As you probably guessed this question is not about a programming language but about arduino.
I'm making a big project which includes a GSM SIM900A module but it draws too much power.
I've looked up the datasheet but I didn't understand a lot as it references a DTR pin, something my module doesn't have.
Can someone tell me how to put it to sleep mode?
Any help will be grately appreciated!
Thanks in advance!
The GSM standard AT command for the setting of modem's level of functionality is AT+CFUN.
According to SIM900 AT commands guide its syntax is
AT+CFUN=fun[,rst]
Where:
fun: is the power saving mode
rst: is the reset flag
There are several possible values of fun parameter that can be supported or not depending on the modem vendor.
In order to reduce power consumption, SIM900A offers two possibilities:
AT+CFUN=0, means that the device is in sleep mode, and the AT interface is not accessible. Usually it keeps its network paging activities and its registration status to the network (it's not really clear from SIM900 guide). The device is woken up as soon as a wake up event occurs (for example an incoming SMS). Test it on your device.
AT+CFUN=4, that disable both TX and RX RF circuits. The AT interface remains reachable.
Usually first solution results in a bigger reduction of power consumption, but I suggest trying both of them in your specific board in order to understand what is the better choice for you.
Related
I have developed a card with sim900 and ATmel, and it works very well, but when I changed sim900 for sim800 it did not recognize the sim card.
Difference in hardware design?
SIM800,SIM800C modem operates from 3.4V to 4.4V supply range (Reduced operating range !)
SIM900, SIM900A modules operate from 3.2V to 4.8V supply range.
SIM800 is having a Pin to connect with Bluetooth Antenna
Apart from these differences the hardware design is almost similar. The same hardware circuit can be used for the SIM IC if the generated supply is within 3.4V to 4.4V for both types..
I faced this issue before. I tried to contact SIMCOM but I didn't get any response.
My solution was to give to the modem a few seconds more time to boot, before I sent any commands to it.
Even if you get an ERROR as a response when you check for the SIM card you can insist on polling the same command until a predefined timeout time.
Also, note that not all of SIM800 have a Bluetooth feature.
Which country are you currently located? SIM900A works with Dual-Band 900/ 1800 MHz. I believe it was designed for US band while SIM800C is Quad-band 850/900/1800/1900MHz and may operate world wide.
Find out the bands used by your mobile service provider and use module compatible with the band.
I'm desperately trying to set up the SIM800C controller, but to no avail.
It seems I cannot register on any network. The AT+COPS=? comaand returns:
AT+COPS:",(0-4),(0-2)
I'm trying to figure out what the " means in that return as it's not defined in the documentation?
For those with more experience with this device: Is there anything obvious I may have missed during startup? I have set the baud rate and currently I'm simply powering up the device and setting different frequency bands to test. I worry that there may be some other commands required to get the device in a normal operating mode.
I unfortunately don't have time to work through all the documentation so I thought I would try some experienced folk out there. Any help would be appreciated!
I unscrewed the antenna and noticed that both the antenna connector as well as the connector it screws into on the PCB was female. The antenna therefore didn't make contact.
I found a pin, forced a gender swap and the Sim800 registered on the network!
I've been trying to establish serial (UART) communication between a Raspberry Pi Model B Revision 2.0 (checked the model like described on this page) and Arduino Mega 2560. I made a service on the Pi that writes to UART and then expects a message and a coworker programmed the Arduino with an echo program. While they were communicating, I had trouble receiving data, meaning that it was clustered in 8 byte pieces and I had to introduce a timeout for waiting between them (I was actually as much as available and calling select()for the next cluster but it turned to be 8bytes a cluster, except for maybe the last one. As explained in a question I found on this site, the programmer is the one to take care of the protocol and can not rely that the whole message will be ready to read at once (that is logical).
However, when I just connected Pi's TXD and RXD pins, no matter how much bytes I tried sending, it sends them in one go (I've gone up to a bit more than 256, that's more than enough for my purposes). I also have around 50 milliseconds of duration difference, measured directly from within the program, using gettimeofday() function.
So, could anybody clear things for me:
Why is this happening?
Is this difference in behaviour expected?
Is there a potential problem in either of the devices (if that can even be concluded from the given information).
Of course, any additional information is welcome, in case I forgot asking something that is deemed important.
Why is this happening?
I tried some time back communicating Arduino-Arduino and Arduino-Pi. I faced some problems with UART communication. However, you might want to keep same Baud rate on both the devices. With Pi, you might need to trigger an event if you receive data from Arduino. On the other side, if you code runs longer, then you might lose some data i.e. your Arduino code is running something else while Pi sends data over UART.
Is this difference in behaviour expected?
