Writing to firestore in firebase cloud-function shifts my dates - datetime

Working on flutter/dart project. Calling cloud function from client side and passing 2 dates which are converted toISO8601String.
Printing dates to console while executing cloud-function to double check. They are always valid. After creating document in firestore, the dates are shifted by 1 hour.
I guess because of my current timezone offset which is UTC+1. In summer I had same issue where firestore was shifting my dates by 2 hours because of summer time, resulting in offset UTC+2.
My cloud-functions are deployed at region: europe-west3, which according to firebase docs is Frankfurt. Same time zone as mine (Central European Standard Time). But when I create:
const now = new Date();
Result is one hour less than my local time. Why is that when we are in the same time zone with same offset?
Reading documents from firestore on client side results in inaccurate dates, which is pretty bad for me since I need it to be accurate.
I was searching everywhere but didn't find anything that really helped me. I was trying to construct the date object with many ways but the result was always the same, can somebody please explain me why and help me out? Thanks.

The Java Object Date does not actually contain timezone information, it's just a number of milliseconds since the "epoch" (01.01.1970 00:00:00 UTC) and thus an absolute point in time. It's converted into a valid time every time it's output to a user.
So it seems that the reason for the time shift is that your PC or the browser you are viewing your firestore documents from is set to the wrong timezone.
For further information, take a look at this question or the java documentation.

Related

Date timezones and Daylight saving time

I'm working in a scheduler web application and my client (Angular) and server (Asp.net core) timezones are different.
The client is in any timezone. Let´s use (GMT-3).
The server is UTC.
Let´s suppose this case:
One user schedule an event to it´s local time at 08:00AM.
When send this information to serve, it will save 11:00AM in database.
So, when user retrieve this information, client will convert back to 08:00AM due to -3 hours timezone.
But, if this schedule was made to a date in future, when client's country will be in daylight saving, it will convert back to -2 hours. So it will converted to 09:00AM to the client, and that is wrong.
How to deal with daylight saving time when I get dates from server?
Simply, date and times should be stored in UTC. You can always get from UTC back to the user's time. The problem with storing a datetime with an offset is that the offset is not contextual. For example, let's assume that the user is in DST with a timezone that is normally -3 offset from UTC. As such, their current offset is -2. You store the -2 offset, and now what? Is it -2 because they're in a zone that's -2 or is it -2 because it's a -3 zone in DST. There's no way to know. In effect, you've failed to capture critical information.
You don't have this issue with datetimes stored in UTC. You can simply get the user's current time, including their current offset (DST or not) and compare that with the times in your data store. You may need to convert the user time to UTC first, but in many case you do not. For example, the DateTimeOffset type is smart enough to be able to compare taking offset into account. Many databases support this as well for offset-capable column types.
If I understand the issue correctly, you want to keep the server using UTC stored date/times and have the client display local time while handling the DST. I recommend using the angular2-moment, Moment & Momemt-Timezone npm packages. This package will be able to automatically handle the DST when you provide the iana_timezone like America\Chicago.
moment.tz(<utc-date-time>, <iana-timezone>).format()
This will handle all the necessary conversions you need in the client.
See Stackblitz example
Also checkout the Moment Timezone Docs

