My image grid on my Wordpress site for some reason does not resize fully to the max-width of the browser when I click an internal link to the homepage (eg. I click on an image then click back on the logo). It goes back to fullscreen when I resize the browser. It also works fine if I go into my website externally (from typing in the url). I have tried using:
#site {
max-width: !important;
}
but doesn't work. I'm not sure if if it is the theme that is the issue or one of my custom css. I have tried isolating some css with the inspector tool and seeing if any of them caused the problem but I couldn't find anything.
Unfortunately I don't have access to the full backend of the theme and I'm not a developer.
So if anyone has any idea that would be great!
Link is http://imconniehuang.com/
Your image gallery's width is calculated and set by Javascript. Have a look at the surrounding div.vc_row, the width is set inline there. So no point in using CSS here. Seems like the script waits for a resize event to recalculate the gallery's width.
The prefix vc_row indicates that you are using Visual Composer. I think the problem is with this plugin. I therefore recommend getting support from the plugin provider-
BTW:
max-width: !important; is not valid syntax. 'max-width' sets the maximum width of an element. You can have a look at the syntax here.
Related
Unable to fix error Google Mobile Usability > Content wider than screen in Google Search Console. I have try chrome mobile layout emulator from DevTools, set width to 320px but no horizontal scroll appears. So, all looks fine in emulator but google raises error. Then, I have add to css:
#media screen {
html, body {
width: 100%;
overflow-x: hidden;
}...
But no effect, error still persist.
Test Live URL tool don't show any error, all pages mobile friendly.
Any idea how to fix this? I'm sure this is google bug, but how to avoid it?
I have remove all "position: absolute" from classes, doesn't matter if absolute element fits on small screen fine. But that classes were assigned to hidden content what fit fine on smallest smartphone screen, also most of them were not connected to any page element, because elements were password protected.
I found a way to quicker render pages, not waiting long time after clicking "request indexing". First create new page, using site template and css, text on page should be unique(Lorem Ipsum Generator help with that). Second, create one more sitemap file with only one url pointing to new file, submit it and in a 5 minutes you'll have crawled and indexed page. That helps a lot while searching a bug in template or css.
Edit:
Since removing absolute position broke UI design, I set it back with javascript.
Check in real devices instead of emulator. Delete every section and check iteratively, you will understand which one is causing horizontal scroll
I'm building a website with WordPress. The theme I used is enfold.
My problem here is that when I open the website in mobile mode, the cart icon is placed on the logo.
I reviewed all the store-related options, but the problem was not resolved. How can I fix this problem?
It's not easy to help you without the actual code. We need at least the HTML that creates the header of your template. But, this will probably do the trick.
Resize your browser window to a mobile screen size
Right click somewhere on the screen and choose to inspect (if you are with Chrome)
Find the cart icon on HTML code and get his class name
Add the following CSS rule either on your style.css child theme or on your theme options page for custom CSS
.cart-css-class {
float: left;
}
This will move the icon on the very left side of the screen. You can try different CSS rules like float: right or position: absolute.
As I said, it's not easy to give a 100% correct answer without a link to the website or the code of the header.
I can't figure out this issue and I have tried looking this up and it is hard to find any one with this scenario. I am using a master page with two content pages. The first content page is default.aspx, of course. The master page has a png that is a banner. This has a rule that makes it responsive in a separate CSS file. This works fine.
For the first content page, I have three buttons that are styled using CSS ( they are custom buttons I made in a vector graphics program that change appearance when they are pressed, all using CSS ) and they are responsive. There is also a listbox that is styled and responsive with CSS.
The layout of the default page is like this: Two div containers: one that floats left and one that floats right. CSS is used to make these containers responsive. In the right div, I have my buttons and they are enclosed in their own divs. So .. and so on. Of course, the listbox is handled the same way with a div that encloses that as well.
Moving on to the second page, I have the same basic structure as the default page. My intention is to have in the right div an image, followed by a text box, then an image, and a text box. The left div will contain the same content that the default page has.
At this point, I have added to the second content page the list box and the CSS is working as expected. The list box looks just like it did on the default page and is responsive as well. So the CSS is working. For the first image, I need a new CSS rule. So I go to my CSS rule and add a new rule .image{ width: 100%; height: auto; } and then I add my image and set it up with the class reference and the image. It does not work. This image is in it's own div. If I change the class of the image to another class that was created previously, the image is responsive. So I can use the banner CSS rule and the image is responsive, I can use the button CSS rules and the image is responsive, it behaves like a button ( clicking on it makes it change its appearance, that kind of thing ), I can even add the rules for the list box and the image is responsive. If I then go back and try to use the rule for image, it doesn't work anymore.
