I have a rack with Supermicro servers each with IPMI interface. I am able to connect to any IPMI web/cli interface from my notebook. I am also able to ping any IPMI interface from any Supermicro server except the Supermicro server, where the IPMI interface is.
An example of a better explanation of my problem:
servers A, B, C can ping IPMI interface of server D, but server D can't ping IPMI interface of server D
servers B, C, D can ping IPMI interface of server A, but server A can't ping IPMI interface of server A
and so on
It looks like each IPMI interface discards packets from a NIC from the same server where IPMI is. Does anybody know why? I don't see any settings or restrictions on any IPMI interface.
I need it for SNMP. I want to get info like by ipmitool sdr but over SNMP.
That is because supermicro servers uses shared NC-SI connections. NC-SI means network controller sideband interface and it allows to share one physical network interface by operating system running on the host and by BMC. I do not know exact model of your supermicro servers but it is pretty clear it has NC-SI connection like that:
IPMI interface does not discard any traffic from the server because it simply does not receive that traffic. NC-SI means the physical NIC and LAN connector are shared by BMC and CPU. So what happen when you send a request from the host OS to the BMC in the same server?
The host OS knows IP address so it starts with MAC address search via ARP. OS creates an ARP request with a broadcast destination MAC and pass it to the network interface card.
Network interface card sends the ARP request to the network switch.
The switch forwards the ARP request to all ports except the port where the request was received.
Nobody replies to the ARP request because BMC has not received anything.
A few workarounds can be applied:
Use IPMI over IPMB instead of IPMI over IP when connecting to local BMC.
Assign BMC and server IP addresses from different IP ranges or different VLANs and force L3 routing for the traffic between server and its BMC.
Buy a dedicated BMC NIC. Some server models allow that.
Related
QUESTION:
Is there a way to trigger Tailscale to restart in a scenario like the following so that packets again flow to a remote Tailscale subnet over a backup ISP connection?
Scenario: Tailscale does not reconnect after my upstream router fails over to its backup ISP connection.
Prior to failover, local client machines can ping public IP addresses -- 8.8.8.8 for example -- as well as private IP addresses on the other side of a Tailscale subnet router -- 10.0.0.2 for example.
After failover, local clients regain public Internet access, but the private network on the other side of the Tailscale subnet router remains unreachable. The remote Tailscale subnet never becomes reachable again, even after waiting over 15 minutes.
The upstream router fails back after plugging the local WAN1 ethernet cable back in. Clients can still access the public Internet and can again reach the remote Tailscale subnet.
Test configuration:
Tailscale is running on a local Linux machine with IP forwarding enabled.
IP address is 192.168.0.2.
Default route is via 192.168.0.1.
Tailscale flags:
--advertise-routes=192.168.0.0/24
--snat-subnet-routes=false
--accept-routes
Local upstream router has two WAN ports configured for failover only.
WAN1 connects to a cable modem in bridge mode.
WAN2 connects to an LTE router in bridge mode.
LAN IP address is 192.168.0.1.
Static route to 10.0.0.0/8 via 192.168.0.2.
Tailscale is running on a remote EC2 instance in an AWS VPC with IP forwarding enabled.
IP address is 10.0.0.2.
Default route is via 10.0.0.1.
Tailscale flags:
--advertise-routes=10.0.0.0/8
--snat-subnet-routes=false
--accept-routes
tailscaled generally reacts to linkchange events, like links going up or down, and figures out which interface has the default route. If both interfaces remain up and both interfaces have a default route, it may not know which one to use.
I have implement a Client-Server application in java. The server can serve multiple clients, and I want to test that, but my knowledges on Networking is poor, and I need a way to test my application on my home.
I have a rooter, which are connected both of my computers. My "server" class in java uses as host the local host (127.0.0.1) on a given port.
How can I test my program if
The Server.java is running on the Computer A
Server.java is running on 127.0.0.1 on 3943 port
1st Client.java is running on the Computer A
1st Client.java is connected to 3943 port
2nd Client.java is running on the Computer B
2nd Client.java is connected to 3943 port
Any ideas?
Use unique ports for the clients and servers running on the same machine. In addition 127.0.0.1 is localhost (internal to that machine). Computer B cannot communicate with 127.0.0.1 on Computer A. Use 127.0.0.1 if all applications or on the same machine. Use the computers actual IP address if you want external machines to be able to communicate with the server.
When client and server, are on the same computer, what you are doing must be already working.
To connect from a different computer, you need to find the "real" ip address of your server.
If you are on Windows, open a command shell on your computer A, and run ipconfig. On unix/linux/mac, run ifconfig.
Look for a string, looking like an ip address, but not 127.0.0.1, there has to be another one if you are connected to a network, probably looks like 10.0.0. or 192.168.<0 or 1> ..
Use this address everywhere instead of 127.0.0.1
A full TCP connection consists of two different endpoints. The server side of the connection is one endpoint (it will be do a listen on that endpoint). When a client creates it's side of the connection (the client socket), it will do a connect to the server ip:port combo and get a number assigned from a range of so-called "ephemeral" ports.