Firebase BigQuery server offset time

Background:
I'm having the Firebase analytics data exported to BigQuery. And I'm using cron jobs to crunch data in BigQuery for getting insight.
Problem:
To be able to only crunch delta data i.e. the data that has arrived since last time I ran my cron job I need a way to figure out the time when the data arrived at server, since the event_timestamp is generated at client and can be cached at client before sent.
Insights:
I have laborated with event_server_timestamp_offset (offset) which I thought I could use together with event_timestamp. But I was expecting the offset to only be positive but it can also be negative. And when I look at the MAX and MIN for the offset in the entire exported Firebase analytics dataset and re-calculate it to years instead of microseconds I can get more than 18 years offset.
Query:
SELECT
MAX(event_server_timestamp_offset)/(1000000*60*60*24) max_days,
MIN(event_server_timestamp_offset)/(1000000*60*60*24) min_days
FROM
`analytics_<project_id>.events_*`
Result: max_days=6784.485790436655,
min_days=-106.95833052104166
Question:
How can I figure out the server arrival time for my Firebase exported BigQuery data so I can run cron jobs crunching only delta data?
Can I use event_server_timestamp_offset together with event_timestamp? If so, how?
Best regards,
Daniel
Surprisingly enough, this question not having a clear answer for almost 2 years, I am leaving here the answers I got from the Firebase support team. The format is - question asked followed by the answer of the support staff.
Q1. event_date - The date on which the event was logged (YYYYMMDD format in the registered timezone of your app). Does it mean that the event occurred on that date, or that it was actually collected on that date?
A1. Per documentation, event_date refers to the date on which the event is logged/occurred. Note that event_date is based on the Analytics timezone setting of your Firebase Project.
Q2. event_timestamp - The time (in microseconds, UTC) at which the event was logged on the client. Is it safe to assume that this is the exact timestamp the event occurred on client side (in the app timezone of course)?
A2. Yes, this is based on the device timezone setting. However, event_timestamp may be skewed if the device time is incorrect.
Q3. event_server_timestamp_offset - Timestamp offset between collection time and upload time in micros. This is the main field that causes all the misunderstandings - in our BigQuery table for the year 2020 this field takes values in a range between 5 days and -2 days. I mean how can the colleciton time be 2 days ahead?
A3. The event_server_timestamp_offset field in the export schema is the time difference between when the event took place and the app uploaded it to our server. In other words, this is the estimated difference between the client's local time and the actual time, according to our servers. The values of this field are usually positive, but can be negative as well if the device time setting is incorrect.
Q4. One last question is very important - can we ignore the
event_server_timestamp_offset field and just rely on event_timestamp -
as the exact date and time the event occurred on the clientside (not
collected, not uplaoded, etc). If not- please explain how we can get
the exact datetime of the event occuring on the clientside. But if yes
please let me know why do we need the event_server_timestamp_offset field?
A4. Yes, you may actually ignore it and use event_timestamp alone. However, as mentioned earlier, event_timestamp could be off if the device time setting incorrect, but it shouldn't really affect the bigger picture of your analytics data as cases like this are usually one-off.
We use the event_date as the indicator and load the data once a day.

User Deletion API: userDeletionRequests:upsert :: deletionRequestTime field

Can someone give little clarification how to interpret following parameter:
deletionRequestTime: datetime`:
This marks the point in time up to which all user data for the specified end user and Google Analytics property or Firebase project should be deleted.`
If I set it to 1st Jan2018 (GTM), does it delete all user data:
from that date till today (which is how I interpret).. meaning all 2018 data will be gone?
or, (from epoch time) till that date ... meaning all 2016/2017 etc. data is gone and all that remains is 2018 data?
When trying the API > refreshed User Explorer report in GA interface > I notice all-time data seems is gone (giving me impression that this filed is not respected?). But let me wait 72hrs since API request to draw any conclusion..
Thanks for any clarification.
Cheers!
First off i dont think your miss-interperting it I dont think the documentation is clear.
The following is from userDeletionRequest
deletionRequestTime datetime
This marks the point in time up to which all user data for the specified end user and Google Analytics property or Firebase project should be deleted.
Now to me that means that its a point in time that the data should be deleted. as in one day? one minute a time stamp? would this then mean you will need to loop though every hour minute in a day to delete everything.
My current answer is this is confusing. I am going to contact the team for clarification they are in West coast USA we wont get an answer back for several hours. I will updated this when i know more.
Clarification from Google
As per documentation, deletionRequestTime represents a timestamp up to
which all use data will be deleted. In other words, all data from the
beginning of time until the point returned in deletionRequestTime will
be deleted.
I don't believe you can set the deletionRequestTime field. It is set to the time you make the call.
I believe that is why you are seeing this behavior.

Is timezone info redundant provided that UTC timestamp is available?

