I am working in an Ember.js app and currently trying to connect to firebase (is not my default adapter, the default is a Rest adapter). I followed the instructions given in https://github.com/firebase/emberfire but when I try to read data from the database I get:
Error while processing route: my.routingFile firebase.app is not a function getApp
In brief, this is my routing file:
import AuthenticatedRouteMixin from 'ember-simple-auth/mixins/authenticated-route-mixin';
import RouteMixin from 'ember-cli-pagination/remote/route-mixin';
import Ember from 'ember';
import RealtimeRouteMixin from 'emberfire/mixins/realtime-route';
export default Ember.Route.extend(AuthenticatedRouteMixin,RouteMixin, RealtimeRouteMixin, {
firebaseApp: Ember.inject.service(),
model(params) {
return this.store.findAll('myModel');
},
setupController(){
this._super(...arguments);
},
actions:{
}
});
And, my adapter is defined as follows:
import RealtimeDatabaseAdapter from 'emberfire/adapters/realtime-database';
export default RealtimeDatabaseAdapter.extend({
databaseURL: 'https://my-url.firebaseio.com/'
});
My ember-cli version is: 3.0.2
Then, what am I missing?
I'm surprised that it's not working. Your code looks fine to me. Did you define the environment variables for Firebase in config/environment.js?
Related
I'm trying to migrate a Next.js project running on Vercel from
"pino-datadog": "2.0.2",
"pino-multi-stream": "6.0.0",
to
"pino": "8.4.2",
"pino-datadog-transport": "1.2.2",
and I copy the setup from the pino-datadog-transport's README.md:
import { LoggerOptions, pino } from 'pino'
const pinoConf: LoggerOptions = {
level: 'trace',
}
const logger = pino(
pinoConf,
pino.transport({
target: 'pino-datadog-transport',
options: {
ddClientConf: {
authMethods: {
apiKeyAuth: process.env.DATADOG_API_KEY,
},
},
ddServerConf: {
site: 'datadoghq.eu',
},
service: process.env.VERCEL_URL
ddsource: 'nodejs',
},
}),
)
and this seems to be working fine locally, but when I publish it on Vercel and run it there I get the following error:
ERROR Error: unable to determine transport target for "pino-datadog-transport"
at fixTarget (/var/task/node_modules/pino/lib/transport.js:136:13)
at Function.transport (/var/task/node_modules/pino/lib/transport.js:110:22)
Am I missing some additional config to get this working? Anyone else running this setup or something similar to get explicit logs working on Vercel with Next.js?
I have enabled the Datadog integration in Vercel as well, but that only forwards Next.js logs, not explicit console.logs or standard Pino logs from what I can tell.
The solution to this problem is to import even though nothing in the import is actually used in the code.
It seems Next.js strips away all code that isn't imported when the code is deployed.
So, adding
import 'pino-datadog-transport'
at the top of the file solves the problem.
Tried this link and created my first store in Quasar using Pinia, I also needed to change the .quasar/app.js manually to add the Pinia store and to make Pinia functional.
import { Quasar } from 'quasar'
import { markRaw } from 'vue'
import RootComponent from 'app/src/App.vue'
import createStore from 'app/src/stores/index'
import createRouter from 'app/src/router/index'
export default async function (createAppFn, quasarUserOptions) {
// Create the app instance.
// Here we inject into it the Quasar UI, the router & possibly the store.
const app = createAppFn(RootComponent)
app.config.devtools = true
app.use(Quasar, quasarUserOptions)
const store = typeof createStore === 'function'
? await createStore({})
: createStore
app.use(store)
const router = markRaw(
typeof createRouter === 'function'
? await createRouter({store})
: createRouter
)
// make router instance available in store
store.use(({ store }) => { store.router = router })
// Expose the app, the router and the store.
// Note that we are not mounting the app here, since bootstrapping will be
// different depending on whether we are in a browser or on the server.
return {
app,
store,
router
}
}
But the problem is .quasar/app.js is re-written with default contents as soon as quasar dev is executed and again I don't have access to the Pinia stores anymore.
As I said this application was based on vuex formerly.
Make sure you have the index file for pinia.
In "src/stores/index.js"
import { store } from 'quasar/wrappers'
import { createPinia } from 'pinia'
/*
* If not building with SSR mode, you can
* directly export the Store instantiation;
*
* The function below can be async too; either use
* async/await or return a Promise which resolves
* with the Store instance.
*/
export default store((/* { ssrContext } */) => {
const pinia = createPinia()
// You can add Pinia plugins here
// pinia.use(SomePiniaPlugin)
return pinia
})
Try checking quasar info
quasar info
Notice #quasar/app-webpack and vuex.
If you are using #quasar/app, try to move to #quasar/app-webpack by upgrading quasar.
quasar upgrade -i
If you have vuex installed in your quasar info output, try to remove it.
npm uninstall vuex
In your package-lock.json, look for "node_modules/vuex" and delete the key and value.
Then delete your "node_modules" folder and run npm i
After that, run quasar clean.
You may try creating a Pinia store via quasar command to validate it.
quasar new store <store_name>
It should generate a pinia store instead of vuex store.
