-pattern>/</url-pattern>
</servlet-mapping>
logging.properties
.level = INFO
src/main/META-INF/MANIFEST>MF
Manifest-Version: 1.0
Main-Class: Initialization
Dependencies
For authentication strategies outlined below #1-3 the Firebase Admin library is used: compile 'com.google.firebase:firebase-admin:6.5.0'
For authentication strategy #4 the Google Cloud Firestore library is used: compile 'com.google.cloud:google-cloud-firestore:0.58.0-beta'
build.gradle
group 'coinverse'
version '1.0-SNAPSHOT'
buildscript {
ext.kotlin_version = '1.2.61'
ext.junitJupiterVersion = '5.0.3'
ext.ktor_version = '0.9.4'
ext.appengine_version = '1.9.60'
ext.appengine_plugin_version = '1.3.4'
repositories {
mavenCentral()
jcenter()
}
dependencies {
classpath "org.jetbrains.kotlin:kotlin-gradle-plugin:$kotlin_version"
classpath 'org.junit.platform:junit-platform-gradle-plugin:1.0.3'
classpath "com.google.cloud.tools:appengine-gradle-plugin:$appengine_plugin_version"
}
}
apply plugin: 'java'
apply plugin: 'kotlin'
apply plugin: 'war'
apply plugin: 'com.google.cloud.tools.appengine'
sourceSets {
main.kotlin.srcDirs = [ 'src/main/kotlin' ]
}
sourceCompatibility = 1.8
repositories {
mavenCentral()
jcenter()
maven { url "https://kotlin.bintray.com/ktor" }
}
dependencies {
implementation "org.jetbrains.kotlin:kotlin-stdlib-jdk8:$kotlin_version"
testCompile group: 'junit', name: 'junit', version: '4.12'
testCompile("org.junit.jupiter:junit-jupiter-api:${junitJupiterVersion}")
testRuntime("org.junit.jupiter:junit-jupiter-engine:${junitJupiterVersion}")
testCompile("org.assertj:assertj-core:3.10.0")
testCompileOnly('org.apiguardian:apiguardian-api:1.0.0')
compile 'com.squareup.retrofit2:retrofit:2.3.0'
compile 'com.squareup.retrofit2:converter-gson:2.3.0'
compile 'com.squareup.retrofit2:adapter-rxjava:2.3.0'
compile 'io.reactivex.rxjava2:rxjava:2.2.0'
compile 'com.google.cloud:google-cloud-firestore:0.58.0-beta'
// Or compile 'com.google.cloud:google-cloud-firestore:0.58.0-beta'
compile 'com.google.firebase:firebase-admin:6.5.0'
compile "org.jetbrains.kotlin:kotlin-stdlib-jdk8:$kotlin_version"
compile "io.ktor:ktor-server-servlet:$ktor_version"
compile "io.ktor:ktor-html-builder:$ktor_version"
providedCompile "com.google.appengine:appengine:$appengine_version"
}
kotlin.experimental.coroutines = 'enable'
compileKotlin {
kotlinOptions.jvmTarget = "1.8"
}
compileTestKotlin {
kotlinOptions.jvmTarget = "1.8"
}
task run(dependsOn: appengineRun)
appengine {
deploy {
version = 'price-staging-1021653pm'
stopPreviousVersion = false
}
}
Initializing Firebase Strategies
1. Initialize on Google Cloud Platform
This method is promising as credentials are managed automatically.
// Use the application default credentials
GoogleCredentials credentials = GoogleCredentials.getApplicationDefault();
FirebaseOptions options = new FirebaseOptions.Builder()
.setCredentials(credentials)
.setProjectId(projectId)
.build();
FirebaseApp.initializeApp(options);
Firestore db = FirestoreClient.getFirestore();
2. Initialize on your own server
I've confirmed in GCPs IAM & admin > Service accounts that the key id's match with the Json object being used to authenticate.
I'm using this strategy successfully in another Firestore connected app deployed to AppEngine. The working app is built as a .Jar and deployed directly to AppEngine without using ktor, but rather with the steps outlined here.
