I have just started to use Facebook's Prophet library in R, I have a question regarding the dyplot.prophet graphing function. I have created a plot using this code:
dyplot.prophet(m,forecast,uncertainty=TRUE)
This works fine, but the resulting graph has no x or y axis labels or a main title, I would like to add some to the plot.
The documentation describes the following
dyplot.prophet(x, fcst, uncertainty = TRUE, ...)
Where:
x is the Prophet object,
fcast is the data frame returned by predict(m, df), and
uncertainty is the Boolean indicating if the uncertainty interval for yhat is to be plotted. There are then … indicating additional arguments, I would like to know what these arguments are, and if any of them relate to plot titles or axis legends. Can anyone assist?
It's now possible to add titles.
dyplot.prophet(m,forecast,main="Graph")
Related
I have run cluster analysis on some time series data using permuco in R. (Permutes the labels of control/treatment conditions and calculates the F statistic as to how likely it is that these time clusters of significant differences occurred by chance.)
So far so good.
I have produced a number of plots using the inbuilt function plot.clusterlm that comes with this package. However, the data come from different groups, and the F values on the y axis get rescaled in each plot, i.e. the values and ticks are reset depending on how strong the effects are.
This is problematic, because the different plots based on different cluster analyses are not visually comparable.
I would like to rescale the y axis, so that all clusters are visualised along the same F values (0-10 for example).
I haven't been able to do that, and I was wondering if there is a way to pass any additional functions into the plot.clusterlm to do this.
This is the usage of the function, but I don't see a way to rescale the y axis. (Although rescaling the x axis is possible by manipulating the nbbaselinepts & nbptsperunit, but that's not what I want...)
plot(x, effect = "all", type = "statistic",
multcomp = "clustermass", alternative = "two.sided",
enhanced_stat = FALSE, nbbaselinepts = 0, nbptsperunit = 1, ...)
If you have any ideas on this, please let me know.
Thank you!
Thanks for using permuco! I opened an issue on GitHub to have a solution for implementing these features. You can expect changes in further releases of permuco.
However, the plot() method shows the F statistic which is not a good measure of effect size. A better measure of effect size is the partial-eta square which is implemented in the afex package
In the base R plotting device axes are altered like this:
x<-1:10; y=x*x
# Simple graph
plot(x, y)
# Enlarge the scale
plot(x, y, xlim=c(1,15), ylim=c(1,150))
# Log scale
plot(x, y, log="y")
This is an example from STHDA where you can find many helpful tutorials.
I've long puzzled over a concise way to communicate significance of an interaction between numeric and categorical variables in a line plot (response on the Y-axis, numeric predictor variable on the X-axis, and each level of the categoric variable a line of a different color or pattern plotted on those axes). I finally came up with the idea of drawing the traditional "brackets and p-values" connecting legend keys instead of lines of data.
Here is a mockup of what I mean:
library(ggplot2);
mydat <- do.call(rbind,lapply(1:3,function(ii) data.frame(
y=seq(0,10)*c(.695,.78,1.39)[ii]+c(.322,.663,.847)[ii],
a=factor(ii-1),b=0:10)));
myplot <- ggplot(data=mydat,aes(x=b,y=y,colour=a,group=a)) +
geom_line()+theme(legend.position=c(.1,.9));
# Plotting with p-value bracket:
myplot +
# The three line segments making up the bracket
geom_segment(x=1.2,xend=1.2,y=13.8,yend=13) +
geom_segment(x=1.1,xend=1.2,y=13,yend=13) +
geom_segment(x=1.1,xend=1.2,y=13.8,yend=13.8) +
# The text accompanying the bracket.
geom_text(label='p < 0.001',x=2,y=13.4);
This is less cluttered than trying to plot brackets someplace on the line-plot itself.
The problem is that the x and y values for the geom_segments and geom_text were obtained by trial and error and for another dataset these coordinates would be completely wrong. That's a problem if I'm trying to write a function whose purpose is to automate the process of pulling these contrasts out of models and plotting them (kind of like the effects package, but with more flexibility about how to represent the data).