Problem is older version of #quasar/app-webpack package. It got support for Pinia since v3.4.0. Check release notes here. So basically upgrade this package.
Run quasar upgrade -i and then quasar new store <store_name> [--format ts]
It will create a stores/ directory with pinia.
In my case i didn't need to edit any special files, simply replace the index.js in the stores folder. To get quasar CLI to then use pinia when running quasar new store I had to use quasar clean and just like that I had fully transitioned.
My solution was to remove and reinstall node_modules
My Main goal is to create an Electron App (Windows) that locally stores data in an SQLite Database. And because of type safety I choose to use the Prisma framework instead of other SQLite Frameworks.
I took this Electron Sample Project and now try to include Prisma. Depending on what I try different problems do arrise.
1. PrismaClient is unable to be run in the Browser
I executed npx prisma generate and then try to execute this function via a button:
import { PrismaClient } from '#prisma/client';
onSqlTestAction(): void {
const prisma = new PrismaClient();
const newTestObject = prisma.testTable.create(
{
data: {
value: "TestValue"
}
}
);
}
When executing this in Electron I get this:
core.js:6456 ERROR Error: PrismaClient is unable to be run in the browser.
In case this error is unexpected for you, please report it in https://github.com/prisma/prisma/issues
at new PrismaClient (index-browser.js:93)
at HomeComponent.onSqlTestAction (home.component.ts:19)
at HomeComponent_Template_button_click_7_listener (template.html:7)
at executeListenerWithErrorHandling (core.js:15281)
at wrapListenerIn_markDirtyAndPreventDefault (core.js:15319)
at HTMLButtonElement.<anonymous> (platform-browser.js:568)
at ZoneDelegate.invokeTask (zone.js:406)
at Object.onInvokeTask (core.js:28666)
at ZoneDelegate.invokeTask (zone.js:405)
at Zone.runTask (zone.js:178)
It somehow seems logical that Prisma cannot run in a browser. But I actually build a native app - with Electron that embeds a Browser. It seems to be a loophole.
2. BREAKING CHANGE: webpack < 5 used to include polyfills
So i found this Question: How to use Prisma with Electron
Seemed to be exactly what I looked for. But the error message is different (Debian binaries were not found).
The solution provided is to generate the prisma artifacts into the src folder instead of node_modules - and this leads to 19 polyfills errors. One for example:
./src/database/generated/index.js:20:11-26 - Error: Module not found: Error: Can't resolve 'path' in '[PATH_TO_MY_PROJECT]\src\database\generated'
BREAKING CHANGE: webpack < 5 used to include polyfills for node.js core modules by default.
This is no longer the case. Verify if you need this module and configure a polyfill for it.
If you want to include a polyfill, you need to:
- add a fallback 'resolve.fallback: { "path": require.resolve("path-browserify") }'
- install 'path-browserify'
If you don't want to include a polyfill, you can use an empty module like this:
resolve.fallback: { "path": false }
And this repeats with 18 other modules. Since the error message to begin with was different I also doubt that this is the way to go.
I finally figured this out. What I needed to understand was, that all Electron apps consist of 2 parts: The Frontend Webapp (running in embedded Chromium) and a Node backend server. Those 2 parts are called IPC Main and IPC Renderer and they can communicate with each other. And since Prisma can only run on the main process which is the backend I had to send my SQL actions to the Electron backend and execute them there.
My minimal example
In the frontend (I use Angular)
// This refers to the node_modules folder of the Electron Backend, the folder where the main.ts file is located.
// I just use this import so that I can use the prisma generated classes for type safety.
import { TestTable } from '../../../app/node_modules/.prisma/client';
// Button action
onSqlTestAction(): void {
this.electronService.ipcRenderer.invoke("prisma-channel", 'Test input').then((value) => {
const testObject: TestTable = JSON.parse(value);
console.log(testObject);
});
The sample project I used already had this service to provide the IPC Renderer:
#Injectable({
providedIn: 'root'
})
export class ElectronService {
ipcRenderer: typeof ipcRenderer;
webFrame: typeof webFrame;
remote: typeof remote;
childProcess: typeof childProcess;
fs: typeof fs;
get isElectron(): boolean {
return !!(window && window.process && window.process.type);
}
constructor() {
// Conditional imports
if (this.isElectron) {
this.ipcRenderer = window.require('electron').ipcRenderer;
this.webFrame = window.require('electron').webFrame;
this.childProcess = window.require('child_process');
this.fs = window.require('fs');
// If you want to use a NodeJS 3rd party deps in Renderer process (like #electron/remote),
// it must be declared in dependencies of both package.json (in root and app folders)
// If you want to use remote object in renderer process, please set enableRemoteModule to true in main.ts
this.remote = window.require('#electron/remote');
}
}
And then in the Electron backend I first added "#prisma/client": "^3.0.1" to the package.json (for the Electron backend not the frontend). Then I added to the main.ts this function to handle the requests from the renderer:
// main.ts
ipcMain.handle("prisma-channel", async (event, args) => {
const prisma = new PrismaClient();
await prisma.testTable.create(
{
data: {
value: args
}
}
);
const readValue = await prisma.testTable.findMany();
return JSON.stringify(readValue);
})
This way of simply adding the IPC Main handler in the main.ts file of course is a big code smell but usefull as minimal example. I think I will move on with the achitecture concept presented in this article.
