I would like to add a column Journal number on the settlement Form (form VendOpenTrans), however the actual form from journal is not showing the newly added Column
I have attempt to duplicate those field that are visible, rename and re-path to Journal Number, but the Field is Not shown as well. Did I miss out any steps to show out the Fields?
Below is my XPO
https://drive.google.com/file/d/1QOLvXqMyEL722ja0ySfOAsRIJEj5nkmZ/view?usp=sharing
Related
In NetSuite, I am setting up a new (currently untitled) saved search that is meant to display three columns simultaneously: Invoice document number, Sales Order document number and Item Fulfillment document number.
I have configured my transaction saved search to display invoice document type. Sales Order document number is called Created From which is a NetSuite-created field and displays normally as desired.
There is a field called Document Number, unfortunately it responds closely to the criteria setting whether document types are set to Invoice or set to Item Fulfillment. Setting both does not meet my desired output.
I believe there is a way to somehow have all three document numbers present in the same saved search as their own unique columns.
While editing the saved search, I have attempted to create a new column called "Formula (text)" which is a field containing the formula {number}, this column appears as a second Invoice document number instead of the desired Item Fulfillment document number.
While editing the saved search, I have also tried another "Formula (text)" field containing the formula {tranid} which also results as another Invoice document number column instead of the desired Item Fulfillment document number.
Result of both above attempts: https://i.ibb.co/KyDP7Z5/2019-06-12-13-55-58-Window.png
I tried going to Customization > Lists, Records & Fields > Transaction Line Fields to create a new custom field, containing the above as defaulted formulas. The result is exactly that of the above image.
I tried going to Customization > Lists, Records & Fields > Transaction Body Fields to create a new custom field, where the content is referenced by another Saved Search. I expected that if I can pick the document number column from the "item fulfillment lookup" saved search, then that would appear as a separate column bearing the Item Fulfillment number.
I marked the document number column inside the "item fulfillment lookup" saved search as the summary type: "group" as well as give this saved search "Document Number" as an available filter in order for the "item fulfillment lookup" saved search to appear for custom columns.
Unfortunately, this yielded an empty blank column.
I know and I admit that I am doing something incorrect and would much appreciate it if there is an alternative solution or workaround to achieve this desired objective (all three document numbers to appear in a single saved search).
In your saved search Columns, at the end of the drop down list where you choose the columns, you can choose related records fields.
You didn't say which record your search is based on, but assuming your search criteria is on Sales Order, then you can use the following:
To get the related Item Fulfillment:
Fulfilling/Receiving Transaction Fields ... and then choose Document Number
To get the related Invoice:
Applying Transaction fields ... and then choose Document Number
I have a 54 pages PDF file. In this PDF, I have some fields like Full Name, the Phone number, etc that repeats more than 10 times. How can do like When I enter Full name one time and all of the remaining full name fields can be filled automatically using Adobe Acrobat?
I hope I asked my question clearly. Thank you for your time and help.
The easiest is, when all properties of the field (font type, size, color, etc.) are the same, to simply copy the field to the other pages.
The field value is a so-called field level property, which will be the same for all instances of the field.
If you want to have only one place where the value can be entered, and the dependent fields should be read-only, you would have to have a different name for the entry field and display fields. In the entry field, you would then add the following line of code in either the Format or onBlur event:
this.getField("myDisplayFields").value = event.value ;
And that should push the value from the entry field to all fields named myDisplayFields.
And that's it…
I'm trying to implement an update procedure like the one in this blog post (via extra entity and workflow updating account, triggered when the new entity is being created)
http://www.powerobjects.com/2013/08/01/updating-records-in-microsoft-dynamics-crm/
In my list and the new entity "Account Update" I have 3 fields for the full name of a company (name, name_2, name_3).
In my workflow I want to put these 3 together and combine their values in the Account field "Company" (the company's name).
In the process I tried to insert them via the "Form Assistant" and in the field "Company" I now have the following entry:
{Name(Account Update);Name_2(Account Update);Name_3(Account Update)}
but it doesn't seem to work. After my import and update of the account (which ends successful) the value in "Company" is only the value of the first name field.
Is it possible to combine values?
What exactly does it do, when I choose more than one field in the Form Assistant and say OK?
So at last I figured out how to archive it.
With the "Form Assistant" you can combine or add multiple field values to one new field but it is a bit tricky.
The value in the process update the properies have to look like this:
{Name(Account Update)} {Name_2(Account Update)} {Name_3(Account Update)}
BUT
It does not work if you enter this as text, you have to add the fields one after another so that they are recognized as fields (and marked yellow).
Click into the field (here: "Company").
Then choose the first field in the Form Assistant. Click "Add", choose it in the list below and click "OK". Now the field is in the field "Company".
