Good evening.
Tell me please
I need to make such an implementation
Have: CollectionView
Rxswift
The maximum number of cells is 6
If there are less than 6 elements in a certain array, then the first cells are filled with one type (by the number of elements in the array), and the rest with other cells.
collectionView.register(UINib(nibName: "PhotoCollectionCell", bundle: nil), forCellWithReuseIdentifier: "PhotoCell")
collectionView.register(UINib(nibName: "EmptyCollectionCell", bundle: nil), forCellWithReuseIdentifier: "EmptyCell")
Please check collectionView.rx.items in UICollectionView+Rx.swift from RxCocoa
Here is the example from code itselft
let items = Observable.just([
1,
2,
3
])
items
.bind(to: collectionView.rx.items) { (collectionView, row, element) in
let indexPath = IndexPath(row: row, section: 0)
let cell = collectionView.dequeueReusableCell(withReuseIdentifier: "Cell", for: indexPath) as! NumberCell
cell.value?.text = "\(element) # \(row)"
return cell
}
.disposed(by: disposeBag)
You can dequeue whatever cell you want based on the index of the row or type of the data, just like the way we did in DataSource
You need to import RxDataSources in case you want different cell type.
// TableView Cell Nib Register
tableView.register(R.nib.meChatCell)
tableView.register(R.nib.otherChatCell)
vm.output.chats
.bind(to: tableView.rx.items){(tv, row, item) -> UITableViewCell in
if item.userId == 0 {
let cellIdentifier = R.reuseIdentifier.meChatCell.identifier
let cell = tv.dequeueReusableCell(withIdentifier: cellIdentifier, for: IndexPath.init(row: row, section: 0)) as! MeChatCell
cell.vm = item
return cell
} else {
let cellIdentifier = R.reuseIdentifier.otherChatCell.identifier
let cell = tv.dequeueReusableCell(withIdentifier: cellIdentifier, for: IndexPath.init(row: row, section: 0)) as! OtherChatCell
cell.vm = item
return cell
}
}.disposed(by: disposeBag)
}
Related
I new in kotlin , i want to update an item in lists.
I use this code:
var index: Int
for (record in recordList)
if (record.id == updatedHeader?.id) {
index = recordList.indexOf(record)
recordList.add(index, updatedHeader)
}
but it cant do this, because of ConcurrentModificationException
Assuming that recordList is a MutableList and val (so, you'd like to modify the records in place), you can use forEachIndexed to find the records you care about and replace them.
This did not cause a ConcurrentModificationException:
recordList.forEachIndexed { index, record ->
if(record.id == updatedHeader?.id) recordList[index] = updatedHeader
}
On the other hand, if you redefine recordList as a non-mutable list, and a var, you could rewrite the entire list using map:
recordList = recordList.map { if(it.id == updatedHeader?.id) updatedHeader else it }
Of course, you could call .toMutableList() on the end of that if you wanted to turn your List into a MutableList.
If there's a single record with the given id in the list, you can find its index and add the header at that index:
val index = recordList.indexOfFirst { it.id == updatedHeader.id }
if (index >= 0)
recordList.add(index, updatedHeader)
If there are multiple records with the given id and you want to prepend header before each of them, you can use get listIterator and use its methods to modify the list during the iteration without getting ConcurrentModificationException:
val iterator = recordList.listIterator()
for (record in iterator) {
if (record.id == updatedHeader.id) {
iterator.previous() // move to the position before the record
iterator.add(updatedHeader) // prepend header
iterator.next() // move next, back to the record
}
}
I have a list of items, and one of item copies is changed by user, how do I find it in my collection by Id and update, or if it's not found I'd like to add the item? my best guess is, but it requires ugly indexOf(v)
fun updateOrInsert(note : UserNote) {
val list = notes.value!!
val v = list.firstOrNull{(Id) -> Id ==note.Id}
if (v==null) {
list.add(note)
} else {
val i = list.indexOf(v)
list[i] = note
}
notes.value = list
}
Use indexOfFirst to find the index of the first element with the given ID. If -1, add the item to the list, otherwise, change the value at the found index.
I am using a UICollectionView with a Flow Layout and trying to get the collectionView to size the cells appropriately according to AutoLayout constraints.
While the cells work as intended, I am running in to issues with the layout of any supplementary views that I add to the CollectionView.
Specifically, the supplementaryView will be in the wrong position (i.e., the y origin is incorrect) on initial layout, before 'correcting' itself after I scroll.
For reference, here is how I am configuring my cell sizing:
1. Set the collectionViewLayout's estimated item size
let collectionView: UICollectionView = {
let layout = UICollectionViewFlowLayout()
layout.estimatedItemSize = CGSizeMake(375, 50.0)
layout.minimumInteritemSpacing = 0.0
layout.minimumLineSpacing = 0.0
let view = UICollectionView(frame: CGRectZero, collectionViewLayout: layout)
view.backgroundColor = UIColor.whiteColor()
view.alwaysBounceVertical = true
return view
}()
2. Use subclasses of AutoLayoutCollectionViewCell
class AutoLayoutCollectionViewCell: UICollectionViewCell {
override func preferredLayoutAttributesFittingAttributes(layoutAttributes: UICollectionViewLayoutAttributes) -> UICollectionViewLayoutAttributes {
layoutIfNeeded()
layoutAttributes.bounds.size.height = systemLayoutSizeFittingSize(UILayoutFittingCompressedSize).height
return layoutAttributes
}
}
Note that at this point, everything works as intended.
The next step is where we fail.
3. Provide a reference size for a header
func collectionView(collectionView: UICollectionView, layout collectionViewLayout: UICollectionViewLayout, referenceSizeForHeaderInSection section: Int) -> CGSize {
return CGSizeMake(CGRectGetWidth(collectionView.frame), 30.0)
}
My question is: Why does this happen? How can I get this to correct? How am I supposed to handle supplementary views within a collectionView that self-sizes its cells??