I have a simple mobile app that schedules future events between people at a specified location. These events may be physical or virtual, so the time specified for the event may or may not be in the same timezone as the 'location' of the event. For example, a physical meeting may be scheduled for two people in London at local time 10am on a specified date. Alternatively, a Skype call may be scheduled for two people in different timezones at 4pm (in one person's timezone) on a specified date though the 'location' of the event is simply 'office' which means two different places in different timezones.
I wonder the following design is going to work for this application:
On the client, it asks user to input the local date and time and specify the timezone local to the event.
On the server, it converts the local date and time with the provided timezone into UTC timestamp, and store this timestamp only.
When a client retrieves these details, it receives the UTC timestamp only and converts it into local time in the same timezone as the client's current timezone. The client's current timezone is determined by the current system timezone setting, which I think is automatically adjusted based on the client's location (of course, assuming the client is connected to a mobile network).
My main motivations for this design are:
UTC is an absolute and universal time standard, and you can convert to/from it from/to any timezone.
Users only care about the local date and time in the timezone they are currently in.
Is this a feasible design? If not, what specific scenarios would break the application or severely affect user experience? Critiques welcome.
For a single event, knowing the UTC instant on which it occurs is usually enough, so long as you have the right UTC instant (see later).
For repeated events, you need to know the time zone in which it repeats... not just the UTC offset, but the actual time zone. For example, if I schedule a weekly meeting at 5pm in Europe/London with colleagues in America/Los_Angeles, then for most of the year it will occur at 9am for them... but for a couple of weeks in the year it will occur at 8am and for a couple of weeks in the year it will occur at 10am, due to differences in when DST is observed.
Even for a single event, you might want to consider what happens if time zone rules change. Suppose I schedule a meeting for 4pm on March 20th 2018, in the Europe/London time zone. Currently that will occur with a UTC offset of 0... but suppose between now and the meeting, the time zone rules change to bring British Summer Time in one hour earlier. If I've written it in my diary as 4pm, I probably don't want the software to think that it's actually at 5pm because that's the UTC instant we originally predicted.
We don't know your exact application requirements, but the above situations at least provide an argument for potentially storing the local time and time zone instead of the UTC instant... but you'll also need to work out what to do if the local time ends up being skipped or being ambiguous due to DST changes. (When the clocks fall back, some local times occur twice. When the clocks skip forward, some local times are skipped. A time that was unambiguous may become invalid or ambiguous if the rules change between the original planning time and the actual event. You should probably account for this in your design.)
To keep it simple, my answers are:
Timezone info is redundant if you want to define a single moment. A
UTC/Unix timestamp completely defines a moment.
Your design seems feasible but on point 2: i would convert to the UTC/Unix timestamp on the client-side and already give this timestamp
in its final form to the server. Reason: the client-side already has the info necessary to convert (see this time-keeping
client-server-db
architecture
example - it works based exactly on the principles you describe).
One possible problem (as described by Jon Skeet in his answer) are recurring events, but this should be reflected in the way you model
time. The difference between recurring events and fixed events is
that the latter completely define a moment (like a UTC/Unix
timestamp) while the first are only a 'function' which can be applied
to the current time to get the next trigger time of the recurring
event. But this might entirely be a different problem than what
you ask - in any case, somehow distinguishing between recurring
events (if you need them) and fixed events in your model is a good
idea.
One decision to make is: PULL or PUSH? Or both? Do you want the server to be able to send emails for example, when an event comes to
pass? Or do you want client-side alerts only when your client-side
app is running? The answers to these questions will help you come
towards a design suitable for you.

Matching GPS tracks to local days

I'm writing a geotagging app and running into headaches with timezones. Basically, my app has the following data:
Images with local timestamps (i.e. relative to a timezone)
GPS track files consisting of entries using UTC timestamps
My problem: I need a way to get all data that belongs to a give day, based on the timezone where the data was acquired. For the images, that is easy (I ask the timezone from the user upon import and save it in the EXIF data), but I'm not sure how to do it for the GPS tracks (there usually are multiple tracks per day, and assigning them timezones is not easy for the user when importing data that spans sever days and timezones). I can think of two possible solutions:
Use a heuristic based on the fact that the tracks are recorded at the same time and place as the images - but there can be tracks before a day's first image or after its last one that still need to be included - I'm not sure how to realiably handle such edge cases
Determine the timezone from the GPS coordinates - this would be an ideal solution, but is there an open source library that does this (ideally one that works offline)?
The heuristic method I don't think will work well.
Firstly always store times as UTC and timezone of origin, otherwise time is less meaningful.
After some thought I think that it would be sufficient to resolve down to the country code and from that lookup the timezone.
Depending on how much detail you want I think GeoTog may help you to locate a city and therefore a country from a lat/long (although it will need changing to work the other way).
If not that then Gisgraphy will work with the larger GeoNames database. You could use the web service or extract the data.
If none of these are good enough then I think you'll need to get a some GIS data, possibly boundaries from VMAP0 and process it into polygons or something searchable.
Option two: you could start by checking this site: http://www.twinsun.com/tz/tz-link.htm
Option one (less complicated, but I am not sure I accurately understand your need...)
So you have as input:
A target day defined in a known timezone TZ, starting at t0 and ending at t1 (excluded)
Images with timestamps ti in the same timezone TZ (is this hypothesis true?)
GPS tracks with UTC timestamps tg which can span over several time zones
We also know that there is at least one GPS track for each image.
Here's something that should work:
Convert your target day into UTC. You get the values t0/UTC and t1/UTC
Convert images' timestamps into UTC (you get ti/UTC from known ti/TZ)
process image if (t0/UTC <= ti/UTC < t1/UTC) i.e. it was taken during your target day.
find a GPS track including ti/UTC (no problem since tracks are timestamped in UTC), and then the closest timestamp within the list of points in this track. This point is the most likely position of your image.

Resources