Yes. Arduino is a microcontroller based device while Pi is microprocessor based (runs on OS)
Is there a potential problem in either of the devices (if that can even be concluded from the given information).
I don't think there could be any hardware problem unless it is not functioning at all.
Also, because of this issues, I switched from UART communication to SPI communication. This solved my problem completely.
I am using 2 esp8266 wireless modules to establish bidirectional wireless communication between 2 arduino boards (one mega and one uno) without the use of any earth based technologies (i.e. radio frequencies, wifi which relies on earth sattelites, etc.). My solution was to use the esp8266 to establish a private area network with both esp's acting as a station and an access point (AT+CIPMODE=3). Unfortunately, this solution has proven to be more of a hassle than it was worth.
To start, I have the esp's each wired according to this diagram
When I first started out, the red LED was on and the blue LED was off. During this time, I was able to send AT commands, establish the server, and achieve the communication I required by entering commands directly to the serial monitor. After this, I started writing a library using the SoftwareSerial library to allow me to issue commands directly through the program to set up the esp as needed upon start up of my script. Before doing this, I changed the baudrate to make sure it was running at 9600, and entered the AT commands in the serial monitor to make sure everything was working properly and it still worked.
After I began writing the library, before uploading the code with a test of the library I noticed the blue LED was lit solid now. Noticing this, I reuploaded the barebones script (I haven't uploaded the library code to the arduino yet) and the esp was no longer receiving the AT commands.
Does this indicate an issue with the board which I can fix or does this mean the board is done?
With my deadlines approaching fast in about 3 weeks it is crucial I get this wireless communication working so if this is an issue with the board, I'm going to have to scrap the esp's and use a different way of communicating. So my second question is, if this is the case, what are other viable options for establishing this communication? I have used xbee's before and while that would be ideal, they fall out of the budget I have been alotted so I need to keep it under $50 for this. If bidirectional communication is not possible for that price I can live with one way because I just need to get this system working. Basically I just need to transmit a single byte of data.
I realize this response is a little belated, and I hope you got it sorted: I've started working with the ESP8266 myself in the last few weeks, and hence why I was looking around for tutorials on direct communication between 2 units, when I found your post.
From what I've been able to ascertain, the AT commands are a part of the 'firmware' which ships with some modules. The Arduino code however starts loading onto the chips at memory address 0x0000, which is the same address that the firmware update tools use.
In other words, I believe that with the Arduino-coded program running on there, you lose the AT command functionality.
If you find a firmware update tool for the ESP8266 (plenty online) you'll get back the AT commands.
I suppose though the real question is why would you want to? It seems that the AT commands are just a way to treat the ESP as a dumb WiFi antenna. With the Arduino code, you're actually treating it as a micro-controller in its own right.
I am trying to use GPRS functionality of the GSM/GPRS modem for sending data to the remote server but i am unable to do so.I had posted a question on Arduino Forum but didn't get any reply.Here is the link for the question.
Well my Main concern is i) I am using a GPRS/GSM Modem and i am not sure about the Power requirements of the Modem.At present i am using a 9V and 1 amp supply but the network LED on the modem is dignifying that Modem is not getting the network. So can this be because of the insufficient supply to the modem?
I very much doubt it's a power thing. Although I have limited experience with Arduino boards.
You can verify that the general GSM stuff is working by executing AT+CREG commands to check if it is connected to the mobile operator.
If you need more detailed help then I think it makes sense for you to post what AT commands are being sent to the modem. And what the modem on the firmware/software side is saying.
Below some information about dealing with GPRS and AT Commands (aka GSM stuff).
With GSM modems there are commonly three ways of getting GPRS and executing AT commands (GSM) simultaneously.
1) Inline multiplexing
As far as I am aware you can switch contexts within the AT command console. This is a little challenging when it comes to writing code. I would advise against this.
2) Mulitplexing over a single serial interface
This is done via drivers that support the GSM 27.010 specification. Some manufacturers provide MUX drivers for this purpose.
The standard command is AT+CMUX. I strongly suggest taking a look at the modem reference manual to find out exactly how to execute this command. You can get a rather information also via AT commands. By executing AT+CMUX=? to see what parameters are expected.
Effectively then you would have two serial connections open to the same serial port. One for GPRS and one for AT Commands.
Negative impact is that the performance (speed of command execution) is significantly reduced depending on how the hardware copes with it.
3) Multiplexing over multiple serial interfaces
The GSM modems that I know of provide multiple serial interfaces (UART). Therefore one can be used for executing standard AT commands. And another can be used for GPRS communications.
I'm not entirely sure if this is possible with the SIM900A. There you would have to look at the hardware information.