Any ideas on what is going on. It is not making any sense what so ever. I added the rule to the CSS file just like I did with all the other rules but for some reason, this rule is not working at all.
Thank you guys for any help. I can post code if you guys need it, but I don't see how that would help. My image for the second content page is identical to how I did the banner and the rules for the banner and the image are virtually identical, except percentages are different. This is just super weird.
To improve the performance, browsers save the css files in their cache and use their cache. If they don't do that, the browser has to keep loading the css file every time a page is using the css file.
If you clear your browser cache, you will notice that the new style gets applied.
If you are developing commercial software, you probably don't want to tell every user to clear their browser cache and you prefer to force the browser to load the new css file. On the other hand, once the css is loaded you would like the browser to cache it, because it will improve the performance.
There is a trick to achieve that!
Let's say your style file is called mystyle.css and you have a link to the style file in your web site like this:
<link rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" href="~/mystyle.css">
To force the browser to load the file again, you need to change link and the standard practice is to use a parameter in the url (usually a version number).
like this:
<link rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" href="~/mystyle.css?version=1.00">
Your style file is going to ignore that version parameter but the browser will notice a change in the link and will load the new style file. Basically, the browser stores the link to the file and if you change the version number, since the link does not match with what your browser has in its cache, it will force the browser to load the file again.
I have an iframe that has a background image in a div. The image displays fine with a direct link to the iframe page but when the page is displayed as an iframe (within another page) the image is not visible?
I have checked the code in Firebug and when I hover over the url in the console it just says "failed to load the given URL").
.fd-img{background-image:url('images/fd-img.jpg'); width: 342px; height: 228px; margin: 76px 0 0 205px;}
<div class="fd-img"></div>
For some reason the image displays in the iframe with no problem using an absolute url but not a relative one. I would use absolute but it is not practical at all for what I need to do.
Hope this makes sense.
Not sure why but it appears that AMPPS was the problem. I moved the exact same files to the server and everything worked fine. I was working on my local drive using AMPPS. Nothing has changed server side, I am still using Firefox and the same code so perhaps AMPPS does not like iframes? Hope this helps someone else that is having the same problem.
in css, point url link as if you were in the folder where the .css file is located
iframe's src will point to a page. The src can be set with javascript or however you like, based on event, etc. The <iframe></iframe> itself can't have a background image. You can give it dimensions, ie. width, height, scroll, etc. But content is from a source page.
I am working on a web application that has a menu across the top of every page with sub menus that drop down when a menu item is hovered over. This works fine, except on one page where we are trying to show a pdf in an iframe. The hover menus all end up behind the iframe in this one case. I have tried adjusting the z-index of both the hover menu and the iframe but neither seems to work. This is occurring in both FireFox 3.5 and IE8 so far.
There are two ways my question could be solved. I can either find a way to accurately adjust the CSS so my menu appears in front of the iframe or if there is another way to show the pdf that doesn't have this issue I could do that too.
Thanks!
When I ran into this issue, I used jQuery to detach the iframe before showing the overlay (and in my case a modal too). Once the user was done with the modal/overlay, I reattached the iframe to the DOM. _viewerFrame and _viewerDiv are just some css selectors of course. In my case there was a wrapping div tag around the iframe element that made detaching and attaching easy.
// detach iframe
_frame = $(_viewerFrame).detach();
function reattach(frame) {
// append it back to the div it was in (reattaching essentially)
$(_viewerDiv).append(frame);
setButtonStates();
setViewerState();
}
function onOk() {
... // other code
reattach(_frame);
}
function onCancel() {
... // other code
reattach(_frame);
}
// show modal with overlay
Dialog.confirm(onOk, onCancel, { ...
Hope that helps...
This is likely because PDFs are displayed in a plugin, rather than natively in the web browser. CSS will not have an effect on this, because CSS only applies to content rendered in the web browser. Google does have a system that converts PDFs to HTML for display in browsers, at which point there would be no z-index issues, but some formatting may be lost in the process, and of course it is no longer a PDF document. Unless there is some way to tell the PDF plugin itself to lower its z-index (and consider that not all users will be using the Adobe plugin, some may use Foxit or other programs) you may be out of luck.
Try position:relative and z-index adjustment to get it in front of the iframe.
You're showing a pdf in an iframe? I'm guessing it has some sort of flash viewer? If so, then make sure you set the wmode of the flash embed code appropriately.
http://kb2.adobe.com/cps/155/tn_15523.html