I'm building a formType to filter products on a collection page. You can set multiple select boxes which makes other auto filled or unnecessary. I want to be able to manipulate the formType based on the data like when using a data_class object. I'm not using data_class because the search isn't a persisted object which is saved to the database. I'm using a GET form.
For example 2 select boxes:
category
productType
When setting a category makes some of the productTypes unnecessary. So i want to not show it.
To do so in the formType I need the data of the request (GET) but I can't find a way to do so.
To retrieve data from the form, you can use $form->getData().
As you're in a GET context, I suspect you can take advantage from FormEvents (take a closer look to POST_SET_DATA event) and get rid of values you don't need.
One other thing I would like to point out, is that you still can use some kind of object that's not persisted to DB, like DTO or whatever.
Forms and entities are not related anyhow, neither in the usage nor in the intentions.
Related
I can't believe this hasn't come up for other people, but I'm unable to find a solution.
Let's say I have two entity types, A and B with a one-to-many relationship. A has a collection of Bs.
The form for A has a CollectionType for the Bs, with a custom entry_type for B, allow_add and allow_delete set to true. When the form is created/populated/rendered, the Bs' fields are identified by their index in the collection. When the form is posted back, the fields are mapped back onto the B entities according to the index again.
What if the database in the mean time decided to return the Bs in a different order? Then the values get swapped around on the Bs! I can't have that, as other entities will reference the Bs and now they've changed their meaning!
Even if the database doesn't change the order, the same issue appears when a B is deleted: The fields get shifted through the Bs and a different one deleted! (Ok, I'm not a 100% certain this happens, as there's a gap then in the numbering of the posted fields.) I've found this similar question where it does happen when another one is created (Symfony CollectionType regards deletion+creation as a modification of an item), but that sort of drifted from the issue and there's no usable answer.
How do I make sure the form is updating the entities the user actually edited?
I already tried to render the Bs' IDs as a HiddenType, but then the form rightfully complains that the ID has no setter. It would probably force an ID on the wrong B anyways and Doctrine doesn't like that. I suppose I could add the Bs as unmapped and copy the values over to the correct objects manually, but that would defeat a good chunk of Symfony's form system.
I've used CollectionType before, but not for entities that are referenced elsewhere. I would then delete all of the previous entities and create the collection anew from the posted data. But I can't do that now, can I?
Since doctrine 2.1, it's possible to change how associations are indexed. This will allow you to use the id as the collection key (as the field has to be unique):
#OneToMany(targetEntity="B", mappedBy="A", indexBy="id")
You might also need to enable orphanRemoval so that the data is actually removed instead of the relation just set to null.
I created a custom object and i want to get all its existing records. Is there a way of doing that via the REST API? Seems like a very basic and simple operation but i couldn't find information about it anywhere.
As you say, it seems like a basic task, but in the reality, it is more complex indeed.
Unfortunately, the Get Custom Object endpoint (which is the only endpoint to fetch Custom Objects) requires the filterType and filterValues parameters to be present as well. Basically this means that you have to have some information about the queried objects beforehand.
Also, a further restriction is that the value of filterType can only be one of the “searchable” fields of the Custom Object, meaning that it has to be either a Link field or a Dedupe field. (These fields are listed under the searchableFields property in the response from the Describe Custom Objects endpoint.)
So as mentioned above, you have to know the values for at least one of the properties of your Custom Objects before you make the query.
With additional queries though, you can grab these required values.
Let's say, you have your Custom Object linked to the Lead Object, and the Link field is called Owner Email (with the REST API name being ownerEmail) which links to the Email Address field of the Lead Object. In this case you could set the filterType to ownerEmail and set the emails of the leads as filterValues.
Then it is up to you how you gather the emails of those Leads who has a Custom Object attached. Luckily the REST API won’t throw an error if you provide a value that has no corresponding Custom Objects.
