I created a rest-api module in odoo12 and am using postman to check the end points but i get the error below on attempting to authenticate user
No CSRF validation token provided for path '/web/session/authenticate/'
Odoo URLs are CSRF-protected by default (when accessed with unsafe
HTTP methods). See
https://www.odoo.com/documentation/12.0/reference/http.html#csrf for
more details.
if this endpoint is accessed through Odoo via py-QWeb form, embed a CSRF
token in the form, Tokens are available via request.csrf_token()
can be provided through a hidden input and must be POST-ed named
csrf_token e.g. in your form add:
if the form is generated or posted in javascript, the token value is
available as csrf_token on web.core and as the csrf_token
List item
value in the default js-qweb execution context
if the form is accessed by an external third party (e.g. REST API
endpoint, payment gateway callback) you will need to disable CSRF
protection (and implement your own protection if necessary) by
passing the csrf=False parameter to the route decorator.
A quick but not recommended fix could be adding csrf=false in authenticating method route as they said in 3rd point not sure why not recommended but may make the route from web less secure but for API it's all good
from odoo.addons.web.controllers.main import Home
class HomeExt(Home):
#http.route(csrf=false)
def authenticate(self, db, login, password, base_location=None):
request.session.authenticate(db, login, password)
return request.env['ir.http'].session_info()
Related
I hope you are doing fine :)
I have the following problem/problems.
I have created a dummy (robot) user. In Azure AD there is an App Registration with some Power BI delegated permission services.
I want to automate the deletion of a push dataset via a HTTP request.
For this, I need to authenticate against that App Registration from Azure AD. With postman, everything worked perfectly, I got the token as a response.
Then, I tried to make the same request using the HTTP connector in PowerAutomate.
I get the following error
{"error":"invalid_request","error_description":"AADSTS900144: The request body must contain the following parameter: 'grant_type'.\r\nTrace ID: e6d68953-ce1c-4217-856c-ae3aada82e00\r\nCorrelation ID: f50db4d9-d5bb-4396-af11-214717721f43\r\nTimestamp: 2022-10-26 19:12:48Z","error_codes":[900144],"timestamp":"2022-10-26 19:12:48Z","trace_id":"e6d68953-ce1c-4217-856c-ae3aada82e00","correlation_id":"f50db4d9-d5bb-4396-af11-214717721f43","error_uri":"https://login.microsoftonline.com/error?code=900144"}
The connector looks like this->
I have tried other ways as well.
The following error ->
{"error":"invalid_grant","error_description":"AADSTS50126: Error validating credentials due to invalid username or password.\r\nTrace ID: fec65949-0701-4727-af3b-2c2b8eb73a00\r\nCorrelation ID: 42c6c04b-98be-477d-8d36-52a01a473a40\r\nTimestamp: 2022-10-26 19:23:50Z","error_codes":[50126],"timestamp":"2022-10-26 19:23:50Z","trace_id":"fec65949-0701-4727-af3b-2c2b8eb73a00","correlation_id":"42c6c04b-98be-477d-8d36-52a01a473a40","error_uri":"https://login.microsoftonline.com/error?code=50126"}
I get from the the next HTTP connector inputs. I tried creating a query out of the previous json. It says the username or password are invalid but I logged in successfully for a number of times with those exact credentials. That I am sure of.
The dummy inputs in the picture are used to avoid the real ids, username and password.
This worked for me ...
Add a header setting Content-Type to application/x-www-form-urlencoded and add the URL form encoded content string like thus ...
client_id=<CLIENT_ID>c&grant_type=password&username=<USERNAME>&password=<PASSWORD>&scope=User.read
If you're using the password grant type approach, you shouldn't need a client secret, just the client ID.
I'm getting started understanding what's required for Cybersource's Flex Microform integration. But to start with, I'm hoping to be able to see a valid response using my merchant ID, shared secret key and the general key that comes with generating the secret on the cybersource api reference page: https://developer.cybersource.com/api-reference-assets/index.html#flex-microform_key-generation_generate-key
This is using the HTTP Signature method and ChasePaymentech (default) processor.
If I use the default settings they supply and choose to do a test POST to here https://apitest.cybersource.com/flex/v1/keys?format=JWT&
The JSON response is good with no complaints of authentication.
If I try to do the same POST with my test environment merchant ID and keys I generated in my merchant environment here: https://ubctest.cybersource.com/ebc2/app/PaymentConfiguration/KeyManagement the POST response will return a 401 with this JSON:
{
"response": {
"rmsg": "Authentication Failed"
}}
Is this developer.cybersource.com site a valid place to perform this kind of test? Are there any other steps I need to do in the merchant account to have this Authenticate?
I'm just getting started on figuring out the CyberSource Flex Micro Form code out myself and it's pretty straight forward from what I can see. If you don't have the proper SDK already pulled in, you can fetch it from https://github.com/CyberSource
I had to use Composer to fetch all the dependencies but once I did, I was able to load up the microform checkout page in my browser window successfully. Make sure you edit the ExternalConfiguration file with your credentials that you setup in CyberSource.