The fact that both sides of the connection have the same IP address doesn't matter - the full connection is defined by two distinct elements (address:port combinations).
FirstClient's connection to the server will be ServerIP:ServerPort<->Client1_IP:Client1_Port, and SecondClient's connection will be ServerIP:ServerPort<->Client2_IP:Client2_Port. The network layer can differentiate between these (they are two different connection streams) and route traffic to the appropriate sender/receiver for that stream.
If you run the server bound to IP 127.0.0.1 you are not opening it to the network, only your own computer will be able to connect to it, acessing 127.0.0.1 (loopback IP address).
To open this server to the network, you must do one of the two things:
Bind it to the IP 0.0.0.0 so it will be acessible from all networks;
Bind it to a specific network IP address so that it will be available to that network only.
Its common practice to just bind it to 0.0.0.0, its easier.
Once its done, you will be able to connect from other computers to the server running on computer A, however, not through IP 127.0.0.1. Thats the loopback address and can only be used by a computer to connect to itself.
Computer A can use the IP 127.0.0.1 to connect to the server since the server is running on it, but other network computers will have to specify computer A's network IP address.
You can find your IP address on the network adapter details, or running the command ipconfig /all on a command prompt (Windows) or ifconfig (Linux).
I want to estabilish TCP connection over the internet between 2 computers which are in different local networks(wifi).
I have looked for description of TCP protocol, esspecially the structure of TCP header: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Transmission_Control_Protocol#Checksum_computation
I assumed from that data that only: Source address(global ip), Destination address(global ip), Source port, Destination port are needed.
But how router in recipient's local network will know which computer in this network is recpient without MAC address or local ip address?
So the question: Is MAC address is needed to estabilish connection?
No, MAC addresses are not needed for that.
What you´re asking is called port forwarding:
The router of the server side must be configured that way
that incoming connections on port x are connected to local PC y.
(This could maybe be automated with UPNP, depends on the router etc.)
At the client side, after the client send something to the server,
the router "remembers" where to forward the incoming answer
What I am asking is if two computers listen to the same port and a packet of information enters the router through the WAN Ip and the same port. Would the packet go to both computers? Neither? One or the other?
IE
computer 1 -(internal IP)-> 192.168.1.3 -(listens to port)-> 4444
computer 2 -(internal IP)-> 192.168.1.2 -(listens to port)-> 4444
computer 3 -(connects and sends)-> 24.157.358.45:4444
packet -> computer 1 AND computer 2
The code in VB6 is:
LAN.LocalPort = 4444
LAN.Protocol = sckTCPProtocol
LAN.Listen
I am using a WinSock object in the Microsoft WinSock Control 6.0 in VB6 Professional
If there is something that needs to be clarified I would be more than happy to.
The router won't send an inbound packet to either machine unless communication has already been established.
If 192.168.1.3 calls out to some other machine (e.g. 4.5.6.7) from its port 4444, the router will assign an arbitrary port on its external address (say 24.157.358.45 [sic] :5555) and pass the packets on to 4.5.6.7. 4.5.6.7 will send reply packets to 24.157.358.45:5555 -- because that's the only address it knows about -- and the router will relay those to 192.168.1.3:4444.
That's the normal course of things, but there are a lot of additional details to this scheme that make it possible to establish communication with a machine behind a router via trickery.
The system of having machines with private IP addresses behind a router with a public address is called network address translation (NAT); it's a pretty deep topic.
From my knowledge of routers, unless port forwarding is setup, the router will discard any packets sent on that port.
If port forwarding is setup, only one of the computers could be setup to receive the packets.
If the packet is an inbound request to establish a new TCP connection with a server that is running behind the router, the router must have an explicit port-forwarding rule configured, either statically in the router's configuration or dynamically via uPNP or SNMP, that tells the router where to route inbound packets on 24.157.358.45:4444 to, either to 192.168.1.2:4444 or to 192.168.1.3:4444, otherwise the packet will be discarded. So no, both of your listening servers will not see the same packet.
Once a TCP connection is established, the router knows which specific LAN machines are associated with which connections and will route incoming packets belonging to those connections accordingly.
The previous answers are correct, you need to enable port forwarding. If it is not enabled port 4444 will be closed on the router.
It sounds like you have multiple servers and want to forward to whatever server is turned on at the moment. This is not possible (*), the router does not care whether or not PC1 or PC2 are listening on port 4444, it will simply forward everything to the address configured in the port forwarding.
(*): Ok it is possible but it takes some extra work.
Solution 1: Trick the router into thinking there is only one server. Give PC1 and PC2 a virtual network interface with the same IP address and forward to that address. Make sure only one of these interfaces is enabled, having duplicate IP addresses in your network can have unintentional behaviour.
Solution 2: Make the router care about which server is on. You will need to write a program to run on the router (or on another server) that can detect which server is on and forward the packets accordingly. If you are using Linux the program iptables can be worth looking at.