I had the same problem, what solved it for me was to subclass UICollectionViewFlowLayout and override the following function:
override func invalidationContext(forPreferredLayoutAttributes preferredAttributes: UICollectionViewLayoutAttributes, withOriginalAttributes originalAttributes: UICollectionViewLayoutAttributes) -> UICollectionViewLayoutInvalidationContext {
let context = super.invalidationContext(forPreferredLayoutAttributes: preferredAttributes, withOriginalAttributes: originalAttributes)
context.invalidateSupplementaryElements(ofKind: UICollectionElementKindSectionHeader,
at: [originalAttributes.indexPath])
return context
}
I have a problem, i want to return the selected Rows values, and the columns separately, i found a method to return both of them using the function cell(row, column), but i want to get them separately
Here is my code :
QTableWidgetItem *c = new QTableWidgetItem();
QMap<QString,int> lists;
for(i=0;i<range.rowCount();++i){
for(int j=0;j<range.columnCount();++j){
c=item(i,j);// here i can return the Rows, Columns Data
QMessageBox::information(this,"",c->text());
}
}
As you can see this code is working, but i just want to return the Rows and the Columns separately so i can put them in my QMap<QString,int> list.
And the purpose of all this is to try to draw a piechart from the selected rows and columns
So Any help please
Here is what I understood from the comments, feel free to correct me and I'll update my answer if necessary.
COL1 | COL2
NAME | VALUE
So when you select a cell, you actually care about the whole row, a.k.a the name of the row and the value associated. If this is the case, it would make more sense to only allow the user to select whole rows, instead of cells. setSelectionBehavior(QAbstractItemView::SelectRows); should do the trick.
Provided that the name of the dataset is always in column 1, and the value in column 2, you should update your code with the snippet:
QTableWidgetItem *c; //Deleted memory leak in your code.
QMap<QString,double> myMap; //Don't name it a list if it is explicitly a map.
for(i=0;i<range.rowCount();++i){
QString dataName = item(i,0)->text();
int dataValue;
for(int j=1;j<range.columnCount();++j){
c=item(i,j);// here i can return the Rows, Columns Data
dataValue += c->text().toDouble();
//If you always have 2 columns only, dataValue will be the value you are looking for.
//If you can have more than 2 columns, dataValue will be the sum of all the cells located after the column 0, on the same row.
//Change this depending on how you want to treat those values.
QMessageBox::information(this,dataName,c->text());
}
myMap[dataName]=dataValue;
}
EDIT for QPieSeries, following this example:
QPieSeries *series = new QPieSeries();
QMap<QString,double>::iterator it = myMap.begin();
QMap<QString,double>::iterator end = myMap.end();
for(; it!=end; ++it){
series->append(it->key(), it->value());
}
QPieSlice *slice = series->slices().at(1);
slice->setExploded();
slice->setLabelVisible();
slice->setPen(QPen(Qt::darkGreen, 2));
slice->setBrush(Qt::green);
QChart *chart = new QChart();
chart->addSeries(series);
chart->setTitle("My Data");
chart->legend()->hide();
QChartView *chartView = new QChartView(chart);
chartView->setRenderHint(QPainter::Antialiasing);
/*change with your window here*/
yourWindow.setCentralWidget(chartView);
I have a treeTable with editable cells within the expanded rows. The editable cells get a dirty flag after editing (in the example the background color is set to red).
The problem i'm running into is that i found no certain way to update the dirty flag on expand/collapse (edited cells get the css class 'edited-cell').
At the moment the code looks like that:
// each editable textfield gets a Listener
textField.attachLiveChange(
var source = oEvent.oSource;
...
jQuery('#' + source.getId()).addClass(EDITED_CELL_CLASS, false)
// list with cell ids, e.g. "__field1-col1-row1"
DIRTY_MODELS.push(model.getId()) //*** add also binding context of row
)
// the table rows are updated on toggleOpenState
new sap.ui.table.TreeTable({
toggleOpenState: function(oEvent) {
...
this.updateRows() // see function below
}
})
// update Rows function is also delegated
oTable.addDelegate({ onAfterRendering : jQuery.proxy(this.updateRows, oTable)});
//http://stackoverflow.com/questions/23683627/access-row-for-styling-in-sap-ui5-template-handler-using-jquery
// this method is called on each expand/collapse: here i can make sure that the whole row has it's correct styling...
// but how to make sure that special cells are dirty?
function updateRows(oEvent) {
if (oEvent.type !== 'AfterRendering'){
this.onvscroll(oEvent);
}
var rows = this.getVisibleRowCount();
var rowStart = this.getFirstVisibleRow();
var actualRow;
for (var i = 0; i < rows; i++){
actualRow = this.getContextByIndex(rowStart + i); //content
var row = this.getRows()[i]
var obj = actualRow.getObject()
var rowId = row.getId()
updateStyleOfRows(obj, rowId, actualRow)
updateDirtyCells(rowId) //*** how to get the binding context in this function???
}
};
// update Dirty Cells in function updateRows():
function updateDirtyCells(rowId){
for (var i = 0; i < DIRTY_MODELS.length; i++){
var dirtyCellId = DIRTY_MODELS[i]
//*** make sure that only the correct expanded/collapsed rows will be updated -> depends on the bindingContext of the row
jQuery('#' + rowId).find('#' + dirtyCellId + '.editable-cell').addClass(EDITED_CELL_CLASS, false)
}
}
This doesn't work correctly, because the ids of the cells change on each layout render (e.g. collapse/expand rows). Please see attached image.
Let me know if i should provide more information.