My question is: is there a way to somehow pull the actual coordinates of each box comprising the legend and convert them to the scale used by geom_segment and geom_text, or manually specify the coordinates of each box when creating the myplot object, or reliably predict where the individual boxes will be and convert them to the plot's scale given that myplot$theme$legend.position returns 0.1 0.9?
I'd like to do this within ggplot2, because it's robust, elegant, and perfect for all the other things I want to do with my script. I'm open to using additional packages that extend ggplot2 and I'm also open to other approaches to visually indicating significance level on line-plots. However, suggestions that amount to "you shouldn't even do that" are not constructive-- because whether or not I personally agree with you, my collaborators and their editors don't read Stackoverflow (unfortunately).
Update:
This question kind of simplifies to: if the myplot$theme$legend.key.height is in lines and myplot$theme$legend.position seems to be roughly in fractions of the overall plot area (but not exactly) how can I convert these to the units in which the x and y axes are delineated, or alternatively, convert the x and y axis scales to the units of legend.key.height and legend.position?
I don't know the answer to your question as posed. But, another, definitely quickly do-able if less fancy approach to convey the information is to change the names of the levels so that the level names include significance codes. In your first example, you could use
levels(mydat$a) <- list("0" = "0", "1 *" = "1", "2 *" = "2")
And then the legend will reflect this:
With more levels and combos of significance, you could probably work out a set of symbols. Then mention in your figure legend the p level reflected in each set of symbols.
This might be a related way to convey the information: The figure below is produced by rxnNorm in HandyStuff here. Unfortunately, this is another non-answer as I have not been able to make this work with the new version of ggplot2. Hopefully I can figure it out soon.
My answer is not using ggplot2, but the lattice package. I think dotplot is what I would use if I want to compare a continuous variable versus categorical variables.
Here I use dotplot in 2 manners, one where I reproduce your plot, and another where
library(lattice)
library(latticeExtra) ## to get ggplot2 theme
#y versus levels of B, in different panel of A
p1 <- dotplot(b~y|a ,
data = mydat,
groups = a,
type = c("p", "h"),
main = "interaction between numeric and categorical variables ",
xlab = "continuous value",
par.settings = ggplot2like())
#y versus levels of B , grouped by a(color and line are defined by a)
p2 <- dotplot(b~y, groups= a ,
data = mydat,
type = c("l"),
main = "interaction between numeric and categorical variables ",
xlab = "continuous value",
par.settings = ggplot2like())
library(gridExtra) ## to arrange many grid plots
grid.arrange(p1,p2)
I'm trying to plot some data with 2d density contours using ggplot2 in R.
I'm getting one slightly odd result.
First I set up my ggplot object:
p <- ggplot(data, aes(x=Distance,y=Rate, colour = Company))
I then plot this with geom_points and geom_density2d. I want geom_density2d to be weighted based on the organisation's size (OrgSize variable). However when I add OrgSize as a weighting variable nothing changes in the plot:
This:
p+geom_point()+geom_density2d()
Gives an identical plot to this:
p+geom_point()+geom_density2d(aes(weight = OrgSize))
However, if I do the same with a loess line using geom_smooth, the weighting does make a clear difference.
This:
p+geom_point()+geom_smooth()
Gives a different plot to this:
p+geom_point()+geom_smooth(aes(weight=OrgSize))
I was wondering if I'm using density2d inappropriately, should I instead be using contour and supplying OrgSize as the 'height'? If so then why does geom_density2d accept a weighting factor?