If I have two internal computers connecting to the same external IP address through a NAT router, how is the router able to get the traffic to the correct internal computer? It is my understanding that NAT forwards incoming packets to the computer that recently sent outgoing packets to the [incoming packet's] sender's IP address. Since both computers are sending to the same address, does the router forward the packet to both? If that is the case, is it the responsibility of the client software to determine which packets are relevant?
Is it possible if both computers are attempting to connect to the same port?
When you open a socket, you need to address a port of the destination system and open a conjugate listening port on your own system to receive any response. You have to send the destination system your listening port.
Having more than one system using the same modem
When you start a web browser, and go to www.google.com:80, your browser obtains/searches for a free non-system conjugate port from the system for listening. Let us say, the conjugate port is 10000. The listener port is for receiving the http stream back from google.
Then your kid sitting next to you incidentally also browses www.google.com:80 and his/her google session of the play station or xbox-whatever also incidentally is assigned conjugate port 10000.
Both of you are sitting behind a cable modem, and behind the cable modem is your wireless router. And both of your systems are behind the wireless router - All sitting in that sequence, network topology-wise.
To prevent port address collision on the router/modem
Let us say that your cable company DHCP assigns your modem ip4 adress 72.72.72.72. But your wireless router DHCP assigns 192.168.0.10 to your system and to 192.168.0.11 to your kid's system.
When the frame carrying the information of your listener ports passes thro your NAT router, it would translate either one or both listening- ports. Let's say port 15000 for your page and port 16000 for your kid's page.
Your wireless router then sends your requests to google server as coming from 72.72.72.72:15000 and 72.72.72.72:16000.
The google server then responds individually to 72.72.72.72:15000 and 72.72.72.72:16000 and when you wireless router encounters the response, it reaches into the mapping that it has stored and translates 72.72.72.72:15000 to 192.168.0.10:10000 to reach your system but translates 72.72.72.72:16000 to 192.168.0.11:10000 to reach your kid's system.
Running web/game/ftp/etc servers
But what if you have a web server or an ftp server running on your system. What if you have two systems and both have a web server and both web servers are listening on port 80?
Let us say the local ip addresses registered/assigned with your wireless router of your first web server system is 192.168.0.30 and your second web server system is 192.168.0.40.
The wireless router would have a configuration web page usually by default 192.168.0.1:80, unless you changed it. There would be a tab to on the page where you could define/reserve application port mappings.
You could register with your wireless router to reserve the mapping
192.168.0.30:80 => outgoing port 8080
192.168.0.40:80 => outgoing port 8088
So that you have to phone your friends your web/game servers are addressable through
72.72.72.72:8080 and 72.72.72.72:8088 respectively,
where the wireless router would preclude its port 8080 and 8088 from its own dynamic NAT usage.
Of course, 72.72.72.72 is as good as only before your ISP DHCP decide to renew the ip4 address of your modem to say, 72.72.90.200. After which you would have to phone/email your friends and say
Hey, the servers' addresses have changed to 72.72.90.200:8080 and 72.72.90.200:8088 respectively. Or you could subscribe to dynamic dns (ddns) service to use a named domain where the ddns service will need you to install a simple heartbeat utility on your system to help them monitor the address variation. DDNS translation is a separate issue/strategy.
NAT modems
Newer ISP contracts supply you with a modem that has NAT. If so, you have to switch off either the one on your modem or the one on your wireless router. You should not use both - what's the point in translating twice because NAT is simply to prevent address collision. When you switch off NAT from your wireless router, it can operate as a hub switch and not a router anymore so that you could connect it to the modem using one of its LAN socket instead of thro its WAN socket.
The router manages "source" ports that are separate for each computer. While you may be connecting to port 80 on the "destination" the router may assign the source port to some high number port.
Wikipedia sums it up as
Network address translation involves
re-writing the source and/or
destination IP addresses and usually
also the TCP/UDP port numbers of IP
packets as they pass through the NAT.
Checksums (both IP and TCP/UDP) must
also be rewritten to take account of
the changes.
Already good answers are provided, but here is another example:
HOST A addr HOST B addr
10.1.0.2:4040 10.1.0.3:4040
-----------------------------------------
NAT 200.50.50.28:4040 200.50.50.28:4041 (what external host sees)
200.50.50.28 is router's global (internet) IP.
Every port number is unique in the NAT table. And of course the router does all the dirty job of modifying the source and destination addresses transparently.
It uses different ports for incoming external traffic, and the NAT then routes the packets on one port to one internal IP address, and the packets from the other port to the other internal IP address... The iniital request from each internal computer, when it goes through the NAT on the way out, establishes which port will be used for the incoming traffic from the external ip address, and it tells the external server what port to send it's traffic back on for that connection.
RFC3022 provides a lot of information on how this works
Since public facing or external IP Address that was given by Internet Service Provider (ISP) has been discussed, I would like to add on this.
You can ask your ISP to have your public IP Address not change. It will become static, so that you do not have to inform your friends to change the IP Address if they want to access your server inside your Network Address Translator (NAT).
As of this writing, static IP Address cost around 100 bucks. Most of the ISP they call it business account.
You can determine your public facing IP Address by googling "what is my ip address".