The apiKeyId value is the value you can find in your CyberSource account under Key Management. This is the value with the dashes in it.
The secretKey value is the value you should have downloaded from CyberSource that is your public key. This is the value without the dashes and probably has a few slashes / in it.
That's all I had to do in my setup to get the first successful authentication / token on my end.
I am trying to verify a HS256 JWT Token generated with locally ran KeyCloak Authentication Provider on https://jwt.io.
The KeyCloack instance is running on my local machine inside a docker container. I have applied almost the same steps as described in this answer (which on contrary applies the RS algorithm instead, and works as described): https://stackoverflow.com/a/55002225/1534753
My validation procedure is very simple:
1.) Request the token (with Postman) from my local docker KeyCloak instance with:
POST requesting http://localhost:8080/auth/realms/dev/protocol/openid-connect/token
2.) Copy the token contents inside the jwt.io's "Encoded" section
3.) I verify that the header and payload are as expected and correct
4.) I copy the client secret from my KeyCloak instance admin dashboard, you can see the reference on the image below:
5.) I paste the secret into the "VERIFY SIGNATURE" section on jwt.io and the "Encoded" token section changes, hence resulting with an invalid signature and a invalid (i.e. different) token.
My core question is what am I missing here? Why does the token change when I apply the expected secret!? Am I applying the right secret, the one from the client? If I understand JWT infrastructre and standard correctly then It should stay the same if the secret (with the expected algorithm applied) is valid. My reasoning is that something with JWT creation on KeyCloak is specific. I have not touched the HS256 algorithm provider on KeyCloak, everything is used as default with the docker installation guide on using KeyCloak. The settings related to the token and algorithm are setup to use HS256, and the algorithm is specified as expected in the JWT's header section correctly which can be verified after the encoded token is pasted into the jwt.io's page.
I need this to work as I am trying to apply the same JWT validation process inside a .NET Core web API application. I have encountered this whole issue in there, i.e. inside the System.IdentityModel.Tokens.JWT and the JwtSecurityTokenHandle.ValidateSignature method which results with an invalid signature and finally resulting in an exception.
On side note, I am accessing the token with Postman and its Authorize feature the configuration can be seen on the image below:
One more side note is I have a user "John" which belongs to my "Demo" realm. I use him to request an access token from KeyCloak.
To get the secret used for signing/verifying HS256 tokens, try using the following SQL:
SELECT value FROM component_config CC INNER JOIN component C ON(CC.component_id = C.id) WHERE C.realm_id = '<realm-id-here>' and provider_id = 'hmac-generated' AND CC.name = 'secret';
If you use the resulting secret to verify the tokens, the signature should match. I’m not sure if this secret is available through the UI, probably not.
Source: https://keycloak.discourse.group/t/invalid-signature-with-hs256-token/3228/3
you can try using Keycloak Gatekeeper.
If you want to verify that token in that way you need to change the Client Authenticator to "Signed JWT with client secret", otherwise you can use this "Gatekeeper" option. Here you can read more about it.
I have a intranet application which i'm able to login using username/password.
Im trying to access the same application using python requests passing my username/password but that does not work. Its a difficult task to get a application support.
Meanwhile, I want to see if I can login using the session the web application created which is in my other browser.
How can I just pass the session using the requests module.
You may need to send data among username and password (usually this data is generated randomly by the server and are inside <input type="hidden"> form elements) which we prevent the CSRF (cross-site request forgery) attack. You may also need to send cookies the Web server send to you.
So, to solve your problem you need to:
Create a requests session to handle cookies;
Request the login page (where the form is) and extract CSRF data;
Post CSRF data among your credentials to the form action URL.
The code will be like this:
import requests
LOGIN_URL = '...' # put URL here
# replace 'user' and 'pass' with form field names for credentials
CREDENTIALS = {'user': '...', 'pass': '...'}
session = requests.session()
# get cookies and CSRF data
response = session.get(LOGIN_URL)
csrf_data = ... # extract data from response.text in a dict
# post data
csrf_data.update(CREDENTIALS)
# you may change LOGIN_URL below with form's 'action' URL if they differ
response = session.post(LOGIN_URL, data=csrf_data)
# now check response.text to see if you're logged in
There are many ways to extract CSRF data, such as: simple string manipulation, regular expressions or more specialized libraries such as lxml and BeautifulSoup (it depends on your input HTML and familiarity with the methods).
I can't get my refresh token with my code. I can only get my access token, token type etc.,
I have followed some tutorials like putting access_type=offline on my login URL:
echo "<a href='https://accounts.google.com/o/oauth2/auth?"
