I have the following document
{
"id": "46c0ccbc-7a05-41dc-bc33-e9d1e69b74fa",
"_id": "5bf8b90f9568cf0001463719",
"vendor": "XXX",
"updatedAt": "2018-11-26T02:17:59.311Z",
"locales": [
{
"title": "351011",
"description": " ",
"categories": [
"Children",
"Accessories"
],
"brand": null,
"images": [
"https://lp.example.com/app006prod?set=source[02_0690165_001_001],type[PRODUCT],device[hdpi],quality[80],ImageVersion[2018081]&call=url[file:/product/main]"
],
"country": "SE",
"currency": "SEK",
"language": "en",
"variants": [
{
"artno": "example",
"urls": [
"https://www.example.com/en_sek/children/baby-newborn/product.cotton-cashmere-newborn-mittens-red.0690165001.html"
],
"price": 120,
"stock": 15,
"attributes": {
"size": "One Size",
"color": "Burgundy"
}
}
]
}
],
"_rid": "QEwcAOOf+rUHAAAAAAAAAA==",
"_self": "dbs/QEwcAA==/colls/QEwcAOOf+rU=/docs/QEwcAOOf+rUHAAAAAAAAAA==/",
"_etag": "\"00000e00-0000-0000-0000-5bfc890d0000\"",
"_attachments": "attachments/",
"_ts": 1543276813
}
I am trying to write a simple query that lists all documents that has "Children" as one of its Categories
I tried the following query but it does not work
SELECT * FROM c where c.locales.categories = "Children"
I am assuming I am referencing the subarrays wrong but what is the right way to write this query?
You need to use the ARRAY_CONTAINS function.
Try this: SELECT * FROM c where ARRAY_CONTAINS(c.locales[0].categories, "Children")
Related
I have Collection items in my cosmos db container.My sample data is
{
"objectID": "abc",
"id": "123",
"name": "gfh",
"description": "chock",
"brand": "hcn",
"size": 180,
"sizeUnits": "Grams",
"stores": []
},
{
"objectID": "123c",
"id": "0dfg",
"name": "shaek",
"description": "7ihk",
"brand": "fghcn",
"size": 768,
"sizeUnits": "Grams",
"stores": [ {
"id": 678",
"price": 2.2
},
{
"id": 678",
"price": 2.2}]
}
and so on...
I need to fetch all the details whose stores is empty. How to write query for this.
Please try this SQL:
SELECT * FROM c where ARRAY_LENGTH(c.stores) > 0
Result:
[
{
"objectID": "123c",
"id": "0dfg",
"name": "shaek",
"description": "7ihk",
"brand": "fghcn",
"size": 768,
"sizeUnits": "Grams",
"stores": [
{
"id": 678,
"price": 2.2
},
{
"id": 678,
"price": 2.2
}
]
}
]
Consider the following json responses..
If you run the graph query g.V().hasLabel('customer'), the response is:
[
{
"id": "75b9bddc-4008-43d7-a24c-8b138735a36a",
"label": "customer",
"type": "vertex",
"properties": {
"partitionKey": [
{
"id": "75b9bddc-4008-43d7-a24c-8b138735a36a|partitionKey",
"value": 1
}
]
}
}
]
If you run the sql query select * from c where c.label = 'customer', the response is:
[
{
"label": "customer",
"partitionKey": 1,
"id": "75b9bddc-4008-43d7-a24c-8b138735a36a",
"_rid": "0osWAOso6VYBAAAAAAAAAA==",
"_self": "dbs/0osWAA==/colls/0osWAOso6VY=/docs/0osWAOso6VYBAAAAAAAAAA==/",
"_etag": "\"2400985f-0000-0c00-0000-5e2066190000\"",
"_attachments": "attachments/",
"_ts": 1579181593
}
]
Q: With this difference in structure around the partitionKey section, should this be referenced as /properties/partitionKey/*, or /partitionKey/? in the indexing policy?
Currently i have hedged by bets with...
{
"indexingMode": "consistent",
"automatic": true,
"includedPaths": [{
"path": "/properties/partitionKey/*"
},{
"path": "/partitionKey/?"
},{
"path": "/label/?"
}
],
"excludedPaths": [{
"path": "/*"
},{
"path": "/\"_etag\"/?"
}
]
}
TIA! 😁
This should be stored as "/partitionKey" in your index policy, not "/properties/partitionKey"
btw, another thing to point out here is it's generally better to only exclude paths you will never query on rather than have to include those you will. This way, if you add properties to your graph you won't have to rebuild the index to query on the new properties.