Code below:
require(ggplot2)
Company <- c("One","One","One","One","One","Two","Two","Two","Two","Two")
Store <- c(1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10)
Distance <- c(1.5,1.6,1.8,5.8,4.2,4.3,6.5,4.9,7.4,7.2)
Rate <- c(0.1,0.3,0.2,0.4,0.4,0.5,0.6,0.7,0.8,0.9)
OrgSize <- c(500,1000,200,300,1500,800,50,1000,75,800)
data <- data.frame(Company,Store,Distance,Rate,OrgSize)
p <- ggplot(data, aes(x=Distance,y=Rate))
# Difference is apparent between these two
p+geom_point()+geom_smooth()
p+geom_point()+geom_smooth(aes(weight = OrgSize))
# Difference is not apparent between these two
p+geom_point()+geom_density2d()
p+geom_point()+geom_density2d(aes(weight = OrgSize))
geom_density2d is "accepting" the weight parameter, but then not passing to MASS::kde2d, since that function has no weights. As a consequence, you will need to use a different 2d-density method.
(I realize my answer is not addressing why the help page says that geom_density2d "understands" the weight argument, but when I have tried to calculate weighted 2D-KDEs, I have needed to use other packages besides MASS. Maybe this is a TODO that #hadley put in the help page that then got overlooked?)
Let's say I have the following dataset
bodysize=rnorm(20,30,2)
bodysize=sort(bodysize)
survive=c(0,0,0,0,0,1,0,1,0,0,1,1,0,1,1,1,0,1,1,1)
dat=as.data.frame(cbind(bodysize,survive))
I'm aware that the glm plot function has several nice plots to show you the fit,
but I'd nevertheless like to create an initial plot with:
1)raw data points
2)the loigistic curve and both
3)Predicted points
4)and aggregate points for a number of predictor levels
library(Hmisc)
plot(bodysize,survive,xlab="Body size",ylab="Probability of survival")
g=glm(survive~bodysize,family=binomial,dat)
curve(predict(g,data.frame(bodysize=x),type="resp"),add=TRUE)
points(bodysize,fitted(g),pch=20)
All fine up to here.
Now I want to plot the real data survival rates for a given levels of x1
dat$bd<-cut2(dat$bodysize,g=5,levels.mean=T)
AggBd<-aggregate(dat$survive,by=list(dat$bd),data=dat,FUN=mean)
plot(AggBd,add=TRUE)
#Doesn't work
I've tried to match AggBd to the dataset used for the model and all sort of other things but I simply can't plot the two together. Is there a way around this?
I basically want to overimpose the last plot along the same axes.
Besides this specific task I often wonder how to overimpose different plots that plot different variables but have similar scale/range on two-dimensional plots. I would really appreciate your help.
The first column of AggBd is a factor, you need to convert the levels to numeric before you can add the points to the plot.
AggBd$size <- as.numeric (levels (AggBd$Group.1))[AggBd$Group.1]
to add the points to the exisiting plot, use points
points (AggBd$size, AggBd$x, pch = 3)
You are best specifying your y-axis. Also maybe using par(new=TRUE)
plot(bodysize,survive,xlab="Body size",ylab="Probability of survival")
g=glm(survive~bodysize,family=binomial,dat)
curve(predict(g,data.frame(bodysize=x),type="resp"),add=TRUE)
points(bodysize,fitted(g),pch=20)
#then
par(new=TRUE)
#
plot(AggBd$Group.1,AggBd$x,pch=30)
obviously remove or change the axis ticks to prevent overlap e.g.
plot(AggBd$Group.1,AggBd$x,pch=30,xaxt="n",yaxt="n",xlab="",ylab="")
giving:
How to plot the density of a single column dataset as dots? For example
x <- c(1:40)
On the same plot using the same scale of the x-axis and y-axis, how to add another data set as line format which represent the density of another data that represents the equation of
y = exp(-x)
to the plot?
The equation is corrected to be y = exp(-x).
So, by doing plot(density(x)) or plot(density(y)), I got two separated figures. How to add them in the same axis and using dots for x, smoothed line for y?
You can add a line to a plot with the lines() function. Your code, modified to do what you asked for, is the following:
x <- 1:40
y <- exp(-x)
plot(density(x), type = "p")
lines(density(y))
Note that we specified the plot to give us points with the type parameter and then added the density curve for y with lines. The help pages for ?plot, ?par, ?lines would be some insightful reading. Also, check out the R Graph Gallery to view some more sophisticated graphs that generally have the source code attached to them.