// Use a service account
InputStream serviceAccount = new FileInputStream("path/to/serviceAccount.json");
GoogleCredentials credentials = GoogleCredentials.fromStream(serviceAccount);
FirebaseOptions options = new FirebaseOptions.Builder()
.setCredentials(credentials)
.build();
FirebaseApp.initializeApp(options);
Firestore db = FirestoreClient.getFirestore();
In my working .Jar built app I'm passing in the Json object programmatically to avoid issues with the file not being found. I tried the same programmatic implementation for this ktor application. It worked with gradle appengineRun but not when deployed.
val credentials = GoogleCredentials.fromStream(Gson().toJson(FirebaseCredentials(
"service_account",
"project-name",
"asdfghjkl",
"keyStringHere",
"firebase-adminsdk-dhr30#project-name.iam.gserviceaccount.com",
"1234567890",
"https://accounts.google.com/o/oauth2/auth",
"https://oauth2.googleapis.com/token",
"https://www.googleapis.com/oauth2/v1/certs",
"https://www.googleapis.com/robot/v1/metadata/x509/firebase-adminsdk-dhr30%40project-name-staging.iam.gserviceaccount.com"
)).byteInputStream())
val options = FirebaseOptions.Builder()
.setCredentials(credentials)
.setDatabaseUrl("https://project-name-staging.firebaseio.com")
.build()
FirebaseApp.initializeApp(options)
3. Initialize on your own server (Firebase console setup)
The only difference between #2 is this setup adds .setDatabaseUrl("https://yourProjectName.firebaseio.com").
4. Initialize cloud Firestore
FirestoreOptions firestoreOptions =
FirestoreOptions.getDefaultInstance().toBuilder()
.setProjectId(projectId)
.build();
Firestore db = firestoreOptions.getService();
Accessing Firestore Object
For #1-3 the Firebase app is initialized right away in the application's main() method. Then, the Firestore object is accessed from an object.
FirebaseClient.Kt
object FirebaseClient {
val firestore: Firestore
init {
firestore = FirestoreClient.getFirestore()
}
}
For #4 the Firestore object is created in the Kotlin object's init{...} and stored in the object as a value.
FirebaseClient.Kt
object FirebaseClient {
val firestore: Firestore
init {
val firestoreOptions = FirestoreOptions.getDefaultInstance().toBuilder()
.setTimestampsInSnapshotsEnabled(true)
.setProjectId("project-name")
.build()
firestore = firestoreOptions.service
}
}
Writing to Firestore
FirebaseClient.firestore.collection(someCollection).document(someDocument).collection(anotherCollection).add(someObject)
After utilizing Firebase authentication for a different project I discovered this is not an issue with Firebase authentication but rather with the application's main method. Therefore the various implementations above of Firebase authentication will work as expected when deployed to AppEngine.
Solution
I was expecting the application's main method to run once the app is deployed to AppEngine, similar to how an application's main method is called when ran in IntelliJ. However I realized main is only called once the app's hosted route is called.
ie: https://[yourProjectName].appspot.com
I've created a new StackOverflow post in order to determine how to run a Ktor app's main method automatically once deployed.
I just created a new deployment slot for my app, imported the publishing profile to Visual Studio, but after deployment I get this error message:
Error 8: An error occurred while creating the WebJob schedule: No website could be found which matches the WebSiteName [myapp__staging] and WebSiteUrl [http://myapp-staging.azurewebsites.net] supplied.
I have 2 webjobs, a continuous and a scheduled webjob.
I already signed in to the correct Azure account, as stated by this answer.
Will I need to set something else up in order to deploy my app to a staging Deployment Slot with webjobs?
My app is using ASP.NET, if it makes a difference?
There are a few quirks when using the Azure Scheduler. The recommendation is to use the new CRON support instead. You can learn more about it here and here.
Jeff,
As David suggested, you can/should migrate to the new CRON support. Here's an example. The WebJob will be deployed as a continuous WebJob.
Keep in mind that in order to use this you need to install the WebJobs package and extensions that are currently a prerelease. You can get them on Nuget.
Install-Package Microsoft.Azure.WebJobs -Pre
Install-Package Microsoft.Azure.WebJobs.Extensions -Pre
Also, as David suggested if you're not using the WebJobs SDK, you can also run this using a settings.job file. He provided an example here.
Program.cs
static void Main()
{
//Set up DI (In case you're using an IOC container)
var module = new CustomModule();
var kernel = new StandardKernel(module);
//Configure JobHost
var storageConnectionString = "your_connection_string";
var config = new JobHostConfiguration(storageConnectionString) { JobActivator = new JobActivator(kernel) };
config.UseTimers(); //Use this to use the CRON expression.
//Pass configuration to JobJost
var host = new JobHost(config);
// The following code ensures that the WebJob will be running continuously
host.RunAndBlock();
}
Function.cs
public class Functions
{
public void YourMethodName([TimerTrigger("00:05:00")] TimerInfo timerInfo, TextWriter log)
{
//This Job runs every 5 minutes.
//Do work here.
}
}
You can change the schedule in the TimerTrigger attribute.