. "access_type=offline&client_id=123345555.apps.googleusercontent.com& "
. "scope=https://www.googleapis.com/auth/calendar+https://www.googleapis.com/auth/plus.me&response_type=code& "
. "redirect_uri=http://www.sample.com/sample.php&state=/profile'>Google</a>";
and my fields in getting the access token:
$fields=array(
'code'=> urlencode($authcode),
'client_id'=> urlencode($clientid),
'client_secret'=> urlencode($clientsecret),
'redirect_uri'=> urlencode($redirecturi),
'grant_type'=> 'authorization_code',
);
but I can't get refresh_token, just the access_token, token_type, id_token and expires_in.
Found out by adding this to your url parameters
approval_prompt=force
Update:
Use access_type=offline&prompt=consent instead.
approval_prompt=force no longer works
https://github.com/googleapis/oauth2client/issues/453
If I may expand on user987361's answer:
From the offline access portion of the OAuth2.0 docs:
When your application receives a refresh token, it is
important to store that refresh token for future use. If your
application loses the refresh token, it will have to re-prompt the
user for consent before obtaining another refresh token. If you need
to re-prompt the user for consent, include the approval_prompt
parameter in the authorization code request, and set the value to
force.
So, when you have already granted access, subsequent requests for a grant_type of authorization_code will not return the refresh_token, even if access_type was set to offline in the query string of the consent page.
As stated in the quote above, in order to obtain a new refresh_token after already receiving one, you will need to send your user back through the prompt, which you can do by setting approval_prompt to force.
Cheers,
PS This change was announced in a blog post as well.
It is access_type=offline that you want.
This will return the refresh token the first time the user authorises the app. Subsequent calls do not force you to re-approve the app (approval_prompt=force).
See further detail:
https://developers.google.com/accounts/docs/OAuth2WebServer#offline
This is complete code in PHP using google official SDK
$client = new Google_Client();
## some need parameter
$client->setApplicationName('your application name');
$client->setClientId('****************');
$client->setClientSecret('************');
$client->setRedirectUri('http://your.website.tld/complete/url2redirect');
$client->setScopes('https://www.googleapis.com/auth/userinfo.email');
## these two lines is important to get refresh token from google api
$client->setAccessType('offline');
$client->setApprovalPrompt('force'); # this line is important when you revoke permission from your app, it will prompt google approval dialogue box forcefully to user to grant offline access
For our app we had to use both these parameters access_type=offline&prompt=consent.
approval_prompt=force did not work for us
Hi I followed following steps and I had been able to get the refresh token.
Authorization flow has two steps.
Is to obtain the authorization code using https://accounts.google.com/o/oauth2/auth? URL.
For that a post request is sent providing following parameters. 'scope=' + SCOPE + '&client_id=' + CLIENTID + '&redirect_uri=' + REDIRECT + '&response_type=' + TYPE + '&access_type=offline' Providing above will receive a authorization code.
Retrieving AcessToken and RefreshToken using https://accounts.google.com/o/oauth2/token? URL.
For that a post request is sent providing following parameters.
"code" : code,
"client_id" : CID,
"client_secret" : CSECRET,
"redirect_uri" : REDIRECT,
"grant_type" : "authorization_code",
So in your first attempt once you authorize the permissions you will be able to get the Refresh token. Subsequent attempts will not provide the refresh token. If you want the token again the revoke the access in you application.
Hope this will help someone cheers :)
OAuth has two scenarios in real mode.
The normal and default style of access is called online.
In some cases, your application may need to access a Google API when the user is not present，It's offline scenarios .
a refresh token is obtained in offline scenarios during the first authorization code exchange.
So you can get refersh_token is some scenarios ,not all.
you can have the content in https://developers.google.com/identity/protocols/OAuth2WebServer#offline
.
Since March 2016, use prompt=consent to regenerate Google API refresh token.
As mentioned in https://github.com/googleapis/oauth2client/issues/453,
approval_prompt=force has been replaced with prompt=none|consent|select_account
For those using the Google API Client Library for PHP and seeking offline access and refresh tokens beware as of the time of this writing the docs are showing incorrect examples.
currently it's showing:
$client = new Google_Client();
$client->setAuthConfig('client_secret.json');
$client->addScope(Google_Service_Drive::DRIVE_METADATA_READONLY);
$client->setRedirectUri('http://' . $_SERVER['HTTP_HOST'] . '/oauth2callback.php');
// offline access will give you both an access and refresh token so that
// your app can refresh the access token without user interaction.
$client->setAccessType('offline');
// Using "consent" ensures that your application always receives a refresh token.
// If you are not using offline access, you can omit this.
$client->setApprovalPrompt("consent");
$client->setIncludeGrantedScopes(true); // incremental auth
source: https://developers.google.com/identity/protocols/OAuth2WebServer#offline
All of this works great - except ONE piece
$client->setApprovalPrompt("consent");
After a bit of reasoning I changed this line to the following and EVERYTHING WORKED
$client->setPrompt("consent");
It makes sense since using the HTTP requests it was changed from approval_prompt=force to prompt=consent. So changing the setter method from setApprovalPrompt to setPrompt follows natural convention - BUT IT'S NOT IN THE DOCS!!! That I found at least.