Now go behind the end of the text in the field make a space and then choose and add the second field (clear the list in the Form Assistant before so that now only the second field is in the list)
So it's right if it looks like:
{Name(Account Update)} {Name_2(Account Update)}
Wrong if looks like following (happens when you keep the first field in the list before adding the second with "OK")
{Name(Account Update);Name_2(Account Update)}
I am trying to create a report putting a field called contact which has the name of a person. This name is linked directly to another table where I keep all the contacts.
For some strange reason, when I include this name (which in query view displays as the name of the contact), instead of the name appearing, the unique ID number is shown on my report.
As mentioned in the article cited in the above comment, you can use a Combo Box control on your report to do the lookup for you. To see how this can be done, create a new report based on the table containing the lookup field, then drag and drop that field onto the report. That will create a Combo Box control with properties that look something like this:
Row Source: SELECT [Clients].[ID], [Clients].[LastName] FROM Clients;
Bound Column: 1
Column Count: 2
Column Widths: 0";1"
You could use a similar Combo Box control on your actual report to display the client's name rather than their numeric ID value.
Another alternative would be to change the Control Source of the report's Text Box control to have it do a DLookUp() on the table. If the lookup field is named [client] then changing the Control Source of the Text Box to something like
=DLookUp("LastName","Clients","ID=" & [client])
would also work.
I wanted to add to the great answer by Gord:
When using a "web" database (started in Access 2007 I think), you cannot change a report's fields to ComboBox style, nor can you use DLookUp(). (web databases lack a ton of features)
The workaround for this, if you want to create a Web-Report that uses lookup fields, is to create a Web-Query first based on your Web-Table (all the Web-* stuff has a www planet icon over the logo, if you create a new Web-DB in Access 2007+ you'll see what I mean)
So, instead of Table -> Report, you'll have to do W-Table -> W-Query -> W-Report.
Then, the only thing you need to customize to get the data right is the W-Query. Start by trying to reproduce the look in the query to match what you want users to see in the report. Note that here in the query, lookups will work fine (instead of the unique ID's, you get field names like you want). However, this will not carry over to the report. To do that, you gotta get the actual text field name you want into the query:
You should already have one table in your query; start by adding the table that your first lookup field points to. For example, the table I want to print is called Stock_Boards, and it has a lookup field called PCBID_lookup that points to the table Stock_PCBs.
Since you're using lookup fields, there should already be a relationship line between the two tables when you add the second one. If there isn't, something has gone horribly wrong.
Now, see how that line connects two fields on the two different tables? For example, I've got my PCBID_lookup field on my Stock_Boards table, which connects to the ID field on my Stock_PCBs table. If I created a report from this now, PCBID_lookup would be a number, a number that correlates to the ID of a record on Stock_PCBs.
To fix it, I will add the name field I want to show up on the report. In my example, that happens to be a Part Number, rather than the ID. I add the PartNumber field from my Stock_PCBs table to the query, and remove the PCBID_lookup field of the Stock_Boards table from my query.
Since PartNumber is what I want to show up on my report, it effectively replaces the original field (PCBID_lookup)
Repeat for all lookup fields you want in your report.
I had 1 more: I removed the Status field of the Stock_Boards table (which was an ID/Lookup) and added the 'Status' field from the Status table (which was the actual text name)
When finished, your query should look exactly how you want the data to appear, without any special tricks or asking Access to do something unnatural. Save your query, and create a web-report from it. Done!
I am trying to create a user profile field in drupal 7 that combines multiple fields and can have multiple values.
For Example,
the field is "Past Job Title" ,"From Year", "To Year" and the whole field ( having 3 sub fields ) can have multiple values thus can have values like
< "Google" , 2000, 2003 ><br/>
< "Facebook" , 2003, 2007 ><br/>
< "Xerox", 2007, 2009 ><br/>
The user should be able to add as many values he/she wants.
In Drupal 7, Multiple Values for a single field can be enabled by setting Number of Values to Unlimited, but how to do in case of multiple fields combined together.
Please Do Suggest...
I believe what you are looking for is the Field Collection module. It allows you to group fields together and allows the entering of many groups. The following article gives a good description of what the module does: Create Multigroups in Drupal 7 using Field Collections
From the Field Collection project page:
Provides a field-collection field, to which any number of fields can
be attached.
A field collection is internally represented as an entity, which is
embedded in the host entity. Thus, if desired field collections may be
viewed and edited separately too.
How can we validate each field collection entity?
Let me Explain:
I have used field collection in line item types.
Line Item type = People
Field collection fields are:
Title
First Name
Last Name etc
I have given the number of values: unlimited. That's why add another item button is appearing.
Now, if user entered values in one set and left others blank and then clicked on add to cart button then, how can stop him to continue further.