I have the following object and I want to create a schema for it that handles nested objects - what's the best way using graphql:
{
"type": "product",
"id": "411e2a2b-37e8-421e-adb8-2e038751d263",
"name": "Hazel",
"slug": "hazel",
"sku": "ENGINEERED3",
"manage_stock": false,
"description": "Abstract, sculptural, refined and edgy with a modern twist. Its symmetrical, spoked structure generates a clever geometric presence, which works well in a contemporary environment..",
"price": [
{
"amount": 11200,
"currency": "AUD",
"includes_tax": true
}
],
"status": "live",
"commodity_type": "physical",
"meta": {
"timestamps": {
"created_at": "2019-05-09T13:30:10+00:00",
"updated_at": "2019-05-09T13:45:11+00:00"
},
"display_price": {
"with_tax": {
"amount": 11200,
"currency": "AUD",
"formatted": "$112.00"
},
"without_tax": {
"amount": 11200,
"currency": "AUD",
"formatted": "$112.00"
}
},
"stock": {
"level": 0,
"availability": "out-stock"
}
}
}
It seems as though graphql wants a separate type per nested object - is that true?
I have wriiten the query to get the all the list of Event Data entities. The result is Coming like this from the google Data Store.
[{
"key": {
"id": 5678669024460800,
"kind": "Event",
"path": [
"Event",
5678669024460800
]
},
"data": {
"createdAt": "2017-03-27T06:28:58.000Z",
"users":["test1#xxx.com","test2#xxx.com","test3#xxx.com"]
}
},
{
"key": {
"id": 5678669024460800,
"kind": "Event",
"path": [
"Event",
5678669024460800
]
},
"data": {
"createdAt": "2017-03-27T06:28:58.000Z",
"users":["test1#xxx.com"]
}
},
{
"key": {
"id": 5678669024460800,
"kind": "Event",
"path": [
"Event",
5678669024460800
]
},
"data": {
"createdAt": "2017-03-27T06:28:58.000Z",
"users":["test2#xxx.com","test3#xxx.com"]
}
}]
but i need to Write a Query to filter by Email'id. means i need to fetch the entities which are match with the Email id. For Eg if i pass the emailid as "test1#xxx.com" i should get final Result like this. Can anybody help me on this.
[{
"key": {
"id": 5678669024460800,
"kind": "Event",
"path": [
"Event",
5678669024460800
]
},
"data": {
"createdAt": "2017-03-27T06:28:58.000Z",
"users":["test1#xxx.com","test2#xxx.com","test3#xxx.com"]
}
},
{
"key": {
"id": 5678669024460800,
"kind": "Event",
"path": [
"Event",
5678669024460800
]
},
"data": {
"createdAt": "2017-03-27T06:28:58.000Z",
"users":["test1#xxx.com"]
}
}]
The GQL query would be something like -
SELECT * FROM Event WHERE users='test1#xxx.com'
You need to make sure the users property is indexed in order for the search to work, otherwise you may not get any results back.
I have taken a deployment template from azure and added this to a deployment project in Visual Studio 2015. When the Resource Group is made and deployed, everything works well except for the Web Site connectionstrings.
I have TableStorage, DocumentDb, and Redis instances all being created by this and cannot figure out how to get the Primary Connection String and Primary Key of these items so that I don't have to go in by hand and add them.
looking at the ARM Template Functions ListKeys should do the trick, but after deployment the value is empty. Furthermore, trying a simple string (TestConnectionString) also adds the name, but not the value.
{
"type": "Microsoft.Web/sites",
"kind": "app",
"name": "[parameters('WebAppName')]",
"apiVersion": "2015-08-01",
"properties": {
"name": "[parameters('WebAppName')]",
"resources": [],
"siteConfig": {
"connectionstrings": [
{
"name": "DocumentDbKey",
"value": "[listKeys(resourceId('Microsoft.DocumentDB/databaseAccounts', parameters('docDbName')), '2015-11-06').primaryMasterKey]",
"type": "Custom"
},
{
"name": "TestConnectionString",
"value": "dummystring:pleaseignore;",
"type": "Custom"
}
]
}
},
"dependsOn": [
"[resourceId('Microsoft.DocumentDB/databaseAccounts', parameters('docDbName'))]",
]
}
As your description we can use ARM Template Functions ListKeys to get the Keys. And we could use the following template code to set the connection string. I test Azure storage connection string and Document DB key, It works correctly for me , please have a try. The following is my detail steps:
1.Create Basic Azure Resource Group project with template WebApp
2.From demo remove the unnecessary resource.