If your Custom Object is linked to a Lead, it's a bit complex but you can do like this:
Create a smart list and filter with "Has You Custom Object"
Get the smart list with API (GET /rest/asset/v1/smartLists.json)
Based on this list of Leads, get all Custom Objects (see the other answer).
I am working on an enterprise scale project where I have a self referencing table called categories as below. Also in my current model I am using following table associations to fetch data. ( using EF6).
I have M-M mapping tables in DB for above M-M relationships.
In my controller GET action result returns the model which has Ilist(all parent categories). Then when the user is selecting items (in view) I am using Ajax to retrieve Ilist for next subset of categories (by passing to controller by Id - return Json result) and dynamically show next to the parent select list as below. ( and I have up to 4 subsets)
As the user is selecting categories, I am using Ajax call to load related categories and create selectlist or dropdownlist dynamically as below:
My question is Since all these data is loaded through Ajax, how can I bind them to my parent model. How can I capture user selected data into one parent model when user is posting the from to controller.
I know I can use Ajax and use Json to capture & transfer to contoller , But I need to use modelview , Can I use partiview to overcome this ?
Please advise the available options..
The key is making sure the name values match the object hierarchy accepted by the post operation. This is certainly doable; it's difficult because several AJAX operations build the UI, but one operation processes it, so you have to ensure the data expressions match the object being posted back.
You can use Html.NameFor() as a workaround to ensuring the naming paths work OK. Collections can make this difficult.
Actually, I have a form with an input to persist an entity. I want to create another form somewhere else with more information and I want to save everything from the submit which is in the first form. I can't include the second inputs in the same form, because this is not the same view. What's the best way to resolve this issue?
Thanks in advance
This sounds difficult.
Have I understood this right:
You have on entity with some required information and some nullable, additional information.
Now there are two forms one which creates the entity with the required information and you than want to update the form with the additionals.
Is this correct?
I would try two things:
Default
You create one FormType with all the fields and have two views which only render the required fields (for this don't use form_rest).
Than do the form handling like descriped in the docs.
It could be that this doesn't work with the validation.
Use FormModels
Under Form/Model/FormModelClass you have the two classes which only have the attributes the one form requires. The Form component interacts with them and maps all attributes to this models. When the form is submitted successfullly and valid you can manuelly map the attributes back to your orginal entity and persist it
I have a table in my SQL Server DB that holds auditing information for certain actions a user takes within my system. Things like who performed the action, when it was performed, and what action are all pieces of information that can easily span multiple actions. But depending on the action performed, there may be other information that I want to capture, that is specific to the action. To handle this, I elected to add an "XML Metadata" column to the table that holds serialized XML of different metadata objects that I've created. I created a metadata object for each of the actions that I'm interested in tracking extra for. So each object is responsible for tracking specific extra information (metadata) for it's action. The objects are serialized and written to my new column.
I have SystemAction objects that I use to store information from this table, and I've added a string field that holds the XML string from the DB. The problem is, when I'm reading this XML back from the SystemAction objects, I'm struggling with a way to generically translate it back into it's correct metadata object. Each metadata object is going to have different fields, and each object has it's own static method that takes an XML string and attempts to return the metadata object type. So I could say:
SomeActionMetadata mdObj = SomeActionMetadata.BuildFromXML(xmlStringFromDB);
But I really don't know of a way to say "Here's some XML that could translate to any number of different objects. Figure it out and give me the right object back."
Given my current implementation, I could always just assign a unique ID to each metadata object that is stored as a field in each object, then use a case statement to switch on that ID and use the appropriate class's static build method to build the right object. But I was hoping for something a little more automatic than that. What if I have a List of SystemAction objects and just want to loop through them and generate the correct metadata object type?
I was hoping someone might have run across something similar to this before, or could point me to an article or post that could help me out. Thanks very much.
As indicated by Subhash Dike in the comments below, there is a similar SO question here that was able to point me in the right direction.