UPDATE Added the webjob-publish-settings.json file
Here's an example of the webjob-publiss-settings.json
{
"$schema": "http://schemastore.org/schemas/json/webjob-publish-settings.json",
"webJobName": "YourWebJobName",
"startTime": null,
"endTime": null,
"jobRecurrenceFrequency": null,
"interval": null,
"runMode": "Continuous"
}
The following blog propose how to fetch an artifact directly from java using ivy (http://developers-blog.org/blog/default/2010/11/08/Embed-Ivy-How-to-use-Ivy-with-Java).
public class IvyArtifactResolver {
public File resolveArtifact(String groupId, String artifactId, String version) throws Exception {
//creates clear ivy settings
IvySettings ivySettings = new IvySettings();
//url resolver for configuration of maven repo
URLResolver resolver = new URLResolver();
resolver.setM2compatible(true);
resolver.setName("central");
//you can specify the url resolution pattern strategy
resolver.addArtifactPattern(
"http://repo1.maven.org/maven2/"
+ "[organisation]/[module]/[revision]/[artifact](-[revision]).[ext]");
//adding maven repo resolver
ivySettings.addResolver(resolver);
//set to the default resolver
ivySettings.setDefaultResolver(resolver.getName());
//creates an Ivy instance with settings
Ivy ivy = Ivy.newInstance(ivySettings);
File ivyfile = File.createTempFile("ivy", ".xml");
ivyfile.deleteOnExit();
String[] dep = null;
dep = new String[]{groupId, artifactId, version};
DefaultModuleDescriptor md =
DefaultModuleDescriptor.newDefaultInstance(ModuleRevisionId.newInstance(dep[0],
dep[1] + "-caller", "working"));
DefaultDependencyDescriptor dd = new DefaultDependencyDescriptor(md,
ModuleRevisionId.newInstance(dep[0], dep[1], dep[2]), false, false, true);
md.addDependency(dd);
//creates an ivy configuration file
XmlModuleDescriptorWriter.write(md, ivyfile);
String[] confs = new String[]{"default"};
ResolveOptions resolveOptions = new ResolveOptions().setConfs(confs);
//init resolve report
ResolveReport report = ivy.resolve(ivyfile.toURL(), resolveOptions);
//so you can get the jar library
File jarArtifactFile = report.getAllArtifactsReports()[0].getLocalFile();
return jarArtifactFile;
}
}
I'm wondering if sbt exposes this kind of interface since it uses ivy.
resolve :: ModuleId -> File
Scripts, REPL, and Dependencies
There's a document called Scripts, REPL, and Dependencies you might be interested in. Script runner for example lets you write something like this:
#!/usr/bin/env scalas
!#
/***
scalaVersion := "2.9.0-1"
libraryDependencies ++= Seq(
"net.databinder" %% "dispatch-twitter" % "0.8.3",
"net.databinder" %% "dispatch-http" % "0.8.3"
)
*/
import dispatch.{ json, Http, Request }
import dispatch.twitter.Search
driving sbt programmatically
You can also use any subparts of sbt as a library and drive it yourself. Because of the plugin ecosystem, it's pretty good about maintaining binary compatibility among the point releases. The key task that grabs jars would be update, so def updateTask (Defaults.scala#L1113) could be a good place to start. If you are driving sbt from the client code, however, wouldn't you end up re-implementing sbt shell or including all the sbt's dependencies? You might as well have a separate sbt shell window or sbt script section.
Custom Resolvers
sbt ships with variety of customizable resolvers, so the first place to check out should be: Resolvers:
sbt provides an interface to the repository types available in Ivy: file, URL, SSH, and SFTP. A key feature of repositories in Ivy is using patterns to configure repositories.
Construct a repository definition using the factory in sbt.Resolver for the desired type. This factory creates a Repository object that can be further configured. The following table contains links to the Ivy documentation for the repository type and the API documentation for the factory and repository class. The SSH and SFTP repositories are configured identically except for the name of the factory. Use Resolver.ssh for SSH and Resolver.sftp for SFTP.
For example you can do:
resolvers += Resolver.file("my-test-repo", file("test")) transactional()
RawRepository
But if you truly want a programmable resolver, there is RawRepository:
final class RawRepository(val resolver: DependencyResolver) extends Resolver
{
def name = resolver.getName
override def toString = "Raw(" + resolver.toString + ")"
}
This is a thin wrapper around org.apache.ivy.plugins.resolver.DependencyResolver, which you should be able to write by extending one of the resolvers they have. (I haven't tried this myself.)
Can anyone provide an updated application skeleton for a Red5 application? From what I have found the logging system changed from Log4j. I've been looking for some tutorials just to setup everything but can't really find something that simply works.
In addiction, can anyone provide a simple tutorial with a server application and Flex client?
Thanks in advance!