3.Add the connection string setting
"resources": [
{
"name": "connectionstrings",
"type": "config",
"apiVersion": "2015-08-01",
"dependsOn": [
"[concat('Microsoft.Web/sites/', variables('webSiteName'))]"
],
"tags": {
"displayName": "tomConnectionString"
},
"properties": {
"documentDB": {
"value": "[listKeys(resourceId('Microsoft.DocumentDB/databaseAccounts', variables('docDbName')), '2015-11-06').primaryMasterKey]",
"type": "Custom"
},
"storage": {
"value": "[concat('DefaultEndpointsProtocol=https;AccountName=',parameters('storageAccountName'),';AccountKey=',concat(listKeys(variables('storageAccountId'),'2015-05-01-preview').key1))]",
"type": "Custom"
}
}
}
]
Add the corresponding parameters or variables such as storage info or docDbName
Deploy the Website
Check the result from the portal
Full template code:
{
"$schema": "https://schema.management.azure.com/schemas/2015-01-01/deploymentTemplate.json#",
"contentVersion": "1.0.0.0",
"parameters": {
"hostingPlanName": {
"type": "string",
"minLength": 1
},
"skuName": {
"type": "string",
"defaultValue": "S1",
"allowedValues": [
"F1",
"D1",
"B1",
"B2",
"B3",
"S1",
"S2",
"S3",
"P1",
"P2",
"P3",
"P4"
],
"metadata": {
"description": "Describes plan's pricing tier and instance size. Check details at https://azure.microsoft.com/en-us/pricing/details/app-service/"
}
},
"storageAccountName": {
"type": "string",
"metadata": {
"description": "Storage Account to access blob storage."
}
},
"skuCapacity": {
"type": "int",
"defaultValue": 1,
"minValue": 1,
"metadata": {
"description": "Describes plan's instance count"
}
}
},
"variables": {
"webSiteName": "[concat('webSite', uniqueString(resourceGroup().id))]",
"docDbName": "tomdocumentdb",
"storageAccountId": "[concat(resourceGroup().id,'/providers/Microsoft.Storage/storageAccounts/', parameters('storageAccountName'))]"
},
"resources": [
{
"apiVersion": "2015-08-01",
"name": "[parameters('hostingPlanName')]",
"type": "Microsoft.Web/serverfarms",
"location": "[resourceGroup().location]",
"tags": {
"displayName": "HostingPlan"
},
"sku": {
"name": "[parameters('skuName')]",
"capacity": "[parameters('skuCapacity')]"
},
"properties": {
"name": "[parameters('hostingPlanName')]"
}
},
{
"apiVersion": "2015-08-01",
"name": "[variables('webSiteName')]",
"type": "Microsoft.Web/sites",
"location": "[resourceGroup().location]",
"tags": {
"[concat('hidden-related:', resourceGroup().id, '/providers/Microsoft.Web/serverfarms/', parameters('hostingPlanName'))]": "Resource",
"displayName": "Website"
},
"dependsOn": [
"[concat('Microsoft.Web/serverfarms/', parameters('hostingPlanName'))]"
],
"properties": {
"name": "[variables('webSiteName')]",
"serverFarmId": "[resourceId('Microsoft.Web/serverfarms', parameters('hostingPlanName'))]"
},
"resources": [
{
"name": "connectionstrings",
"type": "config",
"apiVersion": "2015-08-01",
"dependsOn": [
"[concat('Microsoft.Web/sites/', variables('webSiteName'))]"
],
"tags": {
"displayName": "tomConnectionString"
},
"properties": {
"documentDB": {
"value": "[listKeys(resourceId('Microsoft.DocumentDB/databaseAccounts', variables('docDbName')), '2015-11-06').primaryMasterKey]",
"type": "Custom"
},
"storage": {
"value": "[concat('DefaultEndpointsProtocol=https;AccountName=',parameters('storageAccountName'),';AccountKey=',concat(listKeys(variables('storageAccountId'),'2015-05-01-preview').key1))]",
"type": "Custom"
}
}
}
]
}
]
}
Update:
We could get more useful info about ARM template from the azure resource.
I just had same problem, and it turns out the name of the property that holds the connection string should be named connectionString, so your siteConfig object should look like this:
"siteConfig": {
"connectionstrings": [
{
"name": "DocumentDbKey",
"connectionString": "[listKeys(resourceId('Microsoft.DocumentDB/databaseAccounts', parameters('docDbName')), '2015-11-06').primaryMasterKey]",
"type": "Custom"
},
{
"name": "TestConnectionString",
"connectionString": "dummystring:pleaseignore;",
"type": "Custom"
}
]
}