Good day developers! I'm working with Meteor.js it's my 1st expirience
I created collection in file
// ./dbs/messages.js
import { Mongo } from 'meteor/mongo';
import { Meteor } from 'meteor/meteor';
import { check } from 'meteor/check';
export const Messages = new Mongo.Collection('messages');
and use it in api point with calling Messages.insert like that
// server/mail.js
import Messages from './dbs/messages.js';
Meteor.methods({
'message.post'(messageText, location){
Messages.insert({
messageText: messageText,
location: location
});
}
})
But when I call 'message.post' I get an error
Exception while invoking method 'message.post' TypeError
Messages.insert is not a function
BUT, when I comment collection import and declare it in server/main.js like that
// import Messages from './dbs/messages.js';
const Messages = new Mongo.Collection('messages');
Meteor.methods({
'message.post'(messageText, location){
Messages.insert({
messageText: messageText,
location: location
});
}
});
In this case my Messages.insert works properly.
Who has experience with Meteor - can you explain me what is the reason?
Thanks!
Also I have removed autopublish and insecure packages
As #MasterAM and #Ankur Soni said you need to import Messages using brackets import { Messages } from './dbs/messages.js';
The only way to import without brackets is by defining Messages and then exporting it like so export default Messages;
I initiate my collections in a "common" space. I feel what you did is actually right. You either declare the collection twice, once on the client side and once on the server side or do it only once in a common folder. I see in many documentations that the popular place to keep these declarations is the /imports/api ... which is common to both server and client.
Rgs,
Paul
I'm using AngularFire2 (2.0.0-beta.2) incombination with angular2 (2.0.0-rc.4). I'd like to get access to the native firebase object (not the AngularFire root object) from Angularfire2.
Within my component, I want to make calls like:
firebase.auth().currentUser.updateEmail("user#example.com")
where firebase is the native firebase object, like that you get from the fragment below:
<script src="https://www.gstatic.com/firebasejs/3.1.0/firebase.js"></script>
<script>
// Initialize Firebase
// TODO: Replace with your project's customized code snippet
var config = {
apiKey: "apiKey",
authDomain: "projectId.firebaseapp.com",
databaseURL: "https://databaseName.firebaseio.com",
storageBucket: "bucket.appspot.com",
};
firebase.initializeApp(config);
</script>
But I don't understand how to setup my angular2 component so that the firebase object is visible within it. Probably a very simple problem to solve, but I don't know how to solve -- I'm not an angular2 expert. I was hoping there would be and AngularFire api to get the object, but there is not.
Also, the reason that I'm trying to do this is that I don't think the angularfire2 api's are complete yet (thats understandable as its still in beta) and I'm trying to work around this. For example I want to update the users email address or password, or send them the forgotten password email. None of this functionality seems to exist yet in AngularFire2, so I'm trying to implement using the native Firebase object.
If you're reading this in September 2016 onwards, this approach might sound good to you.
See the code for superior understanding:
import { Component, Inject } from '#angular/core';
import { AngularFire, FirebaseApp } from 'angularfire2';
#Component({
templateUrl: 'app/auth/resetpassword.component.html'
})
export class ResetpassComponent {
public auth: any;
constructor(private af: AngularFire, #Inject(FirebaseApp) firebaseApp: any) {
this.auth = firebaseApp.auth()
console.log(this.auth);
}
// formData.value.email = 'your#email.com';
onSubmit(formData) {
if(formData.valid) {
console.log('Sending email verification');
this.auth.sendPasswordResetEmail(formData.value.email)
.then( (response) => {
console.log('Sent successfully');
})
.catch( (error) => {
console.log(error);
})
}
}
}
In English:
Import Inject and FirebaseApp
Make available in your component
Start using all the native javascript SDK functions and methods, such as sendPasswordResetEmail()
Doing a auth. doesn't autocomplete with the available methods and functions, so you might need the docs close to you, such as this: https://firebase.google.com/docs/auth/web/manage-users
Any thanks? Give to #cartant : https://stackoverflow.com/a/39069813/1757321
I'm going to try and answer my own question. Let me first say that I'm sure my answer is not the most elegant solution, I'm not yet a javascript/typescript/angular expert. But my answer does work -- even if I don't completely understand.
I used angular-cli to setup my project which is based on angular2 and the latest firebase. Apparently when you use this to setup your project there is a global object created with the name "firebase" in existence. One way to make it visible within your angular 2 component is to put this declaration at the global level in you component (right after the import statements and before your class declaration).
declare var firebase : any;
After you do this the global firebase object is available for use in your component.
RanchoSoftware's solution did not work for me, i used
import {AngularFireModule} from "angularfire2";
import *as firebase from 'firebase';
within the imports in the app.module.ts file
found here:
https://github.com/angular/angularfire2/issues/445