I struggled a lot with that.. This reference worked for me:
http://fossies.org/unix/privat/red5-1.0.0-RC2.tar.gz:a/red5-1.0.0/doc/reference/html/logging-setup.html
The trick was to Remove any log4j.properties or log4j.xml files and Remove any "log4j" listeners from the web.xml
Create a logback-myApp.xml where myApp is the name for your webapp and place it on your webapp classpath (WEB-INF/classes or in your application jar within WEB-INF/lib)
and im my app i did:
import org.slf4j.Logger;
import org.red5.logging.Red5LoggerFactory;
and then:
private static Logger log = Red5LoggerFactory.getLogger(MyClassName.class, "myApp");
the clients actionscript looks like this:
// Initializiing Connection
private function initConnection():void{
nc = new NetConnection();
nc.client = new NetConnectionClient();
nc.objectEncoding = flash.net.ObjectEncoding.AMF0;
nc.connect(rtmpPath.text,true); //Path to FMS Server e.g. rtmp://<hostname>/<application name>
nc.addEventListener("netStatus", publishStream); //Listener to see if connection is successful
}
private function publishStream(event:NetStatusEvent):void{
if(nc.connected){
nsPublish = new NetStream(nc); //Initializing NetStream
nsPublish.attachCamera(Camera.getCamera());
nsPublish.attachAudio(Microphone.getMicrophone()); //Attaching Camera & Microphone
nsPublish.publish(streamName.text,'live'); //Publish stream
mx.controls.Alert.show("Published");
}
else{
mx.controls.Alert.show("Connection Error");
}
}
I have a console capplication that runs on the same computer that hosts a bunch of web.config files. I need the console application to open each web.config file and decrypt the connection string and then test if the connection string works.
The problem I am running into is that OpenExeConfiguration is expecting a winforms application configuration file (app.dll.config) and OpenWebConfiguration needs to be run through IIS. Since this is my local machine, I'm not running IIS (I use Visual Studio's built-in server).
Is there a way I can open the web.config files while still getting the robustness of .NET's capabilities to decrypt the connectionstrings?
Thanks
Update
The OpenWebConfiguration works if you are querying IIS directly or are the website in question that you want to look up the web.config for. What I am looking to accomplish is the same sort of functionality, but from a console application opening up the web.config file of a website on my same machine not using an IIS query because IIS isn't running on my machine.
Ok I got it... compiled and accessed this so i know it works...
VirtualDirectoryMapping vdm = new VirtualDirectoryMapping(#"C:\test", true);
WebConfigurationFileMap wcfm = new WebConfigurationFileMap();
wcfm.VirtualDirectories.Add("/", vdm);
// Get the Web application configuration object.
Configuration config = WebConfigurationManager.OpenMappedWebConfiguration(wcfm, "/");
ProtectSection(config, #"connectionStrings", "DataProtectionConfigurationProvider");
This is assuming you have a file called web.config in a directory called C:\Test.
I adjusted #Dillie-O's methods to take a Configuration as a parameter.
You must also reference System.Web and System.configuration and any dlls containing configuration handlers that are set up in your web.config.
The when the ConfigurationManager class grab a section from the config file, it has an "IsProtected" property that it can infer for a given section that you grab. If it is protected, you can then Unprotect it using some code.
The basic method for encrypting/decrypting goes like this (taken from article link below):
private void ProtectSection(string sectionName, string provider)
{
Configuration config =
WebConfigurationManager.
OpenWebConfiguration(Request.ApplicationPath);
ConfigurationSection section =
config.GetSection(sectionName);
if (section != null &&
!section.SectionInformation.IsProtected)
{
section.SectionInformation.ProtectSection(provider);
config.Save();
}
}
private void UnProtectSection(string sectionName)
{
Configuration config =
WebConfigurationManager.
OpenWebConfiguration(Request.ApplicationPath);
ConfigurationSection section =
config.GetSection(sectionName);
if (section != null &&
section.SectionInformation.IsProtected)
{
section.SectionInformation.UnprotectSection();
config.Save();
}
}
Check out this article for the full details on working with this.
public static string WebKey(string key)
{
var configFile = new System.IO.FileInfo(webconfigPath);
var vdm = new VirtualDirectoryMapping(configFile.DirectoryName, true, configFile.Name);
var wcfm = new WebConfigurationFileMap();
wcfm.VirtualDirectories.Add("/", vdm);
System.Configuration.Configuration config = WebConfigurationManager.OpenMappedWebConfiguration(wcfm, "/");
System.Configuration.AppSettingsSection appSettingSection = (System.Configuration.AppSettingsSection)config.GetSection("appSettings");
System.Configuration.KeyValueConfigurationElement kv = appSettingSection.Settings.AllKeys
.Where(x => x.Equals(key))
.Select(x => appSettingSection.Settings[key])
.FirstOrDefault();
return kv != null ? kv.Value : string.Empty;
}
I think you want to use WebConfigurationManager class with its OpenWebConfiguration method.
It takes a path to the web.config and should open it just like it would in a HTTPContext based application.