I am planning to customize Big Blue Button HTML 5 client layout.
but, i know that it is very difficult.
To customize some file, I tried to find imports directory of HTML 5 client.
but, I didn't find it for a few days.
I found other all directories.
only, I didn't find imports directory.
i am very terrible with it.
so, I hoped your help about this.
really, where exists this directory?
Welcome to Stack Overflow. I haven't look at it, but it's not mandatory to use /imports in a Meteor project, it is merely a convention. Looking at the docs, I see there is a meteor project that you can download and run, that should be pretty straight forward.
Looking at this folder: https://github.com/bigbluebutton/bigbluebutton/tree/develop/bigbluebutton-html5
There is indeed a imports folder there. Maybe you are looking in the wrong place?
Related
I have a simple query, a bit embarrassing as well. Dtube is an app that runs using meteor. I am looking to make some changes on the Dtube Home Page..changing icons and such. I have installed it on a linode. However, I am simply not able to locate the index file to make these changes to.
I tried
Locating all the files on linux named index.html in the dtube directory
Locating all the files containing the string div class name ...I was looking for in the dtube home page.
Still no luck.
Documentation is scarce and a bit confusing..
Can anyone simply point me to the path I should be looking at to modify the dtube homepage?
Someone who knows Dtube might be able to answer this.
All HTML's and CSS files are in https://github.com/dtube/dtube/tree/master/client
It's necessary rebuild the system to see the results.
The solution from this question did not work for me. And another answer suggests that firebase deploy does not overwrite the same CSS file. I'm able to deploy a new CSS file with a new name. But I'd like to keep the same CSS file, make changes, and deploy it again. Would this be possible?
All files that have changes will be deployed. The changes are detected by the checksum.
The name doesn't matter. As James More wrote on his comment here:
now is "will only deploy files with different checksums".
Do you experience a behaviour other than that? One thing you should consider is the CSS Cache in Browsers. It can get very tricky. Even when you update the CSS the Page shows the old one.
For sample I got these two modules.
Module.Admin
Module.Web
Then, all images that are uploaded inside the Module.Admin is place inside it, sitemap goes like this.
Module.Admin
- Content
-- Uploads
--- Images
Now, how can I load as source these images inside the Module.Web > View .cshtml file?
As I've notice, these two modules are having two different ports. I hope you understand what I'm saying. Feel free to ask. Thank you
Sounds like you made the module a web project too? That means that they will run in seperate sites and not be able to share information.
You should probably use plugins instead. I've described how you can do it in my blog: http://blog.gauffin.org/2012/05/griffin-mvccontrib-the-plugin-system/
If you only want to access files you have to setup a custom VirtualPathProvider which can access the files from the other library.
I'm helping a colleague configure a new box for an existing Drupal install with multiple sites. It's functioning, but I've noticed that all assets are being referenced as /sites/<site-name>/files/image.png. I don't know from Drupal, but it strikes me that Drupal should be abstracting the logical site from the code so that site-specific assets could be referenced as /files/image.png and Drupal would figure out -- perhaps based on HTTP_HOST -- which site is meant.
In this case, we need separate snapshots of the same site (dev and staging) so we'd like to be able to store the paths without specifically referencing one site or the other. We can do some rewriting to manage this, but I'm wondering whether there's something that we simply don't know.
Does Drupal do this natively in some way? If not, what are others doing to manage this kind of abstraction? Surely we're not the first to encounter this and think there must be a better way.
Thanks.
That would be an interesting module. The Files directory can be in the following locations:
sites/<site name>/files (standard for multi sites, public)
or
sites/default/files (standard installation for single sites, public)
That is, if you want to use the public files method.
Read here if you want to learn about the private files method (very similar to your thought): http://drupal.org/documentation/modules/file
I need to know if it recompiles my site at all or if there are any issues doing this. I have tested the changes locally and in a test environment and I don't want to do a full deployment for one tiny change. I'm just not familiar with aspx.vb files and how they interact with a website.
The short answer is yes, it will cause the page to be dynamically recompiled. Dependencies could cause the entire site to be recompiled.
For more information read this MSDN article: Understanding ASP.NET Dynamic Compilation. The "Recompiling on Change" section addresses your question.
You can modify an .aspx.vb file and drop it into its respective location on the server, overwriting the existing file, and it will be dynamically compiled due to the change. However, if you were referring to having code that changed .vb file content on the fly, that sounds like a bad idea and you should reconsider your problem and approach.